Author | Poll |
Author | Thread |
joec32033
Posts: 30606 Alba Posts: 37 Joined: 2/3/2004 Member: #583 USA |
![]() fishmike wrote:joec32033 wrote:problem with the bold is nobody in NBA circles believe that but a few Knick fans. If RJ believed it himself he wouldnt have resigned for what he did. He would have bet on himself getting a max contract. Instead he took a 2nd tier contract and is proving to be a 2nd tier playerVDesai wrote:We don't maximize our talent by trading RJ for another undersized combo guard to pair with Brunson. We need a lengthy SG/SF who can play defense and stretch the floor. Guys like Trey Murphy III and Cameron Johnson seem to be the best kind of fits. So now we are equating contracts with talent? 1 Stephen Curry GSW $48,070,014 $51,915,615 $55,761,216 $59,606,817 $215,353,662 Top 43 contracts. I stuck with over 30 million. So you are telling me these are the 43 most talented players currently in the NBA? ~You can't run from who you are.~
|
AUTOADVERT |
EwingsGlass
Posts: 27456 Alba Posts: 2 Joined: 4/29/2005 Member: #893 USA |
![]() joec32033 wrote:fishmike wrote:joec32033 wrote:problem with the bold is nobody in NBA circles believe that but a few Knick fans. If RJ believed it himself he wouldnt have resigned for what he did. He would have bet on himself getting a max contract. Instead he took a 2nd tier contract and is proving to be a 2nd tier playerVDesai wrote:We don't maximize our talent by trading RJ for another undersized combo guard to pair with Brunson. We need a lengthy SG/SF who can play defense and stretch the floor. Guys like Trey Murphy III and Cameron Johnson seem to be the best kind of fits. Excluding players on rookie scale contracts, I think you have to see there is a correlation between talent and getting paid. Won't argue that it is a 1 to 1 relationship, but is it correlated, yes. You know I gonna spin wit it
|
joec32033
Posts: 30606 Alba Posts: 37 Joined: 2/3/2004 Member: #583 USA |
![]() EwingsGlass wrote:joec32033 wrote:fishmike wrote:joec32033 wrote:problem with the bold is nobody in NBA circles believe that but a few Knick fans. If RJ believed it himself he wouldnt have resigned for what he did. He would have bet on himself getting a max contract. Instead he took a 2nd tier contract and is proving to be a 2nd tier playerVDesai wrote:We don't maximize our talent by trading RJ for another undersized combo guard to pair with Brunson. We need a lengthy SG/SF who can play defense and stretch the floor. Guys like Trey Murphy III and Cameron Johnson seem to be the best kind of fits. So you are telling me, Hayward, Porter, Russell, McCollumn, Wiggins, Porzingis, Turner, and Simmons are top 43 and Jason Tatum is not? ~You can't run from who you are.~
|
EwingsGlass
Posts: 27456 Alba Posts: 2 Joined: 4/29/2005 Member: #893 USA |
![]() joec32033 wrote:EwingsGlass wrote:joec32033 wrote:fishmike wrote:joec32033 wrote:problem with the bold is nobody in NBA circles believe that but a few Knick fans. If RJ believed it himself he wouldnt have resigned for what he did. He would have bet on himself getting a max contract. Instead he took a 2nd tier contract and is proving to be a 2nd tier playerVDesai wrote:We don't maximize our talent by trading RJ for another undersized combo guard to pair with Brunson. We need a lengthy SG/SF who can play defense and stretch the floor. Guys like Trey Murphy III and Cameron Johnson seem to be the best kind of fits. No. Tatum is 42, so your statement reads incorrectly in any event. But I said correlated but not 1 to 1. Tatum is 42 on the highest salary. Top 10 in terms of talent. But you have to recognize that the maximum salary a player with 5-7 years of experience is capped differently than a player with 10+ years of experience. They couldn't pay him more if they wanted to. Yet. Those caps are based on the cap for the year the contract is signed, which is tied to Basketball related revenue. So, years of experience, year of contract all affect salary. So it correlated but not a direct ranking. Think of it this way. Out of those 43 contracts you name out of the 450 or so players in the league, you will have a very high percentage of hardware related to All NBA, All Defense, MVP, All Star in those 43. Its not going to be an even distribution across those entire 450. That's because talent and salary are correlated. You know I gonna spin wit it
|
fishmike
Posts: 53800 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 7/19/2002 Member: #298 USA |
![]() joec32033 wrote:what's your point? I said RJ is a 2nd tier player. Guess what? He's not as good as any of those guys. You think he's in the same class as the guy's above? He's not (at least not when they SIGNED those contracts). At one point Ben Simmons and John Wall WERE top tier which is why they got those deals. RJ has never been there.fishmike wrote:joec32033 wrote:problem with the bold is nobody in NBA circles believe that but a few Knick fans. If RJ believed it himself he wouldnt have resigned for what he did. He would have bet on himself getting a max contract. Instead he took a 2nd tier contract and is proving to be a 2nd tier playerVDesai wrote:We don't maximize our talent by trading RJ for another undersized combo guard to pair with Brunson. We need a lengthy SG/SF who can play defense and stretch the floor. Guys like Trey Murphy III and Cameron Johnson seem to be the best kind of fits. The point about the contract is RJ KNOWS he's 2nd tier and that's why he took that deal. He could have waited, and had a monster season and looked for max money. He was smart to sign that deal because he's not top tier and he's not getting top tier money. Show me a top tier guy who signed for less. Your list above proves my point. RJ isnt in the class of guys on your list "winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
|
joec32033
Posts: 30606 Alba Posts: 37 Joined: 2/3/2004 Member: #583 USA |
![]() fishmike wrote:joec32033 wrote:what's your point? I said RJ is a 2nd tier player. Guess what? He's not as good as any of those guys. You think he's in the same class as the guy's above? He's not (at least not when they SIGNED those contracts). At one point Ben Simmons and John Wall WERE top tier which is why they got those deals. RJ has never been there.fishmike wrote:joec32033 wrote:problem with the bold is nobody in NBA circles believe that but a few Knick fans. If RJ believed it himself he wouldnt have resigned for what he did. He would have bet on himself getting a max contract. Instead he took a 2nd tier contract and is proving to be a 2nd tier playerVDesai wrote:We don't maximize our talent by trading RJ for another undersized combo guard to pair with Brunson. We need a lengthy SG/SF who can play defense and stretch the floor. Guys like Trey Murphy III and Cameron Johnson seem to be the best kind of fits. Currently RJ is Second tier. That is agreed. My problem is drawing the straight parallel with his contract. Not accurate. Many players have signed for max contracts when they weren't worth it and you are knowledgeable enough to know that. ~You can't run from who you are.~
|
ESOMKnicks
Posts: 21420 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 6/14/2015 Member: #6064 |
![]() joec32033 wrote:VDesai wrote:We don't maximize our talent by trading RJ for another undersized combo guard to pair with Brunson. We need a lengthy SG/SF who can play defense and stretch the floor. Guys like Trey Murphy III and Cameron Johnson seem to be the best kind of fits. I had a similar thought, and then I thought that RJ is well capable of becoming as good as they. I would rather show extra patience and stick with the young home-grown talent. |
joec32033
Posts: 30606 Alba Posts: 37 Joined: 2/3/2004 Member: #583 USA |
![]() ESOMKnicks wrote:joec32033 wrote:VDesai wrote:We don't maximize our talent by trading RJ for another undersized combo guard to pair with Brunson. We need a lengthy SG/SF who can play defense and stretch the floor. Guys like Trey Murphy III and Cameron Johnson seem to be the best kind of fits. If the cost isn't prohibitive I'm ok with it. My first choice is to hold onto Barrett too. I think his upside is huge. Ingram has some holes in his game and I love Brown, but the way he is acting in Boston right now is a little weird, but I always said the only way I trade RJ is if we get a real (ie not marginal) improvement. Guys like Grant and OG are just shuffling around skill sets buy I really can't say they are better to the point of giving up extra assets to get them is a good move. ~You can't run from who you are.~
|
Nalod
Posts: 71065 Alba Posts: 155 Joined: 12/24/2003 Member: #508 USA |
![]() Jaylen got a bit of Kyrie in him but other than that he is border All NBA and he is vying for a max deal if he gets it.
Can’t say how Boston feels about that but if you trade for him he gonna want to get that extension. And Boston will want full value for him and naturally won’t want him in the division. For that matter, If RJ is part of that deal I dont’ want him in Boston either. Jaylen Brown is a SG, yes? Can he play the 3? I suppose. Does he want that? Does Thibs want that? Not saying I don’t do this, but it would cost and we’d be competing with other teams who are more desporate than us? YOu put him in the back court with Brunson you can put RJ on the 3 and be just fine. I’d prefer he be included but its gonna cost like RJ, IQ, and two picks at least. Repeat: “At least”. Lets just say Boston has to look in the mirror and say “This deal we due with reluctance but it might put us over the top”. If you can’t say that then they won’t do it. We have the assets to get it done. Question is how close would that get us with whats left? |
Caseloads
Posts: 27725 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 7/29/2001 Member: #41 |
![]() Nalod wrote:Jaylen got a bit of Kyrie in him but other than that he is border All NBA and he is vying for a max deal if he gets it. You got it right; he’s got some Kyrie in him |
joec32033
Posts: 30606 Alba Posts: 37 Joined: 2/3/2004 Member: #583 USA |
![]() EwingsGlass wrote:joec32033 wrote:EwingsGlass wrote:joec32033 wrote:fishmike wrote:joec32033 wrote:problem with the bold is nobody in NBA circles believe that but a few Knick fans. If RJ believed it himself he wouldnt have resigned for what he did. He would have bet on himself getting a max contract. Instead he took a 2nd tier contract and is proving to be a 2nd tier playerVDesai wrote:We don't maximize our talent by trading RJ for another undersized combo guard to pair with Brunson. We need a lengthy SG/SF who can play defense and stretch the floor. Guys like Trey Murphy III and Cameron Johnson seem to be the best kind of fits. I think I responded to the wrong post than I wanted to with that response, because you left room for error with how you said it isn't 1 for 1 correlated. That was technically my point. I do offer this up. It is talent or performance that correlates closer to contract value? I offer that it is performance. ~You can't run from who you are.~
|
martin
Posts: 75991 Alba Posts: 108 Joined: 7/24/2001 Member: #2 USA |
![]() joec32033 wrote:I do offer this up. It is talent or performance that correlates closer to contract value? I offer that it is performance. I'd offer up that it is more than talent or performance. A lot of it is just circumstance of both the individual and the team. If a team is desperate to keep a particular player cause they are over the cap and wouldn't be able to sign anyone else and risk losing the player for nothing, the team will overpay. No one should be surprised by Tatum being #43 coming off of a rookie contract. Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
|
joec32033
Posts: 30606 Alba Posts: 37 Joined: 2/3/2004 Member: #583 USA |
![]() martin wrote:joec32033 wrote:I do offer this up. It is talent or performance that correlates closer to contract value? I offer that it is performance. 100% makes my origional point for me, but in a better way than I have been trying to show.. The only point I am trying to make is that contract values do not specifically correlate to just talent. ~You can't run from who you are.~
|