gradyandrew wrote:Lauri Marrakennan has got to be the runaway winner for most improved player, right? This might be a new trend in the NBA but I think only Randle has ever had a bigger swing in his career. Before that I have to go back to Houston Kyle Lowry vs. Toronto Kyle Lowry. Sucks for the Cavs and Bulls but some players are late bloomers and need a new coach and when it happens together you get an out of nowhere All Star. If the Cavs consider the player Lauri was vs. is the trade looks a lot better. Injuries aside, I think the Cavs benefitted last season from teams not taking them seriously in the beginning of the season. Their wins decreased remarkably in the last 3Rd of the season. I don't see that as a problem this season.
Good post but let's be honest here.
If Lauri Marrakennan were Julius Randle and/or an NY Knicks player?
This fan base would label and consider him as nothing more than a "stat compiler" who's playing "hero ball" and not efficient.
Due to his Utah Jazz not having an above .500 record (only 25-25) and also only seeded @ 8th in the West and only .5 (1/2) half a game away from OKC (from falling to the 11th seed).
His team is literally only a 1/2 game away from falling to the 11th seed and only ahead of trash teams like Houston (11-36), Spurs (14-33), Lakers (22-26) and Portland (22-25).
An improved player? Yes.
An All-Star Player? The way NY fans judge players?!? Hell no!