Alpha1971 wrote:

Knixkik wrote:Watching Josh Richardson. He’s the type of player who would be really useful off the bench here. Already used to coming off the bench, is a 3 & D guy who can also handle the ball and create a little.

So Stanley is more your type.

Knixkix mentions the player he is looking towards and you divert to another?

WTF is that?

martin wrote:

Alpha1971 wrote:

Knixkik wrote:Watching Josh Richardson. He’s the type of player who would be really useful off the bench here. Already used to coming off the bench, is a 3 & D guy who can also handle the ball and create a little.

So Stanley is more your type.

Knixkix mentions the player he is looking towards and you divert to another?

WTF is that?

I think he replied to the wrong comment.

Knicks get: Josh Hart
Trailblazers get: Toppin and Cam Reddish
On a recent Lowe Post podcast appearance, ESPN’s Bobby Marks floated the idea of Portland doing a two-for-one trade centered around wing Josh Hart. In theory, this would give them increased depth and options, but do the Knicks’ prospects entice the Blazers?

Dealing Toppin and Reddish for Hart would give the Knicks more depth on the wing. Hart would bring them a versatile defender, capable three-point shooter, and one of the best rebounding swingmen in the game.

New York has looked thin at the position amidst Reddish’s benching, injuries, and Fournier’s decreasing playing time.

All they would lose is two players who the rotation has thrived without over recent weeks. Will they be enough for Portland to give up a surefire contributor, though?

Toppin could run into similar troubles finding playing time behind Jerami Grant as he did with Randle.