[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

If Knicks can’t beat good teams than Randle gets moved before Thibs gets fired
Author Thread
martin
Posts: 75997
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
11/4/2022  12:05 PM
Knixkik wrote:
VDesai wrote:At some point, they need to figure out how to play Obi and Randle together. We can't have a situation where Obi tops out at 15 mins- thats a waste of a talented player/roster asset. IF you don't wanna use Obi as a small ball 5, then you use him as a big ball 3. Ultimately if he only will ever play behind Randle here, one of them has to get moved before both of their values dip too far. I already think we're likely to have to sell low on either guy.

Playing them together isn’t the best use of their skill sets though. It’s essentially just trying to cover the issue. The main issue is both are PFs who aren’t rim protectors and the Knicks have to eventually choose between them. Finding 10 mins for them together and saying “problem solved” might help them individually but I don’t see how it helps the team win games.

well said

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
AUTOADVERT
Philc1
Posts: 28286
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 9/2/2020
Member: #8897

11/4/2022  7:40 PM    LAST EDITED: 11/4/2022  9:19 PM
SergioNYK wrote:
VDesai wrote:At some point, they need to figure out how to play Obi and Randle together. We can't have a situation where Obi tops out at 15 mins- thats a waste of a talented player/roster asset. IF you don't wanna use Obi as a small ball 5, then you use him as a big ball 3. Ultimately if he only will ever play behind Randle here, one of them has to get moved before both of their values dip too far. I already think we're likely to have to sell low on either guy.

It's never ever going to happen with Thibs.


Agree let’s go
VDesai
Posts: 42530
Alba Posts: 44
Joined: 10/28/2003
Member: #477
USA
11/4/2022  9:35 PM
martin wrote:
Knixkik wrote:
VDesai wrote:At some point, they need to figure out how to play Obi and Randle together. We can't have a situation where Obi tops out at 15 mins- thats a waste of a talented player/roster asset. IF you don't wanna use Obi as a small ball 5, then you use him as a big ball 3. Ultimately if he only will ever play behind Randle here, one of them has to get moved before both of their values dip too far. I already think we're likely to have to sell low on either guy.

Playing them together isn’t the best use of their skill sets though. It’s essentially just trying to cover the issue. The main issue is both are PFs who aren’t rim protectors and the Knicks have to eventually choose between them. Finding 10 mins for them together and saying “problem solved” might help them individually but I don’t see how it helps the team win games.

well said

Or maybe playing them together will fuel a 4th q comeback

BigDaddyG
Posts: 39746
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049

11/4/2022  9:37 PM
VDesai wrote:
martin wrote:
Knixkik wrote:
VDesai wrote:At some point, they need to figure out how to play Obi and Randle together. We can't have a situation where Obi tops out at 15 mins- thats a waste of a talented player/roster asset. IF you don't wanna use Obi as a small ball 5, then you use him as a big ball 3. Ultimately if he only will ever play behind Randle here, one of them has to get moved before both of their values dip too far. I already think we're likely to have to sell low on either guy.

Playing them together isn’t the best use of their skill sets though. It’s essentially just trying to cover the issue. The main issue is both are PFs who aren’t rim protectors and the Knicks have to eventually choose between them. Finding 10 mins for them together and saying “problem solved” might help them individually but I don’t see how it helps the team win games.

well said

Or maybe playing them together will fuel a 4th q comeback

Comeback or heart attack

Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
Nalod
Posts: 71068
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
11/5/2022  12:00 AM
Philc1 wrote:
SergioNYK wrote:
VDesai wrote:At some point, they need to figure out how to play Obi and Randle together. We can't have a situation where Obi tops out at 15 mins- thats a waste of a talented player/roster asset. IF you don't wanna use Obi as a small ball 5, then you use him as a big ball 3. Ultimately if he only will ever play behind Randle here, one of them has to get moved before both of their values dip too far. I already think we're likely to have to sell low on either guy.

It's never ever going to happen with Thibs.


Agree let’s go

Again, you the man!

Allanfan20
Posts: 35947
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
11/5/2022  8:22 AM
BRIGGS wrote:If Randle cont a bad path--Id go for a mismatch position as sixth man.

Randle isn’t that much of a professional. There is no way he’d accept that. He’s getting traded first.

“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
If Knicks can’t beat good teams than Randle gets moved before Thibs gets fired

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy