martin wrote:Philc1 wrote:ramtour420 wrote:Uptown wrote:ramtour420 wrote:Nalod wrote:Philc1 wrote:Quickley I can understand rising. There’s lots of respect around the league for him and rightfully so. Obi? Can he even put the ball in the ocean?
Hard to permeate new thoughts even when others suggest otherwise?
Your proud to advertise what you don’t understand.
One need not abandon an opinion, but dude, your like proud to demonstrate a redundant repertoire of stupidity.
I think Phil is talking about shooting. If we take that as his argument then no, Obi cannot put the ball in the ocean. Just saying. Everything else on offense he does as well and most of those things he does a few levels better than Randle, who is one season removed from All-NBA second team.
In the 10 Games that Obi started last year, he shot 44% from 3, 82% from the free-throw line and 57% overall. More minutes breeds more confidence. More confidence means his eyes can focus more on the basket as opposed to looking over his shoulder wondering when he is going to get pulled.
Is this a small sample size? Of course. But until Obi gets a full season of 30 mins per at the 4 we wont know for sure...
Hmm, that's really good. I was wrong. Even with such a small sample size I should not have seconded the notion that Obi "cannot put the ball in the ocean" those stats are pretty exciting, actually
Well if you exclude the 72 other regular season games Obi played in last year he shot really well from 3, like better than Steph Curry
We all know Obi ain't a finished product, so why you treating him as such? And what timeline does a late bloomer PF usually get better with his 3point shot?
Last 16 games of the season he shot 43% on about 5 attempts a game; it's not illustrative of the whole season but it does speak to potential and it's definitely not missing the ocean.
Dude just got to put it together.
I love this Toppin stat. Its Net Rating for two man lineups including Toppin. Over the course of the season, every player Toppin played with outscored its opponents while Toppin was on the court.
https://www.nba.com/stats/lineups/advanced/?Season=2021-22&SeasonType=Regular%20Season&GroupQuantity=2&CF=TEAM_ABBREVIATION*E*NYK:GROUP_NAME*E*Toppin&sort=NET_RATING&dir=1
Conversely, and I am trying not to whack Randle, but stats are stats. Over the course of the season, 9 out of 11 players Randle played with were outscored by their opponents. Only Quickley and Sims had positive Net Ratings with Randle.
https://www.nba.com/stats/lineups/advanced/?Season=2021-22&SeasonType=Regular%20Season&GroupQuantity=2&CF=TEAM_ABBREVIATION*E*NYK:GROUP_NAME*E*Randle&sort=NET_RATING&dir=-1
You can convince me that Randle is better and I want to believe.
All these stats tell us is that the second unit outperforms other second units and the starting unit doesn't out perform other starting units. Its not a blatant condemnation of Randle despite the damning statistics. It doesn't tell us that Toppin will thrive in the starting lineup.
It simply tells us that the starting lineup wasn't working.