HofstraBBall wrote:Kemet wrote:nykshaknbake wrote:Randle's value is probably as low as it will go. May as well see if the time off and having a PG on the team improves his play. We know at his best he can ball out.
Randle's not a problem if given 26 to 30 minute per game throughout the regular season.
Which the FO and Thibs will not do!
So playing Randle above 30 minute will lead to trading Randle during the season, or next offseason.
Randle's talemts deserve 7 min in first quarter,
6 min in 2nd quarter,
7 min in 3rd quarter,
And 6 to 8 min in the 4th quarter. WHY ???
We can not have Randle slowing-down the offense/defense in the 4th quarter ..
Because Randle played 30 min in the first 3 quarters!
And become tiresome to hit FT, or can't run for two or three minute against opponents speeding up the tempo on offense/defense in the final quarter of the game.
Randle should've been averaging 27 to 30 minutes per game having a decent backup in Obi Toppin who deserve 20 to 24 minute of playing time in his 2nd season in the NBA.
Brunson have been averaging 25 minutes per game the past 4 seasons with Mavs.
Head coach Thibs career at running 6 to 8 Man rotation will probably look for Brunson to play 34 to 40 minutes per game night after night (Even if D.Rose, Quickley, and McBride are all healthy) throughout the regular season.
Why would any team sign their best player, who just made the All Star team, got you the highest finish in years, to a long term deal and then play him 25-30 MPG?? Do people actually think a NBA level brain trust actually thinks like this?
You claim Brunson only averaged 25 MPG but leave out that he averages over 30 minutes last year. You also fail to notice that in his SECOND year(Like Obi) he only averages 17 a game. So why complain about how many Obi got and blame it on Thibs?
I mean why not just say you want another number one(best player), you don't like the guy, you want to see if Obi is what you think he is and that Randle is a ball stopper? That would be more honest and somewhat factual.
Although I would debate the ball stopper part. As every teams BEST player is theoretically a ball stopper since their usage rate is usually the highest on their team.
Randle is not the best player on the Knicks team!
The Knicks had 2 successful seasons in the past decade, and both successes came from the veteran PG team-leadership playing the majority of minutes in the 4th quarter as the closer .. Jason Kidd, then D.Rose.
Randle did perform like an all-star during a COVID EMPTY stadium regular season, after receiving a 7 or 8 month offseason. When fans were allowed in the stadium to watch the game during postseason, Randle allstar performance became MIA !!!
Which may become Randle's only regular season as a all-star in his career.
Plus Randle is a POOR PF who need a SF/PF type of player (Bullock) in the lineup to cover-up for the Knicks missing PF position Randle should be maintaining. Randle dont pick or screen for teammates, Randle's not shot blocker threat to any Knicks opponents, plus Randle's clueless on a fast break.
Brunson received 30 minutes last season, because Doncic only played 65 games, and Tim Hardaway Jr. only played 42 games.
Was Brunson performance ever close or arguable for an all-star ballot in the past 4 seasons? NO!
Does owner Cuban believe Brunson's worth $104M for 4 years? NO!