Author | Thread |
Chandler
Posts: 26774 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 11/26/2015 Member: #6197 |
![]() fishmike wrote:Chandler wrote:SHarpe and Holmgren should both scare the pants off FOs for different reasonsif you think the bold I am glad you dont scout for the Knicks... there are zero similarities. Those guys are unicorns. I don't get your drift or hostility? Scout what, AAU tape? he might be the next Kobe or the next DSJ -- who when entering draft was super highly regarded for explosiveness. We have zero idea how he competes against elite talent are they identical players -- no, they never are. Have we heard these narratives before about super-elite athleticism or measurables, yes a little history: players with highest vertical (spoiler having the highest vertical has translated poorly) https://www.sportingnews.com/us/nba/news/nba-draft-combine-records-vertical-leap-wingspan/sbsxxzatmj1co22uygivusxo#:~:text=NBA%20Draft%20Combine%3A%20Highest%20vertical,previous%20record%20of%2045.5%20inches. (5)(7)
|
AUTOADVERT |
HofstraBBall
Posts: 27948 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 11/21/2015 Member: #6192 |
![]() Chandler wrote:fishmike wrote:Chandler wrote:SHarpe and Holmgren should both scare the pants off FOs for different reasonsif you think the bold I am glad you dont scout for the Knicks... there are zero similarities. Those guys are unicorns. https://www.google.com/amp/s/syndication.bleacherreport.com/amp/2956721-2022-nba-mock-draft-2-round-predictions-and-latest-buzz.amp.html Sharpe's Draft Range: Nos. 4-10 If a surprise name can shake up the top four, we're hearing it is Sharpe. There is some buzz about a team in the top four showing extra interest, though it is difficult to picture him going that high, considering general managers are evaluating Sharpe on 2021 AAU tape and workouts. The Sacramento Kings would make the most sense, given how his shooting/shot-making would fit next to De'Aaron Fox. He's in the conversation for the Detroit Pistons at No. 5 and likely every team picking sixth to 10th. It's difficult to picture him getting past both the San Antonio Spurs and Washington Wizards. Question is...do you prefer Sharpe over... if you are those teams picking 5 to 10. I just hope there are some surprise picks so that one of those fall to us. 'Knicks focus should be on players that have grown up playing soccer or cricket' - Triplethreat 8/28/2020
|
HoustonSprewell84
Posts: 20178 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 2/6/2021 Member: #8931 |
![]() Mark Williams for me
|
fishmike
Posts: 53803 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 7/19/2002 Member: #298 USA |
![]() Chandler wrote:Its not hostility.. you writing off Sharpe "because we have seen this before with guys like Dennis Smith" is just lame sorry. They have nothing to do with each other. You can apply the DSJr argument to any prospect who's athletic. Truth is there are very few guys with Sharpe's profile, so you look really close because that's a big whiff if you are wrong.fishmike wrote:Chandler wrote:SHarpe and Holmgren should both scare the pants off FOs for different reasonsif you think the bold I am glad you dont scout for the Knicks... there are zero similarities. Those guys are unicorns. Sharpe's profile is Tracy McGrady. Sure its a high school comparison but the physical tools and stats compare there. Compare those two and come back to me. DSjr has adequate size at best. Sharpe would have elite size and length. "winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
|
Chandler
Posts: 26774 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 11/26/2015 Member: #6197 |
![]() fishmike wrote:Chandler wrote:Its not hostility.. you writing off Sharpe "because we have seen this before with guys like Dennis Smith" is just lame sorry. They have nothing to do with each other. You can apply the DSJr argument to any prospect who's athletic. Truth is there are very few guys with Sharpe's profile, so you look really close because that's a big whiff if you are wrong.fishmike wrote:Chandler wrote:SHarpe and Holmgren should both scare the pants off FOs for different reasonsif you think the bold I am glad you dont scout for the Knicks... there are zero similarities. Those guys are unicorns. I suggest you re-read my post. I didn't write off anyone. I said the prosect would be scary because you don't know what you're getting. I also put Kobe as the upside comparison who was also a HS comparison and i would argue is better than McGrady so i wasn't selling him short on the high side. Let me ask you, what do you honestly know about Sharpe? Rumored 50" vertical leap https://www.nationofblue.com/shaedon-sharpe-posts-highest-vertical-leap-in-nba-history/ what else? Do you have any idea how he performs against elite competition (5)(7)
|
fishmike
Posts: 53803 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 7/19/2002 Member: #298 USA |
![]() Chandler wrote:we also know he's very long with a 7 foot wingspan. You have to treat him like a HS kid as far as scouting goes but he's STILL going to usually be the best athlete on the floor when he gets here. It will come down to his workouts and temperament for sure.fishmike wrote:Chandler wrote:Its not hostility.. you writing off Sharpe "because we have seen this before with guys like Dennis Smith" is just lame sorry. They have nothing to do with each other. You can apply the DSJr argument to any prospect who's athletic. Truth is there are very few guys with Sharpe's profile, so you look really close because that's a big whiff if you are wrong.fishmike wrote:Chandler wrote:SHarpe and Holmgren should both scare the pants off FOs for different reasonsif you think the bold I am glad you dont scout for the Knicks... there are zero similarities. Those guys are unicorns. You are right he's a wild card I'm only scared taking him 1-3.... anything after that is fine. You always role the dice in the NBA draft with a few exceptions of course Sharpe was also ranked the #1 recruit... he's not a total unknown "winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
|
Chandler
Posts: 26774 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 11/26/2015 Member: #6197 |
![]() fishmike wrote:Chandler wrote:we also know he's very long with a 7 foot wingspan. You have to treat him like a HS kid as far as scouting goes but he's STILL going to usually be the best athlete on the floor when he gets here. It will come down to his workouts and temperament for sure.fishmike wrote:Chandler wrote:Its not hostility.. you writing off Sharpe "because we have seen this before with guys like Dennis Smith" is just lame sorry. They have nothing to do with each other. You can apply the DSJr argument to any prospect who's athletic. Truth is there are very few guys with Sharpe's profile, so you look really close because that's a big whiff if you are wrong.fishmike wrote:Chandler wrote:SHarpe and Holmgren should both scare the pants off FOs for different reasonsif you think the bold I am glad you dont scout for the Knicks... there are zero similarities. Those guys are unicorns. My main point was the wild card one and the GM will need some brass ones choosing Chet or Sharpe. Huge potential upside and i'd argue downside (for different reasons). Do you remember Hamidou Diallo? ANother Kentucky guy with insane athleticism also incredibly highly ranked out of HS and ALSO did not play a game his first year at Kentucky. People told him to go pro. He instead played the next year at Kentucky. Was a second rounder, won a slam dunk contest, NBA career is on thin ice My suspicions are that Sharpe's team had Diallo's career in mind and made a judgment it's better for him to turn pro now (5)(7)
|
fishmike
Posts: 53803 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 7/19/2002 Member: #298 USA |
![]() Chandler wrote:I do... but he was not ranked nearly as high as Sharpe. Mocks had Diallo mostly in the late first early 2nd. Nobody expects Sharpe to fall out of the lottery.fishmike wrote:Chandler wrote:we also know he's very long with a 7 foot wingspan. You have to treat him like a HS kid as far as scouting goes but he's STILL going to usually be the best athlete on the floor when he gets here. It will come down to his workouts and temperament for sure.fishmike wrote:Chandler wrote:Its not hostility.. you writing off Sharpe "because we have seen this before with guys like Dennis Smith" is just lame sorry. They have nothing to do with each other. You can apply the DSJr argument to any prospect who's athletic. Truth is there are very few guys with Sharpe's profile, so you look really close because that's a big whiff if you are wrong.fishmike wrote:Chandler wrote:SHarpe and Holmgren should both scare the pants off FOs for different reasonsif you think the bold I am glad you dont scout for the Knicks... there are zero similarities. Those guys are unicorns. Teams will know. He's a CAA guy. Would be nice to see us somehow land a guy because he didnt work out for anyone else (like Amare did) "winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
|
Chandler
Posts: 26774 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 11/26/2015 Member: #6197 |
![]() fishmike wrote:Chandler wrote:I do... but he was not ranked nearly as high as Sharpe. Mocks had Diallo mostly in the late first early 2nd. Nobody expects Sharpe to fall out of the lottery.fishmike wrote:Chandler wrote:we also know he's very long with a 7 foot wingspan. You have to treat him like a HS kid as far as scouting goes but he's STILL going to usually be the best athlete on the floor when he gets here. It will come down to his workouts and temperament for sure.fishmike wrote:Chandler wrote:Its not hostility.. you writing off Sharpe "because we have seen this before with guys like Dennis Smith" is just lame sorry. They have nothing to do with each other. You can apply the DSJr argument to any prospect who's athletic. Truth is there are very few guys with Sharpe's profile, so you look really close because that's a big whiff if you are wrong.fishmike wrote:Chandler wrote:SHarpe and Holmgren should both scare the pants off FOs for different reasonsif you think the bold I am glad you dont scout for the Knicks... there are zero similarities. Those guys are unicorns. the point i'm making is Diallo was a was pretty damn high HS prospect: 10th overall in 2017. https://www.maxpreps.com/news/ApmUK4jz9kWIB1yJ7XdZjA/top-10-high-school-basketball-prospect-hamidou-diallo-commits-to-kentucky.htm#:~:text=Video%3A%20Hamidou%20Diallo%20highlights&text=247Sports%20has%20the%206%2Dfoot,in%20the%20Class%20of%202017. That situation is not that far removed from Sharpe's current situation. If Sharpe slides to us it will be crazy. Might get a top 3 or 4 talent (if we win), or Diallo 2.0 (if he's atheltic but otherwise fool's gold) (5)(7)
|
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39752 Alba Posts: 9 Joined: 1/22/2010 Member: #3049 |
![]() Chandler wrote:fishmike wrote:Chandler wrote:I do... but he was not ranked nearly as high as Sharpe. Mocks had Diallo mostly in the late first early 2nd. Nobody expects Sharpe to fall out of the lottery.fishmike wrote:Chandler wrote:we also know he's very long with a 7 foot wingspan. You have to treat him like a HS kid as far as scouting goes but he's STILL going to usually be the best athlete on the floor when he gets here. It will come down to his workouts and temperament for sure.fishmike wrote:Chandler wrote:Its not hostility.. you writing off Sharpe "because we have seen this before with guys like Dennis Smith" is just lame sorry. They have nothing to do with each other. You can apply the DSJr argument to any prospect who's athletic. Truth is there are very few guys with Sharpe's profile, so you look really close because that's a big whiff if you are wrong.fishmike wrote:Chandler wrote:SHarpe and Holmgren should both scare the pants off FOs for different reasonsif you think the bold I am glad you dont scout for the Knicks... there are zero similarities. Those guys are unicorns. Hami catching stray ![]() Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right.
- The Tick
|