[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Free Agency Target: Victor Oladipo
Author Thread
jrodmc
Posts: 32927
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 11/24/2004
Member: #805
USA
6/13/2022  11:43 AM
martin wrote:
gradyandrew wrote:
martin wrote:I don't mean to sound so blunt but...

Why would the Knicks do this? Especially after that go-around with Kemba?

How does this help the team?

Why would Oladipo think this is a good situation for him?


gradyandrew wrote:I think he could be in the starting lineup:
Oladipo/ Rose/ 1st round pick
Fournier/ IQ/ Grimes
Barrett/ Burks/ Reddish
Randle/ Toppin/ Gibson
Robinson/ Noel/ Sims

Appreciate the honesty!
I think the Knicks will be looking for an upgrade at the point. Brunson appears out of range without working out a sign and trade, costing the Knicks players. The idea here is using the MLE to take a swing at a talented player without giving up assets. I think Oladipo's injury was different, not chronic like Kemba. Adding him to the Knicks could be key to getting a top defense again. He was one of the better point of attack defenders when healthy.
Oladipo does it because of ties to Scott Perry and the opportunity to rebuild his brand in New York.

Oladipo is not a PG, he is a SG.

The last 4 years, these are the total games he has played for the regular season: 36, 19, 33, 8 (plus the playoffs).

His market is the vet min.

He is not a starter.

We have IQ/Rose at PG. With McBride in the wings.


+1
That's what struck me immediately. Why move IQ to SG behind Fournier? He looked as good if not better at the PG position at the end of the season than anyone we had.
If Oladipo is that good defensively, I'm all for sliding him in immediately behind Fournier at the 2. Fournier builds up leads with that three, and then Oladipo can come in and hold the opponent in check.

And Burks is suddenly a backup SF? In the past decade, he's played about one full season as a SF.

AUTOADVERT
Nalod
Posts: 71078
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
6/13/2022  12:52 PM
jrodmc wrote:
martin wrote:
gradyandrew wrote:
martin wrote:I don't mean to sound so blunt but...

Why would the Knicks do this? Especially after that go-around with Kemba?

How does this help the team?

Why would Oladipo think this is a good situation for him?


gradyandrew wrote:I think he could be in the starting lineup:
Oladipo/ Rose/ 1st round pick
Fournier/ IQ/ Grimes
Barrett/ Burks/ Reddish
Randle/ Toppin/ Gibson
Robinson/ Noel/ Sims

Appreciate the honesty!
I think the Knicks will be looking for an upgrade at the point. Brunson appears out of range without working out a sign and trade, costing the Knicks players. The idea here is using the MLE to take a swing at a talented player without giving up assets. I think Oladipo's injury was different, not chronic like Kemba. Adding him to the Knicks could be key to getting a top defense again. He was one of the better point of attack defenders when healthy.
Oladipo does it because of ties to Scott Perry and the opportunity to rebuild his brand in New York.

Oladipo is not a PG, he is a SG.

The last 4 years, these are the total games he has played for the regular season: 36, 19, 33, 8 (plus the playoffs).

His market is the vet min.

He is not a starter.

We have IQ/Rose at PG. With McBride in the wings.


+1
That's what struck me immediately. Why move IQ to SG behind Fournier? He looked as good if not better at the PG position at the end of the season than anyone we had.
If Oladipo is that good defensively, I'm all for sliding him in immediately behind Fournier at the 2. Fournier builds up leads with that three, and then Oladipo can come in and hold the opponent in check.

And Burks is suddenly a backup SF? In the past decade, he's played about one full season as a SF.

Burks could be traded. The roster is not as locked in as we often think it does. One might even jettison DRose if he expressed a desire to content right away.

gradyandrew
Posts: 22403
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/19/2021
Member: #8959

6/14/2022  11:23 AM
jrodmc wrote:+1
That's what struck me immediately. Why move IQ to SG behind Fournier? He looked as good if not better at the PG position at the end of the season than anyone we had.
If Oladipo is that good defensively, I'm all for sliding him in immediately behind Fournier at the 2. Fournier builds up leads with that three, and then Oladipo can come in and hold the opponent in check.

And Burks is suddenly a backup SF? In the past decade, he's played about one full season as a SF.

I don't get where you are going with this. In 2021-22 Burks played 74% of his minutes as the backup SF in successful lineups of Rose IQ Burks and Obi. The front office signed Kemba on a two year deal because Thibs wanted to keep that lineup. Burks only became starting PG after Kemba was injured.

Not making IQ the starter until the end was also telling- Thibs knows IQs role. You can flip it to Rose as SG and IQ as PG if you like. It seems This philosophy has been pretty consistent- lockdown defense with the first unit and an offensive explosion with the second.

jrodmc
Posts: 32927
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 11/24/2004
Member: #805
USA
6/15/2022  9:31 AM
gradyandrew wrote:
jrodmc wrote:+1
That's what struck me immediately. Why move IQ to SG behind Fournier? He looked as good if not better at the PG position at the end of the season than anyone we had.
If Oladipo is that good defensively, I'm all for sliding him in immediately behind Fournier at the 2. Fournier builds up leads with that three, and then Oladipo can come in and hold the opponent in check.

And Burks is suddenly a backup SF? In the past decade, he's played about one full season as a SF.

I don't get where you are going with this. In 2021-22 Burks played 74% of his minutes as the backup SF in successful lineups of Rose IQ Burks and Obi. The front office signed Kemba on a two year deal because Thibs wanted to keep that lineup. Burks only became starting PG after Kemba was injured.

Not making IQ the starter until the end was also telling- Thibs knows IQs role. You can flip it to Rose as SG and IQ as PG if you like. It seems This philosophy has been pretty consistent- lockdown defense with the first unit and an offensive explosion with the second.


Not sure how Fournier and Randle fit a lockdown defense first unit philosophy this past season, but okay.

I like Burks, hope we get to keep him somehow. If nothing else, he doesn't remind anyone of Elfrid Payton.

gradyandrew
Posts: 22403
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/19/2021
Member: #8959

6/15/2022  6:00 PM
lol
Zach Lowe wrote earlier in the season that the Knicks had a top 5 defense with Robinson on the court. Unfortunately,I can't find the exact quote.
Chandler
Posts: 26774
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/26/2015
Member: #6197

6/15/2022  6:41 PM
this thread should be moved to the Sado masochism forum

sadistic for proposing it

masochistic if we do it

(5)(7)
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39752
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049

6/16/2022  11:48 AM
Chandler wrote:this thread should be moved to the Sado masochism forum

sadistic for proposing it

masochistic if we do it

Wow.... This entire time I thought S&M stood for Stephan Marbury... The more you learn

Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
Free Agency Target: Victor Oladipo

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy