BRIGGS wrote:

martin wrote:

BRIGGS wrote:

martin wrote:

BRIGGS wrote:He’s a bit of any injury prone player but would be an excellent acquisition IF the price is right.

We are not a Jrue holiday away but he would be a marvelous addition if price is right. I DO NOT want to send out this years lottery pick but I’m willing to give one of the picks from 2023 one quality young player a future second and Kenna’s ending contract( and single contrazts to make the money right) want nothing to do with Myles turner

As in
Kemba Toppin 2023# 1 2027 #2 for Malcolm brogdon( has to be healthy) thoughts?

Essentially 3 #1 picks for a PG who is constantly hurt? Awful trade

In some ways I also agree with you. But I think that would be the cost. The player when healthy wouod help us greatly

I think the Knicks operate this way. A good solid nba pg is going to help the Knicks.

No not really, this is the way you operate and it's a massive overpay.

You haven't checked out the Pacers roster or what their salaries are. They just traded for Haliburton. They just drafted Duarte and they have Hield and McConnel on the roster. Haliburton, Duarte are the future and they will want to MOVE Brogdon to free up both salary and minutes. You start your negotiations at that point if you are trading FOR Brogdon.

Brogdon hurt all the time. 3 years left at $22m and he is not a needle mover.

You really think the pacers will need to pay to move brogdon? Unless he’s bot healthy they are gonna get paid trading him.
If healthy a restricted 1 a 2 and younger player is prob cost. Hopefully I’m wrong

Didn't say that either. It's what the leverage is for each side.

It's why Cam should have been traded in the summer instead of when he did get traded. Leverage and what teams will pony up change because of circumstance.