[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

I know... absolute madness... how about some kind of Ben Simmons/Randle swap?
Author Thread
jrodmc
Posts: 32927
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 11/24/2004
Member: #805
USA
1/25/2022  9:21 PM
For the billionth time, Morey's not shipping his overpaid douchebag within the division. Maybe somewhere pointless in the East, like Orlando, but not here. Hopefully he dumps SimpleSimmon in Detroit or Indiana. Would serve the un-coachable oversensitive azzhole right. At least in those places he wouldn't have to worry about running away from the ball in the playoffs during his lifetime.

Why, why why WHYYYYY another Simmons thread? fish, you getting clickbait residuals or something?

AUTOADVERT
Nalod
Posts: 71087
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
1/26/2022  7:37 AM
SupremeCommander wrote:Where’s Tobias Harris going to go

Thank you for thinking.

HoustonSprewell84
Posts: 20178
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 2/6/2021
Member: #8931

1/26/2022  7:47 AM
Knixkik wrote:
BigDaddyG wrote:
HoustonSprewell84 wrote:Randle doesn’t help Sixers at all, they will turn down the offer. This isn’t nba 2k.

I know. But if a deal became available I'd say take it. Ben's talent would lift the team's ceiling.

How does having another player that doesn’t shoot outside of the paint or make free throws lift the team’s ceiling. If we start Mitch, that means 2 guys on the floor who can’t shoot from anywhere. How do you expect Barrett to be able to drive to the lane to do what he does best? You surround Barrett with Simmons and Mitch, you might as well stick a fork in him right now. It’s 2022 in the nba and you want a lineup filled with guys who can’t shoot threes and can’t shoot free throws ??? Team building 101 is focus on guys who can make shots from multiple spots on the floor.

Agreed, we should be surrounding Barrett and maybe Randle with shooters.
We’re a poor three point, mid range, and free throw shooting team.
I would rather trade for a big who can shoot, like a Steve Novak type. Maybe Peter Kaminsky.
Not a fancy trade but would help our team a lottt.

SergioNYK
Posts: 22544
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/8/2002
Member: #333
USA
1/26/2022  7:48 AM
I'm all for trading Randle but not for a nutjob and quitter like Simmons.
franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
1/26/2022  8:05 AM
I don't think our front office wants to trade Randle. I had suggested another trade for Simmons- Fournier, Walker, Obi, Grimes for Simmons - maybe there is filler around the edges, a third team, etc.

But the more I think about this line up, the more I think it immediately makes us a contender in the East:

Simmons
Barrett
Cam
Randle
Mitch/Noel/Taj (whoever is healthy)

Your weakest link on D might be Randle, and if you put that line up out there, he will definitely feel the good kind of pressure to perform.

D Rose when he is back can change the pace tremendously- and you don't need to go very deep on the rotation.

You still have Burk and IQ that are great shooters which you can slot in as needed.

I'm not crazy about Simmons- but he is a tremendous game changing athlete when he is playing well. I think Thibs can really exploit his package of skill and athletic presence.

TheGame
Posts: 26632
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/15/2006
Member: #1154
USA
1/26/2022  8:30 AM    LAST EDITED: 1/26/2022  8:48 AM
I would love to get the old Ben Simmons, but as others have said, we cannot trust this guy. The NY media is ruthless and he has shown himself to be thin-skinned. He would never survive here. The trade we should do is Randle for Jerami Grant. Grant would provide better defense, the same level of scoring, and fewer turnovers.
Trust the Process
Nalod
Posts: 71087
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
1/26/2022  9:31 AM
Lets go the 1248 route, get a stretch 5 and PG with EF or Grimes, Obi, Mitch, and a pick.
I’d rather we compliment our core roster with talent to enhance their talent then live in a dream world were subtraction is the cure.
nyvector16
Posts: 21322
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/9/2001
Member: #130
USA
1/26/2022  10:04 AM
The problem with Simmons is you are playing 4 on 5 on offense in a half-court set.
The guy refuses to be part of offense down low constantly passing up point-blank shots.

His guy will always play hard help defense.


I would be more interested in Fox from Kings to fix PG situation and not have to absorb Harris' crazy contract.

martin
Posts: 76049
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
1/26/2022  10:13 AM
nyvector16 wrote:The problem with Simmons is you are playing 4 on 5 on offense in a half-court set.
The guy refuses to be part of offense down low constantly passing up point-blank shots.

His guy will always play hard help defense.


I would be more interested in Fox from Kings to fix PG situation and not have to absorb Harris' crazy contract.

Realistically, most all teams play some version of 4 on 5 either on defense or offense. Atlanta and Dallas will always play 4 on 5 defensively.

Bad Boy Detroit play 4 on 5 offensively.

Knicks play 3 on 5 offensively cause they got no PG lol

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
ramtour420
Posts: 26255
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 3/19/2007
Member: #1388
Russian Federation
1/26/2022  10:28 AM
I don't want to do a lateral trade at best to make Philly a title contender. And can we please, for the love of all that's good in this world, stop mentioning Grimes in any trade! He is our best asset and building block after RJ. Grimes is untouchable. Not even for Fox, nor anyone else for that matter.
Everything you have ever wanted is on the other side of fear- George Adair
martin
Posts: 76049
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
1/26/2022  10:31 AM
ramtour420 wrote:I don't want to do a lateral trade at best to make Philly a title contender. And can we please, for the love of all that's good in this world, stop mentioning Grimes in any trade! He is our best asset and building block after RJ. Grimes is untouchable. Not even for Fox, nor anyone else for that matter.

100%

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
nyvector16
Posts: 21322
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/9/2001
Member: #130
USA
1/26/2022  10:38 AM
martin wrote:
nyvector16 wrote:The problem with Simmons is you are playing 4 on 5 on offense in a half-court set.
The guy refuses to be part of offense down low constantly passing up point-blank shots.

His guy will always play hard help defense.


I would be more interested in Fox from Kings to fix PG situation and not have to absorb Harris' crazy contract.

Realistically, most all teams play some version of 4 on 5 either on defense or offense. Atlanta and Dallas will always play 4 on 5 defensively.

Bad Boy Detroit play 4 on 5 offensively.

Knicks play 3 on 5 offensively cause they got no PG lol


These are very good points...
Bulls did he same when they had Rodman.

nyvector16
Posts: 21322
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/9/2001
Member: #130
USA
1/26/2022  10:39 AM
martin wrote:
ramtour420 wrote:I don't want to do a lateral trade at best to make Philly a title contender. And can we please, for the love of all that's good in this world, stop mentioning Grimes in any trade! He is our best asset and building block after RJ. Grimes is untouchable. Not even for Fox, nor anyone else for that matter.

100%

Totally agree as well.
I can't help but wonder if we would feel the same about Deuce if given the playing time.

martin
Posts: 76049
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
1/26/2022  10:40 AM
nyvector16 wrote:
martin wrote:
nyvector16 wrote:The problem with Simmons is you are playing 4 on 5 on offense in a half-court set.
The guy refuses to be part of offense down low constantly passing up point-blank shots.

His guy will always play hard help defense.


I would be more interested in Fox from Kings to fix PG situation and not have to absorb Harris' crazy contract.

Realistically, most all teams play some version of 4 on 5 either on defense or offense. Atlanta and Dallas will always play 4 on 5 defensively.

Bad Boy Detroit play 4 on 5 offensively.

Knicks play 3 on 5 offensively cause they got no PG lol


These are very good points...
Bulls did he same when they had Rodman.

Yeah, as a team other players made up for them OR the player is so good at one end it makes up for it on the other.

I forgot about Rodman. And Kerr. Offensively Rodman would be considered bad, Kerr would be deficient defensively? But Jordan and Pipen and Grant made up for all of that

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
martin
Posts: 76049
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
1/26/2022  10:44 AM
nyvector16 wrote:
martin wrote:
ramtour420 wrote:I don't want to do a lateral trade at best to make Philly a title contender. And can we please, for the love of all that's good in this world, stop mentioning Grimes in any trade! He is our best asset and building block after RJ. Grimes is untouchable. Not even for Fox, nor anyone else for that matter.

100%

Totally agree as well.
I can't help but wonder if we would feel the same about Deuce if given the playing time.

He had one really good freaking outing, 15 points, 9 assists, 2-5 from 3pt land, 6-11 overall. Against a bad Houston team but it's still impressive. I think he'll have a nice career if he puts in the work and it looks like he is

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
jskinny35
Posts: 21580
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/27/2005
Member: #928
USA
1/26/2022  1:56 PM
TheGame wrote:I would love to get the old Ben Simmons, but as others have said, we cannot trust this guy. The NY media is ruthless and he has shown himself to be thin-skinned. He would never survive here. The trade we should do is Randle for Jerami Grant. Grant would provide better defense, the same level of scoring, and fewer turnovers.

This is a lateral move the could prove helpful as we would receive back similar production while encouraging more ball movement, play at faster pace and allow some more minutes for Obi, Reddish, Grimes, etc. We would probably have some growing pains as RJ is looking close (but not quite ready) to assume an increased role. Toppin still needs development time... Could Thibs let go of fighting tooth and nail for the 8th seed and allow these guys the remaining season to figure things out for the future? Ideally this happens concurrently but not sure it would with Thibs and all these young guys. I would support it as we're going nowhere fast.

Philc1
Posts: 28295
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 9/2/2020
Member: #8897

1/26/2022  2:02 PM
SergioNYK wrote:I'm all for trading Randle but not for a nutjob and quitter like Simmons.

We’re trying to build a culture here —- not revive the 2005 Marbury/Larry Brown era

BigDaddyG
Posts: 39769
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049

1/26/2022  4:06 PM
TheGame wrote:I would love to get the old Ben Simmons, but as others have said, we cannot trust this guy. The NY media is ruthless and he has shown himself to be thin-skinned. He would never survive here. The trade we should do is Randle for Jerami Grant. Grant would provide better defense, the same level of scoring, and fewer turnovers.

Simmons is thin-skinned, unlike Randle? Simmons is more talented than Grant and Randle. Why not shoot for the sky if a trade were available?

Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39769
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049

1/26/2022  4:12 PM
jskinny35 wrote:
TheGame wrote:I would love to get the old Ben Simmons, but as others have said, we cannot trust this guy. The NY media is ruthless and he has shown himself to be thin-skinned. He would never survive here. The trade we should do is Randle for Jerami Grant. Grant would provide better defense, the same level of scoring, and fewer turnovers.

This is a lateral move the could prove helpful as we would receive back similar production while encouraging more ball movement, play at faster pace and allow some more minutes for Obi, Reddish, Grimes, etc. We would probably have some growing pains as RJ is looking close (but not quite ready) to assume an increased role. Toppin still needs development time... Could Thibs let go of fighting tooth and nail for the 8th seed and allow these guys the remaining season to figure things out for the future? Ideally this happens concurrently but not sure it would with Thibs and all these young guys. I would support it as we're going nowhere fast.


Grant, in a lead role, is more of black hole than Randle. His assist to turnover ratio is almost 1 to 1. It's a hit offensively in some respects. Grant needs a more PG more than Randle IMHO.
Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
jrodmc
Posts: 32927
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 11/24/2004
Member: #805
USA
1/26/2022  4:26 PM
BigDaddyG wrote:
TheGame wrote:I would love to get the old Ben Simmons, but as others have said, we cannot trust this guy. The NY media is ruthless and he has shown himself to be thin-skinned. He would never survive here. The trade we should do is Randle for Jerami Grant. Grant would provide better defense, the same level of scoring, and fewer turnovers.

Simmons is thin-skinned, unlike Randle? Simmons is more talented than Grant and Randle. Why not shoot for the sky if a trade were available?

Talented at what, exactly? FT shooting? Running away from the ball come playoff time? The incredibly valuable talent of being 6 foot ****ing 11 and not being able to fathom being coached into learning in 4 years how to take and make an effing 10 foot jumper?

Unless I'm missing something, flipping a thumbs down to a bunch of fans and whining at refs WHILE PLAYING compared to sitting out an entire season because you're pansy azz is all butt hurt from people not saying nice things about you is about as far apart on the thin skin spectrum as you can get.

Yes, please sign me up for $30MM a year for Bent Richard Slimmons.

I know... absolute madness... how about some kind of Ben Simmons/Randle swap?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy