HofstraBBall wrote:BigDaddyG wrote:fishmike wrote:hey Briggs remember you laughed at me for suggesting we sign Derozan for $25mm? Good one right?
For what it's worth, still not sure that would work with Randle on the roster.
Disagree. DeRozan is exactly what I like in a closer. Goes to the rim, draws fouls and not afraid of the pressure.
Yeah, but he operates in the same area as Randle and then we'd have to hear reports about how they need more time mesh and blah, blah, blah. The reason it works in Chicago is that Zach is really efficient perimeter scorer and Lonzo isn't ball dominat and get passive in the halfcourt.
Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right.
- The Tick