jrodmc wrote:jrodmc wrote:FANATIC. It's not that hard to understand. Maybe BRIGGS hasn't let go of his inner NBA Rookie of the Year dreams yet. I know I'm still running full court at 60 all summer long and would verbally punch someone in the face if they keep trying to tell me that the Knicks aren't worth the time of day. I absolutely love this game and the Knicks. Maybe some people don't worry as much about the uncool blight of homerism as others do.
Knickoftime wrote:Very hard to understand. Was described as a "goal." (I'm quoting). So how does a person who watches on TV work towards the goal of the Knicks winning a championship this season?
That's a perfectly reasonable question...
Perfectly reasonable for someone who doesn't understand the term "root" as a verb.
I can only lead you to the difference between an active goal and a passive wish, I can't ... well you know.
jrodmc wrote:Practical application? Control issues, maybe? BRIGGS is motivated to root for a chip, with anything else being tolerable.
Since you've empowered yourself to speak for him, does he think anyone else doesn't?
"...or bust" is the relevant term here.
As his appointed spokesperson, can you explain what "...or bust" means? Because that was the original, simple question.
We're all rooting for a chip, but he's rooting for a chip or bust.
I'll ask again: what's the practical difference?
Must be SOMETHING to warrant a thread, no?
jrodmc wrote:Let the balloon go, and just embrace being wrong. It's really not a good look this way.
What's the practical application of petulance?

Concerning yourself with a "look" on a message board with strangers isn't a good look.
But since it's something you consider, what kind of a look s harboring an exchange from 4 years ago that you don't even remember correctly?
I'd have a hard time imaging that's a good look either.