Chandler wrote:i'm more struck by the length than the per/year.

That said, this signing surprises me the least. Rose turned the season around. Plays decisively -- the way Thibs covets. And there's so much mutual respect and loyalty between the two

wish the terms were cheaper though

This. Rose deserved his money after last year. Give him a huge pay raise for this upcoming year with a club option if he shows it was not a fluke.

Jmpasq wrote:

Chandler wrote:i'm more struck by the length than the per/year.

That said, this signing surprises me the least. Rose turned the season around. Plays decisively -- the way Thibs covets. And there's so much mutual respect and loyalty between the two

wish the terms were cheaper though

I was shocked by how well Rose played last year. After his first go around I wanted no part of him and he proved me wrong. However, Three years with his history is irresponsible from this front office.

irresponsible? he's changed his game. he's shooting more reliably from the outside; he's scoring with push shots and mid range. His game has a longevity it didn't in his earlier years.

one can argue that's a lot of money for a guy who hopefully plays 20 minutes, but i don't think the deal is irresponsible. CP3 is getting 40 mill/yr as a 36 year old. Kawhi is probably going to make more and miss the year and then come back from another significant injury.

Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL:

https://twitter.com/wojespn/status/1422369148013879300

Costing the Pels a first round pick.