knicks1248 wrote:Knicksfan wrote:fitzfarm wrote:I think this team should really go after Norman Powell a perfect 3 and D who can also put the ball on the floor. Getting him in his prime years . You could resign burks or bullock to back him up. We need a pass first pg that makes life easier for our starters . Who can that PG be?
My "realistic" list has Powell and Ball in it. I mean, they are attainable if we open the wallet. Not necessarily a trade, although maybe with Ball.
You guys are not concerned that BALL did not make they Pelicans a better team, and Powell is a 6'3" SF who didn't make The raptors much better.
With SF like Simmons, Tatum, Gannis, Butler, KD, all of the hawks SF's we need to getter bigger.
Issue with Pels like many teams are the roster constructions. Tatum and Butler did not carry any further than Bullock this season by your standard of “what have you done today that I can plug in tommorow”?
The issue with Pels is what to do with Zion to max his talent and melt it with Ingram
Its not a question of anyone around here being concerned but does our coaching and FO think he can add to what we have.
So the discussion is not about what we think, but about ones opinion. NObody here has any kind of influence.
We don’t know Pels game plan but If I valued him I’d look at Nola’s roster and draft picks and perhaps create a scenario which is Brock Allers job. Then I consider do I value Ball today over what I can pick in teh lower half of the draft. Now we all an assume Nola has picks, also does not want to match a high salary and lose him for nothing. But at the same time if we value Ball, we don’t want to pay a high salary either for him.
Its in our best interest to find a number he’d accept, then offer compensation to Nola and we get what we want based on our valuation. Not what others think. If the price goes high **** it. Move on.
some of you think he might be worth a 25th pick and Nola walks away and we get him for 18mm-20mil. To high? Then pass. Leon and CO. Will figure his value. They do that good, it was their job previously.
If another team wants to get stupid, good for Ball.
Question is doe Ball enhance OBI more than Randle? Who enhances Randle BTW? DRose and Randle don’t seem together much work except in iso. Rose pushes the ball. Randle slows it down. WE don’t see Randle and rose play a 2 man game.
After sleeping on it I love Randle but if there’s was a vision beyond I’m ok with that. If he fits in it thats cool. Few teams will offer him what we gave him this season. On a better team he is might not be a perennial Allstar. Fewer touches. They can offer him better shooters around him and that might open things up for him in the paint. We keep him we need to two that. Add that to what ATL did to tie him down. Took away Barrets corner. Pushed IQ out further, and let Burkes and Bullock be our saviors. They are not that good. They were for a lot of the season.
Do we take Ball here and yet let Randle be the PF and slow it down? If so, don’t bring him here.