Allanfan20 wrote:TheGame wrote:Philc1 wrote:TheGame wrote:We don't have the assets to trade into the top-3. We likely may offer Kevin Knox and our first pick (and maybe the third pick) if there is a top-flight point guard that falls in the 9-14 range. Otherwise, I think we stand pat or make a move like last year. In this draft, we need to a get a solid PG and a solid 6'8" -6'9" SF who can hit a 3 and guard the position.
Julius, IQ and 4 first round picks may be enough
That would be a lot to give up for an unproven rookie. That is why teams only trade up to top-3, when they already have a top 4-7 pick to offer. Otherwise, you end up giving up too much for the pick. Cade is good, but you don’t trade your #1 player, a promising rookie and 4 other picks for an unproven rookie, no matter how good that rookie might be.
Yup. I would trade Randle for the right return and I would even trade those 4 picks alone for Cade but that whole package is rough. He has his weaknesses too.
But yes.... I would really love Cade or Suggs to be on the Knicks.
Again, why would a team want picks 19 and 21 in this year's draft and two unknown draft picks in the future for the top pick in the 2021 draft? It's totally illogical not to mention it's simply a fan emotional reaction to Randle having a bad playoff series. A couple of weeks ago when Randle was balling these same people wanted to max him out. Geez I'm glad none of y'all have any say in personnel decisions.