Author | Thread |
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39844 Alba Posts: 9 Joined: 1/22/2010 Member: #3049 |
![]() Knixkik wrote:BigDaddyG wrote:I think 27 is way too high to pick Quickley. But, if this rumor is true, I'm pretty sure they're targeting him in the second-round.Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: Good shooter and good on-ball defender, but he has a lot improving to do before he can become a primary ball handler. Plus, his frame kinda limits who he can defend at two-spot. There will be prospects with higher upsides at #27. "Way too high" is probably an overstatement on my part, but I think it's still a bit of reach. Now, that pick wouldn't bother me as much if the Knicks got another second-rounder. That would give them more leeway in terms of gambling on a pick or two. Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right.
- The Tick
|
AUTOADVERT |