TripleThreat wrote:joec32033 wrote:BRILLIANT HIRE, because, the Nets, right?
The larger question for the Knicks, our beloved Knicks, is whether it's better to just build a high floor team.
The Nets were building something nice. Marks and Atkinson turned that team around. They were playing hard, they were playing together, there was a vision and everyone was focused on winning. Then the team got a couple of "superstars" and it all turned to ****. But if you look around the league, except for GSW, it seems to all turn to ****. Superstars holding their teams hostage and all this fabricated drama and guys basically running their coaches and front offices from the court.
I would be happy with 8 Mikal Bridges on my roster. Solid guys who play the right way, play fundamental and would make fans proud of them. Guys who honor the jerseys they put on and don't need to align to what Nike says or what they need to be appealing on Twitter or that happy horse****. Would never win a championship, but could probably get you fun basketball to watch. I don't see this as a failure, I see chasing superstars, most of them, as a type of tax on dignity.
Look at how many rosters that ****sucker LeBron James has driven into the ground. He had to be LeGM. Then LeCoach. Now LeMandela.
Maybe it's just my age, but winning a ring at the cost of all this simping seems like too high a price for me.
The Nets literally sold their sole for KD and Kyrie. While I agree with the having 8 Mikal Bridgea type of players is great for a team, you still need talent. I think the Nets went after the wrong g guys. Way too many questions in my book for both, plus they seem to want to take over that Brooklyn tam. Good luck with that.