Author | Thread |
AUTOADVERT |
Nalod
Posts: 71134 Alba Posts: 155 Joined: 12/24/2003 Member: #508 USA |
![]() The nickname potential is awesome with a name “Obi Toppin”!
|
Uptown
Posts: 31309 Alba Posts: 3 Joined: 4/1/2008 Member: #1883 |
![]() Welpee wrote:Uptown wrote:Not sure if it's less laziness and more about lack of emphasis. Toppin didn't play for Kentucky with 5-6 other future NBA 1st round draft picks. He played on a mid-major who relied a lot on him offensively to both score to open things up for his teammates. It's not unusual for players in that situation to not put as much emphasis on the other side of the ball (not saying it's right). He's already carrying a significant load for the team.martin wrote:Uptown wrote:martin wrote:Uptown wrote:If Toppin is available at 8, you take him and dont think twice! That would be a great value pick! He is a true stretch 4 and in a pick and roll-centric-NBA, Toppin could average 20 pts per right out the gate. The best part of his offensive game is, unlike Randle, he doesn't need to massage the ball for 7-10 seconds before trying to create offense for himself. Lack or emphasis, lack of focus at times and also lack accountability from the coaches. A missed assignment on Duke or Kentucky may lead to being benched for a portion of the game because they have the depth. Not so much at Dayton. Agreed on his trajectory...Obi has gotten better every year for the past 3-4 years or so and that's always a good thing coming into the draft. It would be one thing if we are making a case for him to be the #1 overall pick. But, @ 8, if he's there, (which I would highly doubt) you take him regardless. Even at the very top of the draft, every single prospect has multiple warts and weaknesses from poor shooting, poor defense, anemic offensive numbers, an inability to create off the dribble, etc.... |
Welpee
Posts: 23162 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 1/22/2016 Member: #6239 |
![]() Uptown wrote:Agreed. And if not Toppin (if available) who? If we go through this exercise with everyone likely to be available at 8 we should just forfeit the pick because nobody is going to be satisfactory. It will be interesting.Welpee wrote:Uptown wrote:Not sure if it's less laziness and more about lack of emphasis. Toppin didn't play for Kentucky with 5-6 other future NBA 1st round draft picks. He played on a mid-major who relied a lot on him offensively to both score to open things up for his teammates. It's not unusual for players in that situation to not put as much emphasis on the other side of the ball (not saying it's right). He's already carrying a significant load for the team.martin wrote:Uptown wrote:martin wrote:Uptown wrote:If Toppin is available at 8, you take him and dont think twice! That would be a great value pick! He is a true stretch 4 and in a pick and roll-centric-NBA, Toppin could average 20 pts per right out the gate. The best part of his offensive game is, unlike Randle, he doesn't need to massage the ball for 7-10 seconds before trying to create offense for himself. Also, apparently he was 6'2" his junior year in high school. So he hasn't had a lot of time playing with the body he has now. |
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39839 Alba Posts: 9 Joined: 1/22/2010 Member: #3049 |
![]() Welpee wrote:Uptown wrote:Agreed. And if not Toppin (if available) who? If we go through this exercise with everyone likely to be available at 8 we should just forfeit the pick because nobody is going to be satisfactory. It will be interesting.Welpee wrote:Uptown wrote:Not sure if it's less laziness and more about lack of emphasis. Toppin didn't play for Kentucky with 5-6 other future NBA 1st round draft picks. He played on a mid-major who relied a lot on him offensively to both score to open things up for his teammates. It's not unusual for players in that situation to not put as much emphasis on the other side of the ball (not saying it's right). He's already carrying a significant load for the team.martin wrote:Uptown wrote:martin wrote:Uptown wrote:If Toppin is available at 8, you take him and dont think twice! That would be a great value pick! He is a true stretch 4 and in a pick and roll-centric-NBA, Toppin could average 20 pts per right out the gate. The best part of his offensive game is, unlike Randle, he doesn't need to massage the ball for 7-10 seconds before trying to create offense for himself. That's why I'd say just draft him and try to trade down. You'd have to feel obligated to take Obi if he's at 8. I see a Marcus Fizer type tho, and would rather go for more quality wing/guard depth. We might not even be able to trade down, because other teams see his warts. If he falls down to us, your have to believe there's a legitimate reason for it. The again, beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Grabbing Obi at #8 wouldn't be the worst problem in the world to have. Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right.
- The Tick
|
Welpee
Posts: 23162 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 1/22/2016 Member: #6239 |
![]() BigDaddyG wrote:Would you trade #8 to Boston for #14 and 26?Welpee wrote:Uptown wrote:Agreed. And if not Toppin (if available) who? If we go through this exercise with everyone likely to be available at 8 we should just forfeit the pick because nobody is going to be satisfactory. It will be interesting.Welpee wrote:Uptown wrote:Not sure if it's less laziness and more about lack of emphasis. Toppin didn't play for Kentucky with 5-6 other future NBA 1st round draft picks. He played on a mid-major who relied a lot on him offensively to both score to open things up for his teammates. It's not unusual for players in that situation to not put as much emphasis on the other side of the ball (not saying it's right). He's already carrying a significant load for the team.martin wrote:Uptown wrote:martin wrote:Uptown wrote:If Toppin is available at 8, you take him and dont think twice! That would be a great value pick! He is a true stretch 4 and in a pick and roll-centric-NBA, Toppin could average 20 pts per right out the gate. The best part of his offensive game is, unlike Randle, he doesn't need to massage the ball for 7-10 seconds before trying to create offense for himself. |
Uptown
Posts: 31309 Alba Posts: 3 Joined: 4/1/2008 Member: #1883 |
![]() Welpee wrote:BigDaddyG wrote:Would you trade #8 to Boston for #14 and 26?Welpee wrote:Uptown wrote:Agreed. And if not Toppin (if available) who? If we go through this exercise with everyone likely to be available at 8 we should just forfeit the pick because nobody is going to be satisfactory. It will be interesting.Welpee wrote:Uptown wrote:Not sure if it's less laziness and more about lack of emphasis. Toppin didn't play for Kentucky with 5-6 other future NBA 1st round draft picks. He played on a mid-major who relied a lot on him offensively to both score to open things up for his teammates. It's not unusual for players in that situation to not put as much emphasis on the other side of the ball (not saying it's right). He's already carrying a significant load for the team.martin wrote:Uptown wrote:martin wrote:Uptown wrote:If Toppin is available at 8, you take him and dont think twice! That would be a great value pick! He is a true stretch 4 and in a pick and roll-centric-NBA, Toppin could average 20 pts per right out the gate. The best part of his offensive game is, unlike Randle, he doesn't need to massage the ball for 7-10 seconds before trying to create offense for himself. What else is Boston offering besides those picks to move up? |
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39839 Alba Posts: 9 Joined: 1/22/2010 Member: #3049 |
![]() Welpee wrote:BigDaddyG wrote:Would you trade #8 to Boston for #14 and 26?Welpee wrote:Uptown wrote:Agreed. And if not Toppin (if available) who? If we go through this exercise with everyone likely to be available at 8 we should just forfeit the pick because nobody is going to be satisfactory. It will be interesting.Welpee wrote:Uptown wrote:Not sure if it's less laziness and more about lack of emphasis. Toppin didn't play for Kentucky with 5-6 other future NBA 1st round draft picks. He played on a mid-major who relied a lot on him offensively to both score to open things up for his teammates. It's not unusual for players in that situation to not put as much emphasis on the other side of the ball (not saying it's right). He's already carrying a significant load for the team.martin wrote:Uptown wrote:martin wrote:Uptown wrote:If Toppin is available at 8, you take him and dont think twice! That would be a great value pick! He is a true stretch 4 and in a pick and roll-centric-NBA, Toppin could average 20 pts per right out the gate. The best part of his offensive game is, unlike Randle, he doesn't need to massage the ball for 7-10 seconds before trying to create offense for himself. That would be the best outcome. Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right.
- The Tick
|
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275 Alba Posts: 7 Joined: 7/30/2002 Member: #303 |
![]() He’s a good player and on the right team could be an absolutely awesome small ball 5. He’s no joke but we’ve got M Robinson and I don’t think the two mesh.
Remember he was the best player on the best team in college basketball. He has a lot of high caliber nba skills— he’s a lock not to bust imho. RIP Crushalot😞
|
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39839 Alba Posts: 9 Joined: 1/22/2010 Member: #3049 |
![]() BRIGGS wrote:He’s a good player and on the right team could be an absolutely awesome small ball 5. He’s no joke but we’ve got M Robinson and I don’t think the two mesh. I agree. That's why I compare him guys like Drew Gooden. I can definitely see him being useful rotation player who eats up second units. For him to be an impact scorer he'll need to score at a ridiculously high frequency like Karl Anthony Towns or dramatically improve his defense. Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right.
- The Tick
|
Welpee
Posts: 23162 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 1/22/2016 Member: #6239 |
![]() Uptown wrote:That's it unless you think Boston would also throw in #30. I can't see anybody at 8 that Boston would be so in love with in this draft that they would offer more than #14 and #26. And if Boston is that in love with that player, why wouldn't we draft him?Welpee wrote:BigDaddyG wrote:Would you trade #8 to Boston for #14 and 26?Welpee wrote:Uptown wrote:Agreed. And if not Toppin (if available) who? If we go through this exercise with everyone likely to be available at 8 we should just forfeit the pick because nobody is going to be satisfactory. It will be interesting.Welpee wrote:Uptown wrote:Not sure if it's less laziness and more about lack of emphasis. Toppin didn't play for Kentucky with 5-6 other future NBA 1st round draft picks. He played on a mid-major who relied a lot on him offensively to both score to open things up for his teammates. It's not unusual for players in that situation to not put as much emphasis on the other side of the ball (not saying it's right). He's already carrying a significant load for the team.martin wrote:Uptown wrote:martin wrote:Uptown wrote:If Toppin is available at 8, you take him and dont think twice! That would be a great value pick! He is a true stretch 4 and in a pick and roll-centric-NBA, Toppin could average 20 pts per right out the gate. The best part of his offensive game is, unlike Randle, he doesn't need to massage the ball for 7-10 seconds before trying to create offense for himself. Personally, if Edwards, Ball, Wiseman, Deni, Hayes and Toppin are gone at #8, I'm looking at Lewis or Anthony at that point and both may still be on the board at the end of the lottery. Whatever we do, I don't want Haliburton. |
TheGame
Posts: 26632 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 7/15/2006 Member: #1154 USA |
![]() smackeddog wrote:Defitinitely agree- great on offense, but that defense LMAO. His defense is so bad he must have been trying to be funny. Please just say no. The last thing we need is a bad defender. We need to build this team on a defensive foundation. This kid looks like Amare on defense. Trust the Process
|
Welpee
Posts: 23162 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 1/22/2016 Member: #6239 |
![]() TheGame wrote:He also has drawn comparisons to Amare on offense, which is why he'll go in the upper half of the lottery. Everybody offers who they don't want, who would you take at 8 assuming Edwards, Ball, Wiseman, Deni and Hayes are off the board?smackeddog wrote:Defitinitely agree- great on offense, but that defense |
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39839 Alba Posts: 9 Joined: 1/22/2010 Member: #3049 |
![]() TheGame wrote:smackeddog wrote:Defitinitely agree- great on offense, but that defense Wow... he's even getting burned on D while giving shooters 5 feet of space. Not sure he can even be a starter as a small ball 5. He's worse than STAT because he moves even slower laterally. If does drop down to us, than you know the reason. Other teams must think he's a lost cause. Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right.
- The Tick
|
TheGame
Posts: 26632 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 7/15/2006 Member: #1154 USA |
![]() Welpee wrote:TheGame wrote:He also has drawn comparisons to Amare on offense, which is why he'll go in the upper half of the lottery. Everybody offers who they don't want, who would you take at 8 assuming Edwards, Ball, Wiseman, Deni and Hayes are off the board?smackeddog wrote:Defitinitely agree- great on offense, but that defense Look if Toppin is there then the Knicks probably draft him because the kid looks like a 20 pt scorer. But I personally would draft Vassell or Nesmith and let some other team try to spend the next 10 years covering for Toppins defensive short-comings. Trust the Process
|
EwingsGlass
Posts: 27488 Alba Posts: 2 Joined: 4/29/2005 Member: #893 USA |
![]() I would wait to see Toppin in workouts. Only thing that concerns me is that he a red shirt, 5th year senior. So, he may be the most NBA-ready. But he’s playing against guys that were in middle school when he started college.
Point is, there is probably a puff on his stats and he probably is the player that he is today -can’t see much more upside to him. I’m not running away, but want to see the workouts. You know I gonna spin wit it
|
EwingsGlass
Posts: 27488 Alba Posts: 2 Joined: 4/29/2005 Member: #893 USA |
![]() smackeddog wrote:Defitinitely agree- great on offense, but that defense Wow. He was definitely facing the wrong direction quite a bit. You know I gonna spin wit it
|