Author | Thread |
AUTOADVERT |
Knixkik
Posts: 35445 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 7/24/2001 Member: #11 USA |
![]() martin wrote:BRIGGS wrote: I'd classify him as a potentially great shooter with the talent to be a solid, but not great defender. If anything he won't be a liability. |
martin
Posts: 76208 Alba Posts: 108 Joined: 7/24/2001 Member: #2 USA |
![]() TripleThreat wrote:BRIGGS wrote:Either Wiseman or Nesmith I don't know why the Knicks wouldn't be first in line for this type of acquisition. Gordon has a 1 year $34M option and the Knicks have all sorts of expiring contracts to fit. Boston has picks 16, 26, 30, 46. With Gordon they will be at $140M in salary (with rookies on top of that) and have to pay a lot in luxury. I have no idea what that would be. Boston, I would presume, needs bigs. If one of Toppin, Onyeka Okongwu or Wiseman fall to them, and one of them is an obvious primary target for them, at say 6 what would Boston be willing to give up? Or should the Knicks even consider? Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
|
Knixkik
Posts: 35445 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 7/24/2001 Member: #11 USA |
![]() My top 5 big board in this draft is
1 Ball I don’t think anyone in this draft will be a superstar (Barrett would go 1 in this draft) but if we get one of these 5 guys we will get a good starter for the next 12+ years. |
martin
Posts: 76208 Alba Posts: 108 Joined: 7/24/2001 Member: #2 USA |
![]() ESOMKnicks wrote:Knixkik wrote: Does it matter if CP3 wants to be on the Knicks or not? He's under contract and would be traded here Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
|
Knixkik
Posts: 35445 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 7/24/2001 Member: #11 USA |
![]() martin wrote:ESOMKnicks wrote:Knixkik wrote: Agreed, but they were trying to move him last year when he made it clear he did not want to be there. It wasn't until a trade never materialized that he accepted remaining there. So we have seen this before. |
ESOMKnicks
Posts: 21420 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 6/14/2015 Member: #6064 |
![]() Knixkik wrote:My top 5 big board in this draft is I am in a similar place. My preferred order of outcomes: 1 Edwards (the next Wade) |
TripleThreat
Posts: 23106 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 2/24/2012 Member: #3997 |
![]() martin wrote:I don't know why the Knicks wouldn't be first in line for this type of acquisition. Gordon has a 1 year $34M option and the Knicks have all sorts of expiring contracts to fit. Boston has picks 16, 26, 30, 46.
The issue for the Celtics is two fold 1) Change the variables with the mid level exception 2) Delay the repeater tax problem. The Celtics will get there eventually, but I suspect they want to delay it since the Jaylen Brown/Tatum core will be good enough (justifying the cost) to force the Celtics into the tax zone for a long time. If the Knicks get #6 overall, they should stay put IMHO. The Celtics don't really have anything to offer to move to #6 that they'd want to give up. Boston would also more likely cherry pick the bargain bin for a veteran with experience. I think the most likely trade between Boston and NY, if one was possible, would be NY's 2nd and cash for one of the Celtic's late first round picks. I suspect the Knicks could only get Hayward in a pure contract dump ( i.e. no assets coming with him) since the Knicks have the open space to absorb him. The No#6 overall has historically been a Tier 2 pick. When LBJ, CP3 and Melo negotiated to change the Over 36 Rule to the Over 38 Rule to benefit themselves, part of what they traded away was having the Rookie Scale Exception turn into a cap hold at 120 percent of slot. Long story short, where the Knicks have typically picked the last 4-5 years has been dramatically devalued in any potential trade because you've functionally eliminated any team near the tax line. Melo found a way to keep ****ing the Knicks. From a money standpoint, Melo also helped **** over generations of NBA players to come. The irony being, of course, that out of those three knuckleheads, only Melo was unable to capitalize on his Judas moment. |
smackeddog
Posts: 38389 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 3/30/2005 Member: #883 |
![]() BRIGGS wrote:Either Wiseman or Nesmith Why do you rate Nesmith so much higher than Vassell? (Genuine question) |
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275 Alba Posts: 7 Joined: 7/30/2002 Member: #303 |
![]() smackeddog wrote:BRIGGS wrote:Either Wiseman or Nesmith Nesmith shoots it like Glen Rice and moves around the court like Klay Thompson. Look how he finds spots— someone said rip Hamilton abd I agree but he’s 6-6 220 built like mike Redd. He’s a scorer abd vessel to me is an nba role player RIP Crushalot😞
|
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275 Alba Posts: 7 Joined: 7/30/2002 Member: #303 |
![]() joec32033 wrote:BRIGGS wrote: He actually moves very well with the ball. He’s strong too. If you look at film of FVV he looks like he would have no nba chance— now he’s a 20 mm $ player. RIP Crushalot😞
|
smackeddog
Posts: 38389 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 3/30/2005 Member: #883 |
![]() BRIGGS wrote:smackeddog wrote:BRIGGS wrote:Either Wiseman or Nesmith Thanks, I’m terrible at scouting! |
Knixkik
Posts: 35445 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 7/24/2001 Member: #11 USA |
![]() BRIGGS wrote:smackeddog wrote:BRIGGS wrote:Either Wiseman or Nesmith Briggs you’re spot on. The Rice comp for Nesmith is pretty good. Vassell reminds me of Danny green a little bit. True role player. Nesmith has more upside to me. |
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275 Alba Posts: 7 Joined: 7/30/2002 Member: #303 |
![]() Knixkik wrote:BRIGGS wrote:smackeddog wrote:BRIGGS wrote:Either Wiseman or Nesmith Nesmith is the absolute best compliment to Barrett in this draft. I still want to try Barrett out as Pg but he can be a hybrid 1-2-3 no matter what RIP Crushalot😞
|
Knixkik
Posts: 35445 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 7/24/2001 Member: #11 USA |
![]() BRIGGS wrote:Knixkik wrote:BRIGGS wrote:smackeddog wrote:BRIGGS wrote:Either Wiseman or Nesmith That’s the way I feel about Haliburton though too. He’s basically a 3&D PG that can play off the ball next to Barrett. I like Nesmith a lot but I think given Haliburton fit and being a CAA client he’s a very likely selection if available. For what it’s worth both Haliburton and Nesmith have reps as mature leaders in the locker room. |
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39872 Alba Posts: 9 Joined: 1/22/2010 Member: #3049 |
![]() BRIGGS wrote:Knixkik wrote:BRIGGS wrote:smackeddog wrote:BRIGGS wrote:Either Wiseman or Nesmith I think the athleticim gives Vassel the higher upside. The thing with Klay and Glen is that they are big for the position. They can get their shots up much easier. Even with the Buddy comps, it's easy to see that Buddy is a better athlete. Even Mike Redd is a much better athlete at the same stage. Redr was an athletic slasher when he came into the league and developed into a knock down shooter. At Nesmith's size and athleticism, I'd at least want to see better ball skills. Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right.
- The Tick
|
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39872 Alba Posts: 9 Joined: 1/22/2010 Member: #3049 |
![]() BRIGGS wrote:joec32033 wrote:BRIGGS wrote: I see a backup, which isn't bad. But I wouldn't waste a first rounder in a guy who doesn't provide much versatility on the court on both ends of the floor. If th plan is grab him in the second round and stash him in the G-league, then it doesn't sound like a bad plan. Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right.
- The Tick
|
joec32033
Posts: 30609 Alba Posts: 37 Joined: 2/3/2004 Member: #583 USA |
![]() BRIGGS wrote:joec32033 wrote:BRIGGS wrote: I really don't know what all the Fred Van Vleet love. But that is another story. He screams slightly above average PG to me.
I think you may be spot on on Nesmith, though. ~You can't run from who you are.~
|
Knixkik
Posts: 35445 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 7/24/2001 Member: #11 USA |
![]() joec32033 wrote:BRIGGS wrote:joec32033 wrote:BRIGGS wrote: Regarding FVV, there’s very few players in the league that have his combination of shooting, playmaking, and defensive versatility from the PG position. The question is do all of these qualities hold up to the same caliber outside of Toronto. |