[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

New trade rumor: Devin Booker to the knicks
Author Thread
Knickfury11
Posts: 20290
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/19/2020
Member: #8856
United Kingdom
5/16/2020  4:00 PM
GT2AM wrote:
TheGame wrote:The Suns are not doing that deal unless we get like the 1 or 2 pick, and if we got the 1 or 2 pick, I think we would be better off drafting Ball. If we got Booker, that would be great, but we would still need a point guard.

Ball, RJ, Knox, Randall, Mitchell

v.

Booker, RJ, Knox, ?, Mitchell (with no Frank)

I would just draft Ball. Now if we are stuck at 6, then i would consider the deal, but I would try to keep Frank and maybe give them Trier and DSJ, plus Randle and the 6th Pick.

I'm not sure this trade is the best for the Knicks. They are giving up 3 rotation pieces (Carmelo Anthony situation) and 2 young players (Frank and the draft pick.) That's not such a smart move for a rebuilding team. It leaves gaping holes at 2 positions. PG is only DSJ. I'm assuming the Knicks would have drafted a PG with their pick, which they are now trading. I hope they let Portis go so who is the power forward? Now the Knicks loose leverage in free agency and will have to give extra money/years to players in a mediocre free agent class just to fill holes. That might take them out of the 2021 FA class.

This is more of a win now move. What was the point of sucking if the Knicks don't follow a rebuilding plan? Booker's young but he's already a max player. In a rebuild you try to draft stars or supplimentary players to go with stars. Not trade the youth. The Lakers gave away a bunch of their youth for AD. For the Knicks to do that now? This move by itself doesn't even get the Knicks into the playoffs. (Booker never elevated Pheonix to the playoffs by himself.)

Did anybody mention that Booker and Barret play the same position?

We all are sick of Randle's spinovers but don't sell short on him. He's a legit 20 and 10 guy who is still young and is one of the best bully ball players in the league, even if that style is dying. He has value around the league. Not everybody saw all his spinovers or were emotionally scared by them. Lots of teams won't be able to sign free agents this offseason so I'm sure there will be a trade market for him, as his salary ($18.9m) is pretty fair.

Doing this specific trade and getting Booker is a clear change of direction for this team. It might draw other stars(??) but it takes the Knicks out of rebuilding mode. It puts them back a year (really 2) as there will be no high draft pick this year. But it doesn't make them a much better team and it forces them to rely on the free agent (older players) market just to field a roster around Booker. At most it puts them in the dreaded medium plateau that gets the Knicks medium draft picks and medium supplimentary players with medium ages that have medium salaries but that might take them out range to get a second max star. (We don't know when the salary cap will recover.)

Like the post GT2AM. For sight is a gift. If we continue the rebuild via the draft process at what point can we / should we supplement a young roster with more established, higher caliber players? What is the cut off point?

Booker is capable of starting alongside RJ without being detrimental to his development. He can fill in at PG.

https://eu.azcentral.com/story/sports/nba/suns/2020/04/17/more-small-ball-more-devin-booker-point-guard-phoenix-suns/5146865002/

Booker is an all star level talent not yet close to his prime is he not the type to make sacrifices for?

AUTOADVERT
GT2AM
Posts: 20073
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 2/9/2020
Member: #8847

5/16/2020  5:05 PM    LAST EDITED: 5/16/2020  6:29 PM
Knickfury11 wrote:
GT2AM wrote:
TheGame wrote:The Suns are not doing that deal unless we get like the 1 or 2 pick, and if we got the 1 or 2 pick, I think we would be better off drafting Ball. If we got Booker, that would be great, but we would still need a point guard.

Ball, RJ, Knox, Randall, Mitchell

v.

Booker, RJ, Knox, ?, Mitchell (with no Frank)

I would just draft Ball. Now if we are stuck at 6, then i would consider the deal, but I would try to keep Frank and maybe give them Trier and DSJ, plus Randle and the 6th Pick.

I'm not sure this trade is the best for the Knicks. They are giving up 3 rotation pieces (Carmelo Anthony situation) and 2 young players (Frank and the draft pick.) That's not such a smart move for a rebuilding team. It leaves gaping holes at 2 positions. PG is only DSJ. I'm assuming the Knicks would have drafted a PG with their pick, which they are now trading. I hope they let Portis go so who is the power forward? Now the Knicks loose leverage in free agency and will have to give extra money/years to players in a mediocre free agent class just to fill holes. That might take them out of the 2021 FA class.

This is more of a win now move. What was the point of sucking if the Knicks don't follow a rebuilding plan? Booker's young but he's already a max player. In a rebuild you try to draft stars or supplimentary players to go with stars. Not trade the youth. The Lakers gave away a bunch of their youth for AD. For the Knicks to do that now? This move by itself doesn't even get the Knicks into the playoffs. (Booker never elevated Pheonix to the playoffs by himself.)

Did anybody mention that Booker and Barret play the same position?

We all are sick of Randle's spinovers but don't sell short on him. He's a legit 20 and 10 guy who is still young and is one of the best bully ball players in the league, even if that style is dying. He has value around the league. Not everybody saw all his spinovers or were emotionally scared by them. Lots of teams won't be able to sign free agents this offseason so I'm sure there will be a trade market for him, as his salary ($18.9m) is pretty fair.

Doing this specific trade and getting Booker is a clear change of direction for this team. It might draw other stars(??) but it takes the Knicks out of rebuilding mode. It puts them back a year (really 2) as there will be no high draft pick this year. But it doesn't make them a much better team and it forces them to rely on the free agent (older players) market just to field a roster around Booker. At most it puts them in the dreaded medium plateau that gets the Knicks medium draft picks and medium supplimentary players with medium ages that have medium salaries but that might take them out range to get a second max star. (We don't know when the salary cap will recover.)

Like the post GT2AM. For sight is a gift. If we continue the rebuild via the draft process at what point can we / should we supplement a young roster with more established, higher caliber players? What is the cut off point?

Booker is capable of starting alongside RJ without being detrimental to his development. He can fill in at PG.

https://eu.azcentral.com/story/sports/nba/suns/2020/04/17/more-small-ball-more-devin-booker-point-guard-phoenix-suns/5146865002/

Booker is an all star level talent not yet close to his prime is he not the type to make sacrifices for?

That's what draft picks are for. I would rather hold onto this years first. It's like trading an unprotected top 6 pick. And the Knicks sucked already this year so they should get the fruit of their labor in this point guard heavy draft. Minnesota didn't trade their first this year for Russell because they knew it'd be low. They traded next years. I would keep our first this year and cash in a few other picks for Booker.

For reference Minnesota traded Wiggins (similar stats/age to Randle) next years 2021(top 3 protected) first-round pick and a 2021 second-round pick for DeAngelo Russell (almost similar stats/age to Booker).

Maybe Pheonix insists on this years pick, and push comes to shove I'd do it, with a some other picks. But I wouldn't gut the roster for Booker. Randle gets 20, Frank gets 6 and he's improving (and his thing is defense anyway),and you'd hope the draft pick can score 15. Thats 41 points to make up. Booker gets 26. Now you are forced to play hands at free agency that you might not want to play. Draft picks are capital and the Knicks have those. And they can absorb Bookers contract without sending out matching salaries. If you add Bookers 26 to Randle's 20 and Frank's 6 and D you get 52. That's an addition that makes the Knicks better.

jskinny35
Posts: 21582
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/27/2005
Member: #928
USA
5/16/2020  6:26 PM
Visit cousin in Phx and see at least 3-4 games a season and while Booker is an excellent scorer and can pass well for a 2 - he really does best when he plays with a passing guard (see Rubio this season). Obviously #1 or 2 pick of Ball would have to go if the Knicks tried for a deal, but I strongly believe he would fit great next to Frank (instead of trading Frank in deal)... even better than any of the other Knick guards. Booker can playmake a bit and commands a double team - this would make Frank look like a different player because he would have an easier time on offense, sharing the dribbling duties, etc... think of Charlie Ward who was not great offensively, but did better when Sprewell or Houston was paired in the backcourt. Frank still needs to improve his shot, but certainly easier when the other guard is getting doubled a lot. Not saying it's the right move for Booker - but we should try to substitute most anyone for Frank if that's the deal Phx wants.
NYKBocker
Posts: 38411
Alba Posts: 474
Joined: 1/14/2003
Member: #377
USA
5/17/2020  1:09 PM
So if we get a top 3 pick. Do you still think we should trade it for Booker? I would if we give them Spinover King and DSJr.
GT2AM
Posts: 20073
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 2/9/2020
Member: #8847

5/17/2020  4:00 PM    LAST EDITED: 5/17/2020  5:26 PM
NYKBocker wrote:So if we get a top 3 pick. Do you still think we should trade it for Booker? I would if we give them Spinover King and DSJr.

I'm more inclined to do that because DSJ has a less defined rotation spot. I don't trust him fully with even the backup PG role. Frank can even be a starter and handle it. So if its DSJ its not such an issue with putting holes in the roster. Let me explain with a senario if the trade was as proposed Randle, Frank, and a low first this year.

The Knicks right now have a balanced roster. 3PGs, 2 PF, 2c, 2SG , and 2 SF. They can improve all over but there are no holes. So the Knicks are not forced to make any moves this off-season. Hence they have leverage. If this deal goes down as proposed it will put holes in positions that MUST be filled. Power forward. Randle is gone and Portis will hopefully be gone. And Point Guard will be Payton and DSJ and maybe the late first. This was Randle's last guaranteed year. But now the Knicks will be forced to give either Gallinari/Wood/Bertans a deal and they'd need to get at least 2 years if not more, because the Knicks won't have leverage. They might even be an upgrade over Randle and I'm sure many guys would go for that. But they wil get money into 2021. Then the Point Guard. We would have drafted the hopefully PG of the future. Now we either have to ride with Payton and DSJ this year. Payton isn't the PG of the future or the Knicks. Or the Knicks will have to go all in on Fred VanVleet to get set at the PG position. Knicks would have to close to max him to get him over. Or ride Payton this year and have to sign a PG free agent next year (2021) to at least a medium contract. These moves take the Knicks out of a second Max in 2021. The team is:

Booker ($30m)
Bertans ($20M)
FVV ($25M)
Mitch ($1.6)
Barret ($8m)

Bench
DSJ ($6m)
Knox ($4.5m)
Bullock ($4m)
Brazdekis ($1.7m)

All together thats $100.8 million. Basically at the cap. Starters look good. Bench looks very weak. They'd have to add some veterans on midlevel exception. Now the starters are pretty good. The Knicks might make it to the 6 seed with this. But they are stuck there. This lineup isn't bringing gold here. But it will get draft picks 15-20 range for years. And no real second star to go with Booker. And a bunch of medium sized contacts that might get traded to dig our selves further.... This Sound Familiar? I'm more cautious. Let's take the rebuild route slow. Lets try to get PG of the future locked up for years with a rookie contract. Slow and steady. No Starphucking. Trading 2 young players Frank, and lets say Ball is giving up 2 YEARS of our pain. I'd rather hold steady. Trust the Process. Maybe sign a star in 2021 or trade only draft picks for a star along the way.. Maybe we get a star in Barret, Mitch, and/or Ball. On Rookie contacts. Get other serviceable draft picks who can be role players. All young. Then sign everybody worth it in a few years when , because of restricted FA/Bird rights we can go over the cap to Keep all these guys.

That's why I think this trade is a honey trap. I might do it. But I would just be very carefull. This type of thing is the exact reason the Knicks have been mediocre/ sucked for since the day they traded Patrick Ewing.

GT2AM
Posts: 20073
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 2/9/2020
Member: #8847

5/17/2020  6:18 PM    LAST EDITED: 5/18/2020  3:27 AM
GT2AM wrote:
NYKBocker wrote:So if we get a top 3 pick. Do you still think we should trade it for Booker? I would if we give them Spinover King and DSJr.

I'm more inclined to do that because DSJ has a less defined rotation spot. I don't trust him fully with even the backup PG role. Frank can even be a starter and handle it. So if its DSJ its not such an issue with putting holes in the roster. Let me explain with a senario if the trade was as proposed Randle, Frank, and a low first this year.

The Knicks right now have a balanced roster. 3PGs, 2 PF, 2c, 2SG , and 2 SF. They can improve all over but there are no holes. So the Knicks are not forced to make any moves this off-season. Hence they have leverage. If this deal goes down as proposed it will put holes in positions that MUST be filled. Power forward. Randle is gone and Portis will hopefully be gone. And Point Guard will be Payton and DSJ and maybe the late first. This was Randle's last guaranteed year. But now the Knicks will be forced to give either Gallinari/Wood/Bertans a deal and they'd need to get at least 2 years if not more, because the Knicks won't have leverage. They might even be an upgrade over Randle and I'm sure many guys would go for that. But they wil get money into 2021. Then the Point Guard. We would have drafted the hopefully PG of the future. Now we either have to ride with Payton and DSJ this year. Payton isn't the PG of the future or the Knicks. Or the Knicks will have to go all in on Fred VanVleet to get set at the PG position. Knicks would have to close to max him to get him over. Or ride Payton this year and have to sign a PG free agent next year (2021) to at least a medium contract. These moves take the Knicks out of a second Max in 2021. The team is:

Booker ($30m)
Bertans ($20M)
FVV ($25M)
Mitch ($1.6)
Barret ($8m)

Bench
DSJ ($6m)
Knox ($4.5m)
Bullock ($4m)
Brazdekis ($1.7m)

All together thats $100.8 million. Basically at the cap. Starters look good. Bench looks very weak. They'd have to add some veterans on midlevel exception. Now the starters are pretty good. The Knicks might make it to the 6 seed with this. But they are stuck there. This lineup isn't bringing gold here. But it will get draft picks 15-20 range for years. And no real second star to go with Booker. And a bunch of medium sized contacts that might get traded to dig our selves further.... This Sound Familiar? I'm more cautious. Let's take the rebuild route slow. Lets try to get PG of the future locked up for years with a rookie contract. Slow and steady. No Starphucking. Trading 2 young players Frank, and lets say Ball is giving up 2 YEARS of our pain. I'd rather hold steady. Trust the Process. Maybe sign a star in 2021 or trade only draft picks for a star along the way.. Maybe we get a star in Barret, Mitch, and/or Ball. On Rookie contacts. Get other serviceable draft picks who can be role players. All young. Then sign everybody worth it in a few years when , because of restricted FA/Bird rights we can go over the cap to Keep all these guys.

That's why I think this trade is a honey trap. I might do it. But I would just be very carefull. This type of thing is the exact reason the Knicks have been mediocre/ sucked for since the day they traded Patrick Ewing.


On a side note. If the Knicks play their cards right they can put themselves in a seperate stratosphere of cap bracket than the whole league. By signing many of their draft picks to extentions above the cap in 3 or 4 plus years, by going over the cap in excercizing Bird rights. Example: Draft Ball. In 2021 sign 1 star(ish) FA player to a max. Trade for 1 star with many draft picks.
Star 1 signed max in 2021 - $30 million
Star traded max $30 million
Big contract Frank $15M
Max Barret $30M
Max Mitch $30M
Max Ball $30M
=$165 million salary cap. The rest of the league plays at $115. Most teams have room for only 2 max players on their roster. The Knicks can have room for 4 or 5 or more. Every contact extention given to a draft pick ups the Knicks cap bracket. Knicks will be in luxury tax hell but they can afford it. They are probably the only team in the league that can pursue this strategy. [Golden State is playing this way ($145 million in 2021, $152 Million in 2022) but they are probably stressed out about the luxury tax. They were over the cap but they still were able to get Durant, Russell, Wiggens. And they can play this way because they Drafted all their core stars.] Once your cap is what it is you can still make trades to improve , you just need to send out matching salary. (But you'll never sign a free agent again, except for exceptions, vet minimums etc.)
SupremeCommander
Posts: 34057
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127

5/18/2020  2:23 PM
Uptown wrote:
SupremeCommander wrote:remember when Phil explored trading KP for Booker and a pick, everyone freaked out, and he got fired? ahhh memories

You say this like that's the reason phil got fired. This was the last reason on a toilet paper roll of reasons the fire clueless phil!

not trying to be a conspiracy theorist or whatever. I just meant no to long ago suggesting this was blasphemy. I know very well that Phil just came for Dolan's cash

DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
jrodmc
Posts: 32927
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 11/24/2004
Member: #805
USA
5/18/2020  5:06 PM
SupremeCommander wrote:
Uptown wrote:
SupremeCommander wrote:remember when Phil explored trading KP for Booker and a pick, everyone freaked out, and he got fired? ahhh memories

You say this like that's the reason phil got fired. This was the last reason on a toilet paper roll of reasons the fire clueless phil!

not trying to be a conspiracy theorist or whatever. I just meant no to long ago suggesting this was blasphemy. I know very well that Phil just came for Dolan's cash

At the time, Devin Booker wasn't the freak he is now. Was a really good player on a lousy team. Plus he was hurt almost as much as KP the season right after Phil got canned.

3 years seems like an eternity of spinovers and 20 win seasons until now...

Can't imagine anyone trading us anything for DSJr at this point.

Jmpasq
Posts: 25243
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/10/2012
Member: #4182

5/25/2020  7:09 PM
GT2AM wrote:
GT2AM wrote:
NYKBocker wrote:So if we get a top 3 pick. Do you still think we should trade it for Booker? I would if we give them Spinover King and DSJr.

I'm more inclined to do that because DSJ has a less defined rotation spot. I don't trust him fully with even the backup PG role. Frank can even be a starter and handle it. So if its DSJ its not such an issue with putting holes in the roster. Let me explain with a senario if the trade was as proposed Randle, Frank, and a low first this year.

The Knicks right now have a balanced roster. 3PGs, 2 PF, 2c, 2SG , and 2 SF. They can improve all over but there are no holes. So the Knicks are not forced to make any moves this off-season. Hence they have leverage. If this deal goes down as proposed it will put holes in positions that MUST be filled. Power forward. Randle is gone and Portis will hopefully be gone. And Point Guard will be Payton and DSJ and maybe the late first. This was Randle's last guaranteed year. But now the Knicks will be forced to give either Gallinari/Wood/Bertans a deal and they'd need to get at least 2 years if not more, because the Knicks won't have leverage. They might even be an upgrade over Randle and I'm sure many guys would go for that. But they wil get money into 2021. Then the Point Guard. We would have drafted the hopefully PG of the future. Now we either have to ride with Payton and DSJ this year. Payton isn't the PG of the future or the Knicks. Or the Knicks will have to go all in on Fred VanVleet to get set at the PG position. Knicks would have to close to max him to get him over. Or ride Payton this year and have to sign a PG free agent next year (2021) to at least a medium contract. These moves take the Knicks out of a second Max in 2021. The team is:

Booker ($30m)
Bertans ($20M)
FVV ($25M)
Mitch ($1.6)
Barret ($8m)

Bench
DSJ ($6m)
Knox ($4.5m)
Bullock ($4m)
Brazdekis ($1.7m)

All together thats $100.8 million. Basically at the cap. Starters look good. Bench looks very weak. They'd have to add some veterans on midlevel exception. Now the starters are pretty good. The Knicks might make it to the 6 seed with this. But they are stuck there. This lineup isn't bringing gold here. But it will get draft picks 15-20 range for years. And no real second star to go with Booker. And a bunch of medium sized contacts that might get traded to dig our selves further.... This Sound Familiar? I'm more cautious. Let's take the rebuild route slow. Lets try to get PG of the future locked up for years with a rookie contract. Slow and steady. No Starphucking. Trading 2 young players Frank, and lets say Ball is giving up 2 YEARS of our pain. I'd rather hold steady. Trust the Process. Maybe sign a star in 2021 or trade only draft picks for a star along the way.. Maybe we get a star in Barret, Mitch, and/or Ball. On Rookie contacts. Get other serviceable draft picks who can be role players. All young. Then sign everybody worth it in a few years when , because of restricted FA/Bird rights we can go over the cap to Keep all these guys.

That's why I think this trade is a honey trap. I might do it. But I would just be very carefull. This type of thing is the exact reason the Knicks have been mediocre/ sucked for since the day they traded Patrick Ewing.


On a side note. If the Knicks play their cards right they can put themselves in a seperate stratosphere of cap bracket than the whole league. By signing many of their draft picks to extentions above the cap in 3 or 4 plus years, by going over the cap in excercizing Bird rights. Example: Draft Ball. In 2021 sign 1 star(ish) FA player to a max. Trade for 1 star with many draft picks.
Star 1 signed max in 2021 - $30 million
Star traded max $30 million
Big contract Frank $15M
Max Barret $30M
Max Mitch $30M
Max Ball $30M
=$165 million salary cap. The rest of the league plays at $115. Most teams have room for only 2 max players on their roster. The Knicks can have room for 4 or 5 or more. Every contact extention given to a draft pick ups the Knicks cap bracket. Knicks will be in luxury tax hell but they can afford it. They are probably the only team in the league that can pursue this strategy. [Golden State is playing this way ($145 million in 2021, $152 Million in 2022) but they are probably stressed out about the luxury tax. They were over the cap but they still were able to get Durant, Russell, Wiggens. And they can play this way because they Drafted all their core stars.] Once your cap is what it is you can still make trades to improve , you just need to send out matching salary. (But you'll never sign a free agent again, except for exceptions, vet minimums etc.)

yeah only works when you draft great players in multiple drafts in a short time. I dont see a max player on the roster
Check out My NFL Draft Prospect Videos at Youtube User Pages Jmpasq,JPdraftjedi,Jmpasqdraftjedi. www.Draftbreakdown.com
New trade rumor: Devin Booker to the knicks

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy