[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

knicks interested in trading for charlotte hornets guard malik monk per ian begley
Author Thread
Chandler
Posts: 26778
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/26/2015
Member: #6197

1/23/2020  12:59 PM
i keep Frank. Worst case is Frank is our flavor of Marcus Smart. Each play winning basketball but are extremely frustrating with their non-existent or inconsistent offense. I also hold out hope that Frank will find some offense

DSJ is another story. I would trade him almost as a favor to him to get him out of NY glare and back home; he is struggling mentally and mightily

Also i have to imagine things are only going to get worse because this offseason we have to be thinking of drafting or otherwise getting a pg who can actually shoot: we have 3 pg and not one can be counted on to hit an open shot -- can't make this up

Having said all of that, Monk?

(5)(7)
AUTOADVERT
fishmike
Posts: 53828
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
1/23/2020  1:10 PM
Chandler wrote:i keep Frank. Worst case is Frank is our flavor of Marcus Smart. Each play winning basketball but are extremely frustrating with their non-existent or inconsistent offense. I also hold out hope that Frank will find some offense

DSJ is another story. I would trade him almost as a favor to him to get him out of NY glare and back home; he is struggling mentally and mightily

Also i have to imagine things are only going to get worse because this offseason we have to be thinking of drafting or otherwise getting a pg who can actually shoot: we have 3 pg and not one can be counted on to hit an open shot -- can't make this up

Having said all of that, Monk?

this is a great compare. Somehow "believing in Frank" is being spun as "Frank is a future star."
I think Frank has elite potential as a passer. He makes his own passing lanes with those arms.
Obviously he's got elite defensive chops.
I dont think his shot or offense is broken. A few more years of maturity and muscle and I expect him to at least be able to exploit when defenses dont respect him.

I also dont see bench/6th guy like a Marcus Smart caliber player as a whiff here, Donovan Mitchell aside. Frank has to play better basketball, but I do think he can and will and at least have another year to find out

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39877
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049

1/23/2020  2:01 PM
houston20 wrote:You know malik monk has 14 games of scoring over 10 points this season , you guys know how many game franks and dsj have scoring 10 pts or more combine 11, 7 for frank and 4 for dsj not good. Malik monk is third point guard in charlotte because DEVONTE' Graham and terry rosier are having career season both are averaging close to 18 points game. Devonte graham is averaging 18.6 points and 7.7 assists and terry rosier is averaging 17.9 points and 4.4 assist. Its very hard for monk to get off bench because charlotte backcourt is having a career year. Malik Monk is averaging 8.4 points, 2 assists, and 2.6 rebound on 42 percent shooting and 25 percent from three. While frank is averaging 6 points, 3.1 assists, 2.2 rebounds, on 37 percent and 31 percent from three. Dsj is averaging 5 points, 2.6 assists, and 2.2 rebounds on 32 percent and 29 percent from three. Malik Monk is better then frank and dsj despite being the third point guard on the charlotte hornets roster.

They don't let Malik handle the offense. I'd argue that Malik isn't better than Frank because he doesn't do ANYTHING at an NBA level. His shooting #s aren't much better than Franks and that's supposed to be his strength. The real comparison would be Trier vs Monk and I would still take Trier. Now, Monk is still young and I wouldn't cry if we traded for him, but only for a second round pick.

Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
houston20
Posts: 20484
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/18/2019
Member: #8797

1/23/2020  2:31 PM
fishmike wrote:
Chandler wrote:i keep Frank. Worst case is Frank is our flavor of Marcus Smart. Each play winning basketball but are extremely frustrating with their non-existent or inconsistent offense. I also hold out hope that Frank will find some offense

DSJ is another story. I would trade him almost as a favor to him to get him out of NY glare and back home; he is struggling mentally and mightily

Also i have to imagine things are only going to get worse because this offseason we have to be thinking of drafting or otherwise getting a pg who can actually shoot: we have 3 pg and not one can be counted on to hit an open shot -- can't make this up

Having said all of that, Monk?

this is a great compare. Somehow "believing in Frank" is being spun as "Frank is a future star."
I think Frank has elite potential as a passer. He makes his own passing lanes with those arms.
Obviously he's got elite defensive chops.
I dont think his shot or offense is broken. A few more years of maturity and muscle and I expect him to at least be able to exploit when defenses dont respect him.

I also dont see bench/6th guy like a Marcus Smart caliber player as a whiff here, Donovan Mitchell aside. Frank has to play better basketball, but I do think he can and will and at least have another year to find out


The difference between smart and frank is smart is away better offensive player then frank he can least average 10 points game for season. Frank offensive game can't be counted on, we all thought including me after first dallas game of the season that would be turning point of frank career but it was fools gold and turn back to old frank. Franks aggressiveness doesn't look natural it like he forcing shots like last night the dude was jacking up shots it something he not comfortable doing. I firmly believe frank wants to focus on defense more then offensive game but his defense has been sliping of late.
Chandler
Posts: 26778
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/26/2015
Member: #6197

1/23/2020  2:55 PM
houston20 wrote:
fishmike wrote:
Chandler wrote:i keep Frank. Worst case is Frank is our flavor of Marcus Smart. Each play winning basketball but are extremely frustrating with their non-existent or inconsistent offense. I also hold out hope that Frank will find some offense

DSJ is another story. I would trade him almost as a favor to him to get him out of NY glare and back home; he is struggling mentally and mightily

Also i have to imagine things are only going to get worse because this offseason we have to be thinking of drafting or otherwise getting a pg who can actually shoot: we have 3 pg and not one can be counted on to hit an open shot -- can't make this up

Having said all of that, Monk?

this is a great compare. Somehow "believing in Frank" is being spun as "Frank is a future star."
I think Frank has elite potential as a passer. He makes his own passing lanes with those arms.
Obviously he's got elite defensive chops.
I dont think his shot or offense is broken. A few more years of maturity and muscle and I expect him to at least be able to exploit when defenses dont respect him.

I also dont see bench/6th guy like a Marcus Smart caliber player as a whiff here, Donovan Mitchell aside. Frank has to play better basketball, but I do think he can and will and at least have another year to find out


The difference between smart and frank is smart is away better offensive player then frank he can least average 10 points game for season. Frank offensive game can't be counted on, we all thought including me after first dallas game of the season that would be turning point of frank career but it was fools gold and turn back to old frank. Franks aggressiveness doesn't look natural it like he forcing shots like last night the dude was jacking up shots it something he not comfortable doing. I firmly believe frank wants to focus on defense more then offensive game but his defense has been sliping of late.

being up here in boston i disagree. Smart is dumb enough to shoot you out of a game all by himself. He is however a very effective interior passer and on (rare) occasion hot

(5)(7)
houston20
Posts: 20484
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/18/2019
Member: #8797

1/23/2020  3:12 PM
Chandler wrote:
houston20 wrote:
fishmike wrote:
Chandler wrote:i keep Frank. Worst case is Frank is our flavor of Marcus Smart. Each play winning basketball but are extremely frustrating with their non-existent or inconsistent offense. I also hold out hope that Frank will find some offense

DSJ is another story. I would trade him almost as a favor to him to get him out of NY glare and back home; he is struggling mentally and mightily

Also i have to imagine things are only going to get worse because this offseason we have to be thinking of drafting or otherwise getting a pg who can actually shoot: we have 3 pg and not one can be counted on to hit an open shot -- can't make this up

Having said all of that, Monk?

this is a great compare. Somehow "believing in Frank" is being spun as "Frank is a future star."
I think Frank has elite potential as a passer. He makes his own passing lanes with those arms.
Obviously he's got elite defensive chops.
I dont think his shot or offense is broken. A few more years of maturity and muscle and I expect him to at least be able to exploit when defenses dont respect him.

I also dont see bench/6th guy like a Marcus Smart caliber player as a whiff here, Donovan Mitchell aside. Frank has to play better basketball, but I do think he can and will and at least have another year to find out


The difference between smart and frank is smart is away better offensive player then frank he can least average 10 points game for season. Frank offensive game can't be counted on, we all thought including me after first dallas game of the season that would be turning point of frank career but it was fools gold and turn back to old frank. Franks aggressiveness doesn't look natural it like he forcing shots like last night the dude was jacking up shots it something he not comfortable doing. I firmly believe frank wants to focus on defense more then offensive game but his defense has been sliping of late.

being up here in boston i disagree. Smart is dumb enough to shoot you out of a game all by himself. He is however a very effective interior passer and on (rare) occasion hot

But smart can go on stretches of games where can score over 10 plus points i haven't seen frank do that go on a stretch scoring 10 plus points 4 or 5 games in row. If frank stays how money do the knicks think about giving him in 2 years from know i know marcus smart got 4 year 48 million dollar contract from the celtics last year. I don't think knicks want to give frank over 50 million dollars that is a over payment for his stats.

Chandler
Posts: 26778
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/26/2015
Member: #6197

1/23/2020  3:21 PM
houston20 wrote:
Chandler wrote:
houston20 wrote:
fishmike wrote:
Chandler wrote:i keep Frank. Worst case is Frank is our flavor of Marcus Smart. Each play winning basketball but are extremely frustrating with their non-existent or inconsistent offense. I also hold out hope that Frank will find some offense

DSJ is another story. I would trade him almost as a favor to him to get him out of NY glare and back home; he is struggling mentally and mightily

Also i have to imagine things are only going to get worse because this offseason we have to be thinking of drafting or otherwise getting a pg who can actually shoot: we have 3 pg and not one can be counted on to hit an open shot -- can't make this up

Having said all of that, Monk?

this is a great compare. Somehow "believing in Frank" is being spun as "Frank is a future star."
I think Frank has elite potential as a passer. He makes his own passing lanes with those arms.
Obviously he's got elite defensive chops.
I dont think his shot or offense is broken. A few more years of maturity and muscle and I expect him to at least be able to exploit when defenses dont respect him.

I also dont see bench/6th guy like a Marcus Smart caliber player as a whiff here, Donovan Mitchell aside. Frank has to play better basketball, but I do think he can and will and at least have another year to find out


The difference between smart and frank is smart is away better offensive player then frank he can least average 10 points game for season. Frank offensive game can't be counted on, we all thought including me after first dallas game of the season that would be turning point of frank career but it was fools gold and turn back to old frank. Franks aggressiveness doesn't look natural it like he forcing shots like last night the dude was jacking up shots it something he not comfortable doing. I firmly believe frank wants to focus on defense more then offensive game but his defense has been sliping of late.

being up here in boston i disagree. Smart is dumb enough to shoot you out of a game all by himself. He is however a very effective interior passer and on (rare) occasion hot

But smart can go on stretches of games where can score over 10 plus points i haven't seen frank do that go on a stretch scoring 10 plus points 4 or 5 games in row. If frank stays how money do the knicks think about giving him in 2 years from know i know marcus smart got 4 year 48 million dollar contract from the celtics last year. I don't think knicks want to give frank over 50 million dollars that is a over payment for his stats.

Smart is the defensive spirit for that team. Frank isn't there yet, but hopefully with some good leadership from the coaches and players he can take a more prominent role in that regard

Fizz had Frank second guessing everything and forgetting that his biggest contributions are on D

Frank has to improve. My main beef is there are a lot of posts here who **** on Frank because he's not an allstar. WHo **** on KK because he's not KD etc.

take a look around the league (e.g., Giannis and buck) many of the best teams are full of contributors but only a small number of stars (maybe 1 -- see Bucks, Raptors, Heat, maybe Celts)

of course we want stars but that doesn't mean our non-stars aren't key contributors

(5)(7)
EnySpree
Posts: 44919
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397

1/23/2020  7:56 PM

1/20/2020

He's a short shooting guard. A homeless mans Donovan Mitchell. Trier is the same player with less over dribbling. I think he's worth a flyer... I'm not gonna give up anything good for him though. At the same time, Maybe I would if it meant getting back someone else if value to us. It's all about the team

Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
Jmpasq
Posts: 25243
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/10/2012
Member: #4182

1/23/2020  8:09 PM    LAST EDITED: 1/23/2020  8:15 PM
houston20 wrote:Some within the Knicks organization see Malik Monk as a potential trade target.
https://twitter.com/sny_knicks/status/1220202182240358402

A bum guard what a shock we want him. Scott Perry is the worst talent evaulator in the league. Does he just pick the worst shooters at guard in the league out of a hat

Check out My NFL Draft Prospect Videos at Youtube User Pages Jmpasq,JPdraftjedi,Jmpasqdraftjedi. www.Draftbreakdown.com
fwk00
Posts: 22163
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/20/2015
Member: #6048

1/23/2020  8:53 PM
EnySpree wrote:

1/20/2020

He's a short shooting guard. A homeless mans Donovan Mitchell. Trier is the same player with less over dribbling. I think he's worth a flyer... I'm not gonna give up anything good for him though. At the same time, Maybe I would if it meant getting back someone else if value to us. It's all about the team

May be a pointless lateral move - likely a DSJ trade that works and is technically possible with both teams simply unloading an underperforming asset.

Either *could* [its a long shot in both cases] blossom elsewhere. I would rather DSJ's spot open up for a 3 point shooter from the G-League or overseas.

Sambakick
Posts: 21477
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/8/2013
Member: #5646

1/23/2020  9:33 PM
smackeddog wrote:We seem to love players who aren't good at anything

Everything in moderation. Even moderation.
Sambakick
Posts: 21477
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/8/2013
Member: #5646

1/23/2020  9:37 PM
DSJ for Monk? Sure. Why not. Change of scenery etc etc
Everything in moderation. Even moderation.
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39877
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049

1/23/2020  11:06 PM
Sambakick wrote:DSJ for Monk? Sure. Why not. Change of scenery etc etc

I'm not sure I'd do that. We offer a second, just one, or maybe Ellington and tell them to take it or leave it. I'd rather try and get DSJ's game together here and up his value.

Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
smackeddog
Posts: 38389
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/30/2005
Member: #883
1/24/2020  4:05 AM
EnySpree wrote:

1/20/2020

He's a short shooting guard. A homeless mans Donovan Mitchell. Trier is the same player with less over dribbling. I think he's worth a flyer... I'm not gonna give up anything good for him though. At the same time, Maybe I would if it meant getting back someone else if value to us. It's all about the team

One thing to remember is that his first 2 offseason in the league he was injured so couldn't work on his game, maybe there's some untapped potential in there, but you'd need an elite player development system in place- we don't have anything like one!

franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
1/24/2020  6:45 AM
smackeddog wrote:
EnySpree wrote:

1/20/2020

He's a short shooting guard. A homeless mans Donovan Mitchell. Trier is the same player with less over dribbling. I think he's worth a flyer... I'm not gonna give up anything good for him though. At the same time, Maybe I would if it meant getting back someone else if value to us. It's all about the team

One thing to remember is that his first 2 offseason in the league he was injured so couldn't work on his game, maybe there's some untapped potential in there, but you'd need an elite player development system in place- we don't have anything like one!

so nice highlight video - but did I miss it, or were all of his buckets basically in the paint or ft line?

I would swap DSjr for him because I don't see him working out.

But I like Dotson better if were looking to develop a SG, especially if it's a backup because that is where you have RJ slotted in.

knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
1/24/2020  8:06 AM
Chandler wrote:
houston20 wrote:
Chandler wrote:
houston20 wrote:
fishmike wrote:
Chandler wrote:i keep Frank. Worst case is Frank is our flavor of Marcus Smart. Each play winning basketball but are extremely frustrating with their non-existent or inconsistent offense. I also hold out hope that Frank will find some offense

DSJ is another story. I would trade him almost as a favor to him to get him out of NY glare and back home; he is struggling mentally and mightily

Also i have to imagine things are only going to get worse because this offseason we have to be thinking of drafting or otherwise getting a pg who can actually shoot: we have 3 pg and not one can be counted on to hit an open shot -- can't make this up

Having said all of that, Monk?

this is a great compare. Somehow "believing in Frank" is being spun as "Frank is a future star."
I think Frank has elite potential as a passer. He makes his own passing lanes with those arms.
Obviously he's got elite defensive chops.
I dont think his shot or offense is broken. A few more years of maturity and muscle and I expect him to at least be able to exploit when defenses dont respect him.

I also dont see bench/6th guy like a Marcus Smart caliber player as a whiff here, Donovan Mitchell aside. Frank has to play better basketball, but I do think he can and will and at least have another year to find out


The difference between smart and frank is smart is away better offensive player then frank he can least average 10 points game for season. Frank offensive game can't be counted on, we all thought including me after first dallas game of the season that would be turning point of frank career but it was fools gold and turn back to old frank. Franks aggressiveness doesn't look natural it like he forcing shots like last night the dude was jacking up shots it something he not comfortable doing. I firmly believe frank wants to focus on defense more then offensive game but his defense has been sliping of late.

being up here in boston i disagree. Smart is dumb enough to shoot you out of a game all by himself. He is however a very effective interior passer and on (rare) occasion hot

But smart can go on stretches of games where can score over 10 plus points i haven't seen frank do that go on a stretch scoring 10 plus points 4 or 5 games in row. If frank stays how money do the knicks think about giving him in 2 years from know i know marcus smart got 4 year 48 million dollar contract from the celtics last year. I don't think knicks want to give frank over 50 million dollars that is a over payment for his stats.

Smart is the defensive spirit for that team. Frank isn't there yet, but hopefully with some good leadership from the coaches and players he can take a more prominent role in that regard

Fizz had Frank second guessing everything and forgetting that his biggest contributions are on D

Frank has to improve. My main beef is there are a lot of posts here who **** on Frank because he's not an allstar. WHo **** on KK because he's not KD etc.

take a look around the league (e.g., Giannis and buck) many of the best teams are full of contributors but only a small number of stars (maybe 1 -- see Bucks, Raptors, Heat, maybe Celts)

of course we want stars but that doesn't mean our non-stars aren't key contributors

Smart is playing on a winning team in a winning environment and his role has been establish.

Frank is playing on a loosing team in a dysfunctional environment with no clear cut role.

Perhaps if we had a kemba or a Kyrie his offense wouldn't be needed as much, if we had bigs that could create their own shot or better perimeter players, then I can see where frank would be good.

He plays losing basketball on this team because the other pieces don't compliment his style of play

ES
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
1/24/2020  9:26 AM
Why even bother with monk when you haven't even given your full ATTN to Trier, who you gave 3.5 mill to sit on the bench..

That's why the development of our players is trash

ES
Chandler
Posts: 26778
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/26/2015
Member: #6197

1/24/2020  10:30 AM
knicks1248 wrote:
Chandler wrote:
houston20 wrote:
Chandler wrote:
houston20 wrote:
fishmike wrote:
Chandler wrote:i keep Frank. Worst case is Frank is our flavor of Marcus Smart. Each play winning basketball but are extremely frustrating with their non-existent or inconsistent offense. I also hold out hope that Frank will find some offense

DSJ is another story. I would trade him almost as a favor to him to get him out of NY glare and back home; he is struggling mentally and mightily

Also i have to imagine things are only going to get worse because this offseason we have to be thinking of drafting or otherwise getting a pg who can actually shoot: we have 3 pg and not one can be counted on to hit an open shot -- can't make this up

Having said all of that, Monk?

this is a great compare. Somehow "believing in Frank" is being spun as "Frank is a future star."
I think Frank has elite potential as a passer. He makes his own passing lanes with those arms.
Obviously he's got elite defensive chops.
I dont think his shot or offense is broken. A few more years of maturity and muscle and I expect him to at least be able to exploit when defenses dont respect him.

I also dont see bench/6th guy like a Marcus Smart caliber player as a whiff here, Donovan Mitchell aside. Frank has to play better basketball, but I do think he can and will and at least have another year to find out


The difference between smart and frank is smart is away better offensive player then frank he can least average 10 points game for season. Frank offensive game can't be counted on, we all thought including me after first dallas game of the season that would be turning point of frank career but it was fools gold and turn back to old frank. Franks aggressiveness doesn't look natural it like he forcing shots like last night the dude was jacking up shots it something he not comfortable doing. I firmly believe frank wants to focus on defense more then offensive game but his defense has been sliping of late.

being up here in boston i disagree. Smart is dumb enough to shoot you out of a game all by himself. He is however a very effective interior passer and on (rare) occasion hot

But smart can go on stretches of games where can score over 10 plus points i haven't seen frank do that go on a stretch scoring 10 plus points 4 or 5 games in row. If frank stays how money do the knicks think about giving him in 2 years from know i know marcus smart got 4 year 48 million dollar contract from the celtics last year. I don't think knicks want to give frank over 50 million dollars that is a over payment for his stats.

Smart is the defensive spirit for that team. Frank isn't there yet, but hopefully with some good leadership from the coaches and players he can take a more prominent role in that regard

Fizz had Frank second guessing everything and forgetting that his biggest contributions are on D

Frank has to improve. My main beef is there are a lot of posts here who **** on Frank because he's not an allstar. WHo **** on KK because he's not KD etc.

take a look around the league (e.g., Giannis and buck) many of the best teams are full of contributors but only a small number of stars (maybe 1 -- see Bucks, Raptors, Heat, maybe Celts)

of course we want stars but that doesn't mean our non-stars aren't key contributors

Smart is playing on a winning team in a winning environment and his role has been establish.

Frank is playing on a loosing team in a dysfunctional environment with no clear cut role.

Perhaps if we had a kemba or a Kyrie his offense wouldn't be needed as much, if we had bigs that could create their own shot or better perimeter players, then I can see where frank would be good.

He plays losing basketball on this team because the other pieces don't compliment his style of play

He does not play losing basketball. Fairly consistently, the team plays better with him on the floor even if his stats suck

He's a keeper and a contributor along with a good attitude. We need more talent.

(5)(7)
Chandler
Posts: 26778
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/26/2015
Member: #6197

1/24/2020  10:33 AM
The biggest case against Monk is what wold he do that Trier can't. We know at least statistically Trier shoots better

I think trades to free up the logjam at PF and/or PG might help the team, but we don't need moonshots hoping that someone like Monk will turn it all around once here (See Hezonja, Vonleh etc)

(5)(7)
MS
Posts: 27060
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/28/2004
Member: #724
1/24/2020  11:25 AM
Monk for Dotson or Trier.

I wouldn’t give up Smith just yet. He looked athletic again against the Lakers. They need to move Payton and get the kid minutes. I don’t like his game, but we need to create some value.

knicks interested in trading for charlotte hornets guard malik monk per ian begley

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy