Author | Thread |
AUTOADVERT |
Jmpasq
Posts: 25243 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 4/10/2012 Member: #4182 |
![]() houston20 wrote:Some within the Knicks organization see Malik Monk as a potential trade target. A bum guard what a shock we want him. Scott Perry is the worst talent evaulator in the league. Does he just pick the worst shooters at guard in the league out of a hat Check out My NFL Draft Prospect Videos at Youtube User Pages Jmpasq,JPdraftjedi,Jmpasqdraftjedi. www.Draftbreakdown.com
|
fwk00
Posts: 22163 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 5/20/2015 Member: #6048 |
![]() EnySpree wrote: May be a pointless lateral move - likely a DSJ trade that works and is technically possible with both teams simply unloading an underperforming asset. Either *could* [its a long shot in both cases] blossom elsewhere. I would rather DSJ's spot open up for a 3 point shooter from the G-League or overseas. |
Sambakick
Posts: 21477 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 9/8/2013 Member: #5646 |
![]() smackeddog wrote:We seem to love players who aren't good at anything Everything in moderation. Even moderation.
|
Sambakick
Posts: 21477 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 9/8/2013 Member: #5646 |
![]() DSJ for Monk? Sure. Why not. Change of scenery etc etc
Everything in moderation. Even moderation.
|
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39877 Alba Posts: 9 Joined: 1/22/2010 Member: #3049 |
![]() Sambakick wrote:DSJ for Monk? Sure. Why not. Change of scenery etc etc I'm not sure I'd do that. We offer a second, just one, or maybe Ellington and tell them to take it or leave it. I'd rather try and get DSJ's game together here and up his value. Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right.
- The Tick
|
smackeddog
Posts: 38389 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 3/30/2005 Member: #883 |
![]() EnySpree wrote: One thing to remember is that his first 2 offseason in the league he was injured so couldn't work on his game, maybe there's some untapped potential in there, but you'd need an elite player development system in place- we don't have anything like one! |
franco12
Posts: 34069 Alba Posts: 4 Joined: 2/19/2004 Member: #599 USA |
![]() smackeddog wrote:EnySpree wrote: so nice highlight video - but did I miss it, or were all of his buckets basically in the paint or ft line? I would swap DSjr for him because I don't see him working out. But I like Dotson better if were looking to develop a SG, especially if it's a backup because that is where you have RJ slotted in. |
knicks1248
Posts: 42059 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 2/3/2004 Member: #582 |
![]() Chandler wrote:houston20 wrote:Chandler wrote:houston20 wrote:fishmike wrote:Chandler wrote:i keep Frank. Worst case is Frank is our flavor of Marcus Smart. Each play winning basketball but are extremely frustrating with their non-existent or inconsistent offense. I also hold out hope that Frank will find some offensethis is a great compare. Somehow "believing in Frank" is being spun as "Frank is a future star." Smart is playing on a winning team in a winning environment and his role has been establish. Frank is playing on a loosing team in a dysfunctional environment with no clear cut role. Perhaps if we had a kemba or a Kyrie his offense wouldn't be needed as much, if we had bigs that could create their own shot or better perimeter players, then I can see where frank would be good. He plays losing basketball on this team because the other pieces don't compliment his style of play ES
|
knicks1248
Posts: 42059 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 2/3/2004 Member: #582 |
![]() Why even bother with monk when you haven't even given your full ATTN to Trier, who you gave 3.5 mill to sit on the bench..
That's why the development of our players is trash ES
|
Chandler
Posts: 26778 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 11/26/2015 Member: #6197 |
![]() knicks1248 wrote:Chandler wrote:houston20 wrote:Chandler wrote:houston20 wrote:fishmike wrote:Chandler wrote:i keep Frank. Worst case is Frank is our flavor of Marcus Smart. Each play winning basketball but are extremely frustrating with their non-existent or inconsistent offense. I also hold out hope that Frank will find some offensethis is a great compare. Somehow "believing in Frank" is being spun as "Frank is a future star." He does not play losing basketball. Fairly consistently, the team plays better with him on the floor even if his stats suck He's a keeper and a contributor along with a good attitude. We need more talent. (5)(7)
|
Chandler
Posts: 26778 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 11/26/2015 Member: #6197 |
![]() The biggest case against Monk is what wold he do that Trier can't. We know at least statistically Trier shoots better
I think trades to free up the logjam at PF and/or PG might help the team, but we don't need moonshots hoping that someone like Monk will turn it all around once here (See Hezonja, Vonleh etc) (5)(7)
|
MS
Posts: 27060 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 7/28/2004 Member: #724 |
![]() Monk for Dotson or Trier.
I wouldn’t give up Smith just yet. He looked athletic again against the Lakers. They need to move Payton and get the kid minutes. I don’t like his game, but we need to create some value. |