knicks1248 wrote:Nalod wrote:knicks1248 wrote:Vmart wrote:The PG that lost us the game was Barrett and the PG that almost won the game was Payton. Barrett is the real deal but he is not a PG and our ridiculous coach start a really bad line up and he did not learn from his very first mistake of the season which was the starting lineup of having Barrett as PG. Fast forwarding to the point where Payton picked up his fifth foul and Fizdale panicked and put Barrett at PG which opened the flood gates for the Spurs to do their damage. Fizdale needed a point guard and he should have gone to Frank right back showing confidence in him even Smith. This is what you get when you have a hack for a coach. “I’m a leader” that’s what Fizdale claims himself to be. No man leaders never say they are.
Your basically saying frank should be able play through his mistakes, but everybody else shouldn't.
Here we are in yr 3 with frank and he is yet to score 20 points...and it's still our biggest weakness as far as the position..or ppl wouldn't be starting threads like this
That dude killed all momentum, and i knew it..
Look at DSJ, he worked on his shooting for the entire summer with the knicks coaching staff, particularly with KEITH SMART, and look at him, does in even look remotely better??
development is suspect
At this point, frank should be on par with 19 yr old RJ
You always thing the worst of Frank so you "knew it" always. Even when Frank does good, he is bad in your eyes.
Vmart brings up a good point in that while RJ was playing good with Payton. When Payton left, its when it got ugly. If its UGLY, why not go with one of you PG's. Fiz blew thru 4 of the last night. I think What Vmart is saying is you gotta go with what you have. That moment you don't have the hindsight you so brazenly possess. Frank had a pretty good off and preseason. Thru the FIBA and preseason that was the worst stretch we have seen. If so, and you extend him, then why not go back? With the hindsight I NOW possess I CAN NOW say he should have gone back to Frank because after all, WHAT WAS THERE TO LOSE? See how easy that is AFTER THE GAME?
Payton was solid as we expected.
I'm just tired of you guys always cuddling frank like he's kind of some baby that needs burping..
The kid is avg 5 points and shooting horrendous, and because he played well against the worst USA team that was ever assembled, you want to toot his horn.
well he needs to earn every minute like everyone else, he doesn't get special treatment because he's just a defender, I'm sorry there's more to the game than that...A lot more.
If he is playing well,and the team is winning, i would have brought his jersey, but he's not, and he's making the coaches job very difficult
HERE WE GO...
The UK forum is going to need a permanent sticky thread for "The Sky is Falling, Frankie had a bad game and I told you so".
Frankie has played all of like 4 minutes this season and already the bile is flowing. Not only does a couple of turnovers prove he is beyond redemption but Fizdale should be fired AND Mark Jackson will rescue these poor guards!
Yeah. Let's all sign up for that.
Actually, Frankie wasn't the only one who turned the ball over or showed a few warts. Actually I thought is was a fairly interesting game in that the Knicks held their own with a damned fine Spurs team.
Prior to the game I watched a Frankie video in which he was questioned about his feelings on the new contract. He is focused on getting better and talked about how all the contending guards are supportive of each other. I think Knicks fans would be smart to do the same.
I thought the Trier start was a bit of a pacifier. He started and sat out a lot of the game. Payton showed the importance of defense and Frankie will in coming games as well.
My gut tells me DSJ has a chronically bad back. These take a long time to recover from and are tempermental. If DSJ plays,it should be limited minutes off the bench until he gets his mojo back.
I'm a contrarian in that I think the Knicks are set at PG just in terms of a numbers game. They have the firepower elsewhere that they don't need big points from the position assuming the defense is there.
I thought the turning point in the game was the ill advised shots being taken, missed, and one and done in the fourth. Otherwise a surprisingly winnable game. Good things are coming.