[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Nets trade Crabbe’s contract and 1st to Hawks
Author Thread
GustavBahler
Posts: 42805
Alba Posts: 15
Joined: 7/12/2010
Member: #3186

6/6/2019  6:13 PM    LAST EDITED: 6/6/2019  6:14 PM
Forgot to add Cleveland, was thinking more of the star power on Miami, with Wade already having a ring. LeBron was in his prime as well. Kyrie was off the ball, younger, healthier.
AUTOADVERT
jskinny35
Posts: 21582
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/27/2005
Member: #928
USA
6/6/2019  6:15 PM
Not trying to be funny but Durant is 30 and will be 31 just before next season starts. That would mean he would be 33 after 2 seasons. Although I get the frustration - he's 30 on the Knicks and at least 2 years older if he signs elsewhere :)
GustavBahler
Posts: 42805
Alba Posts: 15
Joined: 7/12/2010
Member: #3186

6/6/2019  6:18 PM
jskinny35 wrote:Not trying to be funny but Durant is 30 and will be 31 just before next season starts. That would mean he would be 33 after 2 seasons. Although I get the frustration - he's 30 on the Knicks and at least 2 years older if he signs elsewhere :)

My mistake. Durant has missed most of the playoffs. 31 is still a concern.

ekstarks94
Posts: 21062
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/5/2015
Member: #6104

6/6/2019  6:25 PM
What is russels cap hold??...close to $30 mill. We have $71 mill in cap space and we still need to trade Frank to fit them both in...how are the Nets doing that by just not signing Russell???

Also....KD wanted to come to NY to be loved...going to the Nets will make him hated in NY....Knicks fans are not becoming Nets fans...

People are acting like they are building the SPurs East across the river...i heard folks making the case for Kyrie to the Nets because there will be less pressure...but everyone that grew up in tri-state area knows Knicks are the "City"'s team....

Uptown
Posts: 31323
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 4/1/2008
Member: #1883

6/6/2019  6:30 PM
GustavBahler wrote:
Uptown wrote:
GustavBahler wrote:
smackeddog wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:
smackeddog wrote:

Uh oh, means they likely will sign two max cats and must be confident (otherwise why include 2 firsts).

So looks like Kyrie is definitely signing with them. Hope the other one is Tobias Harris and not KD. Should hopefully take them out of the AD stakes though (earliest 1st round pick they could trade would be 2022)



with 46 mill, how will you sign 2 guys maxing out at 32 mill per..

so the rumors to NY are BS but the rumors to the Nets are valid coming from the same outlet...ok

They free up 2 max slots by renouncing D’Angelo. If they don’t renounce him then they only have $46mil.

Why would they trade two firsts this close to free agency unless they know they can sign two max players? Kyrie is signing with him- look at the timings, he was even out in the same club as a bunch of nets players last night, has posted a vid about returning home, and all his people have said he’s signing with the nets

You're the Nets, your PG just had an all-star, breakout season. He's younger, less wear and tear than Irving, a willing passer. Nets can match any offer on Russell. Why would you max out Kyrie, and cut Russell? Doubt that Durant has given the Nets a guarantee at this point.

My guess is that if Irving is a lock for the Nets, they are going to try to run a backcourt of Russell/Irving, with Irving playing off the ball, so it doesnt turn out like it did in Boston, or Houston even.

Have hard time believing Nets would give up on a young All-Star PG who is just starting to show what he can do.

You give up on Russell if KD say he will sign and wants to play with Kyrie.


Dont believe Durant has made any promises to the Nets. If thats the ultimatum though, I hope the Nets go for it. Better them than us. Id rather see the Knicks max out Russell, if its a choice between the two.

If the goal is to position yourself to have a chance to win a 'chip, we sign Durant. If the goal to be relevant again, and just compete to make the playoffs, we sign Russell.

I like Russell, in fact, he was the player I wanted the most in the draft until we slid to 4 and took KP. This year, Russell showed the potential that I knew he had which is why I wanted him. If the Nyets land KD and Kyrie, I wouldn't mind signing Russ, but no way am I saying I would rather have him over KD!

fwk00
Posts: 22163
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/20/2015
Member: #6048

6/6/2019  6:42 PM
Uptown wrote:
GustavBahler wrote:
Uptown wrote:
GustavBahler wrote:
smackeddog wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:
smackeddog wrote:

Uh oh, means they likely will sign two max cats and must be confident (otherwise why include 2 firsts).

So looks like Kyrie is definitely signing with them. Hope the other one is Tobias Harris and not KD. Should hopefully take them out of the AD stakes though (earliest 1st round pick they could trade would be 2022)



with 46 mill, how will you sign 2 guys maxing out at 32 mill per..

so the rumors to NY are BS but the rumors to the Nets are valid coming from the same outlet...ok

They free up 2 max slots by renouncing D’Angelo. If they don’t renounce him then they only have $46mil.

Why would they trade two firsts this close to free agency unless they know they can sign two max players? Kyrie is signing with him- look at the timings, he was even out in the same club as a bunch of nets players last night, has posted a vid about returning home, and all his people have said he’s signing with the nets

You're the Nets, your PG just had an all-star, breakout season. He's younger, less wear and tear than Irving, a willing passer. Nets can match any offer on Russell. Why would you max out Kyrie, and cut Russell? Doubt that Durant has given the Nets a guarantee at this point.

My guess is that if Irving is a lock for the Nets, they are going to try to run a backcourt of Russell/Irving, with Irving playing off the ball, so it doesnt turn out like it did in Boston, or Houston even.

Have hard time believing Nets would give up on a young All-Star PG who is just starting to show what he can do.

You give up on Russell if KD say he will sign and wants to play with Kyrie.


Dont believe Durant has made any promises to the Nets. If thats the ultimatum though, I hope the Nets go for it. Better them than us. Id rather see the Knicks max out Russell, if its a choice between the two.

If the goal is to position yourself to have a chance to win a 'chip, we sign Durant. If the goal to be relevant again, and just compete to make the playoffs, we sign Russell.

I like Russell, in fact, he was the player I wanted the most in the draft until we slid to 4 and took KP. This year, Russell showed the potential that I knew he had which is why I wanted him. If the Nyets land KD and Kyrie, I wouldn't mind signing Russ, but no way am I saying I would rather have him over KD!

I'm delighted that Irving is going to the Nets. I prefer Russell, Rubio, or Rozier as well.

My other concern is that Durant and GS are hiding the extent of Durant's injury. WE have ALL been down the road of a star whose health has left the building.

KLeonard should be the #1 stretch FA signing. Durant only if there's a serious physical clearing him of an achille's heel issue.

GustavBahler
Posts: 42805
Alba Posts: 15
Joined: 7/12/2010
Member: #3186

6/6/2019  6:49 PM
Uptown wrote:
GustavBahler wrote:
Uptown wrote:
GustavBahler wrote:
smackeddog wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:
smackeddog wrote:

Uh oh, means they likely will sign two max cats and must be confident (otherwise why include 2 firsts).

So looks like Kyrie is definitely signing with them. Hope the other one is Tobias Harris and not KD. Should hopefully take them out of the AD stakes though (earliest 1st round pick they could trade would be 2022)



with 46 mill, how will you sign 2 guys maxing out at 32 mill per..

so the rumors to NY are BS but the rumors to the Nets are valid coming from the same outlet...ok

They free up 2 max slots by renouncing D’Angelo. If they don’t renounce him then they only have $46mil.

Why would they trade two firsts this close to free agency unless they know they can sign two max players? Kyrie is signing with him- look at the timings, he was even out in the same club as a bunch of nets players last night, has posted a vid about returning home, and all his people have said he’s signing with the nets

You're the Nets, your PG just had an all-star, breakout season. He's younger, less wear and tear than Irving, a willing passer. Nets can match any offer on Russell. Why would you max out Kyrie, and cut Russell? Doubt that Durant has given the Nets a guarantee at this point.

My guess is that if Irving is a lock for the Nets, they are going to try to run a backcourt of Russell/Irving, with Irving playing off the ball, so it doesnt turn out like it did in Boston, or Houston even.

Have hard time believing Nets would give up on a young All-Star PG who is just starting to show what he can do.

You give up on Russell if KD say he will sign and wants to play with Kyrie.


Dont believe Durant has made any promises to the Nets. If thats the ultimatum though, I hope the Nets go for it. Better them than us. Id rather see the Knicks max out Russell, if its a choice between the two.

If the goal is to position yourself to have a chance to win a 'chip, we sign Durant. If the goal to be relevant again, and just compete to make the playoffs, we sign Russell.

I like Russell, in fact, he was the player I wanted the most in the draft until we slid to 4 and took KP. This year, Russell showed the potential that I knew he had which is why I wanted him. If the Nyets land KD and Kyrie, I wouldn't mind signing Russ, but no way am I saying I would rather have him over KD!

Wanted to draft Russell as well. One reason being his leadership qualities. His ability as a floor general which former high school, college coaches, teammates, praised him for. Some of those leadership qualities ran right smack into immaturity, growing beyond his teenage years. See the same situation (more or less) with DSJr. Telling a kid he was the future leader of a franchise, and months later being told, "oh yeah, about that..." would phase a grown man, let alone a kid.

As much as I also feel vindicated in wanting the Knicks to draft Russell. Id rather save the cap room and see how things play out with the PGs we have next season.

If we did sign Russell, he would be part of the starting point, not the end point. The idea would be to sign another star, and try to contend in the East.

Believe if Perry/Mills ignores a player's history, and plugs in whoever Durant wants. There is a decent chance that player will negate some of what Durant brings to the table, if they arent used right. Or cause more drama than they're worth.

Uptown
Posts: 31323
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 4/1/2008
Member: #1883

6/6/2019  6:50 PM
fwk00 wrote:
Uptown wrote:
GustavBahler wrote:
Uptown wrote:
GustavBahler wrote:
smackeddog wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:
smackeddog wrote:

Uh oh, means they likely will sign two max cats and must be confident (otherwise why include 2 firsts).

So looks like Kyrie is definitely signing with them. Hope the other one is Tobias Harris and not KD. Should hopefully take them out of the AD stakes though (earliest 1st round pick they could trade would be 2022)



with 46 mill, how will you sign 2 guys maxing out at 32 mill per..

so the rumors to NY are BS but the rumors to the Nets are valid coming from the same outlet...ok

They free up 2 max slots by renouncing D’Angelo. If they don’t renounce him then they only have $46mil.

Why would they trade two firsts this close to free agency unless they know they can sign two max players? Kyrie is signing with him- look at the timings, he was even out in the same club as a bunch of nets players last night, has posted a vid about returning home, and all his people have said he’s signing with the nets

You're the Nets, your PG just had an all-star, breakout season. He's younger, less wear and tear than Irving, a willing passer. Nets can match any offer on Russell. Why would you max out Kyrie, and cut Russell? Doubt that Durant has given the Nets a guarantee at this point.

My guess is that if Irving is a lock for the Nets, they are going to try to run a backcourt of Russell/Irving, with Irving playing off the ball, so it doesnt turn out like it did in Boston, or Houston even.

Have hard time believing Nets would give up on a young All-Star PG who is just starting to show what he can do.

You give up on Russell if KD say he will sign and wants to play with Kyrie.


Dont believe Durant has made any promises to the Nets. If thats the ultimatum though, I hope the Nets go for it. Better them than us. Id rather see the Knicks max out Russell, if its a choice between the two.

If the goal is to position yourself to have a chance to win a 'chip, we sign Durant. If the goal to be relevant again, and just compete to make the playoffs, we sign Russell.

I like Russell, in fact, he was the player I wanted the most in the draft until we slid to 4 and took KP. This year, Russell showed the potential that I knew he had which is why I wanted him. If the Nyets land KD and Kyrie, I wouldn't mind signing Russ, but no way am I saying I would rather have him over KD!

I'm delighted that Irving is going to the Nets. I prefer Russell, Rubio, or Rozier as well.

My other concern is that Durant and GS are hiding the extent of Durant's injury. WE have ALL been down the road of a star whose health has left the building.

KLeonard should be the #1 stretch FA signing. Durant only if there's a serious physical clearing him of an achille's heel issue.

Kyrie and KD were thought to possibly be a package deal...my concern with Kyrie going to Brooklyn is he may bring KD with him!!! No way can I see Durant coming here by himself...

jskinny35
Posts: 21582
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/27/2005
Member: #928
USA
6/6/2019  6:51 PM
Agree - 31 isn't great when max money is being discussed. He's an unbelievable talent but Kawhi is really the perfect option for a max contract. Too bad he's too smart and wants nothing to do with us...
knicks180nyc
Posts: 20037
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 2/2/2019
Member: #8733

6/6/2019  10:47 PM
Uptown wrote:
fwk00 wrote:
Uptown wrote:
GustavBahler wrote:
Uptown wrote:
GustavBahler wrote:
smackeddog wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:
smackeddog wrote:

Uh oh, means they likely will sign two max cats and must be confident (otherwise why include 2 firsts).

So looks like Kyrie is definitely signing with them. Hope the other one is Tobias Harris and not KD. Should hopefully take them out of the AD stakes though (earliest 1st round pick they could trade would be 2022)



with 46 mill, how will you sign 2 guys maxing out at 32 mill per..

so the rumors to NY are BS but the rumors to the Nets are valid coming from the same outlet...ok

They free up 2 max slots by renouncing D’Angelo. If they don’t renounce him then they only have $46mil.

Why would they trade two firsts this close to free agency unless they know they can sign two max players? Kyrie is signing with him- look at the timings, he was even out in the same club as a bunch of nets players last night, has posted a vid about returning home, and all his people have said he’s signing with the nets

You're the Nets, your PG just had an all-star, breakout season. He's younger, less wear and tear than Irving, a willing passer. Nets can match any offer on Russell. Why would you max out Kyrie, and cut Russell? Doubt that Durant has given the Nets a guarantee at this point.

My guess is that if Irving is a lock for the Nets, they are going to try to run a backcourt of Russell/Irving, with Irving playing off the ball, so it doesnt turn out like it did in Boston, or Houston even.

Have hard time believing Nets would give up on a young All-Star PG who is just starting to show what he can do.

You give up on Russell if KD say he will sign and wants to play with Kyrie.


Dont believe Durant has made any promises to the Nets. If thats the ultimatum though, I hope the Nets go for it. Better them than us. Id rather see the Knicks max out Russell, if its a choice between the two.

If the goal is to position yourself to have a chance to win a 'chip, we sign Durant. If the goal to be relevant again, and just compete to make the playoffs, we sign Russell.

I like Russell, in fact, he was the player I wanted the most in the draft until we slid to 4 and took KP. This year, Russell showed the potential that I knew he had which is why I wanted him. If the Nyets land KD and Kyrie, I wouldn't mind signing Russ, but no way am I saying I would rather have him over KD!

I'm delighted that Irving is going to the Nets. I prefer Russell, Rubio, or Rozier as well.

My other concern is that Durant and GS are hiding the extent of Durant's injury. WE have ALL been down the road of a star whose health has left the building.

KLeonard should be the #1 stretch FA signing. Durant only if there's a serious physical clearing him of an achille's heel issue.

Kyrie and KD were thought to possibly be a package deal...my concern with Kyrie going to Brooklyn is he may bring KD with him!!! No way can I see Durant coming here by himself...

kyrie needs kd. kd doesn't need kyrie. if you're an nba player who would you rather play with? the guy steph, klay, and draymond need or the guy who wanted his own team and quit on them? i'm sure durant will have players wanting to play with him if he's going to sign with the knicks.

smackeddog
Posts: 38389
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/30/2005
Member: #883
6/7/2019  3:03 AM
jskinny35 wrote:Agree - 31 isn't great when max money is being discussed. He's an unbelievable talent but Kawhi is really the perfect option for a max contract. Too bad he's too smart and wants nothing to do with us...

I would love to land Kawahi and AD, but honestly I think the Knicks just released the Kawhi rumour to try and hush of the Nets news. Just don't see Kawhi coming here at all.

newyorknewyork
Posts: 30119
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
6/7/2019  7:27 AM
Everyone is also glossing over the fact they got Taurean Prince as well. Who has a loads of potential. Even if they kept Russell and signed Tobias Harris.

Russell, Levert, Prince, Harris, Allen, Dinwidde, Harris is a strong strong young core. With money left over.

https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
wargames
Posts: 22833
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/27/2015
Member: #6053

6/7/2019  8:13 AM
newyorknewyork wrote:Everyone is also glossing over the fact they got Taurean Prince as well. Who has a loads of potential. Even if they kept Russell and signed Tobias Harris.

Russell, Levert, Prince, Harris, Allen, Dinwidde, Harris is a strong strong young core. With money left over.

That is true.....

The algorithm gives and the algorithm takes away
Chandler
Posts: 26778
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/26/2015
Member: #6197

6/7/2019  8:55 AM
wargames wrote:
newyorknewyork wrote:Everyone is also glossing over the fact they got Taurean Prince as well. Who has a loads of potential. Even if they kept Russell and signed Tobias Harris.

Russell, Levert, Prince, Harris, Allen, Dinwidde, Harris is a strong strong young core. With money left over.

That is true.....

agreed

I actually think the deal was good for both teams and a sign that their FOs have realistic plans. Nets got an athletic wing; Atlanta got a shooter. Nets are positioned for a "now" move; Atlanta is getting assets for future as their two best players are very young. I also wouldn't be surprised to see them pair Russel and Kyrie as some have suggested above

I don't know why everyone is assuming KD to the Nets. For certain KD is not feeling he needs to follow Kyrie someplace -- he'll make his own decision

Personally if Kyrie goes to the nets i won't cry and I'll be a little relieved. His best moments were with Lebron. Pre-Lebron meh; post Lebron is filled with question marks. He has unbelievable flashes but the Celts performed better in the playoffs without him. On top of that you'll pay max money for a player who is probably only going to play 60 games (that's a big issue to me)

I also worry about KD. Super talent no doubt. But we're betting a lot of money that his game will continue for 4 years?!? It could happen but i think any honest assessment will suggest that's unlikely

(5)(7)
GoNyGoNyGo
Posts: 23559
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/29/2003
Member: #411
USA
6/7/2019  9:29 AM
I really would wonder what the NEts are doing if they go for Kyrie. First off, they have seen how Kyrie ruined the chemistry of a good up and coming young team in 1 and a half seasons.

The Nets are not quite where Boston was BUT their back court of Dinwiddie and Russell are the heart of the team. They also have Levert and Harris as SG/SF types.


SO if they renounce Russell, that would make it
Dinwiddie
Irving
Harris
Levert

How is that better than with Russell? Definitely not better from a team chemistry stand point. Not better from a BBALL stand point


option 2 would be to keep Russell and Irving

With this option, they would lose one of Harris, Lavert or Dinwiddie as their playing time WILL decrease a significant amount. IMO, bad for chemistry. A irving/ Russell and DInwiddie backcout threesome is pretty damn good. BBall wise, its a solid move. Lavert and/or Harris will need to play more SF which takes Kukucs out of the mix a bit. NOt awful but still chemistry wise a big ??? mark IMO.

Their ideeal player is KD over Kyrie, IMO. A stretch 4 makes them as constructed now a - a very dangerous team.

SupremeCommander
Posts: 34057
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127

6/7/2019  10:10 AM
it is going to take a certain type of man to resurrect the Mecca. This is exactly why, even though he is not the best player, I really kinda do want Kemba here. For starter's he' snot a whiny bitch. More importantly, he crushes it at MSG. Latly, coming here would actually be an upgrade for him. He's not leaving Boston or GSW
DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
smackeddog
Posts: 38389
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/30/2005
Member: #883
6/7/2019  10:56 AM
See this is a perfect example of the complete preferential coverage the Nets get vs the Knicks:

In addition to Irving, we know this summer's free-agent class is stacked. We know Durant and Irving have been linked as potential partners with the Knicks. Why not form the same partnership across town with a better supporting cast in place? What about, say, Kawhi Leonard? Jimmy Butler? Klay Thompson? Kemba Walker? We'll talk about this in a bit, but there may even be a way to put together an attractive enough package to get into the Anthony Davis sweepstakes.

Even if you look at this deal independent of Brooklyn eventually hooking a couple big fish, it's still a good trade. Prince is a useful player. He can get a little tunnel-visioned as a scorer, but he's long and athletic, he can defend and he can certainly create offense. Getting off Crabbe's money was the win. Getting a good player on a team-friendly deal with an additional unprotected draft pick is pure gravy. The Nets really nailed this.

And now they become a major player this summer. Again, they were already in the mix, but with this additional space and the culture they've built there, not to mention the team itself, this is a very attractive destination. As opposed to a guy like Irving, or any other big free agent, choosing, say, the Knicks, who have nothing to offer except the allure of New York City and whatever new pieces the can add, the Nets, also in New York, already have something good going.

https://www.cbssports.com/nba/news/kyrie-irving-reportedly-serious-about-joining-nets-who-can-now-offer-irving-cap-space-for-a-super-friend/

How come when we trade KP for space and get picks its dependent on if we sign any big FAs, but when the nets send OUT 2 first rounders to move an expiring, it's a great deal regardless as to if they sign any big FA's?! And why does that brain dead writer think they've got an unprotect first?! Why is Kyrie now god with no question marks? Why is there zero critical coverage as whether it's a good idea to get rid of Russell and replace him with Kyrie?

CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
6/7/2019  11:52 AM
smackeddog wrote:See this is a perfect example of the complete preferential coverage the Nets get vs the Knicks:

In addition to Irving, we know this summer's free-agent class is stacked. We know Durant and Irving have been linked as potential partners with the Knicks. Why not form the same partnership across town with a better supporting cast in place? What about, say, Kawhi Leonard? Jimmy Butler? Klay Thompson? Kemba Walker? We'll talk about this in a bit, but there may even be a way to put together an attractive enough package to get into the Anthony Davis sweepstakes.

Even if you look at this deal independent of Brooklyn eventually hooking a couple big fish, it's still a good trade. Prince is a useful player. He can get a little tunnel-visioned as a scorer, but he's long and athletic, he can defend and he can certainly create offense. Getting off Crabbe's money was the win. Getting a good player on a team-friendly deal with an additional unprotected draft pick is pure gravy. The Nets really nailed this.

And now they become a major player this summer. Again, they were already in the mix, but with this additional space and the culture they've built there, not to mention the team itself, this is a very attractive destination. As opposed to a guy like Irving, or any other big free agent, choosing, say, the Knicks, who have nothing to offer except the allure of New York City and whatever new pieces the can add, the Nets, also in New York, already have something good going.

https://www.cbssports.com/nba/news/kyrie-irving-reportedly-serious-about-joining-nets-who-can-now-offer-irving-cap-space-for-a-super-friend/

How come when we trade KP for space and get picks its dependent on if we sign any big FAs, but when the nets send OUT 2 first rounders to move an expiring, it's a great deal regardless as to if they sign any big FA's?! And why does that brain dead writer think they've got an unprotect first?! Why is Kyrie now god with no question marks? Why is there zero critical coverage as whether it's a good idea to get rid of Russell and replace him with Kyrie?

Also, it took two firsts two move Crabbe with one year left on his deal. What would it take to move Tim with two years left and Lee in this market? The Knicks got off two bad salaries, got two first round picks, and DSJ and DJ. No one in the media has mentioned that the Hawks wanted to move Prince because they were not planning on resigning him after this year.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
NYKBocker
Posts: 38411
Alba Posts: 474
Joined: 1/14/2003
Member: #377
USA
6/7/2019  12:55 PM
Allanfan20 wrote:Sign D’Angelo.

Yup

knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
6/7/2019  1:05 PM
CrushAlot wrote:
smackeddog wrote:See this is a perfect example of the complete preferential coverage the Nets get vs the Knicks:

In addition to Irving, we know this summer's free-agent class is stacked. We know Durant and Irving have been linked as potential partners with the Knicks. Why not form the same partnership across town with a better supporting cast in place? What about, say, Kawhi Leonard? Jimmy Butler? Klay Thompson? Kemba Walker? We'll talk about this in a bit, but there may even be a way to put together an attractive enough package to get into the Anthony Davis sweepstakes.

Even if you look at this deal independent of Brooklyn eventually hooking a couple big fish, it's still a good trade. Prince is a useful player. He can get a little tunnel-visioned as a scorer, but he's long and athletic, he can defend and he can certainly create offense. Getting off Crabbe's money was the win. Getting a good player on a team-friendly deal with an additional unprotected draft pick is pure gravy. The Nets really nailed this.

And now they become a major player this summer. Again, they were already in the mix, but with this additional space and the culture they've built there, not to mention the team itself, this is a very attractive destination. As opposed to a guy like Irving, or any other big free agent, choosing, say, the Knicks, who have nothing to offer except the allure of New York City and whatever new pieces the can add, the Nets, also in New York, already have something good going.

https://www.cbssports.com/nba/news/kyrie-irving-reportedly-serious-about-joining-nets-who-can-now-offer-irving-cap-space-for-a-super-friend/

How come when we trade KP for space and get picks its dependent on if we sign any big FAs, but when the nets send OUT 2 first rounders to move an expiring, it's a great deal regardless as to if they sign any big FA's?! And why does that brain dead writer think they've got an unprotect first?! Why is Kyrie now god with no question marks? Why is there zero critical coverage as whether it's a good idea to get rid of Russell and replace him with Kyrie?

Also, it took two firsts two move Crabbe with one year left on his deal. What would it take to move Tim with two years left and Lee in this market? The Knicks got off two bad salaries, got two first round picks, and DSJ and DJ. No one in the media has mentioned that the Hawks wanted to move Prince because they were not planning on resigning him after this year.

we gave up a bona fide All star to get rid of THJ and Lee, and those guys are still very useful players. I wish I knew the other deals that were on the table for KP.

ES
Nets trade Crabbe’s contract and 1st to Hawks

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy