[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

The Knicks really should be 10-4
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum
Page 2 of 2 ‹ Previous 1  2 
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
TheGame
Posts: 26636
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/15/2006
Member: #1154
USA
11/16/2017  7:21 PM
You are your record. The Knicks are a 8-6 team.
Trust the Process
AUTOADVERT
Allanfan20
Posts: 35947
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
11/16/2017  7:38 PM
Every single team in the league has losses they really should have won and wins they had no business winning. It all balances out at the end of the day and you are what your record shows. We are not an elite team yet. We are somewhere between “ehh OK” and “solid.” If we were really a 10-4
Team, we wouldn’t have gotten handled at home by the Rockets that way and we wouldn’t have allowed that comeback by the Cavs, at home.
“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
Welpee
Posts: 23162
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/22/2016
Member: #6239
11/16/2017  8:00 PM    LAST EDITED: 11/16/2017  8:00 PM
TheGame wrote:You are your record. The Knicks are a 8-6 team.
Bill Parcells in da house!
markvmc
Posts: 21996
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 1/6/2008
Member: #1797
11/16/2017  8:18 PM
They keep this up, they'll be the should-be champions.
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
11/16/2017  9:52 PM
Its all variance.
We can win all games but probability of this is microscopic.
If we play without Kristap the probability to with any game is very low.
If we play top 10 teams in NBA the probability to win is low.
The rest is 50/50...
So if Kristap will play all games and we will maintain the current level we are winning 35 games max.
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
newyorknewyork
Posts: 30135
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
11/16/2017  9:54 PM
The better way to look at it is the first three games didn't represent who the Knicks really were and may have been a fluke. Making them 8-3 going forward.
https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
Zebo13
Posts: 20376
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/31/2017
Member: #6434
USA
11/17/2017  12:06 AM
newyorknewyork wrote:The better way to look at it is the first three games didn't represent who the Knicks really were and may have been a fluke. Making them 8-3 going forward.

I’ll sign off on that! Makes sense.
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
11/17/2017  1:08 AM
What the Knicks have become is more important. Stats like this are an example of what these players are getting done.

Zebo13
Posts: 20376
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/31/2017
Member: #6434
USA
11/17/2017  1:20 AM
nixluva wrote:What the Knicks have become is more important. Stats like this are an example of what these players are getting done.

Who’s that at 5? :)
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
11/17/2017  1:46 AM
Zebo13 wrote:
nixluva wrote:What the Knicks have become is more important. Stats like this are an example of what these players are getting done.

Who’s that at 5? :)

Yeah you know I smiled when I saw that 😬. Frank has been great in 4th quarters.
Paris907
Posts: 21146
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/4/2015
Member: #6099
USA
11/17/2017  5:34 AM
EnySpree wrote:Detroit and The Cavs were games we have away...

Cant be mad cuz we stole 2 Games this year ourselves.

How crazy would everyone be right now if we were 10-4?

Shoulda woulda coulda you are what your record is. Keep your shorts on.
From 12/27 til Feb 2 Knicks play 20 games with 16 on the road. Then tell me they shoulda been 10-4.
martin
Posts: 76275
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
11/17/2017  9:48 AM
Zebo13 wrote:
nixluva wrote:What the Knicks have become is more important. Stats like this are an example of what these players are getting done.

Who’s that at 5? :)

and #8 wants to say hi too

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
Welpee
Posts: 23162
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/22/2016
Member: #6239
11/17/2017  9:52 AM    LAST EDITED: 11/17/2017  9:52 AM
Zebo13 wrote:
nixluva wrote:What the Knicks have become is more important. Stats like this are an example of what these players are getting done.

Who’s that at 5? :)

Dennis Smith would be on the list, but Dallas doesn't have any crunch time.
JrZyHuStLa
Posts: 25677
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 1/5/2007
Member: #1241
11/17/2017  11:17 AM
EnySpree wrote:
JrZyHuStLa wrote:
SupremeCommander wrote:
JrZyHuStLa wrote:
EnySpree wrote:
JrZyHuStLa wrote:How can you be something other than your record?

I don't understand.

Thats all anyone wants to talk about?

You can't say yeah man the Knicks are close. They are playing well....

No everyone wants to talk about 10-4...

Obviously we earned 8-6 by losing.

The point was to say the Knicks are playing good basketball and hopefully have a nice fluffy conversation.... but no everyone wants to be....

Anyway 🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕

If they should be 10-4, why is their record 8-6?

I don't understand.

I agree with you and Bill Parcells

It's the NBA. No room for that "should be" shyt.

Get outta here.

This is a internet forum.... a place where we talk hypothetical all day everyday. I have something in my pocket.... here you go 🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕

Your hypotheticals are trash.
JrZyHuStLa
Posts: 25677
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 1/5/2007
Member: #1241
11/17/2017  11:23 AM
nixluva wrote:
JrZyHuStLa wrote:How can you be something other than your record?

I don't understand.

You’re confusing the point. Statistically the Knicks should’ve been able to win in the games they had significant leads which is where the term BLOWN LEAD comes from. The Knicks failed to close out a couple of games that statistically favor teams with those leads. Being a team reliant on young players it’s understandable that they would make the kind of mistakes they did. Hopefully they can grow out of making those mistakes.

You are confused my man. Statistically, they lost those games.

When the final score is lower than your opponent, you lose.

Very simple.
Cartman718
Posts: 29068
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/12/2007
Member: #1694
11/17/2017  1:55 PM
JrZyHuStLa wrote:
nixluva wrote:
JrZyHuStLa wrote:How can you be something other than your record?

I don't understand.

You’re confusing the point. Statistically the Knicks should’ve been able to win in the games they had significant leads which is where the term BLOWN LEAD comes from. The Knicks failed to close out a couple of games that statistically favor teams with those leads. Being a team reliant on young players it’s understandable that they would make the kind of mistakes they did. Hopefully they can grow out of making those mistakes.

You are confused my man. Statistically, they lost those games.

When the final score is lower than your opponent, you lose.

Very simple.

Nixluva is posting triangle screen grabs, even when nobody asks - Fishmike. LOL So are we going to reference that thread like the bible now? "The thread of Wroten Page 14 post 9" - EnySpree
jrodmc
Posts: 32927
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 11/24/2004
Member: #805
USA
11/20/2017  8:54 AM
So we got fluffy conversations and pockets full of hypotheticals...

This really is a more efficient feeling 8-7.... it actually almost feels like 11-4.
Page 2 of 2 ‹ Previous 1  2 
« Reply To Topic
The Knicks really should be 10-4
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy