Sinix wrote:Knickoftime wrote:Sinix wrote:Melo is actually a great fit for the Blazers. Blazers w/ Melo > Rockets w/ Melo
Blazers jump the Rockets despite having added Paul?
That's a big impact for a mediocre player.
The Rockets team is a clumsy fit. Especially clumsy when they add Melo. They are more talented but so what. If talent alone won championships then Steve Nash would have a ring along with Dwight Howard from their Laker days.
Lillard/McCollum/Harkless/Melo/Nurkic with Crabbe on the bench is as good as any team not the Warriors in the West. Right there with San Antonio imo. Lillard could be an MVP contender and that's an elite and balanced supporting cast.
I wasn't arguing.
I was pointing out you seem more in line with Lillard and McCollum that Melo would significantly impact their line-up for the better.
Portand won 41 games last year. Spurs won 61. Rockets won 55 (without Paul)
That's a huge leap you're mainly placing on Melo's addition.
I'm not arguing your conclusion.
Just seems inconsistent with someone who holds the belief he is a mediocre player and locker room cancer.
Can you explain the seeming inconsistency?