[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

People are underestimating Ron baker
Author Thread
Cartman718
Posts: 29069
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/12/2007
Member: #1694

6/1/2017  4:04 PM
martin wrote:
Cartman718 wrote:
martin wrote:
Cartman718 wrote:He is a project at best. I doubt he's in the NBA 5 years from now.

Why?

doesn't know how to avoid traps on offense, dismal shooting percentages and only interested in playing defense. not a 2 way player for sure. the bright lights of nyc are not for him...i can see him sticking around under the tutelage of spurs coaches or a small city like OKC. but if he's traded to big cities...i dont think he has the nerves to stick around.

how do you even substantiate that? or did you just make it up?


how do you substantiate nerves...its not a stat. you go based off in-game observations as a spectator.
you must agree that it takes a certain type of person to be able to play well for the Knicks...i will flip the question over to you...what makes you think that Ron is that type of guy?
Nixluva is posting triangle screen grabs, even when nobody asks - Fishmike. LOL So are we going to reference that thread like the bible now? "The thread of Wroten Page 14 post 9" - EnySpree
AUTOADVERT
GustavBahler
Posts: 42864
Alba Posts: 15
Joined: 7/12/2010
Member: #3186

6/1/2017  4:06 PM
The next step has to be a willingness to shoot more. Baker was one of the best distributors on the team last season, as a rookie. But he wont be here long if he joins the club of former Knick PGs who almost never shoot the ball.

Baker was drafted for his 3 pt shooting ability, so there is something to build on.

fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
6/1/2017  4:25 PM
Cartman718 wrote:
martin wrote:
Cartman718 wrote:
martin wrote:
Cartman718 wrote:He is a project at best. I doubt he's in the NBA 5 years from now.

Why?

doesn't know how to avoid traps on offense, dismal shooting percentages and only interested in playing defense. not a 2 way player for sure. the bright lights of nyc are not for him...i can see him sticking around under the tutelage of spurs coaches or a small city like OKC. but if he's traded to big cities...i dont think he has the nerves to stick around.

how do you even substantiate that? or did you just make it up?


how do you substantiate nerves...its not a stat. you go based off in-game observations as a spectator.
you must agree that it takes a certain type of person to be able to play well for the Knicks...i will flip the question over to you...what makes you think that Ron is that type of guy?
because NY fans love the blue collar game, especially from guards. Ron Baker is in a position to not only succeed here but do so with popularity. Hardworking country boy with a blue collar game making chump change in a league of stars... yea, NY is gonna hate him. Baker is perfect for this town because he doesnt care about it. He goes out and plays ball. So he strikes me as the perfect "type" to succeed here. Whether or not his game is up to the task remains to be seen.
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
martin
Posts: 79948
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
6/1/2017  4:25 PM
Cartman718 wrote:
martin wrote:
Cartman718 wrote:
martin wrote:
Cartman718 wrote:He is a project at best. I doubt he's in the NBA 5 years from now.

Why?

doesn't know how to avoid traps on offense, dismal shooting percentages and only interested in playing defense. not a 2 way player for sure. the bright lights of nyc are not for him...i can see him sticking around under the tutelage of spurs coaches or a small city like OKC. but if he's traded to big cities...i dont think he has the nerves to stick around.

how do you even substantiate that? or did you just make it up?


how do you substantiate nerves...its not a stat. you go based off in-game observations as a spectator.
you must agree that it takes a certain type of person to be able to play well for the Knicks...i will flip the question over to you...what makes you think that Ron is that type of guy?

little bit difficult to have a back and forth when you just 100% just made something up.

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
SupremeCommander
Posts: 34071
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127

6/1/2017  4:27 PM
I don't think anyone here is underestimating Baker. He's got some potential but he's actually got to show some production. I think banking on a guy whose PER was 7.5, has a -0.1, and shot 37.8% from the field and 26.7% from three win share is friggin insane. That's not a knock on Baker but more so the complete lack of depth at guard
DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
6/1/2017  4:32 PM
GustavBahler wrote:The next step has to be a willingness to shoot more. Baker was one of the best distributors on the team last season, as a rookie. But he wont be here long if he joins the club of former Knick PGs who almost never shoot the ball.

Baker was drafted for his 3 pt shooting ability, so there is something to build on.

If rose or JRU is signed, and we draft a pg in the top 10, with lee and Justin minding the 2g, baker is toast

ES
fitzfarm
Posts: 25280
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/28/2010
Member: #3285

6/1/2017  4:47 PM
If we can get another pick in the first and we draft Isaac at 8 and Mitchell @15

Look at our starting 5 on defense

Mitchell
Baker
Isaac
Willy
KP

Look baker is a lock down defender Mitchell is a lockdown defender Willy is the weakest link but still can protect the paint or guard the 4

KP and Isaac are shot blocking machines

Also a great start to a rebuild

nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
6/1/2017  4:54 PM
fitzfarm wrote:If we can get another pick in the first and we draft Isaac at 8 and Mitchell @15

Look at our starting 5 on defense

Mitchell
Baker
Isaac
Willy
KP

Look baker is a lock down defender Mitchell is a lockdown defender Willy is the weakest link but still can protect the paint or guard the 4

KP and Isaac are shot blocking machines

Also a great start to a rebuild

Isaac and Mitchell are my Dream Draft. I'm trying not to think about it too much considering how things tend to go for us.

fitzfarm
Posts: 25280
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/28/2010
Member: #3285

6/1/2017  5:07 PM
nixluva wrote:
fitzfarm wrote:If we can get another pick in the first and we draft Isaac at 8 and Mitchell @15

Look at our starting 5 on defense

Mitchell
Baker
Isaac
Willy
KP

Look baker is a lock down defender Mitchell is a lockdown defender Willy is the weakest link but still can protect the paint or guard the 4

KP and Isaac are shot blocking machines

Also a great start to a rebuild

Isaac and Mitchell are my Dream Draft. I'm trying not to think about it too much considering how things tend to go for us.

True it's like we are the ny jets of basketball nothing goes our way.

nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
6/1/2017  6:11 PM
fitzfarm wrote:
nixluva wrote:
fitzfarm wrote:If we can get another pick in the first and we draft Isaac at 8 and Mitchell @15

Look at our starting 5 on defense

Mitchell
Baker
Isaac
Willy
KP

Look baker is a lock down defender Mitchell is a lockdown defender Willy is the weakest link but still can protect the paint or guard the 4

KP and Isaac are shot blocking machines

Also a great start to a rebuild

Isaac and Mitchell are my Dream Draft. I'm trying not to think about it too much considering how things tend to go for us.

True it's like we are the ny jets of basketball nothing goes our way.

The fact that we've never moved up in the draft but only back or stayed out is crazy. We just can't have nice things

newyorker4ever
Posts: 26515
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/19/2014
Member: #5816

6/1/2017  9:31 PM
SupremeCommander wrote:I don't think anyone here is underestimating Baker. He's got some potential but he's actually got to show some production. I think banking on a guy whose PER was 7.5, has a -0.1, and shot 37.8% from the field and 26.7% from three win share is friggin insane. That's not a knock on Baker but more so the complete lack of depth at guard

Yeah i agree, i don't think anyone has forgot about him but the kid has a lot of work to do but also seems like the type that will put that work in without a doubt, but i don't think he's gonna be our starting PG next year cause i think PG is the top focus of this off season whether that be the draft or free agency or both. If we needed him to start at PG though because of injury or whatever else i wouldn't worry about him doing his job on the floor.

rpknicks
Posts: 20078
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/3/2015
Member: #6003

6/2/2017  1:55 AM
4.1 pts, 2.1 rebounds, 1.7 assists

4.1 pts, 1.1 rebounds, .8 assists

These are the rookie stats for two undrafted free agents, both from small midwestern towns who also shared a knack for defense, hustle and toughness in their limited opportunities.

The first stat line belongs to Ron baker and the second belongs to John Starks, who incidentally made a pretty big jump in his second year ( with his new team , the new york knicks) and just kept going.

Not to set the bar unreasonably high for Ron, but he's shown more than enough to warrant optimism.

The knicks front office has made some bad calls but they got this guy to camp ( called him right after the draft) and I think they know what they've got in Burgundy, see progress, and they will not let him walk this summer.

Zebo13
Posts: 20376
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/31/2017
Member: #6434
USA
6/2/2017  3:10 AM
rpknicks wrote:4.1 pts, 2.1 rebounds, 1.7 assists

4.1 pts, 1.1 rebounds, .8 assists

These are the rookie stats for two undrafted free agents, both from small midwestern towns who also shared a knack for defense, hustle and toughness in their limited opportunities.

The first stat line belongs to Ron baker and the second belongs to John Starks, who incidentally made a pretty big jump in his second year ( with his new team , the new york knicks) and just kept going.

Not to set the bar unreasonably high for Ron, but he's shown more than enough to warrant optimism.

The knicks front office has made some bad calls but they got this guy to camp ( called him right after the draft) and I think they know what they've got in Burgundy, see progress, and they will not let him walk this summer.

Coming in hot with the stats! Love it! I think you're spot on. A pro style
Offseason could do wonders for him.

Whether we sign a vet PG to start and draft a PG of the future there's still room for a 3rd PG who can defend. Lots of teams running two PG's for a lot of minutes these days.

Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
6/2/2017  7:15 AM    LAST EDITED: 6/2/2017  7:15 AM
rpknicks wrote:4.1 pts, 2.1 rebounds, 1.7 assists

4.1 pts, 1.1 rebounds, .8 assists

These are the rookie stats for two undrafted free agents, both from small midwestern towns who also shared a knack for defense, hustle and toughness in their limited opportunities.

The first stat line belongs to Ron baker and the second belongs to John Starks, who incidentally made a pretty big jump in his second year ( with his new team , the new york knicks) and just kept going.

Not to set the bar unreasonably high for Ron, but he's shown more than enough to warrant optimism.

The knicks front office has made some bad calls but they got this guy to camp ( called him right after the draft) and I think they know what they've got in Burgundy, see progress, and they will not let him walk this summer.


3.9 pts, 0.9 rbs, 2.2 Asts. That line belongs to Frank Williams' first full NBA season. He only played 9 more NBA games after that! We could do this forever. Most of the 4 PPG players who couldn't shoot the ball probably didn't last long in the NBA.
Cartman718
Posts: 29069
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/12/2007
Member: #1694

6/2/2017  8:16 AM
martin wrote:
Cartman718 wrote:
martin wrote:
Cartman718 wrote:
martin wrote:
Cartman718 wrote:He is a project at best. I doubt he's in the NBA 5 years from now.

Why?

doesn't know how to avoid traps on offense, dismal shooting percentages and only interested in playing defense. not a 2 way player for sure. the bright lights of nyc are not for him...i can see him sticking around under the tutelage of spurs coaches or a small city like OKC. but if he's traded to big cities...i dont think he has the nerves to stick around.

how do you even substantiate that? or did you just make it up?


how do you substantiate nerves...its not a stat. you go based off in-game observations as a spectator.
you must agree that it takes a certain type of person to be able to play well for the Knicks...i will flip the question over to you...what makes you think that Ron is that type of guy?

little bit difficult to have a back and forth when you just 100% just made something up.

i am simply going off his performance in knicks games. what are you basing his suitability to the Knicks off of?
its not made up...there's just no stat around it.

look at what fish said above..."Baker is perfect for this town because he doesnt care about it. He goes out and plays ball. So he strikes me as the perfect "type" to succeed here."
sounds like a gut feel for the most part. i dont see you asking him to substantiate that statement. lol

Nixluva is posting triangle screen grabs, even when nobody asks - Fishmike. LOL So are we going to reference that thread like the bible now? "The thread of Wroten Page 14 post 9" - EnySpree
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
6/2/2017  8:39 AM
Bonn1997 wrote:
rpknicks wrote:4.1 pts, 2.1 rebounds, 1.7 assists

4.1 pts, 1.1 rebounds, .8 assists

These are the rookie stats for two undrafted free agents, both from small midwestern towns who also shared a knack for defense, hustle and toughness in their limited opportunities.

The first stat line belongs to Ron baker and the second belongs to John Starks, who incidentally made a pretty big jump in his second year ( with his new team , the new york knicks) and just kept going.

Not to set the bar unreasonably high for Ron, but he's shown more than enough to warrant optimism.

The knicks front office has made some bad calls but they got this guy to camp ( called him right after the draft) and I think they know what they've got in Burgundy, see progress, and they will not let him walk this summer.


3.9 pts, 0.9 rbs, 2.2 Asts. That line belongs to Frank Williams' first full NBA season. He only played 9 more NBA games after that! We could do this forever. Most of the 4 PPG players who couldn't shoot the ball probably didn't last long in the NBA.

I can't believe he is even is discussion as a starter

I keep saying the bar for some knick fans have drop so low, that they think we have a better chance of success with baker than melo.

by January their praying for loses because were 9 games below 500, just to get a higher draft pick, and that's the culture we now have.

ES
StarksEwing1
Posts: 32671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/28/2012
Member: #4451

6/2/2017  8:54 AM
knicks1248 wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
rpknicks wrote:4.1 pts, 2.1 rebounds, 1.7 assists

4.1 pts, 1.1 rebounds, .8 assists

These are the rookie stats for two undrafted free agents, both from small midwestern towns who also shared a knack for defense, hustle and toughness in their limited opportunities.

The first stat line belongs to Ron baker and the second belongs to John Starks, who incidentally made a pretty big jump in his second year ( with his new team , the new york knicks) and just kept going.

Not to set the bar unreasonably high for Ron, but he's shown more than enough to warrant optimism.

The knicks front office has made some bad calls but they got this guy to camp ( called him right after the draft) and I think they know what they've got in Burgundy, see progress, and they will not let him walk this summer.


3.9 pts, 0.9 rbs, 2.2 Asts. That line belongs to Frank Williams' first full NBA season. He only played 9 more NBA games after that! We could do this forever. Most of the 4 PPG players who couldn't shoot the ball probably didn't last long in the NBA.

I can't believe he is even is discussion as a starter

I keep saying the bar for some knick fans have drop so low, that they think we have a better chance of success with baker than melo.

by January their praying for loses because were 9 games below 500, just to get a higher draft pick, and that's the culture we now have.

at least baker busts his ass out there more than the "veteran" players you crave
martin
Posts: 79948
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
6/2/2017  9:42 AM
knicks1248 wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
rpknicks wrote:4.1 pts, 2.1 rebounds, 1.7 assists

4.1 pts, 1.1 rebounds, .8 assists

These are the rookie stats for two undrafted free agents, both from small midwestern towns who also shared a knack for defense, hustle and toughness in their limited opportunities.

The first stat line belongs to Ron baker and the second belongs to John Starks, who incidentally made a pretty big jump in his second year ( with his new team , the new york knicks) and just kept going.

Not to set the bar unreasonably high for Ron, but he's shown more than enough to warrant optimism.

The knicks front office has made some bad calls but they got this guy to camp ( called him right after the draft) and I think they know what they've got in Burgundy, see progress, and they will not let him walk this summer.


3.9 pts, 0.9 rbs, 2.2 Asts. That line belongs to Frank Williams' first full NBA season. He only played 9 more NBA games after that! We could do this forever. Most of the 4 PPG players who couldn't shoot the ball probably didn't last long in the NBA.

I can't believe he is even is discussion as a starter

I keep saying the bar for some knick fans have drop so low, that they think we have a better chance of success with baker than melo.

by January their praying for loses because were 9 games below 500, just to get a higher draft pick, and that's the culture we now have.

No one has said that. Stop making stuff up.

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
6/2/2017  10:15 AM
martin wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
rpknicks wrote:4.1 pts, 2.1 rebounds, 1.7 assists

4.1 pts, 1.1 rebounds, .8 assists

These are the rookie stats for two undrafted free agents, both from small midwestern towns who also shared a knack for defense, hustle and toughness in their limited opportunities.

The first stat line belongs to Ron baker and the second belongs to John Starks, who incidentally made a pretty big jump in his second year ( with his new team , the new york knicks) and just kept going.

Not to set the bar unreasonably high for Ron, but he's shown more than enough to warrant optimism.

The knicks front office has made some bad calls but they got this guy to camp ( called him right after the draft) and I think they know what they've got in Burgundy, see progress, and they will not let him walk this summer.


3.9 pts, 0.9 rbs, 2.2 Asts. That line belongs to Frank Williams' first full NBA season. He only played 9 more NBA games after that! We could do this forever. Most of the 4 PPG players who couldn't shoot the ball probably didn't last long in the NBA.

I can't believe he is even is discussion as a starter

I keep saying the bar for some knick fans have drop so low, that they think we have a better chance of success with baker than melo.

by January their praying for loses because were 9 games below 500, just to get a higher draft pick, and that's the culture we now have.

No one has said that. Stop making stuff up.

One half of the dudes brain makes stuff up. The other half buys it. It just makes proving a point easier.
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
6/2/2017  10:53 AM
StarksEwing1 wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
rpknicks wrote:4.1 pts, 2.1 rebounds, 1.7 assists

4.1 pts, 1.1 rebounds, .8 assists

These are the rookie stats for two undrafted free agents, both from small midwestern towns who also shared a knack for defense, hustle and toughness in their limited opportunities.

The first stat line belongs to Ron baker and the second belongs to John Starks, who incidentally made a pretty big jump in his second year ( with his new team , the new york knicks) and just kept going.

Not to set the bar unreasonably high for Ron, but he's shown more than enough to warrant optimism.

The knicks front office has made some bad calls but they got this guy to camp ( called him right after the draft) and I think they know what they've got in Burgundy, see progress, and they will not let him walk this summer.


3.9 pts, 0.9 rbs, 2.2 Asts. That line belongs to Frank Williams' first full NBA season. He only played 9 more NBA games after that! We could do this forever. Most of the 4 PPG players who couldn't shoot the ball probably didn't last long in the NBA.

I can't believe he is even is discussion as a starter

I keep saying the bar for some knick fans have drop so low, that they think we have a better chance of success with baker than melo.

by January their praying for loses because were 9 games below 500, just to get a higher draft pick, and that's the culture we now have.

at least baker busts his ass out there more than the "veteran" players you crave

I don't crave anything but a winning balance roster, I'm not into young, old, fast or slow. I just see what works, and most you guy do too, and baker is not the answer by any stretch of the imagination.

Love the guys heart and defense, but when have you ever seen a lazy undrafted player, those types have to work 10x harder than any player on the court because of their limited skills.

ES
People are underestimating Ron baker

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy