| Author | Thread |
| AUTOADVERT |
|
fishmike
Posts: 53902 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 7/19/2002 Member: #298 USA |
BigDaddyG wrote:Makes no difference who has been picked at 8. That has very little relevance. Its about who is available at 8.fishmike wrote:knicks1248 wrote:The only due diligence that has any relevence is what level of talent is available at 8. Who was picked there in the past doesnt factor in team's drafting history (are they any good?), doesnt factor in team needs (did a team pass a on more talented player because of their roster fit?)... I mean just looking at who was taking at 8 doesnt accomplish much. You need to look at what level of talent is there.fishmike wrote:knicks1248 wrote:Im sorry but this post proves what? So far in those drafts you listed there has been all star talent in almost every draft. If the 8th pick stunk it was because the team picked wrong, NOT because "8th has produce role players for the most part"Nalod wrote:BRIGGS wrote:I dont like 8. Id like to see us offer Portland 8 for 15-20-26 If you want to gauge the "value" of the pick based on history here is what you need to look at: If you look at the actual data you can see picks 6,7,8,9 and 10 are almost identical in value. What happens is the scouting gets tougher and teams simply make more mistakes in this range. "winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
|
|
BigDaddyG
Posts: 40242 Alba Posts: 9 Joined: 1/22/2010 Member: #3049 |
fishmike wrote:BigDaddyG wrote:Makes no difference who has been picked at 8. That has very little relevance. Its about who is available at 8.fishmike wrote:knicks1248 wrote:The only due diligence that has any relevence is what level of talent is available at 8. Who was picked there in the past doesnt factor in team's drafting history (are they any good?), doesnt factor in team needs (did a team pass a on more talented player because of their roster fit?)... I mean just looking at who was taking at 8 doesnt accomplish much. You need to look at what level of talent is there.fishmike wrote:knicks1248 wrote:Im sorry but this post proves what? So far in those drafts you listed there has been all star talent in almost every draft. If the 8th pick stunk it was because the team picked wrong, NOT because "8th has produce role players for the most part"Nalod wrote:BRIGGS wrote:I dont like 8. Id like to see us offer Portland 8 for 15-20-26 Exactly. It's a crapshoot. The biggest take away is that you can't be locked in on a particular position of need. And you also can't get swept away by whatever the trend is in that particular season. It is relevant because you can take note of past draft failures and see where other teams, including us, went wrong. I'm still on the Frank N train, but I'm keeping more of an open mind toward guys like Markkanen and Collins. I'd also like to explore what a package of Melo and the pick can get us. Trading down is an option, but I can't get on board with that idea until we've scouts have completed their workouts and the draft order becomes less murky. Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right.
- The Tick
|