nyknickzingis wrote:That has been Hornachek's biggest failure. He hasn't been able to see what Phil is trying to do. He's sucking up to Melo always. The coach that got the most out of Melo was George Karl. His team I think went to the Conference Finals with Melo in Denver, Karl pushed Melo to move the ball and play like a team leader and not just a scoring machine. He also challenged his defense.Horny does this with all his vets. He defends Noah. He starts Noah. He defends Melo, he lets Melo to isolate a ton. He hasn't really gotten in the faces of his veterans like he should have. They've had too many games like the Laker game, and too little like the Clippers game.
Bottom line is Phil Jackson is a proven great and winner. The way he sees the game, the way he picks apart the mistakes in someone's demeanor, he is doing so because he knows that is not enough to win. People can whine all they want about how Phil has gone about this, but his analysis has been spot on.
Kobe Bryant used to loathe Phil. Hate him. Not even talk to him. They barely spoke to one another. This was during the time I believe Shaq was on the Lakers. It worked. Kobe was a winner. I hate Kobe's personality. I hate seeing him talk or immitate Jordan. But the guy backed it up. He knew what Phil was challenging him to do and he did. He was a great. Melo's a fruit cake next to Kobe. That's not even the point here. The point is Melo wants to hear none of what is actually wrong with his game. Whether it's from Phil. George Karl. Mike D'Antoni. He wants a yes man that kisses his ass.
I can't believe there is such a large portion of Knick fans that don't get this. Melo is a selfish player who has held the Knicks behind. He does not give a rats ass about the Knicks winning. He is in New York to make money, to establish his brand and to be happy with his family. All nice reasons for him individually, but as fans we should want much more. We should want to be a playoff team with a group of 4-5 good young players in their primes. That's not happening so long as Melo is holding the Knicks by the balls.
Phil's doing the Knicks a gigantic favor if he can get Melo out of town. The Knicks need to have 3-4 more players of Kristaps and Willy's talent level. That should be the immediate goal. The vets should be like Noah, Lee, Jennings. Guys coming in who know their role and want to help facilitate the young players into their maximum potential and move the ball.
Again - Phil's tactics may work if he's actually coaching the team. As an executive tweeting from the shadows, who admittedly has not developed a relationship with Melo over three full years here... it's not working.
I don't think anyone is objecting to the idea behind what Phil is saying - yes, Melo should move the ball more and YES, at this point it is probably better that Melo and the team part ways.
The issue is HOW he is trying to do it. In the real world, intentions don't mean much. You are judged on how effectively you carry out your intentions.
Phil has failed to carry out his intention to A) install system basketball, B) instill the Garden with the sort of culture he promised and hoped for, C) get Melo to magically turn into a ball moving superstar when he never was one (the idea he was under George Karl is frankly laughable), D) assembling a roster of basketball players suited to play the Triangle.
Further, all these problems - a coach who won't confront Melo? Hired by Phil. Melo hard to trade because of a NTC? Given by Phil.
Again, my issue is HOW Phil is trying to accomplish his goals. His methods have failed repeatedly and have never been effective... and they've always been the same. He hasn't said "hey, tweeting inscrutable bull**** isn't working. hey, insulting the greatest players in the game (Steph Curry and Lebron) via twitter isn't working... maybe I should try to focus on my own team and try to build a relationship with Melo to get what I want?"
Nope. He just keeps tweeting and arranging "Melo is no gud" takedown stories with his media pals. In the end, you are judged on your results, not your intentions. It's true for Melo and it's true for Phil. If Phil's intention was to paint Melo as the bad guy and drive him out of town, it looks like that too is failing. So, yes, his intention is in the right place - it is his execution that is the problem. Phil has made himself the bad guy and a laughingstock and driven people to support Melo.