Not a snowballs chance in hell I'd give Rose any big contract. He's clearly an improvement of the dire PG's we have had in recent times but he will not take this team to the next level. Given his past injuries and very inconsistent play there is no chance I'd burden the team with another bad long term contract to a player who's best years are behind him.
AUTOADVERT
wargames Posts: 22833
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/27/2015
Member: #6053
magicTs wrote:Not a snowballs chance in hell I'd give Rose any big contract. He's clearly an improvement of the dire PG's we have had in recent times but he will not take this team to the next level. Given his past injuries and very inconsistent play there is no chance I'd burden the team with another bad long term contract to a player who's best years are behind him.
Yep it would have to be short even if it was a high price. Even then I would prefer they try and steal someone like Teague or George Hill.
The algorithm gives and the algorithm takes away
knickstorrents Posts: 21121
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/23/2010
Member: #3050 Hong Kong
What does Rose get you? He is nothing more than an sparkplug/6th man on a good team. He can't run an offense, he is high usage, he doesn't make his teammates better, not particularly good on defense, not a good 3 point shooter. Why would you keep this type of player, especially at a high salary?
Rose is not the answer.
magicTs Posts: 20614
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/15/2013
Member: #5564
