HofstraBBall wrote:nyknickzingis wrote:The Knicks were down 20 at some point in the game and Melo was laughing with Lebron about something.I like Melo but he simply isn't leadership material. He's a great one on one scorer and Phil is absolutely right, Melo is best for this team when he is decisive and quick to make his moves instead of holding onto the ball for too long.
NY media is full of horse crap. They pile on Phil any time they can they love Melo. Yet not a word when Phil makes decisions that go well like hiring Hornachek, drafting KP, Hernangomez, making the Rose and Holiday for Grant and Lopez trade. They are like vultures just waiting for something to write stir the pot stories about. I don't care Knicks are 6th 12-10 and playing decent basketball while still having considerable room to grow this year. Phil has done a really good job.
We are both competitive now while also building a future with KP. New York media have no clue what it takes to win a championship. Jackson does. What he said about Melo was spot on. He knows the game and when Melo moves the ball or takes his shots quicker our flow and offense is much better.
For a guy that knows basketball so much, you would wonder why Phil would try to turn a post up player to a catch and shoot only player? Yes, Melo holds the ball in the post. Have you seen any post players that dont. BK, Ewing, for Knick reference. You have to evaluate the defense before making a move. Plus on instant double teams, he has done a good job kicking out. Think the point is, Phil has never liked Melo as his main guy. Which is fine. But as GM, you keep your mouth shut and feelings asside in public eyes. You do so so not to hurt a team. Specially one that is winning and starting to gel. Van Gundy made a great point the other day. Why do you call out the guy that lead the team in assists last year and why dont you ever call out KP who has half the amount of assists this year? Why dont you call out the center he paid dearly for and who has done nothing? Why dont you call out the entire defense for multiple lapses in losses?
You gotta remember it's Phil who is speaking and his ideas are more generalized philosophies than reality based specifics..For example, Phil said the same thing while ISO Kobe and MJ were taking 25/28 shots per game in the playoffs..And they needed to take those shots to win those ball games..Chicago wasn't a great offensive juggernaut, they were a great defensive team with ISO MJ getting any shot he wanted in crunch time..I remember Phil saying any player taking more than 20 shots per game isn't basketball...If that's the case he never coached basketball, I mean let's be real..
What we know is that if you surround Melo with decent offensive options and defense he gets you 50 wins and the playoffs..The starting talent on this team can get you 50 wins in the East and a shot at the second round...I'm not convinced the bench is ready to play playoff style basketball against Cleveland and Toronto..But the starters can compete running the offense through Melo and not thru Jennings type offense, which is what we saw against Cleveland..Successful teams run their offense thru their best players...
Not to say that ball movement isn't good because Melo does ball hog more than he should...But as the team's best player, you have to allow him to get in rhythm and play his game..MJ and Kobe got that latitude regardless of what Phil is saying...