nixluva wrote:

StarksEwing1 wrote:

nixluva wrote:Glad this is over. It really was a tough thing to deal with for everyone involved. NO ONE came out looking good in this case. Messy stuff but now we can move on and get on with basketball and hopefully no more accusing Forum Members of excusing rape!!!

i dont remember anyone accusing forum members of excusing rape. However if Rose was still in a Bulls jersey i doubt he would have support even if he was innocent as well

First of all you are clearly not paying attention if you didn't read the posts making the accusations. 2nd you are doing the same BS garbage by assuming that people wouldn't make up their minds based on what they saw as the evidence in the case and having nothing to do with Rose being a Knick or not. That is BULLISH!!!

I just posted something mreinman said in this thread, on the 1st page...not much searching that you have to do...

Nixluva don't even sweat it bro. Not worth the argument.

nixluva wrote:

StarksEwing1 wrote:

nixluva wrote:Glad this is over. It really was a tough thing to deal with for everyone involved. NO ONE came out looking good in this case. Messy stuff but now we can move on and get on with basketball and hopefully no more accusing Forum Members of excusing rape!!!

i dont remember anyone accusing forum members of excusing rape. However if Rose was still in a Bulls jersey i doubt he would have support even if he was innocent as well

First of all you are clearly not paying attention if you didn't read the posts making the accusations. 2nd you are doing the same BS garbage by assuming that people wouldn't make up their minds based on what they saw as the evidence in the case and having nothing to do with Rose being a Knick or not. That is BULLISH!!!

EnySpree wrote:

StarksEwing1 wrote:

nixluva wrote:

StarksEwing1 wrote:

nixluva wrote:Glad this is over. It really was a tough thing to deal with for everyone involved. NO ONE came out looking good in this case. Messy stuff but now we can move on and get on with basketball and hopefully no more accusing Forum Members of excusing rape!!!

i dont remember anyone accusing forum members of excusing rape. However if Rose was still in a Bulls jersey i doubt he would have support even if he was innocent as well

First of all you are clearly not paying attention if you didn't read the posts making the accusations. 2nd you are doing the same BS garbage by assuming that people wouldn't make up their minds based on what they saw as the evidence in the case and having nothing to do with Rose being a Knick or not. That is BULLISH!!!

Calm yourself down. This is why I needed to take a break from this board for a while, because of posts like this.

You have to see where he's coming from though. Being accused of supporting rape just because a player is on your favorite team is an instant physical altercation in real life. That's why I'm saying just leave it alone.

Papabear wrote:

Moonangie wrote:

Papabear wrote:Papabear Says

What kind of man would want to pull a train on a female. It's wrong. I'm glad its over and now its time for Derek Rose to earn his pay.

You judging his sexual preferences? She was his girl for 18 months. There were other trains involving Rose and her, including the two friends in question. Maybe you haven't seen much porn in your day, but it's not all that uncommon for a nympho to want to do a few dudes at once, or in a row. If it's her thing, then why judge her or Rose. What they do in privacy is for them to know about, not the public. This classless golddigga made it public, and props to Rose for calling her on it. Saved himself a lot of cheddah.

Now it's time to hoop in NYC!

Papabear Says

I don't care what you say it's wrong. Sodom and Gomorrah ish. What a man can't get his own girl so he gets sloppy seconds.

It's best not to try and put our individual morals and tastes onto what other people legally do in the bedroom. There are all kinds of things that people are into and it's their RIGHT to engage in that activity if they want to as long as it's legal and no one is being hurt or exploited. That's what was in question in this case. Not if the act of some kind of orgy is right or wrong but rather if it was consensual. Adults are free to do all kinds of things you may not agree with.

callmened wrote:

nixluva wrote:
It's best not to try and put our individual morals and tastes onto what other people legally do in the bedroom. There are all kinds of things that people are into and it's their RIGHT to engage in that activity if they want to as long as it's legal and no one is being hurt or exploited. That's what was in question in this case. Not if the act of some kind of orgy is right or wrong but rather if it was consensual. Adults are free to do all kinds of things you may not agree with.

sure rose and others have the right to do what they want as long as its consensual. doesnt mean i cant help but think hes a MISOGYNIST PIG who probably doesn't respect women (based on his testimony). he's not the first or the last - but it (morally) rubs me the wrong way and it will be hard for me to root for him

Damn Ned, pick your grandpa cane up off the floor and stop being so paternalistic. Millennials are a different breed that have grown up swiping left or right to get laid. This generation is not looking for your moral approval or protection. In fact, your paternalistic approach is now considered misogynistic. Ain't dat a b----?

EwingsGlass wrote:

callmened wrote:

nixluva wrote:
It's best not to try and put our individual morals and tastes onto what other people legally do in the bedroom. There are all kinds of things that people are into and it's their RIGHT to engage in that activity if they want to as long as it's legal and no one is being hurt or exploited. That's what was in question in this case. Not if the act of some kind of orgy is right or wrong but rather if it was consensual. Adults are free to do all kinds of things you may not agree with.

sure rose and others have the right to do what they want as long as its consensual. doesnt mean i cant help but think hes a MISOGYNIST PIG who probably doesn't respect women (based on his testimony). he's not the first or the last - but it (morally) rubs me the wrong way and it will be hard for me to root for him

Damn Ned, pick your grandpa cane up off the floor and stop being so paternalistic. Millennials are a different breed that have grown up swiping left or right to get laid. This generation is not looking for your moral approval or protection. In fact, your paternalistic approach is now considered misogynistic. Ain't dat a b----?

im 36. so i dont know what that makes me - doubt its a grandpa. lol.

no one cares about my approval but i wasnt looking for it. just expressing my thoughts

newyorknewyork wrote:

callmened wrote:

EwingsGlass wrote:

callmened wrote:

nixluva wrote:
It's best not to try and put our individual morals and tastes onto what other people legally do in the bedroom. There are all kinds of things that people are into and it's their RIGHT to engage in that activity if they want to as long as it's legal and no one is being hurt or exploited. That's what was in question in this case. Not if the act of some kind of orgy is right or wrong but rather if it was consensual. Adults are free to do all kinds of things you may not agree with.

sure rose and others have the right to do what they want as long as its consensual. doesnt mean i cant help but think hes a MISOGYNIST PIG who probably doesn't respect women (based on his testimony). he's not the first or the last - but it (morally) rubs me the wrong way and it will be hard for me to root for him

Damn Ned, pick your grandpa cane up off the floor and stop being so paternalistic. Millennials are a different breed that have grown up swiping left or right to get laid. This generation is not looking for your moral approval or protection. In fact, your paternalistic approach is now considered misogynistic. Ain't dat a b----?

im 36. so i dont know what that makes me - doubt its a grandpa. lol.

no one cares about my approval but i wasnt looking for it. just expressing my thoughts

These NBA players live a different world then we will know. Guy like Derek Rose is a multi-millionaire celebrity athlete. Women throw themselves at guys like him every single day that he is out. Throughout his NBA career he has probably had access up to a thousand of women willing to sleep with him. Dating back to high school which he probably had women lining up to have him. Probably molded him into the "sexual deviant" he became.

I remember listening to a Chris Brown interview explaining how normal sex doesn't do anything for him anymore. He has had sex so many times from such a young age that he needs something extra. Said even threesomes are nothing to him anymore.

yep. thats crazy to me. smh

dk7th wrote:

EwingsGlass wrote:

callmened wrote:

nixluva wrote:
It's best not to try and put our individual morals and tastes onto what other people legally do in the bedroom. There are all kinds of things that people are into and it's their RIGHT to engage in that activity if they want to as long as it's legal and no one is being hurt or exploited. That's what was in question in this case. Not if the act of some kind of orgy is right or wrong but rather if it was consensual. Adults are free to do all kinds of things you may not agree with.

sure rose and others have the right to do what they want as long as its consensual. doesnt mean i cant help but think hes a MISOGYNIST PIG who probably doesn't respect women (based on his testimony). he's not the first or the last - but it (morally) rubs me the wrong way and it will be hard for me to root for him

Damn Ned, pick your grandpa cane up off the floor and stop being so paternalistic. Millennials are a different breed that have grown up swiping left or right to get laid. This generation is not looking for your moral approval or protection. In fact, your paternalistic approach is now considered misogynistic. Ain't dat a b----?

paternalistic?

nope.

ned is clearly a feminist who respects and loves women. rose clearly hates women and enjoys cavorting only with women who hate themselves. he may have been found not liable in a legal sense but in his actions he is quite obviously a sick individual.

rose and his enablers-- and those who accept or condone such behavior and attitudes-- aren't actually and truly men.

thanks

Another thing.... not liable doesn't tell the whole story. How about not guilty of all charges? Not liable suggest that he did rape the girl but doesn't have to pay money. He was exonerated of all charges.... aka let's get back to this basketball.