| Author | Thread |
|
mreinman
Posts: 37827 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 7/14/2010 Member: #3189 |
nixluva wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:nixluva wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:nixluva wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:nixluva wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:yellowboy90 wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:nixluva wrote:THANK YOU CRUSHALOT!!! That is a masterpiece of breaking down exactly what the real deal is with Melo and this team. Phil has put a team together that has a real legit chance to be a top team in this league. Each player will help the other to see much easier and more open looks. How about Noah? so here is what phil is thinking ....
|
| AUTOADVERT |
|
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654 Alba Posts: 2 Joined: 2/2/2004 Member: #581 USA |
nixluva wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:nixluva wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:nixluva wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:nixluva wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:yellowboy90 wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:nixluva wrote:THANK YOU CRUSHALOT!!! That is a masterpiece of breaking down exactly what the real deal is with Melo and this team. Phil has put a team together that has a real legit chance to be a top team in this league. Each player will help the other to see much easier and more open looks. His teammates as a whole shot .379 from 3 point range last year. I don't think anyone on our roster shot better than that. There was nothing wrong with the spacing. The spacing should have been better than an average NBA roster. |
|
nixluva
Posts: 56258 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 10/5/2004 Member: #758 USA |
mreinman wrote:nixluva wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:nixluva wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:nixluva wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:nixluva wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:yellowboy90 wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:nixluva wrote:THANK YOU CRUSHALOT!!! That is a masterpiece of breaking down exactly what the real deal is with Melo and this team. Phil has put a team together that has a real legit chance to be a top team in this league. Each player will help the other to see much easier and more open looks. What about Noah? He didn't start last year. What I do know is that Melo, KP and Lee make more sense together with Rose. It's a well balanced lineup. Butler isn't as effective without the ball and that was a problem for the Bulls. |
|
nixluva
Posts: 56258 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 10/5/2004 Member: #758 USA |
Bonn1997 wrote:nixluva wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:nixluva wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:nixluva wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:nixluva wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:yellowboy90 wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:nixluva wrote:THANK YOU CRUSHALOT!!! That is a masterpiece of breaking down exactly what the real deal is with Melo and this team. Phil has put a team together that has a real legit chance to be a top team in this league. Each player will help the other to see much easier and more open looks. You're still stuck on the numbers and not HOW his teammates actually played and how they all fit together. Jose shot a nice 3pt % but that doesn't mean he was effective next to Melo and KP in all the ways we needed. There's more to it than the FG%. There's the matter of HOW a player plays. Rose is much more of a perceived threat and as such wherever he goes the defense turns it's attention on him. That will have a positive impact on Melo and KP. Of course Melo creates his own attention and that can help Rose and in turn KP and Lee. You seem to be saying you think Melo and KP are the same threat as the guys Rose played with in Chicago. My opinion is that they are a greater threat from anywhere on the floor than Butler and Gasol. This is the thing you seem not to be grasping and by quoting stats you really are not addressing that issue. Rose, Melo and KP are a PROBLEM for teams. It will not be easy to deal with for any team. |
|
yellowboy90
Posts: 33942 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 4/23/2011 Member: #3538 |
Bonn1997 wrote:yellowboy90 wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:yellowboy90 wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:Cartman718 wrote:nixluva wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:yellowboy90 wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:nixluva wrote:THANK YOU CRUSHALOT!!! That is a masterpiece of breaking down exactly what the real deal is with Melo and this team. Phil has put a team together that has a real legit chance to be a top team in this league. Each player will help the other to see much easier and more open looks. I was just referring to how Rose impacted Chicago. http://www.blogabull.com/2016/4/27/11510276/derrick-rose-stats-higlights-contract Another stat to look at is on/off court numbers. The Bulls were 0.6pts/100 better offensively with Rose off the court and a full 4 points better defensively with Rose off. Yikes. I tend to think that by the end of the season, the Bulls were definitely better offensively with Rose on, but way better off with Rose sitting for defensive purposes. Plus, it's hard not to be better offensively with Rose on the court when you look at the weak backups at the PG spot. Last season, the Bulls were about the same on both ends with Rose on or off the court. In short, I think Rose's abysmal defense and inability to contribute anything on offense when he wasn't scoring indicates that Rose actually was worse this season than last. |
|
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654 Alba Posts: 2 Joined: 2/2/2004 Member: #581 USA |
yellowboy90 wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:yellowboy90 wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:yellowboy90 wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:Cartman718 wrote:nixluva wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:yellowboy90 wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:nixluva wrote:THANK YOU CRUSHALOT!!! That is a masterpiece of breaking down exactly what the real deal is with Melo and this team. Phil has put a team together that has a real legit chance to be a top team in this league. Each player will help the other to see much easier and more open looks. Interesting, that's just one of many stats though (and not sure it's worse than Calderon's). Don't forget if you on/off is bad, it just means your sub is better than you (or your team does better with your sub). It doesn't necessarily mean you're bad. 4 points is a lot though. It would e more useful to look at many years of data for all these stats and then consider them together, but the player tracking stats are in their first year I think. |
|
yellowboy90
Posts: 33942 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 4/23/2011 Member: #3538 |
Bonn1997 wrote:yellowboy90 wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:yellowboy90 wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:yellowboy90 wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:Cartman718 wrote:nixluva wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:yellowboy90 wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:nixluva wrote:THANK YOU CRUSHALOT!!! That is a masterpiece of breaking down exactly what the real deal is with Melo and this team. Phil has put a team together that has a real legit chance to be a top team in this league. Each player will help the other to see much easier and more open looks. True but he also ranked poorly in Drpm if you read the article, he rates a -3.17 which landed him 83rd. That's 83rd for PGs not the entire league. I hope Rose can go back to being slightly below average to average defensively and above average offensively. I'm not expecting greatness but think it's possible he can play like a quality starting PG. |
|
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654 Alba Posts: 2 Joined: 2/2/2004 Member: #581 USA |
yellowboy90 wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:yellowboy90 wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:yellowboy90 wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:yellowboy90 wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:Cartman718 wrote:nixluva wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:yellowboy90 wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:nixluva wrote:THANK YOU CRUSHALOT!!! That is a masterpiece of breaking down exactly what the real deal is with Melo and this team. Phil has put a team together that has a real legit chance to be a top team in this league. Each player will help the other to see much easier and more open looks. Well, it depends on which stats you look at. If you look at the 82games and player tracking data, he was pretty close to average. That's why I was saying having more years of data would help. I suspect that if you have enough years of data and look at all the stats together, he will come out ahead of Calderon defensively (that was the context of the discussion). He was 25th out of 73 in Drpm the prior year and Calderon was 67th, though this year Calderon came out way ahead of him. The year to year fluctuation in drpm makes me question it but I haven't read a lot about it and that's a different topic. |
|
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 7/25/2003 Member: #452 USA |
From Tommy Dee. Collective peak is an interesting term that might allow cherry picking but it still shows a dramatic difference.
Rose and Jennings at their collective peak combined to drive almost 20 times per game, while Jerian Grant and Jose Calderon combined to average 5.7 drives per game in 2015-16.https://www.sny.tv/knicks/news/is-melo-a-different-player-on-team-usa/193777276 I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
|
|
nixluva
Posts: 56258 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 10/5/2004 Member: #758 USA |
CrushAlot wrote:From Tommy Dee. Collective peak is an interesting term that might allow cherry picking but it still shows a dramatic difference.Rose and Jennings at their collective peak combined to drive almost 20 times per game, while Jerian Grant and Jose Calderon combined to average 5.7 drives per game in 2015-16.https://www.sny.tv/knicks/news/is-melo-a-different-player-on-team-usa/193777276 Injury hampered recent performance makes it harder to gauge what we can expect from Rose and Jennings but IMO they do bring certain basic functionality that this team has lacked. Jose, Gallo and Grant all played hesitant and none of them were great breakdown guards. Not at the level of Rose n Jennings. That talent put to use in a PnR and Screen heavy offense is going to have a positive impact when paired with threats like Melo and KP and a good catch and shoot guard like Lee. Noah may not be what he was but he still passes at a high level and with so many targets he's gonna have a positive impact. IMO it just comes down to fit and chemistry. This unit makes sense along with the coach and his style. Hopefully it all works to plan. |
|
knicks1248
Posts: 42059 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 2/3/2004 Member: #582 |
nixluva wrote:CrushAlot wrote:From Tommy Dee. Collective peak is an interesting term that might allow cherry picking but it still shows a dramatic difference.Rose and Jennings at their collective peak combined to drive almost 20 times per game, while Jerian Grant and Jose Calderon combined to average 5.7 drives per game in 2015-16.https://www.sny.tv/knicks/news/is-melo-a-different-player-on-team-usa/193777276 I disagree about grant, this kid was driving to the hole at will in SL last yr. He became a mental mess a month after the season started. One minute they wanted him to run and pick up the pace, the next minute they wanted him to slow it down and run the team, his drives seem to end up as follies because of a over crowded paint, with just one offensive player standing beyond the 3 pt line. That's why numbers don't always tell the truth, because there was a lot more that went into the lack of drives to the basket. ES
|
|
nixluva
Posts: 56258 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 10/5/2004 Member: #758 USA |
knicks1248 wrote:nixluva wrote:CrushAlot wrote:From Tommy Dee. Collective peak is an interesting term that might allow cherry picking but it still shows a dramatic difference.Rose and Jennings at their collective peak combined to drive almost 20 times per game, while Jerian Grant and Jose Calderon combined to average 5.7 drives per game in 2015-16.https://www.sny.tv/knicks/news/is-melo-a-different-player-on-team-usa/193777276 Knowing how to play at different speeds is just the job of an NBA PG! Yes there was a great deal of confusion with Grant tho much of it was his own problem. Sasha was one of the fastest guards in the league in terms of his average speed. Shved played fast and aggressive in the same exact system. It wasn't that anyone was telling Grant to play slow and hesitant. He just had problems mentally processing what to do. He was much more confident when they ran Drag Screens and PnR. At the end of the year he looked much better and more like the early season Grant. I'm not saying Grant can't play better. I was saying that he and our other guards DIDN'T breakdown the defense anywhere close to Rose aggressiveness last year. Sure Grant has the ability to play more like that but he didn't last year. |
|
knicks1248
Posts: 42059 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 2/3/2004 Member: #582 |
nixluva wrote:knicks1248 wrote:nixluva wrote:CrushAlot wrote:From Tommy Dee. Collective peak is an interesting term that might allow cherry picking but it still shows a dramatic difference.Rose and Jennings at their collective peak combined to drive almost 20 times per game, while Jerian Grant and Jose Calderon combined to average 5.7 drives per game in 2015-16.https://www.sny.tv/knicks/news/is-melo-a-different-player-on-team-usa/193777276 THERE's no way you can break down a defense without spacing, if 5 guys are in the lane, 2 offensive and 3 defensive, where can you go, your almost force to shoot a mid range jumper, which was the case on 80% of our possessions. The object has always been to play faster and spread the floor ES
|
|
nixluva
Posts: 56258 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 10/5/2004 Member: #758 USA |
knicks1248 wrote:nixluva wrote:knicks1248 wrote:nixluva wrote:CrushAlot wrote:From Tommy Dee. Collective peak is an interesting term that might allow cherry picking but it still shows a dramatic difference.Rose and Jennings at their collective peak combined to drive almost 20 times per game, while Jerian Grant and Jose Calderon combined to average 5.7 drives per game in 2015-16.https://www.sny.tv/knicks/news/is-melo-a-different-player-on-team-usa/193777276 What about Transition and early offense? Nothing stopped Grant from doing that but himself mostly. We all know that the Triangle isn't a 4 out style offense, so yes it's not as wide open as that kind of offense tends to be. However, it's not true that there are always 5 guys in the lane as you're describing it. The way the Triangle is designed it's not really always about a PG having to breakdown a defense all by himself. A lot of it comes off cuts and Dribble Hand Offs. This Pinch Post cut by Shved creates enough of a lane for a guard to drive. With only one man to beat at the rim and he's not the Center.
Here's the Spurs running the same kind of Pinch Post play.
|