[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

So What Good Is That 2017 #1 Pick Now . . . (?)
Author Thread
Welpee
Posts: 23162
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/22/2016
Member: #6239

7/8/2016  9:38 AM
Plus how did we stab Lopez in the back?
AUTOADVERT
Nalod
Posts: 72113
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
7/8/2016  10:06 AM
Welpee wrote:Plus how did we stab Lopez in the back?

He has not changed the address for his comic book mailings and Dolan is reportedly spending more time on the toilet with them.
RoPez perhaps came for the money, came for Triangle, came to be with his brother, and came for the bright lights of the big city.
Chicago is not a cultural wasteland and while I have no idea what in the hell they are doing with Rondo, and now Wade, they should be an interesting team.

Wade is a ticket selling starphuch. Is butler moving to the 3? Do they start Rondo and Wade?
Im befuddled.

SupremeCommander
Posts: 34074
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127

7/8/2016  10:28 AM
well look at it this way; we'll be happy to have the pick if Noah and Rose play 30 games combined
DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
Nalod
Posts: 72113
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
7/8/2016  11:56 AM
crzymdups wrote:Uh, for one thing - we haven't played the season yet. We don't know what the pick will be.

For another thing - you can get a pretty good player with pick 22 and on.

Kyle Lowry pick 24 2006 says hi!

Serge Ibaka pick 24 says hello, don't blame the Durant thing on me

Jimmy Butler pick 30 2011 say hellooooooo

Hassan Whiteside pick 33 says hey

Draymond Green pick 35 says shalom

Taj Gibson pick 26 says hey there

Courtney Lee pick 22 says hi, also I'm a Knick now

Bobby Portis pick 22 2015 says hi!

Solomon Hill pick 23 2013 says hi!

The Plumlee brothers say hi!

Kenneth Faried pick 22 2011 says hi

I mean... do I really have to go on?

Don't stop!!! Its quite good!!

newyorker4ever
Posts: 26515
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/19/2014
Member: #5816

7/8/2016  12:27 PM
Malcolm wrote:After all the historical angst on this board about not trading #1 picks . . .
what good is the 2017 #1 pick now (?)

If Knicks are top 4 in the East next year . . . that's a #22 overall player.

Wouldn't it have been better to trade that to the Bulls for Rose . . .
instead of stabbing lottery pick Robin Lopez in the back (?)

Some players that were drafted in the 20's.
E.Fournier--20
Z.Randolph--20
K.Faried--22
R.Rondo--21
G.Dieng--21
R.Jackson--24
L.Sprewell--24
W.Chandler--23
N.Batum--25
R.Gobert--27
K.Lowry--24
S.Ibaka--24
T.Parker--29

There's many more names that are starters or 2nd unit guys but i got bored.

meloanyk
Posts: 20768
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/5/2013
Member: #5615

7/8/2016  12:43 PM
#1 can be used in several ways. Offer #1 and Rose for Westbrook to ensure a top four spot. After getting rejected, tell the European scouts to look far and wide for a draft and stash if the pick is beyond twenty. My guess is Knicks will be drafting around 18th given my expected win total
Knickoftime
Posts: 24159
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/13/2011
Member: #3370

7/8/2016  1:24 PM
newyorker4ever wrote:
Malcolm wrote:After all the historical angst on this board about not trading #1 picks . . .
what good is the 2017 #1 pick now (?)

If Knicks are top 4 in the East next year . . . that's a #22 overall player.

Wouldn't it have been better to trade that to the Bulls for Rose . . .
instead of stabbing lottery pick Robin Lopez in the back (?)

Some players that were drafted in the 20's.
E.Fournier--20
Z.Randolph--20
K.Faried--22
R.Rondo--21
G.Dieng--21
R.Jackson--24
L.Sprewell--24
W.Chandler--23
N.Batum--25
R.Gobert--27
K.Lowry--24
S.Ibaka--24
T.Parker--29

There's many more names that are starters or 2nd unit guys but i got bored.

This is perhaps one of the oddest ongoing debates in sports, and it has a simple answer.

Yes, of course you can find a very good player in the 20s.

And yes, of course it is unlikely.

Those two things can be true at the same time, and as it turns out, are.

meloshouldgo
Posts: 26565
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/3/2014
Member: #5801

7/8/2016  4:54 PM    LAST EDITED: 7/8/2016  4:56 PM
Knickoftime wrote:
newyorker4ever wrote:
Malcolm wrote:After all the historical angst on this board about not trading #1 picks . . .
what good is the 2017 #1 pick now (?)

If Knicks are top 4 in the East next year . . . that's a #22 overall player.

Wouldn't it have been better to trade that to the Bulls for Rose . . .
instead of stabbing lottery pick Robin Lopez in the back (?)

Some players that were drafted in the 20's.
E.Fournier--20
Z.Randolph--20
K.Faried--22
R.Rondo--21
G.Dieng--21
R.Jackson--24
L.Sprewell--24
W.Chandler--23
N.Batum--25
R.Gobert--27
K.Lowry--24
S.Ibaka--24
T.Parker--29

There's many more names that are starters or 2nd unit guys but i got bored.

This is perhaps one of the oddest ongoing debates in sports, and it has a simple answer.

Yes, of course you can find a very good player in the 20s.

And yes, of course it is unlikely.

Those two things can be true at the same time, and as it turns out, are.

Yes it's easy to point out the exceptions. If you do a percentage analysis of the ones that pan out and the ones that don't, it would be a more complete picture and a much better framework for decision making.

I cannot teach anybody anything. I can only try to make them think - Socrates
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
7/8/2016  6:27 PM
meloshouldgo wrote:
Knickoftime wrote:
newyorker4ever wrote:
Malcolm wrote:After all the historical angst on this board about not trading #1 picks . . .
what good is the 2017 #1 pick now (?)

If Knicks are top 4 in the East next year . . . that's a #22 overall player.

Wouldn't it have been better to trade that to the Bulls for Rose . . .
instead of stabbing lottery pick Robin Lopez in the back (?)

Some players that were drafted in the 20's.
E.Fournier--20
Z.Randolph--20
K.Faried--22
R.Rondo--21
G.Dieng--21
R.Jackson--24
L.Sprewell--24
W.Chandler--23
N.Batum--25
R.Gobert--27
K.Lowry--24
S.Ibaka--24
T.Parker--29

There's many more names that are starters or 2nd unit guys but i got bored.

This is perhaps one of the oddest ongoing debates in sports, and it has a simple answer.

Yes, of course you can find a very good player in the 20s.

And yes, of course it is unlikely.

Those two things can be true at the same time, and as it turns out, are.

Yes it's easy to point out the exceptions. If you do a percentage analysis of the ones that pan out and the ones that don't, it would be a more complete picture and a much better framework for decision making.

What's the success rate of teams that tank? Percentage-wise?

¿ △ ?
Sangfroid
Posts: 24681
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/7/2009
Member: #2784

7/8/2016  10:23 PM
Knicksfan wrote:In a deep draft, you always have guys dropping. We will get a nice player if we do our homework and keep the picks.

Don't forget about the new crop of international players going in the first round. It will surely fatten up the pickings at the bottom of the round.

"We are playing a game. We are playing at not playing a game..."
smackeddog
Posts: 38391
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/30/2005
Member: #883
7/9/2016  3:29 AM
Malcolm wrote:After all the historical angst on this board about not trading #1 picks . . .
what good is the 2017 #1 pick now (?)

If Knicks are top 4 in the East next year . . . that's a #22 overall player.

Wouldn't it have been better to trade that to the Bulls for Rose . . .
instead of stabbing lottery pick Robin Lopez in the back (?)

Because if anything goes wrong (injuries, turns out the team doesn't fit together etc), you're covered- what part of the aftermath of the eddy Curry trade did you not understand?

So What Good Is That 2017 #1 Pick Now . . . (?)

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy