EwingsGlass wrote:WaltLongmire wrote:jrodmc wrote:We dumped Grant and still signed a bunch more yoots. Life be good!Everyone spent the whole season pining for an upgraded backcourt, now we have two of them (and still relatively young), and the beeyatching continues...
Don't all teams have 3 top PGs on their roster?
I am waiting to see if Boston waives Demetrius Jackson or if Cleveland passes on Felder. I think its plausible that a PG better than the existing crop will become available. I assume Lawson will not take a Vet minimum deal.
The report this thread is based on, says the Cavs really liked Felder, and they had to pay $2.4M to get him, I think...doubt they give him up, and at less than 5'10" he's not exactly a Phil guy.
Remember, Boston does not have to sign Jackson...and they still retain his rights- or am I wrong about this.
I just don't think Phil will add a project PG to this roster, especially players who can only play PG.
As I've said before, if he doesn't keep Baker in favor of a traditional PG, that PG will be an established NBA player.
EnySpree: Can we agree to agree not to mention Phil Jackson and triangle for the rest of our lives?
7/20/2016 3:16 PM