dk7th wrote:does "lead guard" mean only a point guard? the article mentions afflalo and his possible opt out. shouldn't "lead guard" mean either backcourt position for this team?
To me, it's the guy that drives the bus. Doesn't have to be a pure PG necessarily--it could be a combo or more of a scoring guard, whatever (Steph Curry's arguably the best guard in the league and he's no pure point), but a guy that possesses all the requisite skills to run the show -- good enough handle, some speed, breakdown ability, good enough passer. If a guy has that and there are other attractive factors in addition (like in Jerryd Bayless' case, he'd come cheaper than others, he's a knockdown shooter, he has the ability to go out and get his own shot whenever he wants and I think the ability to average 15 ppg/5 apg if leaned on for that amount of production) -- that all factors into a good lead guard candidate imo.
Take a good look at Jordan Clarkson for a sec. -- I like him a lot. He's no pure PG, tough, but I'd classify him as a lead guard. What's the big differences between Clarkson and Jerryd Bayless? One guy's a little younger, OK, but the big difference is Clarkson's gonna get paid a premium whereas Bayless, essentially the same player in my eyes, will go for a fraction of the cost. And when it's all said and done both guys might wind up at the same production level. See that's my thing here -- why pay a premium for Clarkson or Conley Jr. or why trade away our starting center for a Jeff Teague for a production level we could have a good chance of getting out of a Jerryd Bayless for so much less?? Bayless, to me, would be ideal for now -- but I'd also like to invest in another younger understudy to go with Bayless (zeroing in on the handful of quality PG options that should be available in the late 1st round/2nd round/undrafted pool of talent in this upcoming draft) which would give JH options along with providing insurance in case Grant/Wroten didn't pan out, Bayless came aboard but didn't play like I think he's capable of playing, etc.. This would be my plan going into this offseason -- be judicious with the money for once (we don't have to blow it all just because we have the cap room, and we should certainly be mindful by now of not blowing it all on the wrong players--can't stress this enough) but at the same time, looking to add to the talent base for now and the future.