martin wrote:blkexec wrote:SupremeCommander wrote:nychamp wrote:newyorker4ever wrote:I've said this before that we should just add a legit SG this off season and go with Wroten/Grant at PG next season which will tell us if one of or both of them can step up and be a starting PG for us and having Hornacek will only help and if neither one show they can be a full time starter then the following off season is loaded with legit PG's and with the cap going up another $18/$20 mil we can get our PG of the future and Grant/Wroten can be really good athletic guards to come off the bench and give us instant offense with the 2nd team and both can play either guard spot as well.
This seems best to me too. Eyes potentially on Westbrook next offseason, but secure a solid starting SG this offseason and see how the team develops.
DeRozan would be a good fit here and maybe he makes a move if Lowry continues self destructing. I'd love to one up Toronto just once...
DeRozan is fools gold.
Having only seen DeRozan play in these playoffs, I can't see what he does well. What's his bread and butter? It surely ain't scoring or shooting, so what is it?
the knock on him is he needs volume
what i see is someone who seems to get 30 points in some games which all look comfortable for him, in rhthym i.e., doesn't need to shoot out of his mind. Guy doesn't break a sweat, never tires, and is pretty smart with the basketball. Midrange game mostly
His playoffs have been poor relatively speaking but i think that's because other teams can focus on him so much given Toronto's style of play
Key question in my mind, which talent evaluators (not me) would need to know: how will his game translate to one which is more team oriented with lots of passing. He can definitely score with the ball in his hand, but what if it isn't, and can he enable others to score -- this is where Phil's transformative mumbo jumbo comes in.