|
martin
Posts: 80098
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2 USA
|
ChuckBuck wrote:martin wrote:ChuckBuck wrote:martin wrote:ChuckBuck wrote:newyorker4ever wrote:fishmike wrote:And that is what we have right now... we have a frontcourt with no backcourt. Literally none.That being said the frontcourt is pretty damn good. Lopez and KP are excellent together and compliment. Melo at 31 put up career best assist #s and it right at his career high for rebounds which bodes well when he slides to the 4 in smaller lineups. If you have ever played basketball, or any team sport for that matter and have been on a different teams you would know that when one area is so totally weak and undermanned as our backcourt is it hurts your strengths. Your star RB, QB and WRs all look average or bad if your OLine stinks. No defense looks great when the pitcher on the mound is serving up laser beams and no front court will look good if your guards cant stay in front of their man or be enough of a scoring threat to space the floor. I have read some doom and gloom about how much we stink and how there are 20 other teams better than us and I wonder if folks understand how team sports work? A pair of good guards probably adds 15 or more wins to this team... easily. This is not an easy fix. Getting good NBA talent is not easy. If it was Phil would be posting on UK and people would listen to Briggs. It is not a given we fix this, but the path is pretty clear and the rest of the parts look very very good. I think the best way to get our back court right is to be patient and not try to do it in one off season but do it in two off seasons. With the cap increases this off season and the next being right around $20 million each season we should get a legit PG/SG this off season and get the other the following off season. So in two years we have a legit starting 5 and work on the bench with getting solid pieces in both off seasons. Every team in the NBA will have cap space though. Why would free agents pick New York over competitive teams with cap space? Also, the system we're running and coach matter too. Cap Space doesn't equate getting quality players. With the exception of RoLo playing up to snuff, see 2015 New York Knicks free agent haul. So not every team has cap space next year. And not every team with cap space needs the same type of player to fill out their roster. The title contenders will not, but about 80% of the NBA teams this offseason will have cap space similar to New York's or much higher: http://basketball.realgm.com/analysis/240096/The-Maximum-Available-2016-Cap-Space-For-All-30-NBA-Teams Simple supply and demand model. Not enough good free agents, but near every team will want them (about 24 teams). Even if not every team wants Mike Conley and DeMar Derozan and Nicolas Batum, there's enough teams that are setup more favorably than New York. Some teams have enough cap space to cash in on 2 MAX free agents, so there's that possibility as well. Who wouldn't want to play for Boston or Dallas that are only a few pieces away from making deep playoff runs rather than toil away in New York for the next 3 or 4 years being irrelevant. So you just jumped from all teams will have cap space to 80% of teams will have cap space? Care to dig a little deeper and actually lay out the landscape for us? I tried to do it back a few weeks ago. The below doesn't take into account opt outs and RFA, rookies, etc (good example is Beal in WAS): Salary Rk Team 2016-17 1 Cleveland Cavaliers $103,217,259 2 San Antonio Spurs $84,583,607 3 Los Angeles Clippers $83,949,072 4 Toronto Raptors $82,724,898 5 Golden State Warriors $80,023,544 6 Chicago Bulls $74,201,034 7 New Orleans Pelicans $71,967,511 8 Houston Rockets $71,242,899 9 New York Knicks $69,779,528 10 Oklahoma City Thunder $69,610,963 11 Detroit Pistons $69,150,393 12 Minnesota Timberwolves $68,933,517 13 Sacramento Kings $65,768,345 14 Phoenix Suns $64,221,231 15 Memphis Grizzlies $61,959,704 16 Denver Nuggets $61,725,530 17 Dallas Mavericks $61,315,955 18 Utah Jazz $60,906,285 19 Milwaukee Bucks $60,829,049 20 Indiana Pacers $59,242,253 21 Portland Trail Blazers $56,784,823 22 Brooklyn Nets $56,662,720 23 Atlanta Hawks $55,537,594 24 Boston Celtics $51,161,569 25 Washington Wizards $50,268,952 26 Charlotte Hornets $48,905,399 27 Miami Heat $48,881,586 28 Orlando Magic $44,908,271 29 Philadelphia 76ers $33,377,246 30 Los Angeles Lakers $26,101,518
Here's a visual representation of where the Knicks stand. Right smack dab in the middle. Forget about the numbers, the initial estimate was $89 Mill, then they said $92 mill, now they're saying $95 mill...doesn't matter. 
Basically alot more teams have more money to throw at the same free agents we'll be chasing. outside of a nice pic you didn't add anything to what was already posted. And by saying that "Basically alot more teams have more money to throw at the same free agents we'll be chasing." you are making an over generalization that adds nothing, it amounts to saying that every team will be under the cap. The pic and my table lack one big caveat: free agents that will need to be retained, and that will be a showstopper to a lot of teams' cap space. Also, notice that your pic has the Cavs with $28M in cap space. Something is wrong with that.
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
|