foosballnick wrote:mreinman wrote:CrushAlot wrote:mreinman wrote:EnySpree wrote:mreinman wrote:EnySpree wrote:I don't like Chaunceys commentator style. He wants to be hard and no nonsense. He's also using Melo to get that out there. Is kinda disgusting if you ask me. He's a former player and knows what is like to be slandered by the media. Now he's doing it and using his insider information as a former teamate. Also he's trying to bring the Knicks down too. Players holds Chauncey on a pedestal. If he says a point guard will not want to play in the triangle guys will follow that based on that alone. He's disgusting.
I think that he is great and refreshing. He was under appreciated as a player and now as a commentator.
Not when he's slandering your team. His comments hurt our free agent chances and helps fuel the potential drama surrounding Melo. We don't need that. Nothing refreshing about about slander and sabotage.
not sabotage. He is saying what you don't want to hear and what every PG thinks.
the triangle will get us a wrotten but no way a connelly.
they better fix this stupidity is what he is saying and he is right. This is not your fathers basketball anymore.
I disagree. I think Chauncey was really pissed that he got sent out of Denver because Melo wanted NY. He goes at him a lot in broadcasts and he also is the guy that is credited with 'getting Melo to function in a team concept'. Not a good look for Chauncey. He could get his message across in a manner that was less condemning of his old teammate if he feels the need to go there. I also think he is still angry at the Knick organization for amnestying him( see recent comments).
wow you seem to be able to be critical but can you use this in a fair and balanced way? Or, do you believe that a true fan can only criticize players on other teams? Or ex players that mentions current players?
Let's face it, what he says fits your agenda so you support it. I'm not a triangle guy, but your constantly complaining about it on this board is tiring.
if you find it tiring then ignore and move on. You argument here is .... well ... not anything.
I don't have agenda's or alliances. I disagree with both sides all the time because I say what I think I see and not what is ok for the stupid party lines.
Funny ... I did not like the triangle from the start. Everyone basically did .... now here come the ship jumpers.
Melo ... I have been killing about his lack of passing and had to listen to all the excuses in the book from the melo team about how he finally has a team and players to pass to now blah blah blah .... how is that argument looking now? Yet he is still passing. Interesting.
Honesty is such a lonely word everyone is so ...
so here is what phil is thinking ....