[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Isn't Afflalo supposed to be helping KP when no Melo?
Author Thread
newyorker4ever
Posts: 26515
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/19/2014
Member: #5816

1/17/2016  1:37 PM
nyknickzingis wrote:Afflalo is a good scorer in the post and can defend. He's a solid support player. Not a guy you can ask to be your number 1 or 2 scorer, which is what we often wind up using him as.

I think his best role would be to come off the bench next year if we keep him. We need a starting 2 who can pass, shoot 3's or is just younger and more athletic. Afflalo can be really good as the go to scorer off the bench.


The only way i keep Afflalo if i'm Phil is if he doesn't opt out and then yes i try to find a better player for the 2 guard spot and make Afflalo our 6th man.
AUTOADVERT
newyorker4ever
Posts: 26515
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/19/2014
Member: #5816

1/17/2016  1:42 PM    LAST EDITED: 1/17/2016  1:44 PM
martin wrote:
newyorker4ever wrote:
martin wrote:
newyorker4ever wrote:
newyorker4ever wrote:
Rookie wrote:
newyorker4ever wrote:
Rookie wrote:Knicks have had a tough schedule without a lot of rest. No need for panic moves. The AS break can't come soon enough. Hopefully we can stay competitive till then. These guys are playing hard and need some rest. Our schedule this year has sucked and I think the short rotation is wearing us down. AA shouldn't be playing 36 minutes. What we need is a little more depth, and not to blow the team up.

I don't agree and wouldn't call getting rid of guys that aren't in our future plans a panic move. This team that we have now is NOT a team that we can win in the playoffs with and is NOT the finished product that Phil has in mind anyway so why not keep building for the future even if it means missing the playoffs this year?? We need to remember that this roster is gonna change regardless if we do it at this trade deadline or in the off season but the difference is we could get something for some of these guys now but not after this season when they opt out of their contracts.

The position we really need an upgrade at is PG. Your post and reply are so full of contradictions that I am not going to spend the time to point them out. This thread is ridiculous.


I don't know if you know this but nobody asked you to spend any of your to point anything out and nobody even asked you to even post anything in this thread so be gone. lol By the way.......we all know that we need an upgrade at point guard and we talk about it every day on here.

But that's just stating the obvious. How and who and is it clearly beneficial.


Well you tell me what you think about it?? Do you think we should trade any of the guys i mentioned in A.Afflalo, D.Williams, L.Galloway or K.O'Quinn to keep building for the future or do we keep the guys we have and make a playoff run knowing that AA and DW will opt out after this year and be looking for more money and even more years on a contract?? If they do opt out and we give them more money then we won't have the money to sign a max guy so guys like M.Conley, N.Batum and D.Derozan will no longer be guys we can afford.

unless it's a no-brainer deal than I say do nothing at this point. Roster turnover is hard to deal with unless it's end of bench player or obvious long-term upgrades. Similarly, the Knicks have started to get some cohesion in the starting lineup before this Melo ankle turn, why ruin that?

If AA, DWill opt out (and that's an IF), then Knicks will have more cap money to spend elsewhere, plenty of guys out there. If they opt out, there is no assumption that we HAVE to sign them or sign them to more money, why have you assumed that?


Well i don't think i ever just assumed that cause i'm pretty sure i always used the word "if" but if i did then that's not how i meant it. I do think with the way AA and DW are playing that both will opt out and want more money especially DW cause he's so young and again with the way he's been playing i think there will be plenty of teams ready to offer him more money and years. I would just hate to lose a guy like DW for nothing when i would have to think if we put him on the trade market there will be playoff teams standing in line to trade for him cause he's really bringing it on the offensive end and teams would love to have him on their bench to have instant offense when needed.
martin
Posts: 80097
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
1/17/2016  1:51 PM
newyorker4ever wrote:
martin wrote:
newyorker4ever wrote:
martin wrote:
newyorker4ever wrote:
newyorker4ever wrote:
Rookie wrote:
newyorker4ever wrote:
Rookie wrote:Knicks have had a tough schedule without a lot of rest. No need for panic moves. The AS break can't come soon enough. Hopefully we can stay competitive till then. These guys are playing hard and need some rest. Our schedule this year has sucked and I think the short rotation is wearing us down. AA shouldn't be playing 36 minutes. What we need is a little more depth, and not to blow the team up.

I don't agree and wouldn't call getting rid of guys that aren't in our future plans a panic move. This team that we have now is NOT a team that we can win in the playoffs with and is NOT the finished product that Phil has in mind anyway so why not keep building for the future even if it means missing the playoffs this year?? We need to remember that this roster is gonna change regardless if we do it at this trade deadline or in the off season but the difference is we could get something for some of these guys now but not after this season when they opt out of their contracts.

The position we really need an upgrade at is PG. Your post and reply are so full of contradictions that I am not going to spend the time to point them out. This thread is ridiculous.


I don't know if you know this but nobody asked you to spend any of your to point anything out and nobody even asked you to even post anything in this thread so be gone. lol By the way.......we all know that we need an upgrade at point guard and we talk about it every day on here.

But that's just stating the obvious. How and who and is it clearly beneficial.


Well you tell me what you think about it?? Do you think we should trade any of the guys i mentioned in A.Afflalo, D.Williams, L.Galloway or K.O'Quinn to keep building for the future or do we keep the guys we have and make a playoff run knowing that AA and DW will opt out after this year and be looking for more money and even more years on a contract?? If they do opt out and we give them more money then we won't have the money to sign a max guy so guys like M.Conley, N.Batum and D.Derozan will no longer be guys we can afford.

unless it's a no-brainer deal than I say do nothing at this point. Roster turnover is hard to deal with unless it's end of bench player or obvious long-term upgrades. Similarly, the Knicks have started to get some cohesion in the starting lineup before this Melo ankle turn, why ruin that?

If AA, DWill opt out (and that's an IF), then Knicks will have more cap money to spend elsewhere, plenty of guys out there. If they opt out, there is no assumption that we HAVE to sign them or sign them to more money, why have you assumed that?


Well i don't think i ever just assumed that cause i'm pretty sure i always used the word "if" but if i did then that's not how i meant it. I do think with the way AA and DW are playing that both will opt out and want more money especially DW cause he's so young and again with the way he's been playing i think there will be plenty of teams ready to offer him more money and years. I would just hate to lose a guy like DW for nothing when i would have to think if we put him on the trade market there will be playoff teams standing in line to trade for him cause he's really bringing it on the offensive end and teams would love to have him on their bench to have instant offense when needed.

For me, in the acr that is the building of the Knicks, bench players will come and go. Before this season, everyone HATED the idea of DWill for more than the minimum or at least a lot less than the $5M he currently gets. The Knicks need starters first and upgrade that talent. DWill opts out, and the Knicks will have $24M in cap, add AA to that and the number goes to $32M. $32M is more than enough to upgrade the starting backcourt, so I'm not worried about them leaving.

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
newyorker4ever
Posts: 26515
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/19/2014
Member: #5816

1/17/2016  2:39 PM
martin wrote:
newyorker4ever wrote:
martin wrote:
newyorker4ever wrote:
martin wrote:
newyorker4ever wrote:
newyorker4ever wrote:
Rookie wrote:
newyorker4ever wrote:
Rookie wrote:Knicks have had a tough schedule without a lot of rest. No need for panic moves. The AS break can't come soon enough. Hopefully we can stay competitive till then. These guys are playing hard and need some rest. Our schedule this year has sucked and I think the short rotation is wearing us down. AA shouldn't be playing 36 minutes. What we need is a little more depth, and not to blow the team up.

I don't agree and wouldn't call getting rid of guys that aren't in our future plans a panic move. This team that we have now is NOT a team that we can win in the playoffs with and is NOT the finished product that Phil has in mind anyway so why not keep building for the future even if it means missing the playoffs this year?? We need to remember that this roster is gonna change regardless if we do it at this trade deadline or in the off season but the difference is we could get something for some of these guys now but not after this season when they opt out of their contracts.

The position we really need an upgrade at is PG. Your post and reply are so full of contradictions that I am not going to spend the time to point them out. This thread is ridiculous.


I don't know if you know this but nobody asked you to spend any of your to point anything out and nobody even asked you to even post anything in this thread so be gone. lol By the way.......we all know that we need an upgrade at point guard and we talk about it every day on here.

But that's just stating the obvious. How and who and is it clearly beneficial.


Well you tell me what you think about it?? Do you think we should trade any of the guys i mentioned in A.Afflalo, D.Williams, L.Galloway or K.O'Quinn to keep building for the future or do we keep the guys we have and make a playoff run knowing that AA and DW will opt out after this year and be looking for more money and even more years on a contract?? If they do opt out and we give them more money then we won't have the money to sign a max guy so guys like M.Conley, N.Batum and D.Derozan will no longer be guys we can afford.

unless it's a no-brainer deal than I say do nothing at this point. Roster turnover is hard to deal with unless it's end of bench player or obvious long-term upgrades. Similarly, the Knicks have started to get some cohesion in the starting lineup before this Melo ankle turn, why ruin that?

If AA, DWill opt out (and that's an IF), then Knicks will have more cap money to spend elsewhere, plenty of guys out there. If they opt out, there is no assumption that we HAVE to sign them or sign them to more money, why have you assumed that?


Well i don't think i ever just assumed that cause i'm pretty sure i always used the word "if" but if i did then that's not how i meant it. I do think with the way AA and DW are playing that both will opt out and want more money especially DW cause he's so young and again with the way he's been playing i think there will be plenty of teams ready to offer him more money and years. I would just hate to lose a guy like DW for nothing when i would have to think if we put him on the trade market there will be playoff teams standing in line to trade for him cause he's really bringing it on the offensive end and teams would love to have him on their bench to have instant offense when needed.

For me, in the acr that is the building of the Knicks, bench players will come and go. Before this season, everyone HATED the idea of DWill for more than the minimum or at least a lot less than the $5M he currently gets. The Knicks need starters first and upgrade that talent. DWill opts out, and the Knicks will have $24M in cap, add AA to that and the number goes to $32M. $32M is more than enough to upgrade the starting backcourt, so I'm not worried about them leaving.

Ok, and thank you for giving a straight forward answer which i haven't gotten much of yet. I can agree with you that if we lose them then it really just ups our cap room and we'll be able to find replacements for them but i sure would love to be in on this next draft with a pick or two which we have none of as of now.

NardDogNation
Posts: 27692
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 5/7/2013
Member: #5555

1/17/2016  2:51 PM    LAST EDITED: 1/17/2016  2:55 PM
martin wrote:
newyorker4ever wrote:
martin wrote:
newyorker4ever wrote:
martin wrote:
newyorker4ever wrote:
newyorker4ever wrote:
Rookie wrote:
newyorker4ever wrote:
Rookie wrote:Knicks have had a tough schedule without a lot of rest. No need for panic moves. The AS break can't come soon enough. Hopefully we can stay competitive till then. These guys are playing hard and need some rest. Our schedule this year has sucked and I think the short rotation is wearing us down. AA shouldn't be playing 36 minutes. What we need is a little more depth, and not to blow the team up.

I don't agree and wouldn't call getting rid of guys that aren't in our future plans a panic move. This team that we have now is NOT a team that we can win in the playoffs with and is NOT the finished product that Phil has in mind anyway so why not keep building for the future even if it means missing the playoffs this year?? We need to remember that this roster is gonna change regardless if we do it at this trade deadline or in the off season but the difference is we could get something for some of these guys now but not after this season when they opt out of their contracts.

The position we really need an upgrade at is PG. Your post and reply are so full of contradictions that I am not going to spend the time to point them out. This thread is ridiculous.


I don't know if you know this but nobody asked you to spend any of your to point anything out and nobody even asked you to even post anything in this thread so be gone. lol By the way.......we all know that we need an upgrade at point guard and we talk about it every day on here.

But that's just stating the obvious. How and who and is it clearly beneficial.


Well you tell me what you think about it?? Do you think we should trade any of the guys i mentioned in A.Afflalo, D.Williams, L.Galloway or K.O'Quinn to keep building for the future or do we keep the guys we have and make a playoff run knowing that AA and DW will opt out after this year and be looking for more money and even more years on a contract?? If they do opt out and we give them more money then we won't have the money to sign a max guy so guys like M.Conley, N.Batum and D.Derozan will no longer be guys we can afford.

unless it's a no-brainer deal than I say do nothing at this point. Roster turnover is hard to deal with unless it's end of bench player or obvious long-term upgrades. Similarly, the Knicks have started to get some cohesion in the starting lineup before this Melo ankle turn, why ruin that?

If AA, DWill opt out (and that's an IF), then Knicks will have more cap money to spend elsewhere, plenty of guys out there. If they opt out, there is no assumption that we HAVE to sign them or sign them to more money, why have you assumed that?


Well i don't think i ever just assumed that cause i'm pretty sure i always used the word "if" but if i did then that's not how i meant it. I do think with the way AA and DW are playing that both will opt out and want more money especially DW cause he's so young and again with the way he's been playing i think there will be plenty of teams ready to offer him more money and years. I would just hate to lose a guy like DW for nothing when i would have to think if we put him on the trade market there will be playoff teams standing in line to trade for him cause he's really bringing it on the offensive end and teams would love to have him on their bench to have instant offense when needed.

For me, in the acr that is the building of the Knicks, bench players will come and go. Before this season, everyone HATED the idea of DWill for more than the minimum or at least a lot less than the $5M he currently gets. The Knicks need starters first and upgrade that talent. DWill opts out, and the Knicks will have $24M in cap, add AA to that and the number goes to $32M. $32M is more than enough to upgrade the starting backcourt, so I'm not worried about them leaving.

Do you know what Bird Rights we'd own with Williams? I still don't understand how or why we couldn't add pieces to our backcourt in spite of the $5-$7 million cap hold for his deal.

Hell, if his demands get too outrageous, I would not be opposed to letting him walk and then acquire Markieff Morris from the Suns. In the age of the hybrid forward/ small ball lineups, guys like him will always hold value.

NardDogNation
Posts: 27692
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 5/7/2013
Member: #5555

1/17/2016  2:59 PM
...speaking of, would it be a bad idea to reunite the twins and have them be the backbone of our bench? I could see Detriot having interest in D-Will as their starting 4, so a trade of him for Marcus could work. And Markieff could probably be had for cash and a 2nd round pick that would never materialize.
knickscity
Posts: 24533
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/2/2012
Member: #4241
USA
1/17/2016  3:01 PM
NardDogNation wrote:
martin wrote:
newyorker4ever wrote:
martin wrote:
newyorker4ever wrote:
martin wrote:
newyorker4ever wrote:
newyorker4ever wrote:
Rookie wrote:
newyorker4ever wrote:
Rookie wrote:Knicks have had a tough schedule without a lot of rest. No need for panic moves. The AS break can't come soon enough. Hopefully we can stay competitive till then. These guys are playing hard and need some rest. Our schedule this year has sucked and I think the short rotation is wearing us down. AA shouldn't be playing 36 minutes. What we need is a little more depth, and not to blow the team up.

I don't agree and wouldn't call getting rid of guys that aren't in our future plans a panic move. This team that we have now is NOT a team that we can win in the playoffs with and is NOT the finished product that Phil has in mind anyway so why not keep building for the future even if it means missing the playoffs this year?? We need to remember that this roster is gonna change regardless if we do it at this trade deadline or in the off season but the difference is we could get something for some of these guys now but not after this season when they opt out of their contracts.

The position we really need an upgrade at is PG. Your post and reply are so full of contradictions that I am not going to spend the time to point them out. This thread is ridiculous.


I don't know if you know this but nobody asked you to spend any of your to point anything out and nobody even asked you to even post anything in this thread so be gone. lol By the way.......we all know that we need an upgrade at point guard and we talk about it every day on here.

But that's just stating the obvious. How and who and is it clearly beneficial.


Well you tell me what you think about it?? Do you think we should trade any of the guys i mentioned in A.Afflalo, D.Williams, L.Galloway or K.O'Quinn to keep building for the future or do we keep the guys we have and make a playoff run knowing that AA and DW will opt out after this year and be looking for more money and even more years on a contract?? If they do opt out and we give them more money then we won't have the money to sign a max guy so guys like M.Conley, N.Batum and D.Derozan will no longer be guys we can afford.

unless it's a no-brainer deal than I say do nothing at this point. Roster turnover is hard to deal with unless it's end of bench player or obvious long-term upgrades. Similarly, the Knicks have started to get some cohesion in the starting lineup before this Melo ankle turn, why ruin that?

If AA, DWill opt out (and that's an IF), then Knicks will have more cap money to spend elsewhere, plenty of guys out there. If they opt out, there is no assumption that we HAVE to sign them or sign them to more money, why have you assumed that?


Well i don't think i ever just assumed that cause i'm pretty sure i always used the word "if" but if i did then that's not how i meant it. I do think with the way AA and DW are playing that both will opt out and want more money especially DW cause he's so young and again with the way he's been playing i think there will be plenty of teams ready to offer him more money and years. I would just hate to lose a guy like DW for nothing when i would have to think if we put him on the trade market there will be playoff teams standing in line to trade for him cause he's really bringing it on the offensive end and teams would love to have him on their bench to have instant offense when needed.

For me, in the acr that is the building of the Knicks, bench players will come and go. Before this season, everyone HATED the idea of DWill for more than the minimum or at least a lot less than the $5M he currently gets. The Knicks need starters first and upgrade that talent. DWill opts out, and the Knicks will have $24M in cap, add AA to that and the number goes to $32M. $32M is more than enough to upgrade the starting backcourt, so I'm not worried about them leaving.

Do you know what Bird Rights we'd own with Williams? I still don't understand how or why we couldn't add pieces to our backcourt in spite of the $5-$7 million cap hold for his deal.

Hell, if his demands get too outrageous, I would not be opposed to letting him walk and then acquire Markieff Morris from the Suns. In the age of the hybrid forward/ small ball lineups, guys like him will always hold value.


Bird rights really dont matter much unless a max deal is being offered
newyorker4ever
Posts: 26515
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/19/2014
Member: #5816

1/17/2016  3:44 PM
NardDogNation wrote:...speaking of, would it be a bad idea to reunite the twins and have them be the backbone of our bench? I could see Detriot having interest in D-Will as their starting 4, so a trade of him for Marcus could work. And Markieff could probably be had for cash and a 2nd round pick that would never materialize.

The problem with the Morris twins is that they get in off court trouble when they're together and they make locker room troubles when they're not together or at least Markief does. I don't see Phil wanting that on the team he's trying to build when he's trying to build a team with team players. I don't have a problem trading DW though but i think i'd steer more towards draft picks if it were me. Martin made good points though that if both AA and DW do stay with us for the rest of this year and they both do opt out of their contracts and we don't re-sign them then it really just gives us more cap to spend elsewhere but i would hate to lose either one if i knew i could have gotten draft picks for them.

dk7th
Posts: 30006
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/14/2012
Member: #4228
USA
1/17/2016  4:00 PM    LAST EDITED: 1/17/2016  5:17 PM
afflalo doesn't facilitate and he's an overrated defender. i initially liked the signing but now that we have had a closer look at his game i think there's a very good reason he is on his 6th in team in 9 years. in terms of the valuable tool "real plus minus," this season afflalo is ranked 26th in the league among starting shooting guards, meaning he's not good enough to be a starter on a 19th-ranked knicks team. clearly he's a 6th man on a contender... at best.

meanwhile kp is ranked 11th among starting power forwards (and as a rookie no less!!) and melo is ranked 5th among small forwards.

knicks win 38-43 games in 16-17. rose MUST shoot no more than 14 shots per game, defer to kp6 + melo, and have a usage rate of less than 25%
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
1/17/2016  5:06 PM
dk7th wrote:afflalo doesn't facilitate and he's an overrated defender. i initially liked the signing but now that we have had a closer look at his game i think there's a very good reason he is on his 6th in team in 9 years. in terms of his the valuable tool "real plus minus," this season afflalo is ranked 26th in the league among starting shooting guards, meaning he's not good enough to be a starter on a 19th-ranked knicks team. clearly he's a 6th man on a contender... at best.

meanwhile kp is ranked 11th among starting power forwards (and as a rookie no less!!) and melo is ranked 5th among small forwards.

There's no question the position can be upgraded, just keep in my that there' a lot of options at sg overall.

ES
dk7th
Posts: 30006
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/14/2012
Member: #4228
USA
1/17/2016  5:32 PM
knicks1248 wrote:
dk7th wrote:afflalo doesn't facilitate and he's an overrated defender. i initially liked the signing but now that we have had a closer look at his game i think there's a very good reason he is on his 6th in team in 9 years. in terms of his the valuable tool "real plus minus," this season afflalo is ranked 26th in the league among starting shooting guards, meaning he's not good enough to be a starter on a 19th-ranked knicks team. clearly he's a 6th man on a contender... at best.

meanwhile kp is ranked 11th among starting power forwards (and as a rookie no less!!) and melo is ranked 5th among small forwards.

There's no question the position can be upgraded, just keep in my that there' a lot of options at sg overall.

even though i don't like westbrooks's game i can imagine being an ideal upgrade for the triangle. some here may have already stated as much, but it was a while ago. looking at when westbrook's contract until 2017-18, it's too bad the careers of he and melo don't really overlap. you'd have to hope melo continues to evolve his game as he ages. by then he may well no longer be a starter when westbrook becomes available but that's really okay. complete players-- the kind of player he has shown he can become-- extend their careers with a slower diminishment of effectiveness.

in the meantime, you have to make sure whoever you get is no older than 26 or so, no matter the position.

knicks win 38-43 games in 16-17. rose MUST shoot no more than 14 shots per game, defer to kp6 + melo, and have a usage rate of less than 25%
nyknickzingis
Posts: 23029
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/8/2015
Member: #6207

1/17/2016  5:46 PM
newyorker4ever wrote:
nyknickzingis wrote:Afflalo is a good scorer in the post and can defend. He's a solid support player. Not a guy you can ask to be your number 1 or 2 scorer, which is what we often wind up using him as.

I think his best role would be to come off the bench next year if we keep him. We need a starting 2 who can pass, shoot 3's or is just younger and more athletic. Afflalo can be really good as the go to scorer off the bench.


The only way i keep Afflalo if i'm Phil is if he doesn't opt out and then yes i try to find a better player for the 2 guard spot and make Afflalo our 6th man.

I'd keep Afflalo under many circumstances other than the obvious opt in.

If he is willing to take a 3 year deal but at a lower starting salary - say 6 million starting. He can probably get 20/2 from a few teams, maybe even more. But for the lower yearly cap hit, I'd take him.

At the current price or up to 10 million a year for 2 more years, with the 2nd year a team option.

He's a professional. Hard worker. Can start or be a go to scorer off the bench. He fits into the Triangle as he's a wing that can post up which is a big advantage to an offense like the Triangle.

If we are able to sign Conley, a Conley/Afflalo/Grant/Galloway rotation is very very effective. Lots of different combinations you can use for your backcourt.

newyorker4ever
Posts: 26515
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/19/2014
Member: #5816

1/17/2016  6:10 PM
dk7th wrote:afflalo doesn't facilitate and he's an overrated defender. i initially liked the signing but now that we have had a closer look at his game i think there's a very good reason he is on his 6th in team in 9 years. in terms of the valuable tool "real plus minus," this season afflalo is ranked 26th in the league among starting shooting guards, meaning he's not good enough to be a starter on a 19th-ranked knicks team. clearly he's a 6th man on a contender... at best.

meanwhile kp is ranked 11th among starting power forwards (and as a rookie no less!!) and melo is ranked 5th among small forwards.


Yeah i also liked the AA signing more when it happened than i do now. I also still like him but would like him more as the first guard off the bench/6th man more than as our starting 2 guard. So it looks to me that the main priority should be both guard spots to put with KP, Melo and Rolo. If we do lose both AA and DW in the off season then that will give us the money to sign a M.Conley and a better SG. I'd like for both to not opt out but i don't see that happening especially with DW.
newyorker4ever
Posts: 26515
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/19/2014
Member: #5816

1/17/2016  6:13 PM
dk7th wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:
dk7th wrote:afflalo doesn't facilitate and he's an overrated defender. i initially liked the signing but now that we have had a closer look at his game i think there's a very good reason he is on his 6th in team in 9 years. in terms of his the valuable tool "real plus minus," this season afflalo is ranked 26th in the league among starting shooting guards, meaning he's not good enough to be a starter on a 19th-ranked knicks team. clearly he's a 6th man on a contender... at best.

meanwhile kp is ranked 11th among starting power forwards (and as a rookie no less!!) and melo is ranked 5th among small forwards.

There's no question the position can be upgraded, just keep in my that there' a lot of options at sg overall.

even though i don't like westbrooks's game i can imagine being an ideal upgrade for the triangle. some here may have already stated as much, but it was a while ago. looking at when westbrook's contract until 2017-18, it's too bad the careers of he and melo don't really overlap. you'd have to hope melo continues to evolve his game as he ages. by then he may well no longer be a starter when westbrook becomes available but that's really okay. complete players-- the kind of player he has shown he can become-- extend their careers with a slower diminishment of effectiveness.

in the meantime, you have to make sure whoever you get is no older than 26 or so, no matter the position.

Wait did i read this right and you said you don't think Melo will be a starter when Westbrook hits free agency which is in two years?? If i did read it right then you sir are crazy.

CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
1/17/2016  6:18 PM
newyorker4ever wrote:
dk7th wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:
dk7th wrote:afflalo doesn't facilitate and he's an overrated defender. i initially liked the signing but now that we have had a closer look at his game i think there's a very good reason he is on his 6th in team in 9 years. in terms of his the valuable tool "real plus minus," this season afflalo is ranked 26th in the league among starting shooting guards, meaning he's not good enough to be a starter on a 19th-ranked knicks team. clearly he's a 6th man on a contender... at best.

meanwhile kp is ranked 11th among starting power forwards (and as a rookie no less!!) and melo is ranked 5th among small forwards.

There's no question the position can be upgraded, just keep in my that there' a lot of options at sg overall.

even though i don't like westbrooks's game i can imagine being an ideal upgrade for the triangle. some here may have already stated as much, but it was a while ago. looking at when westbrook's contract until 2017-18, it's too bad the careers of he and melo don't really overlap. you'd have to hope melo continues to evolve his game as he ages. by then he may well no longer be a starter when westbrook becomes available but that's really okay. complete players-- the kind of player he has shown he can become-- extend their careers with a slower diminishment of effectiveness.

in the meantime, you have to make sure whoever you get is no older than 26 or so, no matter the position.

Wait did i read this right and you said you don't think Melo will be a starter when Westbrook hits free agency which is in two years?? If i did read it right then you sir are crazy.

He has also said Melo should be a sixth man but not recently.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
dk7th
Posts: 30006
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/14/2012
Member: #4228
USA
1/17/2016  6:55 PM
newyorker4ever wrote:
dk7th wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:
dk7th wrote:afflalo doesn't facilitate and he's an overrated defender. i initially liked the signing but now that we have had a closer look at his game i think there's a very good reason he is on his 6th in team in 9 years. in terms of his the valuable tool "real plus minus," this season afflalo is ranked 26th in the league among starting shooting guards, meaning he's not good enough to be a starter on a 19th-ranked knicks team. clearly he's a 6th man on a contender... at best.

meanwhile kp is ranked 11th among starting power forwards (and as a rookie no less!!) and melo is ranked 5th among small forwards.

There's no question the position can be upgraded, just keep in my that there' a lot of options at sg overall.

even though i don't like westbrooks's game i can imagine being an ideal upgrade for the triangle. some here may have already stated as much, but it was a while ago. looking at when westbrook's contract until 2017-18, it's too bad the careers of he and melo don't really overlap. you'd have to hope melo continues to evolve his game as he ages. by then he may well no longer be a starter when westbrook becomes available but that's really okay. complete players-- the kind of player he has shown he can become-- extend their careers with a slower diminishment of effectiveness.

in the meantime, you have to make sure whoever you get is no older than 26 or so, no matter the position.

Wait did i read this right and you said you don't think Melo will be a starter when Westbrook hits free agency which is in two years?? If i did read it right then you sir are crazy.

well i would rather he not be a bench player but there's no way of knowing whether or how much he will have been diminished by age and injury. that said, the more he focusses on facilitating he can evolve in such a way that extends his career while remaining effective. i love the way he is playing this season but will he be the same physically in a couple of years?

by the end of this 2015-16 season he will be just shy of his 32nd birthday. by the end of 2017-2018 carmelo will be 33 years old. and that is an old 33 because melo was a one and done. by then he will have played 14-15 seasons and accumulated 35,000 minutes. all these are a factor.

knicks win 38-43 games in 16-17. rose MUST shoot no more than 14 shots per game, defer to kp6 + melo, and have a usage rate of less than 25%
Knicks1969
Posts: 25394
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/7/2014
Member: #5915

1/17/2016  7:11 PM
We can't keep changing players season after season; this is not how you build and nurture chemistry. We can add one player here and there, but not two or three at a time. AFLALO is a good dude and produce when guys can help create space for him to operate. He is at his best on offense and defense when he is guarded or guarding smaller players, but has difficulty with taller players
Thank God Fisher is no longer our coach, now let's get Calderon out of here:)
dk7th
Posts: 30006
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/14/2012
Member: #4228
USA
1/17/2016  7:33 PM
Knicks1969 wrote:We can't keep changing players season after season; this is not how you build and nurture chemistry. We can add one player here and there, but not two or three at a time. AFLALO is a good dude and produce when guys can help create space for him to operate. He is at his best on offense and defense when he is guarded or guarding smaller players, but has difficulty with taller players

his defense and facilitating skills are not enough to be a starter on a contending team, meaning a top-6 team. unfortunately there's no one out there in free agency that fits the bill next season.

knicks win 38-43 games in 16-17. rose MUST shoot no more than 14 shots per game, defer to kp6 + melo, and have a usage rate of less than 25%
dk7th
Posts: 30006
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/14/2012
Member: #4228
USA
1/17/2016  7:36 PM
actually if evan turner is available next summer he'd be a good pickup. cheaper contract and a better playmaker than afflalo.
knicks win 38-43 games in 16-17. rose MUST shoot no more than 14 shots per game, defer to kp6 + melo, and have a usage rate of less than 25%
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
1/17/2016  7:42 PM
dk7th wrote:actually if evan turner is available next summer he'd be a good pickup. cheaper contract and a better playmaker than afflalo.

He doesn't fit, he's not a post up guard

ES
Isn't Afflalo supposed to be helping KP when no Melo?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy