mreinman wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:mreinman wrote:yellowboy90 wrote:Bpm and vorp have Melo ahead of Drummond.
melo's numbers are really hurt because of the way he started. Now that he is in a groove he is clearly playing better than Drummond.
So yes you can look at the whole season but playing well at the right time makes a difference when it comes to perception and voting windows.
And, if melo gets his TS back to his average, his WS48 will trend much higher if he stay ThisMelo
This is how a fan speaks more than an objective outsider. IMO Melo's playing great now and I'm happy to see that. But you can't just ignore a whole month or more of the season, unless you're going to remove the 20 worst games from every player.
Almost all the stats would actually say Love, Bosh, Millsap and maybe even a few other forwards have had better seasons than both Melo and Drummond actually.
I am a fan but outsiders are also fans of the all star game. This is not an MVP vote, its an allstar vote. Maybe my use of "deserving" was wrong.
Also, do you not think that its more important to play well to close the season than to start the season? Are all games equal? Interesting question? How about the first 10 minutes of a game or the last 10 minutes? Are they the same? Some stat purists may say yes but I don't think they are the same.
Right now, we're talking about middle of the season vs. start of the season (not closing the season). In the standings, every game is the same. In terms of attracting FAs and satisfying fans, I assume more recent games matter more. More recent games are also likely more predictive of how the team will do in the playoffs than earlier games. But for any kind of season-long award, I would weigh each game equally.