[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Interesting comment by Fisher: "We built the roster this way because we didn't think KP could play the 5 this quickly"
Author Thread
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
12/16/2015  11:20 PM    LAST EDITED: 12/16/2015  11:23 PM
nyknickzingis wrote:I was ABOUT to make this point in terms of giving Phil a lot of credit. All of his signings are showing something significant, other than Lopez and Lopez mainly because they thought he'd be their man closer and go to 5 man, but Porzingis has emerged as their best. So now they have a bit of dilemma as to how to play.

On the bright side it's a good problem to have but Fish has to manage carefully. He overplays the bigger lineup, when he should be toning it down. There was no reason to close with Lopez/Porzingis/Melo tonight. You need to have a strong identity of who you want to close with, and who you want to start.

Lopez should be a starter up until the 6 min mark of each half, then move him to the bench. You bring him back in with the 2nd unit for a bit, and if he's playing really really well or Porzingis is in foul trouble, you close the half with him. It's not that hard, only that considering NY invested so much money in him and designed their defense around Lopez, I think they feel they owe him more PT.

I agree - I think Fisher is trying to manage it... it almost seems like there are times when he is trying to get away with Rolo on the floor. But Rolo did have two big blocks in the closing minutes.

But I am just glad they are acknowledging the potential of the KP at 5 and Melo at 4 lineups. Fisher's been playing it more often lately and it's nice to hear him acknowledge it's a look they want to go with at times. I don't think KP should be a full time 5 right now, but it's a look you go with at times - just like Golden State starts Bogut still, but their self-proclaimed "Death Lineup" features Draymond Green at center.

The Rolo/KP dilemma actually really reminds me of how Bogut is used in Golden State. It is obvious Bogut slows down their offense, but they feed him to keep him engaged, because they know there are games they will need him.

I think Rolo still had a place on the team, as does KOQ.

Though I might try to look into moving Seraphin for a 2/3 who can defend and shoot the 3.

¿ △ ?
AUTOADVERT
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
12/16/2015  11:20 PM
nyknickzingis wrote:I disagree about all the other bigs comments - because Quinn has been a great energy guy for 4 M a year. Seraphin was what a vet min guy? Derrick Williams is a wing, he's not a big at all.

The Knicks need a wing that can handle the ball, play the Pippen role obviously, but last time I checked in the league, there wasn't many players who were available like that. And Lance Thomas has been surprisingly solid.

We definitely need another ballhandling wing, the thing is it's not going to be easy to find that player and that sort of player wasn't available this past summer. Someone like Iguodala would be fantastic, but the W's won't let him go. Perhaps take a big run at Batum this summer, but I don't think he'll walk.

I think pretty much everyone here is praying we get a shot at Batum.

¿ △ ?
nyknickzingis
Posts: 23029
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/8/2015
Member: #6207

12/16/2015  11:30 PM    LAST EDITED: 12/16/2015  11:33 PM
Lopez is someone physical, someone who gives the team the ability to keep KP from playing 5 full time. The major question is playing him in that role for 18-20 mpg worth the 15 M a year price tag? Bogut doesn't play a lot for the Warriors, but is paid a lot as well. Could the team rely on Quinn or Seraphin to replace Lopez as starter? Don't think so.

I think Fisher himself is still trying to figure out the right rotation and strategy. But the best one IMO is one he doesn't use a lot of, which is playing Porzingis at 5 and Melo at 4. You get a wing in there like Batum and a 3 point sniper, and the Knicks go from a team trying to make the playoffs to top 4-5 in the East. Especially if you see some improvement from Porzingis, Galloway and Grant next year as well.

For this season though, best thing is to keep doing more of what we saw tonight, minus the closing minutes Lopez/Porzingis got. Have to close with Lopez or Porzingis at C, with Melo at 4. It proved itself many times this season already.

crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
12/17/2015  12:34 AM    LAST EDITED: 12/17/2015  12:35 AM
"It was definitely a thought in terms of maybe eventually being able to [play center]. And especially when we constructed our roster, there probably weren't going to be a lot of minutes at the center spot because of the guys that we do have. I think as we've grown and evolved, and the way teams are playing, we've been able to do it some. I think it will be good for us, but it's probably not a finished product at this point. But I do think Kris' ability to change shots, block shots and play bigger than what his frame looks like is going to allow us to do it a little bit more."

Fisher might have been talking in the future tense about using Porzingis at center more often, but the truth is that he's already begun to do so. Take a look at the following splits, via the stats site NBAWOWY:

Date MPG at Center
10/28 - 11/20 2.46
11/21 - 12/12 6.50

Porzingis' time at center has grown by more than four minutes per night over the last three weeks—ever since he posted a seven-block game against the Houston Rockets back on Nov. 21. He's registered two more games of at least six blocks since then, meaning Patrick Ewing is now the only Knick since the 1985-86 season with more six-plus block games in a season than Porzingis.

In Wednesday night's win over the Minnesota Timberwolves, Porzingis logged his most extensive time at center yet—15 minutes' worth. He started his block party early on while playing next to Lopez, swatting Andrew Wiggins twice in the first minute and a half of the game, but he continued right on blocking everything in sight even as he patrolled the paint by his lonesome. By the end of the first half, he had six blocks in all. By the end of the night, he had seven, as he closed out the game by blocking a three-point attempt by Karl-Anthony Towns.


http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2599943-kristaps-porzingis-already-shaping-new-york-knicks-defensive-identity

¿ △ ?
Jmpasq
Posts: 25243
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/10/2012
Member: #4182

12/17/2015  12:42 AM
CrushAlot wrote:
Knicks1969 wrote:I still can't believe it took him this long to realize that he has a special talent in KP. In fact, I can't believe how slow he is when it comes to utilize our over all talents. I am glad he is seing the light
KP looks so much better than he did in the summer league in my opinion. I don't think anyone could anticipate this smooth of a transition. KP was being held out for injuries etc. and appeared a bit frail. He has been fantastic.

He has gotten better so damn fast. I don't really blame them for not thinking he was ready, I didnt think so either watching his Spanish tape

Check out My NFL Draft Prospect Videos at Youtube User Pages Jmpasq,JPdraftjedi,Jmpasqdraftjedi. www.Draftbreakdown.com
Knicks1969
Posts: 25394
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/7/2014
Member: #5915

12/17/2015  8:25 AM
Jmpasq wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
Knicks1969 wrote:I still can't believe it took him this long to realize that he has a special talent in KP. In fact, I can't believe how slow he is when it comes to utilize our over all talents. I am glad he is seing the light
KP looks so much better than he did in the summer league in my opinion. I don't think anyone could anticipate this smooth of a transition. KP was being held out for injuries etc. and appeared a bit frail. He has been fantastic.

He has gotten better so damn fast. I don't really blame them for not thinking he was ready, I didnt think so either watching his Spanish tape

KP is a star my friends.....that kid is built right...

Thank God Fisher is no longer our coach, now let's get Calderon out of here:)
fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
12/17/2015  9:01 AM
Im open to him playing some 5, but when I see how we protect the rim with him at the 4 playing next to another 7 footer I see a title caliber frontcourt. When he is next to Lopez and he's allowed to roam a bit he is simply a nightmare. If we had better defense in the backcourt we could be one of the best defensive squads in the league.

That being said Im not one of these guys who cries when I think a guy isnt being used like I think he should be. KP's development has been incredible, and for you guys crying about Fisher you need to understand this coaching staff has put this guy in a position to suceed time and time again.

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
12/17/2015  10:17 AM    LAST EDITED: 12/17/2015  10:18 AM
fishmike wrote:Im open to him playing some 5, but when I see how we protect the rim with him at the 4 playing next to another 7 footer I see a title caliber frontcourt. When he is next to Lopez and he's allowed to roam a bit he is simply a nightmare. If we had better defense in the backcourt we could be one of the best defensive squads in the league.

That being said Im not one of these guys who cries when I think a guy isnt being used like I think he should be. KP's development has been incredible, and for you guys crying about Fisher you need to understand this coaching staff has put this guy in a position to suceed time and time again.


I agree to a certain extent

I'll give the coaching staff a little credit, but lets be honest here, KP would be good in any system. He is not a limited player by any stretch, 26 games in, and the 3 teams that picked before us, would have taken KP in a heartbeat. It was almost a no brainer to make him a starter, that right there gave me every indication he was ready.

I'll give Melo, sasha, calderon and Lopez just as much credit, those guys have had just as much impact on and off the court, and it's so ironic that those four players garner the most trade talk on these boards.

ES
Nalod
Posts: 72117
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
12/17/2015  10:33 AM
Knicks1969 wrote:I still can't believe it took him this long to realize that he has a special talent in KP. In fact, I can't believe how slow he is when it comes to utilize our over all talents. I am glad he is seing the light

What gives you the impression Knicks were slow to realize?

The quote is "We Didn't think".........Not "I didn't think"......

The kid started ever game.
He proved in Camp he could start.

Lets break down the numerical thing here:

He has started at the PF. That's the 4.
Now the "We", as depicted by fisher said they are surprised he can hold his own at the 5.

Your just all looking for any reason to get on Fisher's ass for any little reason and its pretty apparent your scraping the barrel here and losing cred.

Nalod
Posts: 72117
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
12/17/2015  10:36 AM
knicks1248 wrote:
fishmike wrote:Im open to him playing some 5, but when I see how we protect the rim with him at the 4 playing next to another 7 footer I see a title caliber frontcourt. When he is next to Lopez and he's allowed to roam a bit he is simply a nightmare. If we had better defense in the backcourt we could be one of the best defensive squads in the league.

That being said Im not one of these guys who cries when I think a guy isnt being used like I think he should be. KP's development has been incredible, and for you guys crying about Fisher you need to understand this coaching staff has put this guy in a position to suceed time and time again.


I agree to a certain extent

I'll give the coaching staff a little credit, but lets be honest here, KP would be good in any system. He is not a limited player by any stretch, 26 games in, and the 3 teams that picked before us, would have taken KP in a heartbeat. It was almost a no brainer to make him a starter, that right there gave me every indication he was ready.

I'll give Melo, sasha, calderon and Lopez just as much credit, those guys have had just as much impact on and off the court, and it's so ironic that those four players garner the most trade talk on these boards.

Give coaches hell when things don't go right, but "Little" cred when it goes good. Beyond Fish, who played a long time in the league the coaching staff is very experienced. Thing is, when was the last time the NBA saw a 7-3 kid like this?? He is defying common logic every day. Linsanity broke the notion Asian's can't play ball, this kid is breaking the height barrier!!!!

crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
12/17/2015  10:44 AM
Nalod wrote:
Knicks1969 wrote:I still can't believe it took him this long to realize that he has a special talent in KP. In fact, I can't believe how slow he is when it comes to utilize our over all talents. I am glad he is seing the light

What gives you the impression Knicks were slow to realize?

The quote is "We Didn't think".........Not "I didn't think"......

The kid started ever game.
He proved in Camp he could start.

Lets break down the numerical thing here:

He has started at the PF. That's the 4.
Now the "We", as depicted by fisher said they are surprised he can hold his own at the 5.

Your just all looking for any reason to get on Fisher's ass for any little reason and its pretty apparent your scraping the barrel here and losing cred.

Yeah, I have no issue whatsoever with Fisher's development of KP. I think he's done great with him from day 1. They've started him since pre-season, they've let him be aggressive with the ball/scoring, they've let him play through mistakes and taken him out when he starts to get a little lost at times. I think they've done a great job with him.

I just thought this quote was of interest for a few reasons:

1) It means they think he can play SOME minutes at the 5 now (he played 15min there against Minnie). This is exciting to me because Melo at the 4 and KP at the 5 is their most interesting and hard to guard lineup. Even Dirk went out of his way to say that. KP at the 5 is potentially unguardable. We all know how good Melo is at the 4.

2) It means they realize they have too many bigs and not enough wings, which is a roster construction issue a lot of us have mentioned - especially once we saw how good KP was and how capable he was of defending the 4 or the 5.

This stuff just means that Fisher and Phil are paying attention. It is reassuring to me.

3) It sort of implies they might look to make a small move to balance out the roster. I wouldn't be shocked to see them move Seraphin for a 2/3 swing man who can fill the "3 and D" role and allow them to play faster sometimes.

I'm not saying bench Rolo - I think basically Rolo should be our Bogut and KP should be our Draymond Green. Obviously the comparison in the skills between those players doesn't lineup, but how Golden State uses them. Bogut starts and plays 15-20min a night... unless they need him against a particularly big team. Draymond starts at the 4, but often moves over to the 5 for stretches of the game and it is Golden State's best lineup. They don't start that lineup - they save it for when they need to make a run. They call it their "Death lineup"

KP can be a 4/5 the way Draymond is - their games have very little in common obviously - but they are both unique talents at the 4/5 who present matchup nightmares and can more than hold their own on defense, in fact they are both fantastic defenders at the4 and the 5.

Now, I'm not saying KP is Draymond. I'm saying look at how GSW uses Bogut and Draymond. That's a sort of blueprint for how you can utilize guys and lineups who give you a very different look.

¿ △ ?
Knixkik
Posts: 35759
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
12/17/2015  10:49 AM
It's been nice to have KP capable of playing the 5, but we don't want him there full time for a couple of years. If the game dictates it, we can play him some extended minutes there, but i'm more concerned with keeping him healthy and not have to take on a huge workload defensively. He's more effective as a weak side defender right now.
blkexec
Posts: 28451
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/3/2004
Member: #748
12/17/2015  10:56 AM
Knixkik wrote:It's been nice to have KP capable of playing the 5, but we don't want him there full time for a couple of years. If the game dictates it, we can play him some extended minutes there, but i'm more concerned with keeping him healthy and not have to take on a huge workload defensively. He's more effective as a weak side defender right now.

If we were playing in GS system....and had GS shooters and scorers......KP would be a monster.

In this half court system, KP will be bounced around a lot in the post by other bigs, which will decrease his offensive output. Having another center next to KP is not the problem. Having Rolo next to KP is the problem.

Born in Brooklyn, Raised in Queens, Lives in Maryland. The future is bright, I'm a Knicks fan for life!
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
12/17/2015  10:58 AM
blkexec wrote:
Knixkik wrote:It's been nice to have KP capable of playing the 5, but we don't want him there full time for a couple of years. If the game dictates it, we can play him some extended minutes there, but i'm more concerned with keeping him healthy and not have to take on a huge workload defensively. He's more effective as a weak side defender right now.

If we were playing in GS system....and had GS shooters and scorers......KP would be a monster.

In this half court system, KP will be bounced around a lot in the post by other bigs, which will decrease his offensive output. Having another center next to KP is not the problem. Having Rolo next to KP is the problem.

Yeah, but other teams are going to play small, too. They're not going to play big just because we do. Most teams go small for at least some portion of the game these days.

¿ △ ?
Knixkik
Posts: 35759
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
12/17/2015  11:06 AM
blkexec wrote:
Knixkik wrote:It's been nice to have KP capable of playing the 5, but we don't want him there full time for a couple of years. If the game dictates it, we can play him some extended minutes there, but i'm more concerned with keeping him healthy and not have to take on a huge workload defensively. He's more effective as a weak side defender right now.

If we were playing in GS system....and had GS shooters and scorers......KP would be a monster.

In this half court system, KP will be bounced around a lot in the post by other bigs, which will decrease his offensive output. Having another center next to KP is not the problem. Having Rolo next to KP is the problem.

So what type of center do you think we need?

crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
12/17/2015  11:44 AM
Knixkik wrote:
blkexec wrote:
Knixkik wrote:It's been nice to have KP capable of playing the 5, but we don't want him there full time for a couple of years. If the game dictates it, we can play him some extended minutes there, but i'm more concerned with keeping him healthy and not have to take on a huge workload defensively. He's more effective as a weak side defender right now.

If we were playing in GS system....and had GS shooters and scorers......KP would be a monster.

In this half court system, KP will be bounced around a lot in the post by other bigs, which will decrease his offensive output. Having another center next to KP is not the problem. Having Rolo next to KP is the problem.

So what type of center do you think we need?

I said in my post above:

I'm not saying bench Rolo - I think basically Rolo should be our Bogut and KP should be our Draymond Green. Obviously the comparison in the skills between those players doesn't lineup, but how Golden State uses them. Bogut starts and plays 15-20min a night... unless they need him against a particularly big team. Draymond starts at the 4, but often moves over to the 5 for stretches of the game and it is Golden State's best lineup. They don't start that lineup - they save it for when they need to make a run. They call it their "Death lineup"

KP can be a 4/5 the way Draymond is - their games have very little in common obviously - but they are both unique talents at the 4/5 who present matchup nightmares and can more than hold their own on defense, in fact they are both fantastic defenders at the4 and the 5.

Now, I'm not saying KP is Draymond. I'm saying look at how GSW uses Bogut and Draymond. That's a sort of blueprint for how you can utilize guys and lineups who give you a very different look.

¿ △ ?
Knixkik
Posts: 35759
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
12/17/2015  11:45 AM
crzymdups wrote:
Knixkik wrote:
blkexec wrote:
Knixkik wrote:It's been nice to have KP capable of playing the 5, but we don't want him there full time for a couple of years. If the game dictates it, we can play him some extended minutes there, but i'm more concerned with keeping him healthy and not have to take on a huge workload defensively. He's more effective as a weak side defender right now.

If we were playing in GS system....and had GS shooters and scorers......KP would be a monster.

In this half court system, KP will be bounced around a lot in the post by other bigs, which will decrease his offensive output. Having another center next to KP is not the problem. Having Rolo next to KP is the problem.

So what type of center do you think we need?

I said in my post above:

I'm not saying bench Rolo - I think basically Rolo should be our Bogut and KP should be our Draymond Green. Obviously the comparison in the skills between those players doesn't lineup, but how Golden State uses them. Bogut starts and plays 15-20min a night... unless they need him against a particularly big team. Draymond starts at the 4, but often moves over to the 5 for stretches of the game and it is Golden State's best lineup. They don't start that lineup - they save it for when they need to make a run. They call it their "Death lineup"

KP can be a 4/5 the way Draymond is - their games have very little in common obviously - but they are both unique talents at the 4/5 who present matchup nightmares and can more than hold their own on defense, in fact they are both fantastic defenders at the4 and the 5.

Now, I'm not saying KP is Draymond. I'm saying look at how GSW uses Bogut and Draymond. That's a sort of blueprint for how you can utilize guys and lineups who give you a very different look.

I completely agree. This is how they should be used.

Chandler
Posts: 26915
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/26/2015
Member: #6197

12/17/2015  1:43 PM
me too. i also extend to Jose. Start Rolo and Jose but have a quick hook if it's not working.

When it's KP at 5 and Melo at 4 it seems play is more decisive. Rolo is still figuring out his role in the offense (personally optimistic that he will; guy went to Stanford after all)

(5)(7)
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
12/17/2015  2:06 PM
The one thing about the Triangle is that there is a LOT to absorb and what makes it harder is that it's a group thing much more than an individual thing. RoLo is still learning how to execute at his position and there is a lot to learn for a big in this system, even tho it seems simple. RoLo has NEVER had to make this many decisions and so it will take time. The longer these players stay in this offense the better they will get. It's just the fact of the matter.

KP at C is something they can gradually increase but it doesn't have to be a starting alignment or full time setup. I think they are approaching it the right way. Let it be eased in and if its working stick with it longer. It's gonna take the players time to get used to it as well and to perfect their execution in this alignment. All of these things will improve over time.

WaltLongmire
Posts: 27623
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/28/2014
Member: #5843

12/17/2015  5:00 PM
Lineup flexibility.

Really depends on who opposition coaches are playing.

Minny took advantage of Lopez since their bigs can shoot from the outside...Towns at any time, and Dieng if he has time to get his shot off. Neither showed any consistency from the post, although both hit shots from in close.

Lopez is simply unwilling to go out too far on the perimeter. I was surprised that Fisher started with Lopez on Towns, since I've watched enough Minny games to know that Towns can hit from the outside with confidence- he was 3/3 from the 3 in one recent game. Towns was a bit off the first half, but it I'm sure he was told to keep on shooting if Lopez gave him the space he got in the first half. Fisher started the second half with the Lopez on Towns match-up, and Towns got his stroke down.

Just don't see why we can't adjust our lineup and go big vs big or smaller vs small based on what the opposing coach is doing, and against a team like GS, Fisher should not hesitate to sit Lopez and use a smaller starting lineup to deal with GS' speed.

EnySpree: Can we agree to agree not to mention Phil Jackson and triangle for the rest of our lives?
Interesting comment by Fisher: "We built the roster this way because we didn't think KP could play the 5 this quickly"

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy