[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Jeremy Lin: Was open to return to Knicks, but team not interested..
Author Thread
StarksEwing1
Posts: 32671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/28/2012
Member: #4451

10/18/2015  9:59 AM
CrushAlot wrote:
StarksEwing1 wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
Sangfroid wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:The quote where he said they chose not to resign me oissed me off. The Knicks were going to match the original deal offered to Lin but couldn't match the poison pill deal. I really liked Lin as a knick but he needs to take some ownership for chasing the money. He got paid but he owned ny and his career probably would have had a different path had he not put the Knicks in a position where matching his offer was almost financially not possuble. the aw shucks its all good I just want to get back to linsanity isn't cutting it anymore in my opinion.

Revisionist's history. He must be a Republican.


Really? You don't think Lin went for the money? I have said this since that July by the way.
its not fair to bash lin for chasing the money because EVERY player chases the money. Lets be honest melo is a knick because we could offer him much more than anyone otherwise he would have went to chicago. LINSANITY was probably the best time we have had as knick fans since 2000

I agree. It is a business for these guys. But one guy chasing money is no different from another guy doing it. Right after Lin hired his new agent to negotiate that contract the agent came out and said it wasn't a done deal that Lin would return to NY.
again you singling out lin because he left. We actually did the right thing by letting him go BUT i had no problem with him trying to get security for his future.
AUTOADVERT
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
10/18/2015  10:08 AM
mreinman wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
Sangfroid wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:The quote where he said they chose not to resign me oissed me off. The Knicks were going to match the original deal offered to Lin but couldn't match the poison pill deal. I really liked Lin as a knick but he needs to take some ownership for chasing the money. He got paid but he owned ny and his career probably would have had a different path had he not put the Knicks in a position where matching his offer was almost financially not possuble. the aw shucks its all good I just want to get back to linsanity isn't cutting it anymore in my opinion.

Revisionist's history. He must be a Republican.


Really? You don't think Lin went for the money? I have said this since that July by the way.

of course he chased the money. Who would expect him not to?

He chased the wrong kind of money, the endorsements he would have continue to get in NY would have trumped that 15 25 mill. Not signing him change the entire direction of the franchise.

ES
newyorknewyork
Posts: 30169
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
10/18/2015  10:17 AM
StarksEwing1 wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
StarksEwing1 wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
Sangfroid wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:The quote where he said they chose not to resign me oissed me off. The Knicks were going to match the original deal offered to Lin but couldn't match the poison pill deal. I really liked Lin as a knick but he needs to take some ownership for chasing the money. He got paid but he owned ny and his career probably would have had a different path had he not put the Knicks in a position where matching his offer was almost financially not possuble. the aw shucks its all good I just want to get back to linsanity isn't cutting it anymore in my opinion.

Revisionist's history. He must be a Republican.


Really? You don't think Lin went for the money? I have said this since that July by the way.
its not fair to bash lin for chasing the money because EVERY player chases the money. Lets be honest melo is a knick because we could offer him much more than anyone otherwise he would have went to chicago. LINSANITY was probably the best time we have had as knick fans since 2000

I agree. It is a business for these guys. But one guy chasing money is no different from another guy doing it. Right after Lin hired his new agent to negotiate that contract the agent came out and said it wasn't a done deal that Lin would return to NY.
again you singling out lin because he left. We actually did the right thing by letting him go BUT i had no problem with him trying to get security for his future.

Problem is Lin doesn't say things like he made the best deal for his future. Or that Rockets gave him an offer he couldn't refuse. He claims things like the Knicks didn't want him or that the Knicks just didn't match. To avoid any backlash from the public he continues to try and throw the Knicks under the bus. So its easy to see why Knicks fans would be upset about these type of comments from him.

https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
StarksEwing1
Posts: 32671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/28/2012
Member: #4451

10/18/2015  10:20 AM
newyorknewyork wrote:
StarksEwing1 wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
StarksEwing1 wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
Sangfroid wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:The quote where he said they chose not to resign me oissed me off. The Knicks were going to match the original deal offered to Lin but couldn't match the poison pill deal. I really liked Lin as a knick but he needs to take some ownership for chasing the money. He got paid but he owned ny and his career probably would have had a different path had he not put the Knicks in a position where matching his offer was almost financially not possuble. the aw shucks its all good I just want to get back to linsanity isn't cutting it anymore in my opinion.

Revisionist's history. He must be a Republican.


Really? You don't think Lin went for the money? I have said this since that July by the way.
its not fair to bash lin for chasing the money because EVERY player chases the money. Lets be honest melo is a knick because we could offer him much more than anyone otherwise he would have went to chicago. LINSANITY was probably the best time we have had as knick fans since 2000

I agree. It is a business for these guys. But one guy chasing money is no different from another guy doing it. Right after Lin hired his new agent to negotiate that contract the agent came out and said it wasn't a done deal that Lin would return to NY.
again you singling out lin because he left. We actually did the right thing by letting him go BUT i had no problem with him trying to get security for his future.

Problem is Lin doesn't say things like he made the best deal for his future. Or that Rockets gave him an offer he couldn't refuse. He claims things like the Knicks didn't want him or that the Knicks just didn't match. To avoid any backlash from the public he continues to try and throw the Knicks under the bus. So its easy to see why Knicks fans would be upset about these type of comments from him.

i think its a bit silly to be upset. Lin is a good guy. Secondly it was a few years back...lets move on
newyorknewyork
Posts: 30169
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
10/18/2015  10:31 AM
knickscity wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
knickscity wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:The quote where he said they chose not to resign me oissed me off. The Knicks were going to match the original deal offered to Lin but couldn't match the poison pill deal. I really liked Lin as a knick but he needs to take some ownership for chasing the money. He got paid but he owned ny and his career probably would have had a different path had he not put the Knicks in a position where matching his offer was almost financially not possuble. the aw shucks its all good I just want to get back to linsanity isn't cutting it anymore in my opinion.

Firstly, the Knicks had already secured a deal with Felton before the Lin decision. they never intended on bringing him back, and even duped Kidd into signing under pretenses he would be a mentor, when he wound up being a key rotational player and broke down.

The underlying fact is Lin did nothing but what the Kniks told him to. The Knicks told Lin to go find a deal and they'll match it. The Knicks could have just offered the 4/24 deal from the start, but THEY did not. Ironically they didnt tell Novak to go find a deal...they gave him his without having to secure one first. Sma situation of both players, and what made the Knicks look so stupid is the NBA players Assoc. fought for them to keep Lin and Novak as they would have lost both for nothing without the EB ruling.

So off Lin goes, and the team that wanted him back offered a deal, a poison pill one. Knicks did not match though, but the players currently on the team sure had words to say about another mans money, which I've always felt was a huge no-no....

Melo: “It’s not up to me,” Anthony said laughing. “It’s up to the organization to say that they want to match that ridiculous contract that’s out there.

Tyson:“Jeremy was a young point guard who was inexperienced, who brought a great light to the organization,” Chandler said. “But as far as being able to run the offense and putting players in the right position he just wasn't there. We got some veteran point guards that are capable of doing that."

JR: "Without a doubt," he said. "I think some guys take it personal, because they've been doing it longer and haven't received any reward for it yet. I think it's a tough subject to touch on for a lot of guys."

Novak: “It can be looked at as a ridiculous contract in the sense that it’s a $5 [million], a $5 [million] and a $15 [million over the first three years],” Novak told SNY.tv Wednesday at the Steve Novak Basketball Camp at Sleepy Hollow High School.

“It is kind of ridiculous in terms of the structure. I don’t think in terms of Jeremy’s value that it’s ridiculous. I think everybody knows that. He’s very valuable….I wasn’t there when Carmelo said it but ‘ridiculous contract,’ I think probably means more the fact that there’s a max offer being offered in the third year when the first two was a five.”


The Knicks signed Felton after they were presented the poison pill deal. It was during the time period where they could match Lin's deal. Once that happened it seemed obvious that they were moving on but they still had not committed either way in regards to lin.

Lin was done way before the pill was presented. recall the Knicks were in the running for Steve Nash as well. Nash to Felton to Kidd...come on now Lin was done. Things were official obviously during that period as there were moratoriums and things in place, but make no mistake Felton was headed to the Knicks way before. From Dolans BBQ appearance to his agent publicly blurting out $&T scenarios July 5th ....the deal was there.

July 5th....“They’ve shown great interest, but there’s stuff they’ve had to get through,’’ Dutt told the Post.

“He loved playing in New York. Our choice was to never have left New York. There were no hard feelings. Management handled it the best they could. I don’t think they ever misled us and I never felt they wanted him in that trade.’’

The Knicks have the $3.09 million taxpayer mid-level exception to offer Felton, though Dutt said he hoped a sign-and-trade can be done with Portland to get an increased salary.

“I consider them definitely on his high list,’’ Dutt said. “He would love to go back. He loved New York and was playing at an all-star level.’’

I realize we as fans want to diss the ex players and laud the team, but the team made this decision happen. Unless they offered the 4/24 deal they could have just like they gave Novak...this was all on them.

ALL indications from the Knicks side was that they were going to match the initial offer. Woodson made the notorious claim we would match up to a billion dollars or something silly like that. If it was so clear that Knicks weren't going to match then Houston wouldn't have upped there offer to poison pill status. They clearly felt the heat that the Knicks were going to match the offer which again ALL indications pointed to.

We had Grunwald hiding in a closet avoiding phone calls to buy time for goodness sake.

Nash and Kidd were being looked at and brought in because they wanted veteran insurance. Lin had the amazing run but still lacked experience and needed more improvement and seasoning. Its logical to have Lin back those guys up and be instant offense off the bench as he grew into a better player with experience. Felton could have always been an option in case we struck out on Nash & Kidd. Or Felton could have been an option along with Nash or Kidd as well as Lin under the first Houston offer. At 3 mil Felton could have competed with Lin for the backup spot. Since we ran a lot of 2 pg sets one of them would have taken Pablo's spot.

https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
newyorknewyork
Posts: 30169
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
10/18/2015  10:35 AM
StarksEwing1 wrote:
newyorknewyork wrote:
StarksEwing1 wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
StarksEwing1 wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
Sangfroid wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:The quote where he said they chose not to resign me oissed me off. The Knicks were going to match the original deal offered to Lin but couldn't match the poison pill deal. I really liked Lin as a knick but he needs to take some ownership for chasing the money. He got paid but he owned ny and his career probably would have had a different path had he not put the Knicks in a position where matching his offer was almost financially not possuble. the aw shucks its all good I just want to get back to linsanity isn't cutting it anymore in my opinion.

Revisionist's history. He must be a Republican.


Really? You don't think Lin went for the money? I have said this since that July by the way.
its not fair to bash lin for chasing the money because EVERY player chases the money. Lets be honest melo is a knick because we could offer him much more than anyone otherwise he would have went to chicago. LINSANITY was probably the best time we have had as knick fans since 2000

I agree. It is a business for these guys. But one guy chasing money is no different from another guy doing it. Right after Lin hired his new agent to negotiate that contract the agent came out and said it wasn't a done deal that Lin would return to NY.
again you singling out lin because he left. We actually did the right thing by letting him go BUT i had no problem with him trying to get security for his future.

Problem is Lin doesn't say things like he made the best deal for his future. Or that Rockets gave him an offer he couldn't refuse. He claims things like the Knicks didn't want him or that the Knicks just didn't match. To avoid any backlash from the public he continues to try and throw the Knicks under the bus. So its easy to see why Knicks fans would be upset about these type of comments from him.

i think its a bit silly to be upset. Lin is a good guy. Secondly it was a few years back...lets move on

I've been over it from any type of emotional standpoint. I would just like the record to be straight on the situation. But that's just how I am.

https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
StarksEwing1
Posts: 32671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/28/2012
Member: #4451

10/18/2015  10:36 AM
newyorknewyork wrote:
StarksEwing1 wrote:
newyorknewyork wrote:
StarksEwing1 wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
StarksEwing1 wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
Sangfroid wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:The quote where he said they chose not to resign me oissed me off. The Knicks were going to match the original deal offered to Lin but couldn't match the poison pill deal. I really liked Lin as a knick but he needs to take some ownership for chasing the money. He got paid but he owned ny and his career probably would have had a different path had he not put the Knicks in a position where matching his offer was almost financially not possuble. the aw shucks its all good I just want to get back to linsanity isn't cutting it anymore in my opinion.

Revisionist's history. He must be a Republican.


Really? You don't think Lin went for the money? I have said this since that July by the way.
its not fair to bash lin for chasing the money because EVERY player chases the money. Lets be honest melo is a knick because we could offer him much more than anyone otherwise he would have went to chicago. LINSANITY was probably the best time we have had as knick fans since 2000

I agree. It is a business for these guys. But one guy chasing money is no different from another guy doing it. Right after Lin hired his new agent to negotiate that contract the agent came out and said it wasn't a done deal that Lin would return to NY.
again you singling out lin because he left. We actually did the right thing by letting him go BUT i had no problem with him trying to get security for his future.

Problem is Lin doesn't say things like he made the best deal for his future. Or that Rockets gave him an offer he couldn't refuse. He claims things like the Knicks didn't want him or that the Knicks just didn't match. To avoid any backlash from the public he continues to try and throw the Knicks under the bus. So its easy to see why Knicks fans would be upset about these type of comments from him.

i think its a bit silly to be upset. Lin is a good guy. Secondly it was a few years back...lets move on

I've been over it from any type of emotional standpoint. I would just like the record to be straight on the situation. But that's just how I am.

i just dont see the logic of bashing lin....he did nothing wrong and neither did the knicks
knickscity
Posts: 24533
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/2/2012
Member: #4241
USA
10/18/2015  10:53 AM
newyorknewyork wrote:
knickscity wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
knickscity wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:The quote where he said they chose not to resign me oissed me off. The Knicks were going to match the original deal offered to Lin but couldn't match the poison pill deal. I really liked Lin as a knick but he needs to take some ownership for chasing the money. He got paid but he owned ny and his career probably would have had a different path had he not put the Knicks in a position where matching his offer was almost financially not possuble. the aw shucks its all good I just want to get back to linsanity isn't cutting it anymore in my opinion.

Firstly, the Knicks had already secured a deal with Felton before the Lin decision. they never intended on bringing him back, and even duped Kidd into signing under pretenses he would be a mentor, when he wound up being a key rotational player and broke down.

The underlying fact is Lin did nothing but what the Kniks told him to. The Knicks told Lin to go find a deal and they'll match it. The Knicks could have just offered the 4/24 deal from the start, but THEY did not. Ironically they didnt tell Novak to go find a deal...they gave him his without having to secure one first. Sma situation of both players, and what made the Knicks look so stupid is the NBA players Assoc. fought for them to keep Lin and Novak as they would have lost both for nothing without the EB ruling.

So off Lin goes, and the team that wanted him back offered a deal, a poison pill one. Knicks did not match though, but the players currently on the team sure had words to say about another mans money, which I've always felt was a huge no-no....

Melo: “It’s not up to me,” Anthony said laughing. “It’s up to the organization to say that they want to match that ridiculous contract that’s out there.

Tyson:“Jeremy was a young point guard who was inexperienced, who brought a great light to the organization,” Chandler said. “But as far as being able to run the offense and putting players in the right position he just wasn't there. We got some veteran point guards that are capable of doing that."

JR: "Without a doubt," he said. "I think some guys take it personal, because they've been doing it longer and haven't received any reward for it yet. I think it's a tough subject to touch on for a lot of guys."

Novak: “It can be looked at as a ridiculous contract in the sense that it’s a $5 [million], a $5 [million] and a $15 [million over the first three years],” Novak told SNY.tv Wednesday at the Steve Novak Basketball Camp at Sleepy Hollow High School.

“It is kind of ridiculous in terms of the structure. I don’t think in terms of Jeremy’s value that it’s ridiculous. I think everybody knows that. He’s very valuable….I wasn’t there when Carmelo said it but ‘ridiculous contract,’ I think probably means more the fact that there’s a max offer being offered in the third year when the first two was a five.”


The Knicks signed Felton after they were presented the poison pill deal. It was during the time period where they could match Lin's deal. Once that happened it seemed obvious that they were moving on but they still had not committed either way in regards to lin.

Lin was done way before the pill was presented. recall the Knicks were in the running for Steve Nash as well. Nash to Felton to Kidd...come on now Lin was done. Things were official obviously during that period as there were moratoriums and things in place, but make no mistake Felton was headed to the Knicks way before. From Dolans BBQ appearance to his agent publicly blurting out $&T scenarios July 5th ....the deal was there.

July 5th....“They’ve shown great interest, but there’s stuff they’ve had to get through,’’ Dutt told the Post.

“He loved playing in New York. Our choice was to never have left New York. There were no hard feelings. Management handled it the best they could. I don’t think they ever misled us and I never felt they wanted him in that trade.’’

The Knicks have the $3.09 million taxpayer mid-level exception to offer Felton, though Dutt said he hoped a sign-and-trade can be done with Portland to get an increased salary.

“I consider them definitely on his high list,’’ Dutt said. “He would love to go back. He loved New York and was playing at an all-star level.’’

I realize we as fans want to diss the ex players and laud the team, but the team made this decision happen. Unless they offered the 4/24 deal they could have just like they gave Novak...this was all on them.

ALL indications from the Knicks side was that they were going to match the initial offer. Woodson made the notorious claim we would match up to a billion dollars or something silly like that. If it was so clear that Knicks weren't going to match then Houston wouldn't have upped there offer to poison pill status. They clearly felt the heat that the Knicks were going to match the offer which again ALL indications pointed to.

We had Grunwald hiding in a closet avoiding phone calls to buy time for goodness sake.

Nash and Kidd were being looked at and brought in because they wanted veteran insurance. Lin had the amazing run but still lacked experience and needed more improvement and seasoning. Its logical to have Lin back those guys up and be instant offense off the bench as he grew into a better player with experience. Felton could have always been an option in case we struck out on Nash & Kidd. Or Felton could have been an option along with Nash or Kidd as well as Lin under the first Houston offer. At 3 mil Felton could have competed with Lin for the backup spot. Since we ran a lot of 2 pg sets one of them would have taken Pablo's spot.


We should know by now what happens during the moratorium is never official, but it was a poison pill the entire time. the first "offer" was 4 years 28 mil, 5 for the first two, 9 per for the next two, that fourth year being a team option, but if the Knicks match there would be no options.

http://espn.go.com/newyork/nba/story/_/id/8133715/source-newyork-knicks-jeremy-lin-agrees-sign-offer-sheet-houston-rockets

This deal was equally bad tax wise.

If the Knicks had gotten Nash, there would be no Lin. Even the Kidd deal was before the last deal....

Jason Kidd, who was set to rejoin the Dallas Mavericks, made a late and stunning reversal and agreed to join the Knicks instead. Negotiations were continuing Thursday night, and it was not yet clear whether the Knicks would sign Kidd outright or acquire him in a sign-and-trade deal.

Just as Kidd committed, the Knicks learned that Jeremy Lin, their promising 23-year-old point guard, had agreed to an offer sheet with the Houston Rockets, complicating the picture further.

The Rockets’ offer could be worth as much as $28.8 million over four years, with backloaded payments in the final two seasons, according to a person who was briefed on the details. The fourth year is a team option. Because Lin is a restricted free agent, the Knicks have the right to match the deal.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/06/sports/basketball/kidd-is-heading-to-the-knicks.html

Lin was done.

newyorknewyork
Posts: 30169
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
10/18/2015  10:57 AM
StarksEwing1 wrote:
newyorknewyork wrote:
StarksEwing1 wrote:
newyorknewyork wrote:
StarksEwing1 wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
StarksEwing1 wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
Sangfroid wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:The quote where he said they chose not to resign me oissed me off. The Knicks were going to match the original deal offered to Lin but couldn't match the poison pill deal. I really liked Lin as a knick but he needs to take some ownership for chasing the money. He got paid but he owned ny and his career probably would have had a different path had he not put the Knicks in a position where matching his offer was almost financially not possuble. the aw shucks its all good I just want to get back to linsanity isn't cutting it anymore in my opinion.

Revisionist's history. He must be a Republican.


Really? You don't think Lin went for the money? I have said this since that July by the way.
its not fair to bash lin for chasing the money because EVERY player chases the money. Lets be honest melo is a knick because we could offer him much more than anyone otherwise he would have went to chicago. LINSANITY was probably the best time we have had as knick fans since 2000

I agree. It is a business for these guys. But one guy chasing money is no different from another guy doing it. Right after Lin hired his new agent to negotiate that contract the agent came out and said it wasn't a done deal that Lin would return to NY.
again you singling out lin because he left. We actually did the right thing by letting him go BUT i had no problem with him trying to get security for his future.

Problem is Lin doesn't say things like he made the best deal for his future. Or that Rockets gave him an offer he couldn't refuse. He claims things like the Knicks didn't want him or that the Knicks just didn't match. To avoid any backlash from the public he continues to try and throw the Knicks under the bus. So its easy to see why Knicks fans would be upset about these type of comments from him.

i think its a bit silly to be upset. Lin is a good guy. Secondly it was a few years back...lets move on

I've been over it from any type of emotional standpoint. I would just like the record to be straight on the situation. But that's just how I am.

i just dont see the logic of bashing lin....he did nothing wrong and neither did the knicks

I didn't take Crush comments as Lin bashing. He stated clearly what specifically pissed him off(Throwing the Knicks under the bus) which is understandable as a Knicks fan. The Lin bashing that does go on though outside of these specific comments from Crush I agree with you on. Lin helped us make the playoffs that yr and gave us some amazing moments. He will always be remember for that by me.

https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
StarksEwing1
Posts: 32671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/28/2012
Member: #4451

10/18/2015  11:01 AM
newyorknewyork wrote:
StarksEwing1 wrote:
newyorknewyork wrote:
StarksEwing1 wrote:
newyorknewyork wrote:
StarksEwing1 wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
StarksEwing1 wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
Sangfroid wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:The quote where he said they chose not to resign me oissed me off. The Knicks were going to match the original deal offered to Lin but couldn't match the poison pill deal. I really liked Lin as a knick but he needs to take some ownership for chasing the money. He got paid but he owned ny and his career probably would have had a different path had he not put the Knicks in a position where matching his offer was almost financially not possuble. the aw shucks its all good I just want to get back to linsanity isn't cutting it anymore in my opinion.

Revisionist's history. He must be a Republican.


Really? You don't think Lin went for the money? I have said this since that July by the way.
its not fair to bash lin for chasing the money because EVERY player chases the money. Lets be honest melo is a knick because we could offer him much more than anyone otherwise he would have went to chicago. LINSANITY was probably the best time we have had as knick fans since 2000

I agree. It is a business for these guys. But one guy chasing money is no different from another guy doing it. Right after Lin hired his new agent to negotiate that contract the agent came out and said it wasn't a done deal that Lin would return to NY.
again you singling out lin because he left. We actually did the right thing by letting him go BUT i had no problem with him trying to get security for his future.

Problem is Lin doesn't say things like he made the best deal for his future. Or that Rockets gave him an offer he couldn't refuse. He claims things like the Knicks didn't want him or that the Knicks just didn't match. To avoid any backlash from the public he continues to try and throw the Knicks under the bus. So its easy to see why Knicks fans would be upset about these type of comments from him.

i think its a bit silly to be upset. Lin is a good guy. Secondly it was a few years back...lets move on

I've been over it from any type of emotional standpoint. I would just like the record to be straight on the situation. But that's just how I am.

i just dont see the logic of bashing lin....he did nothing wrong and neither did the knicks

I didn't take Crush comments as Lin bashing. He stated clearly what specifically pissed him off(Throwing the Knicks under the bus) which is understandable as a Knicks fan. The Lin bashing that does go on though outside of these specific comments from Crush I agree with you on. Lin helped us make the playoffs that yr and gave us some amazing moments. He will always be remember for that by me.

thats fair. I still am not sure lin threw them under the bus. To be truthful we dont know what really went down.
holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081

10/18/2015  11:25 AM    LAST EDITED: 10/18/2015  11:38 AM
knickscity wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:The quote where he said they chose not to resign me oissed me off. The Knicks were going to match the original deal offered to Lin but couldn't match the poison pill deal. I really liked Lin as a knick but he needs to take some ownership for chasing the money. He got paid but he owned ny and his career probably would have had a different path had he not put the Knicks in a position where matching his offer was almost financially not possuble. the aw shucks its all good I just want to get back to linsanity isn't cutting it anymore in my opinion.

Firstly, the Knicks had already secured a deal with Felton before the Lin decision. they never intended on bringing him back, and even duped Kidd into signing under pretenses he would be a mentor, when he wound up being a key rotational player and broke down.

The underlying fact is Lin did nothing but what the Kniks told him to. The Knicks told Lin to go find a deal and they'll match it. The Knicks could have just offered the 4/24 deal from the start, but THEY did not. Ironically they didnt tell Novak to go find a deal...they gave him his without having to secure one first. Sma situation of both players, and what made the Knicks look so stupid is the NBA players Assoc. fought for them to keep Lin and Novak as they would have lost both for nothing without the EB ruling.

So off Lin goes, and the team that wanted him back offered a deal, a poison pill one. Knicks did not match though, but the players currently on the team sure had words to say about another mans money, which I've always felt was a huge no-no....

Melo: “It’s not up to me,” Anthony said laughing. “It’s up to the organization to say that they want to match that ridiculous contract that’s out there.

Tyson:“Jeremy was a young point guard who was inexperienced, who brought a great light to the organization,” Chandler said. “But as far as being able to run the offense and putting players in the right position he just wasn't there. We got some veteran point guards that are capable of doing that."

JR: "Without a doubt," he said. "I think some guys take it personal, because they've been doing it longer and haven't received any reward for it yet. I think it's a tough subject to touch on for a lot of guys."

Novak: “It can be looked at as a ridiculous contract in the sense that it’s a $5 [million], a $5 [million] and a $15 [million over the first three years],” Novak told SNY.tv Wednesday at the Steve Novak Basketball Camp at Sleepy Hollow High School.

“It is kind of ridiculous in terms of the structure. I don’t think in terms of Jeremy’s value that it’s ridiculous. I think everybody knows that. He’s very valuable….I wasn’t there when Carmelo said it but ‘ridiculous contract,’ I think probably means more the fact that there’s a max offer being offered in the third year when the first two was a five.”

Thoroughly inaccurate...I can't remember but I can look it up, the Knicks told Lin to find a deal elsewhere because they were limited in what they could offer him under the CBA..So they could only match the figure he would willing agree to...

holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081

10/18/2015  11:27 AM    LAST EDITED: 10/18/2015  11:28 AM
StarksEwing1 wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
Sangfroid wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:The quote where he said they chose not to resign me oissed me off. The Knicks were going to match the original deal offered to Lin but couldn't match the poison pill deal. I really liked Lin as a knick but he needs to take some ownership for chasing the money. He got paid but he owned ny and his career probably would have had a different path had he not put the Knicks in a position where matching his offer was almost financially not possuble. the aw shucks its all good I just want to get back to linsanity isn't cutting it anymore in my opinion.

Revisionist's history. He must be a Republican.


Really? You don't think Lin went for the money? I have said this since that July by the way.
its not fair to bash lin for chasing the money because EVERY player chases the money. Lets be honest melo is a knick because we could offer him much more than anyone otherwise he would have went to chicago. LINSANITY was probably the best time we have had as knick fans since 2000

Speak for yourself..Knicks won 54 games and making it to the second round of the playoffs was much, much, more entertaining for me than the 8-1 media driven Linsanity experience...
newyorknewyork
Posts: 30169
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
10/18/2015  11:28 AM    LAST EDITED: 10/18/2015  11:31 AM
knickscity wrote:
newyorknewyork wrote:
knickscity wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
knickscity wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:The quote where he said they chose not to resign me oissed me off. The Knicks were going to match the original deal offered to Lin but couldn't match the poison pill deal. I really liked Lin as a knick but he needs to take some ownership for chasing the money. He got paid but he owned ny and his career probably would have had a different path had he not put the Knicks in a position where matching his offer was almost financially not possuble. the aw shucks its all good I just want to get back to linsanity isn't cutting it anymore in my opinion.

Firstly, the Knicks had already secured a deal with Felton before the Lin decision. they never intended on bringing him back, and even duped Kidd into signing under pretenses he would be a mentor, when he wound up being a key rotational player and broke down.

The underlying fact is Lin did nothing but what the Kniks told him to. The Knicks told Lin to go find a deal and they'll match it. The Knicks could have just offered the 4/24 deal from the start, but THEY did not. Ironically they didnt tell Novak to go find a deal...they gave him his without having to secure one first. Sma situation of both players, and what made the Knicks look so stupid is the NBA players Assoc. fought for them to keep Lin and Novak as they would have lost both for nothing without the EB ruling.

So off Lin goes, and the team that wanted him back offered a deal, a poison pill one. Knicks did not match though, but the players currently on the team sure had words to say about another mans money, which I've always felt was a huge no-no....

Melo: “It’s not up to me,” Anthony said laughing. “It’s up to the organization to say that they want to match that ridiculous contract that’s out there.

Tyson:“Jeremy was a young point guard who was inexperienced, who brought a great light to the organization,” Chandler said. “But as far as being able to run the offense and putting players in the right position he just wasn't there. We got some veteran point guards that are capable of doing that."

JR: "Without a doubt," he said. "I think some guys take it personal, because they've been doing it longer and haven't received any reward for it yet. I think it's a tough subject to touch on for a lot of guys."

Novak: “It can be looked at as a ridiculous contract in the sense that it’s a $5 [million], a $5 [million] and a $15 [million over the first three years],” Novak told SNY.tv Wednesday at the Steve Novak Basketball Camp at Sleepy Hollow High School.

“It is kind of ridiculous in terms of the structure. I don’t think in terms of Jeremy’s value that it’s ridiculous. I think everybody knows that. He’s very valuable….I wasn’t there when Carmelo said it but ‘ridiculous contract,’ I think probably means more the fact that there’s a max offer being offered in the third year when the first two was a five.”


The Knicks signed Felton after they were presented the poison pill deal. It was during the time period where they could match Lin's deal. Once that happened it seemed obvious that they were moving on but they still had not committed either way in regards to lin.

Lin was done way before the pill was presented. recall the Knicks were in the running for Steve Nash as well. Nash to Felton to Kidd...come on now Lin was done. Things were official obviously during that period as there were moratoriums and things in place, but make no mistake Felton was headed to the Knicks way before. From Dolans BBQ appearance to his agent publicly blurting out $&T scenarios July 5th ....the deal was there.

July 5th....“They’ve shown great interest, but there’s stuff they’ve had to get through,’’ Dutt told the Post.

“He loved playing in New York. Our choice was to never have left New York. There were no hard feelings. Management handled it the best they could. I don’t think they ever misled us and I never felt they wanted him in that trade.’’

The Knicks have the $3.09 million taxpayer mid-level exception to offer Felton, though Dutt said he hoped a sign-and-trade can be done with Portland to get an increased salary.

“I consider them definitely on his high list,’’ Dutt said. “He would love to go back. He loved New York and was playing at an all-star level.’’

I realize we as fans want to diss the ex players and laud the team, but the team made this decision happen. Unless they offered the 4/24 deal they could have just like they gave Novak...this was all on them.

ALL indications from the Knicks side was that they were going to match the initial offer. Woodson made the notorious claim we would match up to a billion dollars or something silly like that. If it was so clear that Knicks weren't going to match then Houston wouldn't have upped there offer to poison pill status. They clearly felt the heat that the Knicks were going to match the offer which again ALL indications pointed to.

We had Grunwald hiding in a closet avoiding phone calls to buy time for goodness sake.

Nash and Kidd were being looked at and brought in because they wanted veteran insurance. Lin had the amazing run but still lacked experience and needed more improvement and seasoning. Its logical to have Lin back those guys up and be instant offense off the bench as he grew into a better player with experience. Felton could have always been an option in case we struck out on Nash & Kidd. Or Felton could have been an option along with Nash or Kidd as well as Lin under the first Houston offer. At 3 mil Felton could have competed with Lin for the backup spot. Since we ran a lot of 2 pg sets one of them would have taken Pablo's spot.


We should know by now what happens during the moratorium is never official, but it was a poison pill the entire time. the first "offer" was 4 years 28 mil, 5 for the first two, 9 per for the next two, that fourth year being a team option, but if the Knicks match there would be no options.

http://espn.go.com/newyork/nba/story/_/id/8133715/source-newyork-knicks-jeremy-lin-agrees-sign-offer-sheet-houston-rockets

This deal was equally bad tax wise.

If the Knicks had gotten Nash, there would be no Lin. Even the Kidd deal was before the last deal....

Jason Kidd, who was set to rejoin the Dallas Mavericks, made a late and stunning reversal and agreed to join the Knicks instead. Negotiations were continuing Thursday night, and it was not yet clear whether the Knicks would sign Kidd outright or acquire him in a sign-and-trade deal.

Just as Kidd committed, the Knicks learned that Jeremy Lin, their promising 23-year-old point guard, had agreed to an offer sheet with the Houston Rockets, complicating the picture further.

The Rockets’ offer could be worth as much as $28.8 million over four years, with backloaded payments in the final two seasons, according to a person who was briefed on the details. The fourth year is a team option. Because Lin is a restricted free agent, the Knicks have the right to match the deal.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/06/sports/basketball/kidd-is-heading-to-the-knicks.html

Lin was done.

Knicks would have matched the initial offer due to it being the market that Lin set for himself. Knicks were able to offer 4 yrs 24mil, but wanted Lin to find the market for himself and then match what that offer was. All was going according the plan until Lin after agreeing in principal to the initial offer from Houston fired his agent. Pulled out of the initial offer once word was set that the Knicks would match(up to 1 billion dollars), and signed for an even more lucrative offer. This is obviously what pissed the Knicks(Dolan) off. As it seemed that Lin was just looking to milk money out of the Knicks once it was clear they were willing to match rather then actually signing a deal that the market set. Not that this is really Lin's fault. Knicks said they would match any offer so he designed a way to get top dollar. But the Knicks were always interested in bringing Lin back until they felt Lin was milking them. He was not done before that.

Regardless if they signed Nash or Kidd they were always able to match Lin's offer. One didn't prevent the other from happening. And since this is a business bring Lin back would have been more profitable for the Knicks in terms of sells then not even if it jacked up the cap. Lin made like mimimum yet during Linsanity Knicks made huge profit, and Lin helped the Knicks make playoffs making the Knicks even more profit while again making minimum. He probably already covered the profit necessary for the first 2 yrs of the new contract during his Linsanity run. The only thing that stopped the Knicks from being interested in bringing Lin back was Dolan feeling betrayed.

https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
Nalod
Posts: 71379
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
10/18/2015  11:34 AM
Remember, Lin was asked the question. He did not hold a press conference to make this statement.

Its an old subject so the Media can bring it out, dust it off and perhaps get a rise out of us.
I would have loved to have Lin back, and would trade him for Jose, but that's not how things work in the real world. We have Grant, Galloway and and the triangle proven Sasha for a reasonable one year $1.5mil.

I don't think Dolan trashed his office in a rage of anger nor anything like that. If it don't fit, it don't fit for many reasons. We signed big's with most of the money. Lin got a two year deal for 4.5mil. I doubt that fit our plan. Good for him. Good for us.

Non issue.

I'd rather spend my time thinking about the preseason wins we can't use and the pitchfork to use when we storm Silver's office when we need a better explanation!

knickscity
Posts: 24533
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/2/2012
Member: #4241
USA
10/18/2015  11:34 AM
holfresh wrote:
knickscity wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:The quote where he said they chose not to resign me oissed me off. The Knicks were going to match the original deal offered to Lin but couldn't match the poison pill deal. I really liked Lin as a knick but he needs to take some ownership for chasing the money. He got paid but he owned ny and his career probably would have had a different path had he not put the Knicks in a position where matching his offer was almost financially not possuble. the aw shucks its all good I just want to get back to linsanity isn't cutting it anymore in my opinion.

Firstly, the Knicks had already secured a deal with Felton before the Lin decision. they never intended on bringing him back, and even duped Kidd into signing under pretenses he would be a mentor, when he wound up being a key rotational player and broke down.

The underlying fact is Lin did nothing but what the Kniks told him to. The Knicks told Lin to go find a deal and they'll match it. The Knicks could have just offered the 4/24 deal from the start, but THEY did not. Ironically they didnt tell Novak to go find a deal...they gave him his without having to secure one first. Sma situation of both players, and what made the Knicks look so stupid is the NBA players Assoc. fought for them to keep Lin and Novak as they would have lost both for nothing without the EB ruling.

So off Lin goes, and the team that wanted him back offered a deal, a poison pill one. Knicks did not match though, but the players currently on the team sure had words to say about another mans money, which I've always felt was a huge no-no....

Melo: “It’s not up to me,” Anthony said laughing. “It’s up to the organization to say that they want to match that ridiculous contract that’s out there.

Tyson:“Jeremy was a young point guard who was inexperienced, who brought a great light to the organization,” Chandler said. “But as far as being able to run the offense and putting players in the right position he just wasn't there. We got some veteran point guards that are capable of doing that."

JR: "Without a doubt," he said. "I think some guys take it personal, because they've been doing it longer and haven't received any reward for it yet. I think it's a tough subject to touch on for a lot of guys."

Novak: “It can be looked at as a ridiculous contract in the sense that it’s a $5 [million], a $5 [million] and a $15 [million over the first three years],” Novak told SNY.tv Wednesday at the Steve Novak Basketball Camp at Sleepy Hollow High School.

“It is kind of ridiculous in terms of the structure. I don’t think in terms of Jeremy’s value that it’s ridiculous. I think everybody knows that. He’s very valuable….I wasn’t there when Carmelo said it but ‘ridiculous contract,’ I think probably means more the fact that there’s a max offer being offered in the third year when the first two was a five.”

Thoroughly inaccurate...


prove it, I've already laid my ground in the thread.
holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081

10/18/2015  11:39 AM    LAST EDITED: 10/18/2015  11:46 AM
knickscity wrote:
holfresh wrote:
knickscity wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:The quote where he said they chose not to resign me oissed me off. The Knicks were going to match the original deal offered to Lin but couldn't match the poison pill deal. I really liked Lin as a knick but he needs to take some ownership for chasing the money. He got paid but he owned ny and his career probably would have had a different path had he not put the Knicks in a position where matching his offer was almost financially not possuble. the aw shucks its all good I just want to get back to linsanity isn't cutting it anymore in my opinion.

Firstly, the Knicks had already secured a deal with Felton before the Lin decision. they never intended on bringing him back, and even duped Kidd into signing under pretenses he would be a mentor, when he wound up being a key rotational player and broke down.

The underlying fact is Lin did nothing but what the Kniks told him to. The Knicks told Lin to go find a deal and they'll match it. The Knicks could have just offered the 4/24 deal from the start, but THEY did not. Ironically they didnt tell Novak to go find a deal...they gave him his without having to secure one first. Sma situation of both players, and what made the Knicks look so stupid is the NBA players Assoc. fought for them to keep Lin and Novak as they would have lost both for nothing without the EB ruling.

So off Lin goes, and the team that wanted him back offered a deal, a poison pill one. Knicks did not match though, but the players currently on the team sure had words to say about another mans money, which I've always felt was a huge no-no....

Melo: “It’s not up to me,” Anthony said laughing. “It’s up to the organization to say that they want to match that ridiculous contract that’s out there.

Tyson:“Jeremy was a young point guard who was inexperienced, who brought a great light to the organization,” Chandler said. “But as far as being able to run the offense and putting players in the right position he just wasn't there. We got some veteran point guards that are capable of doing that."

JR: "Without a doubt," he said. "I think some guys take it personal, because they've been doing it longer and haven't received any reward for it yet. I think it's a tough subject to touch on for a lot of guys."

Novak: “It can be looked at as a ridiculous contract in the sense that it’s a $5 [million], a $5 [million] and a $15 [million over the first three years],” Novak told SNY.tv Wednesday at the Steve Novak Basketball Camp at Sleepy Hollow High School.

“It is kind of ridiculous in terms of the structure. I don’t think in terms of Jeremy’s value that it’s ridiculous. I think everybody knows that. He’s very valuable….I wasn’t there when Carmelo said it but ‘ridiculous contract,’ I think probably means more the fact that there’s a max offer being offered in the third year when the first two was a five.”

Thoroughly inaccurate...


prove it, I've already laid my ground in the thread.

I don't have to prove it, everyone knows it's BS...And the Knicks couldn't offer Lin 24/4 because of the CBA..

Lin signed with Houston on July 11th then added the poison pill to the contract...Knicks announced the sign and trade deal for Felton on July 17th...The time to match the offer expired on July 19th...
knickscity
Posts: 24533
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/2/2012
Member: #4241
USA
10/18/2015  11:47 AM
newyorknewyork wrote:
knickscity wrote:
newyorknewyork wrote:
knickscity wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
knickscity wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:The quote where he said they chose not to resign me oissed me off. The Knicks were going to match the original deal offered to Lin but couldn't match the poison pill deal. I really liked Lin as a knick but he needs to take some ownership for chasing the money. He got paid but he owned ny and his career probably would have had a different path had he not put the Knicks in a position where matching his offer was almost financially not possuble. the aw shucks its all good I just want to get back to linsanity isn't cutting it anymore in my opinion.

Firstly, the Knicks had already secured a deal with Felton before the Lin decision. they never intended on bringing him back, and even duped Kidd into signing under pretenses he would be a mentor, when he wound up being a key rotational player and broke down.

The underlying fact is Lin did nothing but what the Kniks told him to. The Knicks told Lin to go find a deal and they'll match it. The Knicks could have just offered the 4/24 deal from the start, but THEY did not. Ironically they didnt tell Novak to go find a deal...they gave him his without having to secure one first. Sma situation of both players, and what made the Knicks look so stupid is the NBA players Assoc. fought for them to keep Lin and Novak as they would have lost both for nothing without the EB ruling.

So off Lin goes, and the team that wanted him back offered a deal, a poison pill one. Knicks did not match though, but the players currently on the team sure had words to say about another mans money, which I've always felt was a huge no-no....

Melo: “It’s not up to me,” Anthony said laughing. “It’s up to the organization to say that they want to match that ridiculous contract that’s out there.

Tyson:“Jeremy was a young point guard who was inexperienced, who brought a great light to the organization,” Chandler said. “But as far as being able to run the offense and putting players in the right position he just wasn't there. We got some veteran point guards that are capable of doing that."

JR: "Without a doubt," he said. "I think some guys take it personal, because they've been doing it longer and haven't received any reward for it yet. I think it's a tough subject to touch on for a lot of guys."

Novak: “It can be looked at as a ridiculous contract in the sense that it’s a $5 [million], a $5 [million] and a $15 [million over the first three years],” Novak told SNY.tv Wednesday at the Steve Novak Basketball Camp at Sleepy Hollow High School.

“It is kind of ridiculous in terms of the structure. I don’t think in terms of Jeremy’s value that it’s ridiculous. I think everybody knows that. He’s very valuable….I wasn’t there when Carmelo said it but ‘ridiculous contract,’ I think probably means more the fact that there’s a max offer being offered in the third year when the first two was a five.”


The Knicks signed Felton after they were presented the poison pill deal. It was during the time period where they could match Lin's deal. Once that happened it seemed obvious that they were moving on but they still had not committed either way in regards to lin.

Lin was done way before the pill was presented. recall the Knicks were in the running for Steve Nash as well. Nash to Felton to Kidd...come on now Lin was done. Things were official obviously during that period as there were moratoriums and things in place, but make no mistake Felton was headed to the Knicks way before. From Dolans BBQ appearance to his agent publicly blurting out $&T scenarios July 5th ....the deal was there.

July 5th....“They’ve shown great interest, but there’s stuff they’ve had to get through,’’ Dutt told the Post.

“He loved playing in New York. Our choice was to never have left New York. There were no hard feelings. Management handled it the best they could. I don’t think they ever misled us and I never felt they wanted him in that trade.’’

The Knicks have the $3.09 million taxpayer mid-level exception to offer Felton, though Dutt said he hoped a sign-and-trade can be done with Portland to get an increased salary.

“I consider them definitely on his high list,’’ Dutt said. “He would love to go back. He loved New York and was playing at an all-star level.’’

I realize we as fans want to diss the ex players and laud the team, but the team made this decision happen. Unless they offered the 4/24 deal they could have just like they gave Novak...this was all on them.

ALL indications from the Knicks side was that they were going to match the initial offer. Woodson made the notorious claim we would match up to a billion dollars or something silly like that. If it was so clear that Knicks weren't going to match then Houston wouldn't have upped there offer to poison pill status. They clearly felt the heat that the Knicks were going to match the offer which again ALL indications pointed to.

We had Grunwald hiding in a closet avoiding phone calls to buy time for goodness sake.

Nash and Kidd were being looked at and brought in because they wanted veteran insurance. Lin had the amazing run but still lacked experience and needed more improvement and seasoning. Its logical to have Lin back those guys up and be instant offense off the bench as he grew into a better player with experience. Felton could have always been an option in case we struck out on Nash & Kidd. Or Felton could have been an option along with Nash or Kidd as well as Lin under the first Houston offer. At 3 mil Felton could have competed with Lin for the backup spot. Since we ran a lot of 2 pg sets one of them would have taken Pablo's spot.


We should know by now what happens during the moratorium is never official, but it was a poison pill the entire time. the first "offer" was 4 years 28 mil, 5 for the first two, 9 per for the next two, that fourth year being a team option, but if the Knicks match there would be no options.

http://espn.go.com/newyork/nba/story/_/id/8133715/source-newyork-knicks-jeremy-lin-agrees-sign-offer-sheet-houston-rockets

This deal was equally bad tax wise.

If the Knicks had gotten Nash, there would be no Lin. Even the Kidd deal was before the last deal....

Jason Kidd, who was set to rejoin the Dallas Mavericks, made a late and stunning reversal and agreed to join the Knicks instead. Negotiations were continuing Thursday night, and it was not yet clear whether the Knicks would sign Kidd outright or acquire him in a sign-and-trade deal.

Just as Kidd committed, the Knicks learned that Jeremy Lin, their promising 23-year-old point guard, had agreed to an offer sheet with the Houston Rockets, complicating the picture further.

The Rockets’ offer could be worth as much as $28.8 million over four years, with backloaded payments in the final two seasons, according to a person who was briefed on the details. The fourth year is a team option. Because Lin is a restricted free agent, the Knicks have the right to match the deal.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/06/sports/basketball/kidd-is-heading-to-the-knicks.html

Lin was done.

Knicks would have matched the initial offer due to it being the market that Lin set for himself. Knicks were able to offer 4 yrs 24mil, but wanted Lin to find the market for himself and then match what that offer was. All was going according the plan until Lin after agreeing in principal to the initial offer from Houston fired his agent. Pulled out of the initial offer once word was set that the Knicks would match(up to 1 billion dollars), and signed for an even more lucrative offer. This is obviously what pissed the Knicks(Dolan) off. As it seemed that Lin was just looking to milk money out of the Knicks once it was clear they were willing to match rather then actually signing a deal that the market set. Not that this is really Lin's fault. Knicks said they would match any offer so he designed a way to get top dollar. But the Knicks were always interested in bringing Lin back until they felt Lin was milking them. He was not done before that.

Regardless if they signed Nash or Kidd they were always able to match Lin's offer. One didn't prevent the other from happening. And since this is a business bring Lin back would have been more profitable for the Knicks in terms of sells then not even if it jacked up the cap. Lin made like mimimum yet during Linsanity Knicks made huge profit, and Lin helped the Knicks make playoffs making the Knicks even more profit while again making minimum. He probably already covered the profit necessary for the first 2 yrs of the new contract during his Linsanity run. The only thing that stopped the Knicks from being interested in bringing Lin back was Dolan feeling betrayed.


This is where rumors vs actual reported facts get lost. You cant match what you didnt recieve. Lin has to sign an agreement first. The first offer was never signed as it was the moratorium and once again it was a poison pill as well. Only difference was the first was 18 mil backloaded over two year and the second was backloaded by 15 in one year.

Also the report that Lin changed agents was dated in June of 2012...before free agency started....

According to a release sent out by Geisler on Thursday, Tanner will represent Lin in all areas of contractual agreements, marketing endorsements, licensing, personal appearances, media relations, community investments and other business opportunities. In addition, Montgomery will collaborate with Tanner on free agency and other basketball-related matters.


http://espn.go.com/blog/newyork/knicks/post/_/id/21003/jeremy-lin-switches-agents

Also I really do think folks are getting the profit angle very much wrong. The Knicks have to share their profits with the other teams, it doesnt just stay with them. Houston found that out once Lin signed with them. Sure they COULD have kept Lin, but they didnt...never offered a deal.

There's two facts we know....Knicks never offered a contract, and they didnt match. Knicks had control over both, not Lin.

knickscity
Posts: 24533
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/2/2012
Member: #4241
USA
10/18/2015  11:56 AM
holfresh wrote:
knickscity wrote:
holfresh wrote:
knickscity wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:The quote where he said they chose not to resign me oissed me off. The Knicks were going to match the original deal offered to Lin but couldn't match the poison pill deal. I really liked Lin as a knick but he needs to take some ownership for chasing the money. He got paid but he owned ny and his career probably would have had a different path had he not put the Knicks in a position where matching his offer was almost financially not possuble. the aw shucks its all good I just want to get back to linsanity isn't cutting it anymore in my opinion.

Firstly, the Knicks had already secured a deal with Felton before the Lin decision. they never intended on bringing him back, and even duped Kidd into signing under pretenses he would be a mentor, when he wound up being a key rotational player and broke down.

The underlying fact is Lin did nothing but what the Kniks told him to. The Knicks told Lin to go find a deal and they'll match it. The Knicks could have just offered the 4/24 deal from the start, but THEY did not. Ironically they didnt tell Novak to go find a deal...they gave him his without having to secure one first. Sma situation of both players, and what made the Knicks look so stupid is the NBA players Assoc. fought for them to keep Lin and Novak as they would have lost both for nothing without the EB ruling.

So off Lin goes, and the team that wanted him back offered a deal, a poison pill one. Knicks did not match though, but the players currently on the team sure had words to say about another mans money, which I've always felt was a huge no-no....

Melo: “It’s not up to me,” Anthony said laughing. “It’s up to the organization to say that they want to match that ridiculous contract that’s out there.

Tyson:“Jeremy was a young point guard who was inexperienced, who brought a great light to the organization,” Chandler said. “But as far as being able to run the offense and putting players in the right position he just wasn't there. We got some veteran point guards that are capable of doing that."

JR: "Without a doubt," he said. "I think some guys take it personal, because they've been doing it longer and haven't received any reward for it yet. I think it's a tough subject to touch on for a lot of guys."

Novak: “It can be looked at as a ridiculous contract in the sense that it’s a $5 [million], a $5 [million] and a $15 [million over the first three years],” Novak told SNY.tv Wednesday at the Steve Novak Basketball Camp at Sleepy Hollow High School.

“It is kind of ridiculous in terms of the structure. I don’t think in terms of Jeremy’s value that it’s ridiculous. I think everybody knows that. He’s very valuable….I wasn’t there when Carmelo said it but ‘ridiculous contract,’ I think probably means more the fact that there’s a max offer being offered in the third year when the first two was a five.”

Thoroughly inaccurate...


prove it, I've already laid my ground in the thread.

I don't have to prove it, everyone knows it's BS...And the Knicks couldn't offer Lin 24/4 because of the CBA..

Lin signed with Houston on July 11th then added the poison pill to the contract...Knicks announced the sign and trade deal for Felton on July 17th...The time to match the offer expired on July 19th...

You really need to get verse in the events. The Knicks could have offered the deal, did they not come to agreement with Novak on a four year deal on July 9th? The same could have been offered to Lin as they both had the same ruling in their favor. I just posted an article from felton agents discussing s&t chances with the Knicks dated July 5th....and guess what? S& T happens, excatly how they wanted....and nobody denied felton was at Dolans BBQ on July 4th.

But nobody can explain if the Knicks wanted to resign Lin why go after Nash before the moratorium, then Kidd, then Felton? they were not gonna have Lin as a 6 mil + backup.

He was done in NY, the day he said he was 85% yet didnt play, and then explained why.

martin
Posts: 76527
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
10/18/2015  11:58 AM
knicks1248 wrote:
mreinman wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
Sangfroid wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:The quote where he said they chose not to resign me oissed me off. The Knicks were going to match the original deal offered to Lin but couldn't match the poison pill deal. I really liked Lin as a knick but he needs to take some ownership for chasing the money. He got paid but he owned ny and his career probably would have had a different path had he not put the Knicks in a position where matching his offer was almost financially not possuble. the aw shucks its all good I just want to get back to linsanity isn't cutting it anymore in my opinion.

Revisionist's history. He must be a Republican.


Really? You don't think Lin went for the money? I have said this since that July by the way.

of course he chased the money. Who would expect him not to?

He chased the wrong kind of money, the endorsements he would have continue to get in NY would have trumped that 15 25 mill. Not signing him change the entire direction of the franchise.

Not true at all. You NEVER turn down guaranteed money over something like potential endorsements.

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
StarksEwing1
Posts: 32671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/28/2012
Member: #4451

10/18/2015  12:00 PM
holfresh wrote:
StarksEwing1 wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
Sangfroid wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:The quote where he said they chose not to resign me oissed me off. The Knicks were going to match the original deal offered to Lin but couldn't match the poison pill deal. I really liked Lin as a knick but he needs to take some ownership for chasing the money. He got paid but he owned ny and his career probably would have had a different path had he not put the Knicks in a position where matching his offer was almost financially not possuble. the aw shucks its all good I just want to get back to linsanity isn't cutting it anymore in my opinion.

Revisionist's history. He must be a Republican.


Really? You don't think Lin went for the money? I have said this since that July by the way.
its not fair to bash lin for chasing the money because EVERY player chases the money. Lets be honest melo is a knick because we could offer him much more than anyone otherwise he would have went to chicago. LINSANITY was probably the best time we have had as knick fans since 2000

Speak for yourself..Knicks won 54 games and making it to the second round of the playoffs was much, much, more entertaining for me than the 8-1 media driven Linsanity experience...
no shock there i know you despise lin. I loved the 54 wins but hated the way we got our ass kicked by indy in the playoffs
Jeremy Lin: Was open to return to Knicks, but team not interested..

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy