[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Do we have one of the best front courts in the league?
Author Thread
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
10/6/2015  12:45 PM
blkexec wrote:
EnySpree wrote:
blkexec wrote:
Cartman718 wrote:
nixluva wrote:
Cartman718 wrote:we have the best frontcourt to never play a game together in a regular season yes.

That's taking the easy way out. Of course they haven't played a game yet. This is where we get to see your talent evaluation skills. How do you actually see this group of bigs performing this year based on their talent, skills and fit together? Do they have the needed skills and BB IQ for this system and will that enhance their abilities? Relative to other teams how do you think they stack up. Come on! Put some work into it.

i haven't really seen quinn dwill kp play. i have seen some of seraphin's games and i honestly think he has the potential to be great and an all-star. if he's in the starting lineup, i have hope for the frontcourt.

reserving judgment till the season is underway. talent evaluation in scrimmage and summer league is hardly that.
it's about team chemistry also and who knows what will happen with that when the season begins.

who knows what will happen with that when the season begins.

You can say the same thing after the season begins. Nobody knows how this story ends until the season is over.

Unfortunately, thats part of the reason why people use these threads. Discuss their predictions before.....analysis during.....and post analysis after.

But I think we have the potential to be the best front court, at least on paper. I think we can matchup with any teams front court in the NBA, which is something we haven't said since Patrick Ewing. But Lopez is only 1 injury away from dropping that best front court prediction.

Rolo is getting the Tyson chandler treatment. He's becoming a tad overrated. We definately need him but the Knicks have Seraphin, O'Quinn, Kristaps and even Lou to fall back on if he did get hurt. God forbid of course but this brings me back to the strength we have on this team.

I like Seraphin....I'm a big fan. I never seen O'Quinn plan, but he's from Queens, so by default I like him. KP isn't ready to play defense at center. Lopez is the only legit 7 footer on the team that can hold his own in the paint, as a shot blocker. Seraphin and O'Quinn will block shots, but Lopez is a little taller and gets credit for missed layups as well, because of his length. This is just my personal prediction that Lopez (just like Chandler was) are key rim protectors. When they go down, we bring in guys that can score better on offense, but gives up more points on defense. Again, just my prediction based on what we have on paper. Would like to see how the team looks when Lopez is out the game.


O'Quinn is the closest thing to RoLo in terms of a paint presence, which says a lot about him given his size. He's better than some realize as a rim protector. Just for comparison against some of the best rim protectors a couple of years ago, you can see that O'Quinn wasn't bad. The last column in the chart below is the one that shows the defensive impact on FG%. O'Quinn's -3.6 FG% is very good. It means O'Quinn is altering shots inside.

2013-14

Player Team Age Pos GP G FREQ DFGM DFGA DFG% FG% Diff%
Roy Hibbert IND 27 C 81 81 100.0% 5.9 13.9 42.5 47.8 -5.3
Andrew Bogut GSW 29 C 66 66 100.0% 4.9 11.3 43.2 48.0 -4.8
Robin Lopez POR 26 C 82 82 100.0% 6.9 15.9 43.3 47.8 -4.5
Joakim Noah CHI 29 C 80 80 100.0% 6.8 15.6 43.5 47.1 -3.6
Tim Duncan SAS 38 F 74 74 100.0% 5.8 13.0 44.8 48.2 -3.4
Serge Ibaka OKC 24 F-C 81 81 100.0% 6.7 15.2 43.9 47.2 -3.2
Timofey Mozgov DEN 27 C 82 82 100.0% 4.8 10.8 44.6 47.6 -3.0
Anthony Davis NOP 21 F-C 66 66 100.0% 6.2 14.2 43.7 46.4 -2.7
DeAndre Jordan LAC 25 C 82 82 100.0% 7.6 16.4 46.0 48.1 -2.1
Kyle O'Quinn ORL 24 F 63 63 100.0% 3.3 7.7 42.7 46.3 -3.6

AUTOADVERT
Cartman718
Posts: 29069
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/12/2007
Member: #1694

10/6/2015  12:49 PM
martin wrote:I love the upside potential of the bigs on the Knicks, especially considering their ages.

I don't know too much about Seraphin but the praise I am reading is interesting. Wish he was on the Knicks under a multi-year deal.

exactly this but the dude is also smart and knows more money is coming. he's going to get serious mins and he knows he could add 7-8 million per year in salary by performing at a high level just this year alone.

i am going total dk7th on this but he also feels like a guy who would click with melo.

Nixluva is posting triangle screen grabs, even when nobody asks - Fishmike. LOL So are we going to reference that thread like the bible now? "The thread of Wroten Page 14 post 9" - EnySpree
blkexec
Posts: 28347
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/3/2004
Member: #748
10/6/2015  12:50 PM
martin wrote:I love the upside potential of the bigs on the Knicks, especially considering their ages.

I don't know too much about Seraphin but the praise I am reading is interesting. Wish he was on the Knicks under a multi-year deal.

I live in Maryland, so I've seen and heard about Seraphin more than most knick fans. I've also met him in person. His biggest issue is he has the skills to be a starter, and he's always trying to prove it, when he comes in the game. The problem with that he tends to play outside of the team system / strategy. He's a great two way player. But I don't think he's 6'10 without shoes. So when he goes up against taller centers, he has a difficult time. But he's a great help defender and blind side shotblocker. The problem is he wants to be a scorer as well, so he just needs to figure out what we need and how he can impact. I believe his best position is PF.....eventhough he can play center, whenever we play small ball. Thats the other problem. This might sound strange, but I think we have too much flexibility, which makes Fisher the weak link. Can he put Seraphin and others in the right positions to succeed? We have 9 PF's that can either play SF or Center. Thats great for a veteran coach. But for a young coach, it's almost easier if everybody has a defined role, like GS has.

Born in Brooklyn, Raised in Queens, Lives in Maryland. The future is bright, I'm a Knicks fan for life!
martin
Posts: 76527
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
10/6/2015  12:52 PM
nixluva wrote:
blkexec wrote:
EnySpree wrote:
blkexec wrote:
Cartman718 wrote:
nixluva wrote:
Cartman718 wrote:we have the best frontcourt to never play a game together in a regular season yes.

That's taking the easy way out. Of course they haven't played a game yet. This is where we get to see your talent evaluation skills. How do you actually see this group of bigs performing this year based on their talent, skills and fit together? Do they have the needed skills and BB IQ for this system and will that enhance their abilities? Relative to other teams how do you think they stack up. Come on! Put some work into it.

i haven't really seen quinn dwill kp play. i have seen some of seraphin's games and i honestly think he has the potential to be great and an all-star. if he's in the starting lineup, i have hope for the frontcourt.

reserving judgment till the season is underway. talent evaluation in scrimmage and summer league is hardly that.
it's about team chemistry also and who knows what will happen with that when the season begins.

who knows what will happen with that when the season begins.

You can say the same thing after the season begins. Nobody knows how this story ends until the season is over.

Unfortunately, thats part of the reason why people use these threads. Discuss their predictions before.....analysis during.....and post analysis after.

But I think we have the potential to be the best front court, at least on paper. I think we can matchup with any teams front court in the NBA, which is something we haven't said since Patrick Ewing. But Lopez is only 1 injury away from dropping that best front court prediction.

Rolo is getting the Tyson chandler treatment. He's becoming a tad overrated. We definately need him but the Knicks have Seraphin, O'Quinn, Kristaps and even Lou to fall back on if he did get hurt. God forbid of course but this brings me back to the strength we have on this team.

I like Seraphin....I'm a big fan. I never seen O'Quinn plan, but he's from Queens, so by default I like him. KP isn't ready to play defense at center. Lopez is the only legit 7 footer on the team that can hold his own in the paint, as a shot blocker. Seraphin and O'Quinn will block shots, but Lopez is a little taller and gets credit for missed layups as well, because of his length. This is just my personal prediction that Lopez (just like Chandler was) are key rim protectors. When they go down, we bring in guys that can score better on offense, but gives up more points on defense. Again, just my prediction based on what we have on paper. Would like to see how the team looks when Lopez is out the game.


O'Quinn is the closest thing to RoLo in terms of a paint presence, which says a lot about him given his size. He's better than some realize as a rim protector. Just for comparison against some of the best rim protectors a couple of years ago, you can see that O'Quinn wasn't bad. The last column in the chart below is the one that shows the defensive impact on FG%. O'Quinn's -3.6 FG% is very good. It means O'Quinn is altering shots inside.

2013-14

Player Team Age Pos GP G FREQ DFGM DFGA DFG% FG% Diff%
Roy Hibbert IND 27 C 81 81 100.0% 5.9 13.9 42.5 47.8 -5.3
Andrew Bogut GSW 29 C 66 66 100.0% 4.9 11.3 43.2 48.0 -4.8
Robin Lopez POR 26 C 82 82 100.0% 6.9 15.9 43.3 47.8 -4.5
Joakim Noah CHI 29 C 80 80 100.0% 6.8 15.6 43.5 47.1 -3.6
Tim Duncan SAS 38 F 74 74 100.0% 5.8 13.0 44.8 48.2 -3.4
Serge Ibaka OKC 24 F-C 81 81 100.0% 6.7 15.2 43.9 47.2 -3.2
Timofey Mozgov DEN 27 C 82 82 100.0% 4.8 10.8 44.6 47.6 -3.0
Anthony Davis NOP 21 F-C 66 66 100.0% 6.2 14.2 43.7 46.4 -2.7
DeAndre Jordan LAC 25 C 82 82 100.0% 7.6 16.4 46.0 48.1 -2.1
Kyle O'Quinn ORL 24 F 63 63 100.0% 3.3 7.7 42.7 46.3 -3.6

nix, where do you get such a chart?

Also, the biggest difference between O'Quinn and all of the others is that O'Quinn came off the bench and probably played an average of 10-15 minutes less than the others, that's significant.

There are so many good stats out there but I think they should all be adjusted for players who don't start, or adjusted for how much percentage of time they play against starters as a whole, not just starting 5 players but starters in general. O'Quinn averaged 20 minutes that year and came off the bench, so you can assume he played against lesser competition, which would equate to inflated stats compared with the rest of the group.

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
WaltLongmire
Posts: 27623
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/28/2014
Member: #5843

10/6/2015  12:53 PM
Most interesting front court we've had in a long time, and it's a pretty young group.

We should not get outmuscled very often, and I'm looking forward to seeing if we can bully some of the smaller lineups we face.

Seems to me that we have a lot of flexibility in the front court, and should be able to match up with most lineups thrown at us.

Not sure it is one of the best in the league, but it gives me a lot of optimism.

EnySpree: Can we agree to agree not to mention Phil Jackson and triangle for the rest of our lives?
blkexec
Posts: 28347
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/3/2004
Member: #748
10/6/2015  12:53 PM
My bold prediction?

KP will adapt to the NBA quicker than Fisher will as a coach. I think KP might come on slow, but if he's healthy, he will be in the running for rookie of the year! He might come in second place, but he will be in the discussion. There's too much talk about him vs Dirk / Pau.....or......if he's going to start or not. Even as a Steve Novak role, KP will impact the game in his rookie year.

Born in Brooklyn, Raised in Queens, Lives in Maryland. The future is bright, I'm a Knicks fan for life!
martin
Posts: 76527
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
10/6/2015  12:54 PM
blkexec wrote:
martin wrote:I love the upside potential of the bigs on the Knicks, especially considering their ages.

I don't know too much about Seraphin but the praise I am reading is interesting. Wish he was on the Knicks under a multi-year deal.

I live in Maryland, so I've seen and heard about Seraphin more than most knick fans. I've also met him in person. His biggest issue is he has the skills to be a starter, and he's always trying to prove it, when he comes in the game. The problem with that he tends to play outside of the team system / strategy. He's a great two way player. But I don't think he's 6'10 without shoes. So when he goes up against taller centers, he has a difficult time. But he's a great help defender and blind side shotblocker. The problem is he wants to be a scorer as well, so he just needs to figure out what we need and how he can impact. I believe his best position is PF.....eventhough he can play center, whenever we play small ball. Thats the other problem. This might sound strange, but I think we have too much flexibility, which makes Fisher the weak link. Can he put Seraphin and others in the right positions to succeed? We have 9 PF's that can either play SF or Center. Thats great for a veteran coach. But for a young coach, it's almost easier if everybody has a defined role, like GS has.

I like a starting rotation of: Lopez, Seraphin, Melo, AA, Grant/Jose. You have 2 post players in Melo and Seraphin, solid front court, shooters to space on the wings.

OQuinn, KP, DWill, Gallo, Grant/Jose as a second unit is decent too.

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
Cartman718
Posts: 29069
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/12/2007
Member: #1694

10/6/2015  1:07 PM
blkexec wrote:
martin wrote:I love the upside potential of the bigs on the Knicks, especially considering their ages.

I don't know too much about Seraphin but the praise I am reading is interesting. Wish he was on the Knicks under a multi-year deal.

I live in Maryland, so I've seen and heard about Seraphin more than most knick fans. I've also met him in person. His biggest issue is he has the skills to be a starter, and he's always trying to prove it, when he comes in the game. The problem with that he tends to play outside of the team system / strategy. He's a great two way player. But I don't think he's 6'10 without shoes. So when he goes up against taller centers, he has a difficult time. But he's a great help defender and blind side shotblocker. The problem is he wants to be a scorer as well, so he just needs to figure out what we need and how he can impact. I believe his best position is PF.....eventhough he can play center, whenever we play small ball. Thats the other problem. This might sound strange, but I think we have too much flexibility, which makes Fisher the weak link. Can he put Seraphin and others in the right positions to succeed? We have 9 PF's that can either play SF or Center. Thats great for a veteran coach. But for a young coach, it's almost easier if everybody has a defined role, like GS has.

i hear you and the pressure is definitely ON on fisher. but i like seraphin compared to rolo on both sides of the court. although...triangle wise rolo seems like a better fit.
as long as seraphin listens to fisher, he will be fine... else he knows he has millions to lose.
2012-13 season, < 22 mins per game, 46% shooting, 9.1 points, 70% FT shooting, 4.4 rebounds

Nixluva is posting triangle screen grabs, even when nobody asks - Fishmike. LOL So are we going to reference that thread like the bible now? "The thread of Wroten Page 14 post 9" - EnySpree
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
10/6/2015  1:10 PM
martin wrote:
nixluva wrote:
blkexec wrote:
EnySpree wrote:
blkexec wrote:
Cartman718 wrote:
nixluva wrote:
Cartman718 wrote:we have the best frontcourt to never play a game together in a regular season yes.

That's taking the easy way out. Of course they haven't played a game yet. This is where we get to see your talent evaluation skills. How do you actually see this group of bigs performing this year based on their talent, skills and fit together? Do they have the needed skills and BB IQ for this system and will that enhance their abilities? Relative to other teams how do you think they stack up. Come on! Put some work into it.

i haven't really seen quinn dwill kp play. i have seen some of seraphin's games and i honestly think he has the potential to be great and an all-star. if he's in the starting lineup, i have hope for the frontcourt.

reserving judgment till the season is underway. talent evaluation in scrimmage and summer league is hardly that.
it's about team chemistry also and who knows what will happen with that when the season begins.

who knows what will happen with that when the season begins.

You can say the same thing after the season begins. Nobody knows how this story ends until the season is over.

Unfortunately, thats part of the reason why people use these threads. Discuss their predictions before.....analysis during.....and post analysis after.

But I think we have the potential to be the best front court, at least on paper. I think we can matchup with any teams front court in the NBA, which is something we haven't said since Patrick Ewing. But Lopez is only 1 injury away from dropping that best front court prediction.

Rolo is getting the Tyson chandler treatment. He's becoming a tad overrated. We definately need him but the Knicks have Seraphin, O'Quinn, Kristaps and even Lou to fall back on if he did get hurt. God forbid of course but this brings me back to the strength we have on this team.

I like Seraphin....I'm a big fan. I never seen O'Quinn plan, but he's from Queens, so by default I like him. KP isn't ready to play defense at center. Lopez is the only legit 7 footer on the team that can hold his own in the paint, as a shot blocker. Seraphin and O'Quinn will block shots, but Lopez is a little taller and gets credit for missed layups as well, because of his length. This is just my personal prediction that Lopez (just like Chandler was) are key rim protectors. When they go down, we bring in guys that can score better on offense, but gives up more points on defense. Again, just my prediction based on what we have on paper. Would like to see how the team looks when Lopez is out the game.


O'Quinn is the closest thing to RoLo in terms of a paint presence, which says a lot about him given his size. He's better than some realize as a rim protector. Just for comparison against some of the best rim protectors a couple of years ago, you can see that O'Quinn wasn't bad. The last column in the chart below is the one that shows the defensive impact on FG%. O'Quinn's -3.6 FG% is very good. It means O'Quinn is altering shots inside.

2013-14

Player Team Age Pos GP G FREQ DFGM DFGA DFG% FG% Diff%
Roy Hibbert IND 27 C 81 81 100.0% 5.9 13.9 42.5 47.8 -5.3
Andrew Bogut GSW 29 C 66 66 100.0% 4.9 11.3 43.2 48.0 -4.8
Robin Lopez POR 26 C 82 82 100.0% 6.9 15.9 43.3 47.8 -4.5
Joakim Noah CHI 29 C 80 80 100.0% 6.8 15.6 43.5 47.1 -3.6
Tim Duncan SAS 38 F 74 74 100.0% 5.8 13.0 44.8 48.2 -3.4
Serge Ibaka OKC 24 F-C 81 81 100.0% 6.7 15.2 43.9 47.2 -3.2
Timofey Mozgov DEN 27 C 82 82 100.0% 4.8 10.8 44.6 47.6 -3.0
Anthony Davis NOP 21 F-C 66 66 100.0% 6.2 14.2 43.7 46.4 -2.7
DeAndre Jordan LAC 25 C 82 82 100.0% 7.6 16.4 46.0 48.1 -2.1
Kyle O'Quinn ORL 24 F 63 63 100.0% 3.3 7.7 42.7 46.3 -3.6

nix, where do you get such a chart?

Also, the biggest difference between O'Quinn and all of the others is that O'Quinn came off the bench and probably played an average of 10-15 minutes less than the others, that's significant.

There are so many good stats out there but I think they should all be adjusted for players who don't start, or adjusted for how much percentage of time they play against starters as a whole, not just starting 5 players but starters in general. O'Quinn averaged 20 minutes that year and came off the bench, so you can assume he played against lesser competition, which would equate to inflated stats compared with the rest of the group.


I added O'Quinn to show his potential not that he was actually in that group. I would assume that regardless of whether O'Quinn starts or comes off the bench the general nature of his willingness to challenge shots will remain. This stat is about penetration and defending against shots closer to the rim. It almost doesn't matter if it's bench guys or not. If you suck at defending close to the basket you will always suck even against bench guys. O'Quinn is not a product of just playing against lesser talent. He has legit talent as a rim protector and also an offensive player.

blkexec
Posts: 28347
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/3/2004
Member: #748
10/6/2015  1:13 PM    LAST EDITED: 10/6/2015  1:31 PM
martin wrote:
blkexec wrote:
martin wrote:I love the upside potential of the bigs on the Knicks, especially considering their ages.

I don't know too much about Seraphin but the praise I am reading is interesting. Wish he was on the Knicks under a multi-year deal.

I live in Maryland, so I've seen and heard about Seraphin more than most knick fans. I've also met him in person. His biggest issue is he has the skills to be a starter, and he's always trying to prove it, when he comes in the game. The problem with that he tends to play outside of the team system / strategy. He's a great two way player. But I don't think he's 6'10 without shoes. So when he goes up against taller centers, he has a difficult time. But he's a great help defender and blind side shotblocker. The problem is he wants to be a scorer as well, so he just needs to figure out what we need and how he can impact. I believe his best position is PF.....eventhough he can play center, whenever we play small ball. Thats the other problem. This might sound strange, but I think we have too much flexibility, which makes Fisher the weak link. Can he put Seraphin and others in the right positions to succeed? We have 9 PF's that can either play SF or Center. Thats great for a veteran coach. But for a young coach, it's almost easier if everybody has a defined role, like GS has.

I like a starting rotation of: Lopez, Seraphin, Melo, AA, Grant/Jose. You have 2 post players in Melo and Seraphin, solid front court, shooters to space on the wings.

OQuinn, KP, DWill, Gallo, Grant/Jose as a second unit is decent too.

I agree....Since Seraphin only signed a 1 year contract, he's looking for a starting gig. We would be the first team to offer him a starting role, and maybe have an under the table contract extension. But I like Seraphin as the PF on defense.....but I rather have Melo as the starting PF on offense. See my dilemma. Melo might turn into a 3 pt jump shooter with Serphin and Lopez in the paint. Seraphin and KP would be nice. KP and Lopez would be nice. You can almost pick any combination of PF / center and it will look nice on paper. Most people might disagree, but I like D.Will and Lopez. Because D.Will is like Melo....He can play SF or PF.

With Melo, I think it's better to have a PF who can play SF. Players like D.Will, KP are perfect. That way Melo will have room to operate on offense, and guard the slower but stronger PF on defense. Can D.Will and KP guard NBA SF's? I think so, just because of KP's length. D.Will is 6'8 so he shold be able to guard SF's.

Melo, Seraphin, Lopez is a great front line. I would like to see how that works on offense and in transistion.

I think the perfect lineup is when you can add rim protection, rebounds and speed.....Thats where KP and Lopez combination works the best. But Seraphin's offense from the outside will be key to him crowding the paint. I don't think the coaching staff want Seraphin shooting long 2's......KP would spread the floor or take it down low.

Born in Brooklyn, Raised in Queens, Lives in Maryland. The future is bright, I'm a Knicks fan for life!
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
10/6/2015  1:21 PM
SupremeCommander wrote:our front court is better than the Spurs or the Grizz or the Cavs???

what about the Clips and mini, as far as im concern, we need to see who actually steps up

ES
Nalod
Posts: 71378
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
10/6/2015  1:46 PM
O'Quinn reminds me of Rony Turiaf. If you recall, he spent his first three seasons with Phil and has a ring with the Lakers.
SupremeCommander
Posts: 34067
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127

10/6/2015  2:51 PM
knicks1248 wrote:
SupremeCommander wrote:our front court is better than the Spurs or the Grizz or the Cavs???

what about the Clips and mini, as far as im concern, we need to see who actually steps up

I was trying to go easy

DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
EnySpree
Posts: 44919
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397

10/6/2015  3:03 PM
WaltLongmire wrote:Most interesting front court we've had in a long time, and it's a pretty young group.

We should not get outmuscled very often, and I'm looking forward to seeing if we can bully some of the smaller lineups we face.

Seems to me that we have a lot of flexibility in the front court, and should be able to match up with most lineups thrown at us.

Not sure it is one of the best in the league, but it gives me a lot of optimism.

What you described sounds like one of the best. I say show your tits and earn your beads!

Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
10/6/2015  3:04 PM
martin wrote:
blkexec wrote:
martin wrote:I love the upside potential of the bigs on the Knicks, especially considering their ages.

I don't know too much about Seraphin but the praise I am reading is interesting. Wish he was on the Knicks under a multi-year deal.

I live in Maryland, so I've seen and heard about Seraphin more than most knick fans. I've also met him in person. His biggest issue is he has the skills to be a starter, and he's always trying to prove it, when he comes in the game. The problem with that he tends to play outside of the team system / strategy. He's a great two way player. But I don't think he's 6'10 without shoes. So when he goes up against taller centers, he has a difficult time. But he's a great help defender and blind side shotblocker. The problem is he wants to be a scorer as well, so he just needs to figure out what we need and how he can impact. I believe his best position is PF.....eventhough he can play center, whenever we play small ball. Thats the other problem. This might sound strange, but I think we have too much flexibility, which makes Fisher the weak link. Can he put Seraphin and others in the right positions to succeed? We have 9 PF's that can either play SF or Center. Thats great for a veteran coach. But for a young coach, it's almost easier if everybody has a defined role, like GS has.

I like a starting rotation of: Lopez, Seraphin, Melo, AA, Grant/Jose. You have 2 post players in Melo and Seraphin, solid front court, shooters to space on the wings.

OQuinn, KP, DWill, Gallo, Grant/Jose as a second unit is decent too.


Post players? The only post play i saw last season was when Amare said Fck the triangle, and got to the line more than anyone..the triangle has a knack for turning everyone into jump shooters, and i mean everyone

ES
callmened
Posts: 24448
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/26/2012
Member: #4234

10/6/2015  3:10 PM
no...next question..lol (dusts off hands like that was easy) lol
Knicks should be improved: win about 40 games and maybe sneak into the playoffs. Melo, Rose and even Noah will have some nice moments however this team should be about PORZINGUS. the sooner they make him the primary player, the better
WaltLongmire
Posts: 27623
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/28/2014
Member: #5843

10/6/2015  3:47 PM
martin wrote:
blkexec wrote:
martin wrote:I love the upside potential of the bigs on the Knicks, especially considering their ages.

I don't know too much about Seraphin but the praise I am reading is interesting. Wish he was on the Knicks under a multi-year deal.

I live in Maryland, so I've seen and heard about Seraphin more than most knick fans. I've also met him in person. His biggest issue is he has the skills to be a starter, and he's always trying to prove it, when he comes in the game. The problem with that he tends to play outside of the team system / strategy. He's a great two way player. But I don't think he's 6'10 without shoes. So when he goes up against taller centers, he has a difficult time. But he's a great help defender and blind side shotblocker. The problem is he wants to be a scorer as well, so he just needs to figure out what we need and how he can impact. I believe his best position is PF.....eventhough he can play center, whenever we play small ball. Thats the other problem. This might sound strange, but I think we have too much flexibility, which makes Fisher the weak link. Can he put Seraphin and others in the right positions to succeed? We have 9 PF's that can either play SF or Center. Thats great for a veteran coach. But for a young coach, it's almost easier if everybody has a defined role, like GS has.

I like a starting rotation of: Lopez, Seraphin, Melo, AA, Grant/Jose. You have 2 post players in Melo and Seraphin, solid front court, shooters to space on the wings.

OQuinn, KP, DWill, Gallo, Grant/Jose as a second unit is decent too.

My gut feeling is that a frontline of Lopez, Seraphin, and Melo would work OK on offense, but I'm not sure Seraphin is a guy you want guarding someone on the perimeter. I like having "power" in a power forward, but they also have to guard quicker PFs these days, so you need a versatile player at the position.

Not even sure how O'Quinn does as a defender against quicker PFs. KP, Williams, and Anthony, if you want him there, are quick enough to guard some of the faster PFs.

I have no issue with situational starters...not sure how common it is, or has been, though.

EnySpree: Can we agree to agree not to mention Phil Jackson and triangle for the rest of our lives?
EnySpree
Posts: 44919
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397

10/6/2015  4:41 PM
WaltLongmire wrote:
martin wrote:
blkexec wrote:
martin wrote:I love the upside potential of the bigs on the Knicks, especially considering their ages.

I don't know too much about Seraphin but the praise I am reading is interesting. Wish he was on the Knicks under a multi-year deal.

I live in Maryland, so I've seen and heard about Seraphin more than most knick fans. I've also met him in person. His biggest issue is he has the skills to be a starter, and he's always trying to prove it, when he comes in the game. The problem with that he tends to play outside of the team system / strategy. He's a great two way player. But I don't think he's 6'10 without shoes. So when he goes up against taller centers, he has a difficult time. But he's a great help defender and blind side shotblocker. The problem is he wants to be a scorer as well, so he just needs to figure out what we need and how he can impact. I believe his best position is PF.....eventhough he can play center, whenever we play small ball. Thats the other problem. This might sound strange, but I think we have too much flexibility, which makes Fisher the weak link. Can he put Seraphin and others in the right positions to succeed? We have 9 PF's that can either play SF or Center. Thats great for a veteran coach. But for a young coach, it's almost easier if everybody has a defined role, like GS has.

I like a starting rotation of: Lopez, Seraphin, Melo, AA, Grant/Jose. You have 2 post players in Melo and Seraphin, solid front court, shooters to space on the wings.

OQuinn, KP, DWill, Gallo, Grant/Jose as a second unit is decent too.

My gut feeling is that a frontline of Lopez, Seraphin, and Melo would work OK on offense, but I'm not sure Seraphin is a guy you want guarding someone on the perimeter. I like having "power" in a power forward, but they also have to guard quicker PFs these days, so you need a versatile player at the position.

Not even sure how O'Quinn does as a defender against quicker PFs. KP, Williams, and Anthony, if you want him there, are quick enough to guard some of the faster PFs.

I have no issue with situational starters...not sure how common it is, or has been, though.

It works both ways. The small players have to guard the big guys. The nba today is too soft. I would welcome Seraphin, melo and Rolo starting. Punish teams for trying to copy golden states copy of Dantoni offense. Then play small and run them off the court. Then go big again.

Go knicks

Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
blkexec
Posts: 28347
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/3/2004
Member: #748
10/6/2015  4:46 PM
WaltLongmire wrote:
martin wrote:
blkexec wrote:
martin wrote:I love the upside potential of the bigs on the Knicks, especially considering their ages.

I don't know too much about Seraphin but the praise I am reading is interesting. Wish he was on the Knicks under a multi-year deal.

I live in Maryland, so I've seen and heard about Seraphin more than most knick fans. I've also met him in person. His biggest issue is he has the skills to be a starter, and he's always trying to prove it, when he comes in the game. The problem with that he tends to play outside of the team system / strategy. He's a great two way player. But I don't think he's 6'10 without shoes. So when he goes up against taller centers, he has a difficult time. But he's a great help defender and blind side shotblocker. The problem is he wants to be a scorer as well, so he just needs to figure out what we need and how he can impact. I believe his best position is PF.....eventhough he can play center, whenever we play small ball. Thats the other problem. This might sound strange, but I think we have too much flexibility, which makes Fisher the weak link. Can he put Seraphin and others in the right positions to succeed? We have 9 PF's that can either play SF or Center. Thats great for a veteran coach. But for a young coach, it's almost easier if everybody has a defined role, like GS has.

I like a starting rotation of: Lopez, Seraphin, Melo, AA, Grant/Jose. You have 2 post players in Melo and Seraphin, solid front court, shooters to space on the wings.

OQuinn, KP, DWill, Gallo, Grant/Jose as a second unit is decent too.

My gut feeling is that a frontline of Lopez, Seraphin, and Melo would work OK on offense, but I'm not sure Seraphin is a guy you want guarding someone on the perimeter. I like having "power" in a power forward, but they also have to guard quicker PFs these days, so you need a versatile player at the position.

Not even sure how O'Quinn does as a defender against quicker PFs. KP, Williams, and Anthony, if you want him there, are quick enough to guard some of the faster PFs.

I have no issue with situational starters...not sure how common it is, or has been, though.

I believe our strength is also our weakness. Having situational starters is a blessing and a curse. We need stability. And if players are yanked in and out of the lineup, we will never obtain any consistency in player performance. I think with this team, while waiting for KP to develop, we may have to do situational starters. But a groomed KP is really the answer to our problems. I believe Lopez, KP, Melo is our best front court combination. But thats not going to sit well with Seraphin, since he's kicking and scratching to be a starter. Whoever starts at PF this first game will have the upper hand.

Born in Brooklyn, Raised in Queens, Lives in Maryland. The future is bright, I'm a Knicks fan for life!
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
10/6/2015  5:30 PM
It sounds like Kristaps is starting tomorrow with Rolo and Melo.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
Do we have one of the best front courts in the league?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy