[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

OT:U.S. Soldiers Told to Ignore Sexual Abuse of Boys by Afghan Allies..
Author Thread
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
9/23/2015  11:31 AM
newyorknewyork wrote:
arkrud wrote:
newyorknewyork wrote:
arkrud wrote:
newyorknewyork wrote:
arkrud wrote:
newyorknewyork wrote:Regardless of culture the sexual abuse of a child is wrong. If that isn't worth fighting and going to war over then nothing is.

Why raping women which is basically how treatment of women in general is from our perspective in any traditional Muslim country is not a big deal but raping boys is?
Or honor killing, or heads cutting, or stoning, or whatever?
Is making some nation follow the rules they do not yet understand worth killing 1 of 10 to enforce it?
You cannot be liberal with cannibals - they will broil you and eat you together with you liberal ideas and will not even choke.

There is no benefit for any culture to rape and or sexually abuse children. It only benefits the perversions of the ppl that choose to do so. Anyone who wants rape and sexual abuse over childern as part of there culture does not deserve to have a culture.

If the culture is centered on making most of the people leaving in fear and humiliation under the power of few this is very beneficial for this culture goals.
This culture assumed that most of the people are not capable to sustain their live and need strong leadership which should be enforced by any means.
This nations do not have enough wealth for every member to enjoy. So they consider a lot of human beings just a material which can be used and thrown away...
This how all human race used to leave in primitive times. And a lot of humans are still leave in societies like this.
Colonialism was a process of spreading more human culture to primitive societies by brutal means.
They were thinking that Goal approves the means.
Now we are not sure any more... Time to get our-self clear on this. We may have no choice but make a choice.

I get what your saying but that's not culture that's dictatorship. Claiming culture is making it seem as if there society as a whole wants there children and women to be raped.

Dictatorship is how culture manifest itself, secondary thing.
The human race is still young and still wild for the most part.
We did a lot of strides forward to secure, prosperous, human society.
But it is very uneven across the globe.
We need to have more compassion to those who born and raised into primitive cultures.
They need help not angry dismissal. This does not help.

Afghanistan has been a civilization longer then the US. A lot of the moral laws the US and other counrties use today were first established around that area. Humanity no matter how many yrs we live will always put selfish desires of there own over the needs of others. Leaders who view people at property to satisfy there perversions or even in general aren't fit to be leaders. And most likely are only in that position due to massive wealth and not due to there moral standing and leadership skills. True leaders would be looking to improve the living conditions of there ppl and using there allied pack with US to attempt to create something better.

I don't believe for them to be viewed as dumb savages. The people at the top and there tierney need to be removed from power.

The civilizations raze and fall.
Current Afghanistan has nothing to do with civilization of distant past.
The power which is is reflection of the society. You cannot remove it from outside without distraction of the society it is.
We see this clearly in Syria, Iraq, Yemen, Livia, etc.
The removal of locally established power no matter how inhuman it is leads to destruction, war, and misery all local people.
But we never learn...

"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
AUTOADVERT
newyorknewyork
Posts: 30169
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
9/23/2015  2:17 PM
arkrud wrote:
newyorknewyork wrote:
arkrud wrote:
newyorknewyork wrote:
arkrud wrote:
newyorknewyork wrote:
arkrud wrote:
newyorknewyork wrote:Regardless of culture the sexual abuse of a child is wrong. If that isn't worth fighting and going to war over then nothing is.

Why raping women which is basically how treatment of women in general is from our perspective in any traditional Muslim country is not a big deal but raping boys is?
Or honor killing, or heads cutting, or stoning, or whatever?
Is making some nation follow the rules they do not yet understand worth killing 1 of 10 to enforce it?
You cannot be liberal with cannibals - they will broil you and eat you together with you liberal ideas and will not even choke.

There is no benefit for any culture to rape and or sexually abuse children. It only benefits the perversions of the ppl that choose to do so. Anyone who wants rape and sexual abuse over childern as part of there culture does not deserve to have a culture.

If the culture is centered on making most of the people leaving in fear and humiliation under the power of few this is very beneficial for this culture goals.
This culture assumed that most of the people are not capable to sustain their live and need strong leadership which should be enforced by any means.
This nations do not have enough wealth for every member to enjoy. So they consider a lot of human beings just a material which can be used and thrown away...
This how all human race used to leave in primitive times. And a lot of humans are still leave in societies like this.
Colonialism was a process of spreading more human culture to primitive societies by brutal means.
They were thinking that Goal approves the means.
Now we are not sure any more... Time to get our-self clear on this. We may have no choice but make a choice.

I get what your saying but that's not culture that's dictatorship. Claiming culture is making it seem as if there society as a whole wants there children and women to be raped.

Dictatorship is how culture manifest itself, secondary thing.
The human race is still young and still wild for the most part.
We did a lot of strides forward to secure, prosperous, human society.
But it is very uneven across the globe.
We need to have more compassion to those who born and raised into primitive cultures.
They need help not angry dismissal. This does not help.

Afghanistan has been a civilization longer then the US. A lot of the moral laws the US and other counrties use today were first established around that area. Humanity no matter how many yrs we live will always put selfish desires of there own over the needs of others. Leaders who view people at property to satisfy there perversions or even in general aren't fit to be leaders. And most likely are only in that position due to massive wealth and not due to there moral standing and leadership skills. True leaders would be looking to improve the living conditions of there ppl and using there allied pack with US to attempt to create something better.

I don't believe for them to be viewed as dumb savages. The people at the top and there tierney need to be removed from power.

The civilizations raze and fall.
Current Afghanistan has nothing to do with civilization of distant past.
The power which is is reflection of the society. You cannot remove it from outside without distraction of the society it is.
We see this clearly in Syria, Iraq, Yemen, Livia, etc.
The removal of locally established power no matter how inhuman it is leads to destruction, war, and misery all local people.
But we never learn...

The locals are suffering regardless. Sacrificing women and children isn't a fair price to pay. Removing local power can be smoothed over over time by establishing and supporting another local influence that maybe aren't as morally deluded.

https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
9/23/2015  3:04 PM    LAST EDITED: 9/23/2015  3:06 PM
newyorknewyork wrote:
arkrud wrote:
newyorknewyork wrote:
arkrud wrote:
newyorknewyork wrote:
arkrud wrote:
newyorknewyork wrote:
arkrud wrote:
newyorknewyork wrote:Regardless of culture the sexual abuse of a child is wrong. If that isn't worth fighting and going to war over then nothing is.

Why raping women which is basically how treatment of women in general is from our perspective in any traditional Muslim country is not a big deal but raping boys is?
Or honor killing, or heads cutting, or stoning, or whatever?
Is making some nation follow the rules they do not yet understand worth killing 1 of 10 to enforce it?
You cannot be liberal with cannibals - they will broil you and eat you together with you liberal ideas and will not even choke.

There is no benefit for any culture to rape and or sexually abuse children. It only benefits the perversions of the ppl that choose to do so. Anyone who wants rape and sexual abuse over childern as part of there culture does not deserve to have a culture.

If the culture is centered on making most of the people leaving in fear and humiliation under the power of few this is very beneficial for this culture goals.
This culture assumed that most of the people are not capable to sustain their live and need strong leadership which should be enforced by any means.
This nations do not have enough wealth for every member to enjoy. So they consider a lot of human beings just a material which can be used and thrown away...
This how all human race used to leave in primitive times. And a lot of humans are still leave in societies like this.
Colonialism was a process of spreading more human culture to primitive societies by brutal means.
They were thinking that Goal approves the means.
Now we are not sure any more... Time to get our-self clear on this. We may have no choice but make a choice.

I get what your saying but that's not culture that's dictatorship. Claiming culture is making it seem as if there society as a whole wants there children and women to be raped.

Dictatorship is how culture manifest itself, secondary thing.
The human race is still young and still wild for the most part.
We did a lot of strides forward to secure, prosperous, human society.
But it is very uneven across the globe.
We need to have more compassion to those who born and raised into primitive cultures.
They need help not angry dismissal. This does not help.

Afghanistan has been a civilization longer then the US. A lot of the moral laws the US and other counrties use today were first established around that area. Humanity no matter how many yrs we live will always put selfish desires of there own over the needs of others. Leaders who view people at property to satisfy there perversions or even in general aren't fit to be leaders. And most likely are only in that position due to massive wealth and not due to there moral standing and leadership skills. True leaders would be looking to improve the living conditions of there ppl and using there allied pack with US to attempt to create something better.

I don't believe for them to be viewed as dumb savages. The people at the top and there tierney need to be removed from power.

The civilizations raze and fall.
Current Afghanistan has nothing to do with civilization of distant past.
The power which is is reflection of the society. You cannot remove it from outside without distraction of the society it is.
We see this clearly in Syria, Iraq, Yemen, Livia, etc.
The removal of locally established power no matter how inhuman it is leads to destruction, war, and misery all local people.
But we never learn...

The locals are suffering regardless. Sacrificing women and children isn't a fair price to pay. Removing local power can be smoothed over over time by establishing and supporting another local influence that maybe aren't as morally deluded.

US and Russia(USSR) are playing god and trying to progress nations for a long time.
Can you please point me out to any non-disastrous for local people result?
Which local influence you can use in Afghanistan instead of currently ruling Karzai Pushtun clan?
Taliban, Tadzhik rebels on the North, Hekmatyar, any other warlord/heroin king?
Alexander the Great, French, Russians, and us already dig countless graves for themselves and local people in this country.
Do you think it is not enough?

"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
newyorknewyork
Posts: 30169
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
9/23/2015  5:15 PM
arkrud wrote:
newyorknewyork wrote:
arkrud wrote:
newyorknewyork wrote:
arkrud wrote:
newyorknewyork wrote:
arkrud wrote:
newyorknewyork wrote:
arkrud wrote:
newyorknewyork wrote:Regardless of culture the sexual abuse of a child is wrong. If that isn't worth fighting and going to war over then nothing is.

Why raping women which is basically how treatment of women in general is from our perspective in any traditional Muslim country is not a big deal but raping boys is?
Or honor killing, or heads cutting, or stoning, or whatever?
Is making some nation follow the rules they do not yet understand worth killing 1 of 10 to enforce it?
You cannot be liberal with cannibals - they will broil you and eat you together with you liberal ideas and will not even choke.

There is no benefit for any culture to rape and or sexually abuse children. It only benefits the perversions of the ppl that choose to do so. Anyone who wants rape and sexual abuse over childern as part of there culture does not deserve to have a culture.

If the culture is centered on making most of the people leaving in fear and humiliation under the power of few this is very beneficial for this culture goals.
This culture assumed that most of the people are not capable to sustain their live and need strong leadership which should be enforced by any means.
This nations do not have enough wealth for every member to enjoy. So they consider a lot of human beings just a material which can be used and thrown away...
This how all human race used to leave in primitive times. And a lot of humans are still leave in societies like this.
Colonialism was a process of spreading more human culture to primitive societies by brutal means.
They were thinking that Goal approves the means.
Now we are not sure any more... Time to get our-self clear on this. We may have no choice but make a choice.

I get what your saying but that's not culture that's dictatorship. Claiming culture is making it seem as if there society as a whole wants there children and women to be raped.

Dictatorship is how culture manifest itself, secondary thing.
The human race is still young and still wild for the most part.
We did a lot of strides forward to secure, prosperous, human society.
But it is very uneven across the globe.
We need to have more compassion to those who born and raised into primitive cultures.
They need help not angry dismissal. This does not help.

Afghanistan has been a civilization longer then the US. A lot of the moral laws the US and other counrties use today were first established around that area. Humanity no matter how many yrs we live will always put selfish desires of there own over the needs of others. Leaders who view people at property to satisfy there perversions or even in general aren't fit to be leaders. And most likely are only in that position due to massive wealth and not due to there moral standing and leadership skills. True leaders would be looking to improve the living conditions of there ppl and using there allied pack with US to attempt to create something better.

I don't believe for them to be viewed as dumb savages. The people at the top and there tierney need to be removed from power.

The civilizations raze and fall.
Current Afghanistan has nothing to do with civilization of distant past.
The power which is is reflection of the society. You cannot remove it from outside without distraction of the society it is.
We see this clearly in Syria, Iraq, Yemen, Livia, etc.
The removal of locally established power no matter how inhuman it is leads to destruction, war, and misery all local people.
But we never learn...

The locals are suffering regardless. Sacrificing women and children isn't a fair price to pay. Removing local power can be smoothed over over time by establishing and supporting another local influence that maybe aren't as morally deluded.

US and Russia(USSR) are playing god and trying to progress nations for a long time.
Can you please point me out to any non-disastrous for local people result?
Which local influence you can use in Afghanistan instead of currently ruling Karzai Pushtun clan?
Taliban, Tadzhik rebels on the North, Hekmatyar, any other warlord/heroin king?
Alexander the Great, French, Russians, and us already dig countless graves for themselves and local people in this country.
Do you think it is not enough?

We can refuse to accept the request to ignore them sexually abusing boys. Fighting for there land, recources, religious beliefs is one thing. The desire to sexually abuse children is another. The answer can't be to comply and let them do as they please hoping one day they will progress past there perversion while maintaining alliance with them.

https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
9/23/2015  10:26 PM
newyorknewyork wrote:
arkrud wrote:
newyorknewyork wrote:
arkrud wrote:
newyorknewyork wrote:
arkrud wrote:
newyorknewyork wrote:
arkrud wrote:
newyorknewyork wrote:
arkrud wrote:
newyorknewyork wrote:Regardless of culture the sexual abuse of a child is wrong. If that isn't worth fighting and going to war over then nothing is.

Why raping women which is basically how treatment of women in general is from our perspective in any traditional Muslim country is not a big deal but raping boys is?
Or honor killing, or heads cutting, or stoning, or whatever?
Is making some nation follow the rules they do not yet understand worth killing 1 of 10 to enforce it?
You cannot be liberal with cannibals - they will broil you and eat you together with you liberal ideas and will not even choke.

There is no benefit for any culture to rape and or sexually abuse children. It only benefits the perversions of the ppl that choose to do so. Anyone who wants rape and sexual abuse over childern as part of there culture does not deserve to have a culture.

If the culture is centered on making most of the people leaving in fear and humiliation under the power of few this is very beneficial for this culture goals.
This culture assumed that most of the people are not capable to sustain their live and need strong leadership which should be enforced by any means.
This nations do not have enough wealth for every member to enjoy. So they consider a lot of human beings just a material which can be used and thrown away...
This how all human race used to leave in primitive times. And a lot of humans are still leave in societies like this.
Colonialism was a process of spreading more human culture to primitive societies by brutal means.
They were thinking that Goal approves the means.
Now we are not sure any more... Time to get our-self clear on this. We may have no choice but make a choice.

I get what your saying but that's not culture that's dictatorship. Claiming culture is making it seem as if there society as a whole wants there children and women to be raped.

Dictatorship is how culture manifest itself, secondary thing.
The human race is still young and still wild for the most part.
We did a lot of strides forward to secure, prosperous, human society.
But it is very uneven across the globe.
We need to have more compassion to those who born and raised into primitive cultures.
They need help not angry dismissal. This does not help.

Afghanistan has been a civilization longer then the US. A lot of the moral laws the US and other counrties use today were first established around that area. Humanity no matter how many yrs we live will always put selfish desires of there own over the needs of others. Leaders who view people at property to satisfy there perversions or even in general aren't fit to be leaders. And most likely are only in that position due to massive wealth and not due to there moral standing and leadership skills. True leaders would be looking to improve the living conditions of there ppl and using there allied pack with US to attempt to create something better.

I don't believe for them to be viewed as dumb savages. The people at the top and there tierney need to be removed from power.

The civilizations raze and fall.
Current Afghanistan has nothing to do with civilization of distant past.
The power which is is reflection of the society. You cannot remove it from outside without distraction of the society it is.
We see this clearly in Syria, Iraq, Yemen, Livia, etc.
The removal of locally established power no matter how inhuman it is leads to destruction, war, and misery all local people.
But we never learn...

The locals are suffering regardless. Sacrificing women and children isn't a fair price to pay. Removing local power can be smoothed over over time by establishing and supporting another local influence that maybe aren't as morally deluded.

US and Russia(USSR) are playing god and trying to progress nations for a long time.
Can you please point me out to any non-disastrous for local people result?
Which local influence you can use in Afghanistan instead of currently ruling Karzai Pushtun clan?
Taliban, Tadzhik rebels on the North, Hekmatyar, any other warlord/heroin king?
Alexander the Great, French, Russians, and us already dig countless graves for themselves and local people in this country.
Do you think it is not enough?

We can refuse to accept the request to ignore them sexually abusing boys. Fighting for there land, recources, religious beliefs is one thing. The desire to sexually abuse children is another. The answer can't be to comply and let them do as they please hoping one day they will progress past there perversion while maintaining alliance with them.

I agree with that... but unfortunately not much we can do to stop it.
Our presence there is hanging on the string and we cannot force any of our temporary allies to change their ways, no can we prosecute them as per our sense of low and morality.
There are many other places in the world where this kind of abuse or worth is going on as business as usual.
We have no presence in this places and so no moral oblations. But does it makes it better for those who suffer?

"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
LivingLegend
Posts: 25763
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 8/13/2007
Member: #1645

9/24/2015  4:26 PM    LAST EDITED: 9/24/2015  4:28 PM
newyorknewyork wrote:
arkrud wrote:
newyorknewyork wrote:
arkrud wrote:
newyorknewyork wrote:
arkrud wrote:
newyorknewyork wrote:
arkrud wrote:
newyorknewyork wrote:
arkrud wrote:
newyorknewyork wrote:Regardless of culture the sexual abuse of a child is wrong. If that isn't worth fighting and going to war over then nothing is.

Why raping women which is basically how treatment of women in general is from our perspective in any traditional Muslim country is not a big deal but raping boys is?
Or honor killing, or heads cutting, or stoning, or whatever?
Is making some nation follow the rules they do not yet understand worth killing 1 of 10 to enforce it?
You cannot be liberal with cannibals - they will broil you and eat you together with you liberal ideas and will not even choke.

There is no benefit for any culture to rape and or sexually abuse children. It only benefits the perversions of the ppl that choose to do so. Anyone who wants rape and sexual abuse over childern as part of there culture does not deserve to have a culture.

If the culture is centered on making most of the people leaving in fear and humiliation under the power of few this is very beneficial for this culture goals.
This culture assumed that most of the people are not capable to sustain their live and need strong leadership which should be enforced by any means.
This nations do not have enough wealth for every member to enjoy. So they consider a lot of human beings just a material which can be used and thrown away...
This how all human race used to leave in primitive times. And a lot of humans are still leave in societies like this.
Colonialism was a process of spreading more human culture to primitive societies by brutal means.
They were thinking that Goal approves the means.
Now we are not sure any more... Time to get our-self clear on this. We may have no choice but make a choice.

I get what your saying but that's not culture that's dictatorship. Claiming culture is making it seem as if there society as a whole wants there children and women to be raped.

Dictatorship is how culture manifest itself, secondary thing.
The human race is still young and still wild for the most part.
We did a lot of strides forward to secure, prosperous, human society.
But it is very uneven across the globe.
We need to have more compassion to those who born and raised into primitive cultures.
They need help not angry dismissal. This does not help.

Afghanistan has been a civilization longer then the US. A lot of the moral laws the US and other counrties use today were first established around that area. Humanity no matter how many yrs we live will always put selfish desires of there own over the needs of others. Leaders who view people at property to satisfy there perversions or even in general aren't fit to be leaders. And most likely are only in that position due to massive wealth and not due to there moral standing and leadership skills. True leaders would be looking to improve the living conditions of there ppl and using there allied pack with US to attempt to create something better.

I don't believe for them to be viewed as dumb savages. The people at the top and there tierney need to be removed from power.

The civilizations raze and fall.
Current Afghanistan has nothing to do with civilization of distant past.
The power which is is reflection of the society. You cannot remove it from outside without distraction of the society it is.
We see this clearly in Syria, Iraq, Yemen, Livia, etc.
The removal of locally established power no matter how inhuman it is leads to destruction, war, and misery all local people.
But we never learn...

The locals are suffering regardless. Sacrificing women and children isn't a fair price to pay. Removing local power can be smoothed over over time by establishing and supporting another local influence that maybe aren't as morally deluded.

US and Russia(USSR) are playing god and trying to progress nations for a long time.
Can you please point me out to any non-disastrous for local people result?
Which local influence you can use in Afghanistan instead of currently ruling Karzai Pushtun clan?
Taliban, Tadzhik rebels on the North, Hekmatyar, any other warlord/heroin king?
Alexander the Great, French, Russians, and us already dig countless graves for themselves and local people in this country.
Do you think it is not enough?

We can refuse to accept the request to ignore them sexually abusing boys. Fighting for there land, recources, religious beliefs is one thing. The desire to sexually abuse children is another. The answer can't be to comply and let them do as they please hoping one day they will progress past there perversion while maintaining alliance with them.

Tend to agree - we all know right from wrong regardless of where we may be in whatever part of the world.

If a guy is abusing a young boy or someone is raping a woman --- give our soldiers the right to put a bullet in their head and the next guy might think twice before dropping his drawers.

This has nothing to do with culture - it has to do with power. Right is right and wrong is wrong --- I say put a bullet in their head and they hurt nobody again.

Nalod
Posts: 71378
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
9/24/2015  5:19 PM
LivingLegend wrote:
newyorknewyork wrote:
arkrud wrote:
newyorknewyork wrote:
arkrud wrote:
newyorknewyork wrote:
arkrud wrote:
newyorknewyork wrote:
arkrud wrote:
newyorknewyork wrote:
arkrud wrote:
newyorknewyork wrote:Regardless of culture the sexual abuse of a child is wrong. If that isn't worth fighting and going to war over then nothing is.

Why raping women which is basically how treatment of women in general is from our perspective in any traditional Muslim country is not a big deal but raping boys is?
Or honor killing, or heads cutting, or stoning, or whatever?
Is making some nation follow the rules they do not yet understand worth killing 1 of 10 to enforce it?
You cannot be liberal with cannibals - they will broil you and eat you together with you liberal ideas and will not even choke.

There is no benefit for any culture to rape and or sexually abuse children. It only benefits the perversions of the ppl that choose to do so. Anyone who wants rape and sexual abuse over childern as part of there culture does not deserve to have a culture.

If the culture is centered on making most of the people leaving in fear and humiliation under the power of few this is very beneficial for this culture goals.
This culture assumed that most of the people are not capable to sustain their live and need strong leadership which should be enforced by any means.
This nations do not have enough wealth for every member to enjoy. So they consider a lot of human beings just a material which can be used and thrown away...
This how all human race used to leave in primitive times. And a lot of humans are still leave in societies like this.
Colonialism was a process of spreading more human culture to primitive societies by brutal means.
They were thinking that Goal approves the means.
Now we are not sure any more... Time to get our-self clear on this. We may have no choice but make a choice.

I get what your saying but that's not culture that's dictatorship. Claiming culture is making it seem as if there society as a whole wants there children and women to be raped.

Dictatorship is how culture manifest itself, secondary thing.
The human race is still young and still wild for the most part.
We did a lot of strides forward to secure, prosperous, human society.
But it is very uneven across the globe.
We need to have more compassion to those who born and raised into primitive cultures.
They need help not angry dismissal. This does not help.

Afghanistan has been a civilization longer then the US. A lot of the moral laws the US and other counrties use today were first established around that area. Humanity no matter how many yrs we live will always put selfish desires of there own over the needs of others. Leaders who view people at property to satisfy there perversions or even in general aren't fit to be leaders. And most likely are only in that position due to massive wealth and not due to there moral standing and leadership skills. True leaders would be looking to improve the living conditions of there ppl and using there allied pack with US to attempt to create something better.

I don't believe for them to be viewed as dumb savages. The people at the top and there tierney need to be removed from power.

The civilizations raze and fall.
Current Afghanistan has nothing to do with civilization of distant past.
The power which is is reflection of the society. You cannot remove it from outside without distraction of the society it is.
We see this clearly in Syria, Iraq, Yemen, Livia, etc.
The removal of locally established power no matter how inhuman it is leads to destruction, war, and misery all local people.
But we never learn...

The locals are suffering regardless. Sacrificing women and children isn't a fair price to pay. Removing local power can be smoothed over over time by establishing and supporting another local influence that maybe aren't as morally deluded.

US and Russia(USSR) are playing god and trying to progress nations for a long time.
Can you please point me out to any non-disastrous for local people result?
Which local influence you can use in Afghanistan instead of currently ruling Karzai Pushtun clan?
Taliban, Tadzhik rebels on the North, Hekmatyar, any other warlord/heroin king?
Alexander the Great, French, Russians, and us already dig countless graves for themselves and local people in this country.
Do you think it is not enough?

We can refuse to accept the request to ignore them sexually abusing boys. Fighting for there land, recources, religious beliefs is one thing. The desire to sexually abuse children is another. The answer can't be to comply and let them do as they please hoping one day they will progress past there perversion while maintaining alliance with them.

Tend to agree - we all know right from wrong regardless of where we may be in whatever part of the world.

If a guy is abusing a young boy or someone is raping a woman --- give our soldiers the right to put a bullet in their head and the next guy might think twice before dropping his drawers.

This has nothing to do with culture - it has to do with power. Right is right and wrong is wrong --- I say put a bullet in their head and they hurt nobody again.

But there, we are not right. Here we can do that.
I walk into your home and you ask me to take my shoes off. As a courtesy I do it. I don't in my house.
Even If I was asked to come and help you with something in your home, I take my shoes off. Its your custom. My feet smell and your wife won't look me in the eye cuz its not your culture.
What Do I do, demand she respect me and look at me? And Im gonna leave my shoes on?
Now, I would not be hurting anyone by refusing to leave my shoes on. Certainly raping a boy is not the same. What about raping a girl? Or marrying at 9 year old girl and having sex? What about stoning your daughter because she disrespected the family by kissing a boy? What about girls being enslaved in many places? Its shyt we know is phucked up, but we can't go around and shoot up the planet anymore than we already am!

This is not a moral discussion, its about our presence in Afghanistan.

nykshaknbake
Posts: 22247
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/15/2003
Member: #492
9/25/2015  5:17 AM
newyorknewyork wrote:Regardless of culture the sexual abuse of a child is wrong. If that isn't worth fighting and going to war over then nothing is.

Best post on the topic...I don't understand how some on this board justify it by claiming moral equivalency. If this isn't wrong than nothing is.

arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
9/25/2015  11:01 AM
nykshaknbake wrote:
newyorknewyork wrote:Regardless of culture the sexual abuse of a child is wrong. If that isn't worth fighting and going to war over then nothing is.

Best post on the topic...I don't understand how some on this board justify it by claiming moral equivalency. If this isn't wrong than nothing is.

No one said that this is not wrong.
The discussion is - do we Americans have rights to prosecute people in other countries based on our moral lows?
And if yes (which I am not sure about) how to practically implement this prosecution?
Should we lead the world by example of leaving is safe, prosper, expanding society or go in and force people in other countries by the power of the gun to leave as we think is right? Would this work?
A lot of people in US are tend to simplify the world. This is convenient but is a laziness of the mind and biggest miss-service to the human race Americans do.

"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
Nalod
Posts: 71378
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
9/25/2015  11:31 AM
Im not willing to send my son to war over that issue. how in gods name do you police that? How could we keep a presence there to prevent and punish those offenders. The logistics are off the charts crazy to implement that.
Worthy cause? Of course it is!!!! Practical implementation to do so is not possible. Its not like there is a faction of hoods who are into boys and eliminate them and it ends. It won't.

I thought Boko Haram taking 200 school girls and enslaving them is a worthy cause.
Want to go after them, then your talking about a single group who is doing some nasty things. That has its own set of problems.

arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
9/25/2015  12:15 PM    LAST EDITED: 9/25/2015  12:36 PM
Nalod wrote:Im not willing to send my son to war over that issue. how in gods name do you police that? How could we keep a presence there to prevent and punish those offenders. The logistics are off the charts crazy to implement that.
Worthy cause? Of course it is!!!! Practical implementation to do so is not possible. Its not like there is a faction of hoods who are into boys and eliminate them and it ends. It won't.

I thought Boko Haram taking 200 school girls and enslaving them is a worthy cause.
Want to go after them, then your talking about a single group who is doing some nasty things. That has its own set of problems.

We tend to think (and our media and politicians are encouraging this thinking) that there are a minority of radicals and some evil leader who are responsible for all this atrocities. We hunt them and kill them and drive them from power. But yet countless more emerged. The truth is this is not a fault of the few but the way of live of majority of population in some areas of the world.
Europe of Dark Ages and even not so distant Nazi past was not much better.
Time to wake up from the liberal illusions and utopias and look in the face of the reality.
We can push this nations to gradually change but not by using force. Rather by helping them to get out of their primitive life with their own efforts.

"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
nykshaknbake
Posts: 22247
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/15/2003
Member: #492
9/26/2015  8:00 AM
arkrud wrote:
nykshaknbake wrote:
newyorknewyork wrote:Regardless of culture the sexual abuse of a child is wrong. If that isn't worth fighting and going to war over then nothing is.

Best post on the topic...I don't understand how some on this board justify it by claiming moral equivalency. If this isn't wrong than nothing is.

No one said that this is not wrong.
The discussion is - do we Americans have rights to prosecute people in other countries based on our moral lows?
And if yes (which I am not sure about) how to practically implement this prosecution?
Should we lead the world by example of leaving is safe, prosper, expanding society or go in and force people in other countries by the power of the gun to leave as we think is right? Would this work?
A lot of people in US are tend to simplify the world. This is convenient but is a laziness of the mind and biggest miss-service to the human race Americans do.


When you say 'our moral laws' you are implicitly saying that abusing children is only wrong to us and possibly maybe right to them and is not objectively wrong.

Saying nothing when something like that is happening is not leading it's tacit approval and enabling the sexual abuse of children. Not saying you shoot them on the spot, but the current method of ignoring it is horrible.

Nalod
Posts: 71378
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
9/26/2015  10:29 AM
nykshaknbake wrote:
arkrud wrote:
nykshaknbake wrote:
newyorknewyork wrote:Regardless of culture the sexual abuse of a child is wrong. If that isn't worth fighting and going to war over then nothing is.

Best post on the topic...I don't understand how some on this board justify it by claiming moral equivalency. If this isn't wrong than nothing is.

No one said that this is not wrong.
The discussion is - do we Americans have rights to prosecute people in other countries based on our moral lows?
And if yes (which I am not sure about) how to practically implement this prosecution?
Should we lead the world by example of leaving is safe, prosper, expanding society or go in and force people in other countries by the power of the gun to leave as we think is right? Would this work?
A lot of people in US are tend to simplify the world. This is convenient but is a laziness of the mind and biggest miss-service to the human race Americans do.


When you say 'our moral laws' you are implicitly saying that abusing children is only wrong to us and possibly maybe right to them and is not objectively wrong.

Saying nothing when something like that is happening is not leading it's tacit approval and enabling the sexual abuse of children. Not saying you shoot them on the spot, but the current method of ignoring it is horrible.

How then to enforce it? Again, Its horrible they are not under our rule, thus we cannot create laws to enforce.
Easy to be morally outraged (as am I.

nykshaknbake
Posts: 22247
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/15/2003
Member: #492
9/26/2015  7:48 PM
Nalod wrote:
nykshaknbake wrote:
arkrud wrote:
nykshaknbake wrote:
newyorknewyork wrote:Regardless of culture the sexual abuse of a child is wrong. If that isn't worth fighting and going to war over then nothing is.

Best post on the topic...I don't understand how some on this board justify it by claiming moral equivalency. If this isn't wrong than nothing is.

No one said that this is not wrong.
The discussion is - do we Americans have rights to prosecute people in other countries based on our moral lows?
And if yes (which I am not sure about) how to practically implement this prosecution?
Should we lead the world by example of leaving is safe, prosper, expanding society or go in and force people in other countries by the power of the gun to leave as we think is right? Would this work?
A lot of people in US are tend to simplify the world. This is convenient but is a laziness of the mind and biggest miss-service to the human race Americans do.


When you say 'our moral laws' you are implicitly saying that abusing children is only wrong to us and possibly maybe right to them and is not objectively wrong.

Saying nothing when something like that is happening is not leading it's tacit approval and enabling the sexual abuse of children. Not saying you shoot them on the spot, but the current method of ignoring it is horrible.

How then to enforce it? Again, Its horrible they are not under our rule, thus we cannot create laws to enforce.
Easy to be morally outraged (as am I.

Well, I wouldnt throw the soldier that confronted one instance of this out like we did. Think about it the abuser is till in good stead in his job and our guy who stood up for the abused is fired---by us. There are plenty of other ways to effect leverage. At the very least you could on a governmental level voice objections to this sort of thing. We have and continue to give them billions of dollars and support them with our blood. It's not like we don't have a right to a voice.

arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
9/26/2015  11:04 PM    LAST EDITED: 9/26/2015  11:05 PM
nykshaknbake wrote:
Nalod wrote:
nykshaknbake wrote:
arkrud wrote:
nykshaknbake wrote:
newyorknewyork wrote:Regardless of culture the sexual abuse of a child is wrong. If that isn't worth fighting and going to war over then nothing is.

Best post on the topic...I don't understand how some on this board justify it by claiming moral equivalency. If this isn't wrong than nothing is.

No one said that this is not wrong.
The discussion is - do we Americans have rights to prosecute people in other countries based on our moral lows?
And if yes (which I am not sure about) how to practically implement this prosecution?
Should we lead the world by example of leaving is safe, prosper, expanding society or go in and force people in other countries by the power of the gun to leave as we think is right? Would this work?
A lot of people in US are tend to simplify the world. This is convenient but is a laziness of the mind and biggest miss-service to the human race Americans do.


When you say 'our moral laws' you are implicitly saying that abusing children is only wrong to us and possibly maybe right to them and is not objectively wrong.

Saying nothing when something like that is happening is not leading it's tacit approval and enabling the sexual abuse of children. Not saying you shoot them on the spot, but the current method of ignoring it is horrible.

How then to enforce it? Again, Its horrible they are not under our rule, thus we cannot create laws to enforce.
Easy to be morally outraged (as am I.

Well, I wouldnt throw the soldier that confronted one instance of this out like we did. Think about it the abuser is till in good stead in his job and our guy who stood up for the abused is fired---by us. There are plenty of other ways to effect leverage. At the very least you could on a governmental level voice objections to this sort of thing. We have and continue to give them billions of dollars and support them with our blood. It's not like we don't have a right to a voice.

I 100% agree that this situation was handled purely..
We are in Afghanistan to defend our geopolitical interests not make the live of Afghanistan people better.
This is what money is paid for and this what our soldiers are dying for.
Obviously it is debatable if this "geopolitical" interests worth this sacrifices and this money.
I do not have enough info to judge.
But what practically happened we expose our solders to the world that they cannot morally accept.
And then we are puzzled why they suddenly go berserk killing civilians, etc.
I do not have the answers, and whoever makes American politics dies not have answers also.
But I feel that we need finish getting out and let the money talk.
Back in Russia when I was in army training the officers took us to the some funny (as they was thinking) show.
To see some soldiers from Asian USSR republics raping pigs that we suppose to eat next day for Lunch.
This was the microcosm of USSR society back in 1980th... World is full of sht you cannot even imagine.

"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
Nalod
Posts: 71378
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
9/27/2015  8:58 AM
nykshaknbake wrote:
Nalod wrote:
nykshaknbake wrote:
arkrud wrote:
nykshaknbake wrote:
newyorknewyork wrote:Regardless of culture the sexual abuse of a child is wrong. If that isn't worth fighting and going to war over then nothing is.

Best post on the topic...I don't understand how some on this board justify it by claiming moral equivalency. If this isn't wrong than nothing is.

No one said that this is not wrong.
The discussion is - do we Americans have rights to prosecute people in other countries based on our moral lows?
And if yes (which I am not sure about) how to practically implement this prosecution?
Should we lead the world by example of leaving is safe, prosper, expanding society or go in and force people in other countries by the power of the gun to leave as we think is right? Would this work?
A lot of people in US are tend to simplify the world. This is convenient but is a laziness of the mind and biggest miss-service to the human race Americans do.


When you say 'our moral laws' you are implicitly saying that abusing children is only wrong to us and possibly maybe right to them and is not objectively wrong.

Saying nothing when something like that is happening is not leading it's tacit approval and enabling the sexual abuse of children. Not saying you shoot them on the spot, but the current method of ignoring it is horrible.

How then to enforce it? Again, Its horrible they are not under our rule, thus we cannot create laws to enforce.
Easy to be morally outraged (as am I.

Well, I wouldnt throw the soldier that confronted one instance of this out like we did. Think about it the abuser is till in good stead in his job and our guy who stood up for the abused is fired---by us. There are plenty of other ways to effect leverage. At the very least you could on a governmental level voice objections to this sort of thing. We have and continue to give them billions of dollars and support them with our blood. It's not like we don't have a right to a voice.

Perhaps we have objected but not publicly. IF they won't enforce it, how can any "voice" have any teeth? They can take the money an promise to look into it. Fact is they would have to arrest their own people.

OT:U.S. Soldiers Told to Ignore Sexual Abuse of Boys by Afghan Allies..

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy