fishmike wrote:We paid Afflalo, so he's logging 30mpg + at SG and some SF in small line ups.After that you have Jose, Galloway, Grant, Ledo at guard.
So do you just give Shved the $2.8 and let the guards fight for the remaining minutes? Does he have a role here? Keep in mind he was a very bad NBA player before 15 great games with the Knicks.
I liked what I saw from him, very limited sample size. Not sure what the front office thought process is on this guy
I can't pencil in Calderon as an important part of the backcourt, not after what we saw last year. Even when healthy, he had his flaws/showed limitation and now he's a yr older. Galloway's not a PG. Not that great a player anyway (similar to Toney Douglas--that's pretty much all we're looking at here)--and he's showing that in SL. Grant's a rookie and although I like him a lot, there will be growing pains. Ledo can handle a little bit but he's more of a 2 and Afflalo's strictly a 2G, coming off a disappointing year. Those are the facts. I think we're in desperate need of at least one more lead guard. Two probably would be ideal but we definitely need one more. Not sure why we're fooling around--Shved should be signed. He's talented, he's versatile, he performed well in this system last yr, he'd solidify what right now is an incomplete backcourt and he wouldn't be too expensive -- we're talking the room exception here man--that's too much for a guy who was easily our best player last yr once he arrived? I don't get why people are having a problem with this. Shved's not playing hardball with us. He's looking for fair value based on the late season success he had. Did D-Will get paid off his late season success? You bet, and I don't have a problem with that. Why lowball Shved then?