Posted by s3231:
Posted by MX25:
People trying to defend Boozer are insane.
Cavs didn't have to give Boozer any more than 690,00 he was owed. They thought..Lets give him a nice raise. THEY COULDN'T GIVE HIM ANYMORE THAN 6 YEARS 40 Million.
They didn't low ball Boozer. They gave him as much as they were allowed to under NBA Rules.
Cavs=Gullible..Boozer=Liar
If they had just let Boozer's contract expire next year they would have his Bird's rights. With the Bird's rights they would be able to give Boozer more money than any other team could. Why do you think we are saying that they lowballed Boozer? We know that they can't offer more than the MLE this summer but if they had waited they would be able to give Boozer more money in a longterm deal. They weren't thinking, "Lets give him a nice raise," it was more along the lines of, "We better give him a long term deal now before we have to pay him more money next year." I'm not defending Boozer at all because it is pretty wrong to leave your team for more money (which about everyone of us would've done too), however, the Cavs screwed up bigtime.
[Edited by - s3231 on 07/09/2004 17:37:37]
TAKE IT EZ ON THE NEWBIES LOL

