[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Made up my mind. Porzingis @4
Author Thread
s3231
Posts: 23162
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #544
USA
6/14/2015  9:02 AM    LAST EDITED: 6/14/2015  9:03 AM
Bonn1997 wrote:
s3231 wrote:For those making the KP to Bargnani comparisons, I think the athleticism that Porzingis has at this stage separates the two by a bit.

I really really really like KP as a prospect and even from just watching interviews, it's diffiicult to not like where his head is at. Like others have said in this thread though, I don't see him being ready to contribute substantially in year one. Physically, he will get abused in the post and if you watch the game footage, it's not uncommon to see his opposition put a 6'7 guy on him and still establish position in the paint and outbox/out rebound KP.

He already looks like he has added a few more pounds since the season ended so I don't see any reason why he can't develop into a star in this league. But if you draft Porgz at #4, the expectation has to be that you will need to wait 1-2 years before he really takes off.

Not sure if Phil and the front office will be willing to wait but you never know. Phil has said he doesn't expect much out of rookies in first couple of years before (especially with bigs) and he brought up Bynum as an example from his time with the Lakers. We'll see what happens.....hell of a prospect though.


Athleticism? Did you see the video I posted of Bargs in game plays at age 19?

I did, watched the whole thing. Bangs looked very good as a prospect too but KP plays more above the rim in my opinion and that should help him get more easy baskets at next level. Coild Bargs do one handed alley oops with ease at 19? That's a serious question because I don't really remember him showing that at that age.

"This is a very cautious situation that we're in. You have to be conservative in terms of using your assets and using them wisely. We're building for the future." - Zeke (I guess not protecting a first round pick is being conservative)
AUTOADVERT
Finestrg
Posts: 27296
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/1/2006
Member: #1069

6/14/2015  9:02 AM    LAST EDITED: 6/14/2015  11:22 AM
Would love to draft Kristaps but if he's off the board, I'd be very happy with D'Angelo Russell as well. A starting backcourt of Russell/Alexey Shved would be great -- plus size, interchangeable, both very good passers/feel for the game, both can shoot/score...Integrate Galloway/Thanasis for some defense at both positions, maybe Joe Young who we hopefully pick up in the 2nd round for some added firepower/speed/PG depth, other talented DL-types we could turn to for SG depth if need be, say THJ's traded (Ricky Ledo, Scotty Hopson, Dominique Jones, Orlando Johnson, maybe a Jarell Eddie in a Roger Mason 3-pt shooting role)...Not bad, man... Praying hard for Porzingis or Russell..
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
6/14/2015  9:08 AM    LAST EDITED: 6/14/2015  9:10 AM
s3231 wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
s3231 wrote:For those making the KP to Bargnani comparisons, I think the athleticism that Porzingis has at this stage separates the two by a bit.

I really really really like KP as a prospect and even from just watching interviews, it's diffiicult to not like where his head is at. Like others have said in this thread though, I don't see him being ready to contribute substantially in year one. Physically, he will get abused in the post and if you watch the game footage, it's not uncommon to see his opposition put a 6'7 guy on him and still establish position in the paint and outbox/out rebound KP.

He already looks like he has added a few more pounds since the season ended so I don't see any reason why he can't develop into a star in this league. But if you draft Porgz at #4, the expectation has to be that you will need to wait 1-2 years before he really takes off.

Not sure if Phil and the front office will be willing to wait but you never know. Phil has said he doesn't expect much out of rookies in first couple of years before (especially with bigs) and he brought up Bynum as an example from his time with the Lakers. We'll see what happens.....hell of a prospect though.


Athleticism? Did you see the video I posted of Bargs in game plays at age 19?

I did, watched the whole thing. Bangs looked very good as a prospect too but KP plays more above the rim in my opinion and that should help him get more easy baskets at next level. Coild Bargs do one handed alley oops with ease at 19? That's a serious question because I don't really remember him showing that at that age.


I'm sure he could. He was dunking on grown men in the NBA in games in his early 20s.
LivingLegend
Posts: 25763
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 8/13/2007
Member: #1645

6/14/2015  9:10 AM    LAST EDITED: 6/14/2015  9:12 AM
Lol with you guys and the Bargs compare - you haven't done ANY homework on Zingy.

This kid is a far superior athlete to Bargs - not even close. Where they do compare is with the shooting but in my estimation Zingy will be better. If you watch numerous (not just 1) game tapes of Zingy you'll see that he is coherent defensively, that he can defend pick and roll and smaller players. You'll also see that he is very active around the rim contesting and blocking shots.

I read some stat that his team was 5 points better when he was on the court defensively.

Also people knock his rebounding #s which I think we're 4.8 per game but the top guy only avg 6.2.
He was 2nd in scoring, 4 in steals, 1st in blocks. He only avg 0.5 assists but top guy on team is only around 5 I believe.

People are trying to convey stats from Europe to us hoops but game is different.

Zingy will be a load defensively down the road - he's too long, too athletic and too tough not to be.

Bargs he is not. Bargs is doing the exact same things you see in that video - he's never taken a step to add or improve his game. Zingy loves the game and will be a much better player.

s3231
Posts: 23162
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #544
USA
6/14/2015  9:20 AM
Bonn1997 wrote:
s3231 wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
s3231 wrote:For those making the KP to Bargnani comparisons, I think the athleticism that Porzingis has at this stage separates the two by a bit.

I really really really like KP as a prospect and even from just watching interviews, it's diffiicult to not like where his head is at. Like others have said in this thread though, I don't see him being ready to contribute substantially in year one. Physically, he will get abused in the post and if you watch the game footage, it's not uncommon to see his opposition put a 6'7 guy on him and still establish position in the paint and outbox/out rebound KP.

He already looks like he has added a few more pounds since the season ended so I don't see any reason why he can't develop into a star in this league. But if you draft Porgz at #4, the expectation has to be that you will need to wait 1-2 years before he really takes off.

Not sure if Phil and the front office will be willing to wait but you never know. Phil has said he doesn't expect much out of rookies in first couple of years before (especially with bigs) and he brought up Bynum as an example from his time with the Lakers. We'll see what happens.....hell of a prospect though.


Athleticism? Did you see the video I posted of Bargs in game plays at age 19?

I did, watched the whole thing. Bangs looked very good as a prospect too but KP plays more above the rim in my opinion and that should help him get more easy baskets at next level. Coild Bargs do one handed alley oops with ease at 19? That's a serious question because I don't really remember him showing that at that age.


I'm sure he could. He was dunking on grown men in the NBA in games in his early 20s.

Not bad but KP is still on another level of athleticism in my book.

"This is a very cautious situation that we're in. You have to be conservative in terms of using your assets and using them wisely. We're building for the future." - Zeke (I guess not protecting a first round pick is being conservative)
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
6/14/2015  9:24 AM
s3231 wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
s3231 wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
s3231 wrote:For those making the KP to Bargnani comparisons, I think the athleticism that Porzingis has at this stage separates the two by a bit.

I really really really like KP as a prospect and even from just watching interviews, it's diffiicult to not like where his head is at. Like others have said in this thread though, I don't see him being ready to contribute substantially in year one. Physically, he will get abused in the post and if you watch the game footage, it's not uncommon to see his opposition put a 6'7 guy on him and still establish position in the paint and outbox/out rebound KP.

He already looks like he has added a few more pounds since the season ended so I don't see any reason why he can't develop into a star in this league. But if you draft Porgz at #4, the expectation has to be that you will need to wait 1-2 years before he really takes off.

Not sure if Phil and the front office will be willing to wait but you never know. Phil has said he doesn't expect much out of rookies in first couple of years before (especially with bigs) and he brought up Bynum as an example from his time with the Lakers. We'll see what happens.....hell of a prospect though.


Athleticism? Did you see the video I posted of Bargs in game plays at age 19?

I did, watched the whole thing. Bangs looked very good as a prospect too but KP plays more above the rim in my opinion and that should help him get more easy baskets at next level. Coild Bargs do one handed alley oops with ease at 19? That's a serious question because I don't really remember him showing that at that age.


I'm sure he could. He was dunking on grown men in the NBA in games in his early 20s.

Not bad but KP is still on another level of athleticism in my book.


You think Porzingis could do that stuff in Bargs dunk video right now? Or are you projecting growth for him over time?
WaltLongmire
Posts: 27623
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/28/2014
Member: #5843

6/14/2015  9:24 AM
For me, Bargs is on of the great enigmas of the NBA, another guy with a ton of talent whose problem was in his head, not his ability. You still see hints that he could have been a great player- but he never address his weaknesses, and his decision making is less than stellar.

I know realtors always talk about location, location. Also applies to Bargs, who might have been talked about differently if had been drafted 15th, instead of 1st.

EnySpree: Can we agree to agree not to mention Phil Jackson and triangle for the rest of our lives?
Ilovestarks
Posts: 20047
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/3/2015
Member: #6058

6/14/2015  9:26 AM
Looks like everyone are after krisP, after this workout...http://www.sbnation.com/nba/2015/6/13/8775675/kristaps-porzingis-had-an-amazing-workout-against-no-one
WaltLongmire
Posts: 27623
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/28/2014
Member: #5843

6/14/2015  9:46 AM
blkexec wrote:So far.....the two best workout videos are WCS and Porzingis. Thats not by accident. They have something to prove.

Russell and Mudiays LA workout video looks like two slow average shooters. By video alone...you can make the argument that Porzingis and WCS should be picked 2 and 3.....

Add ok4 in there as one of the worst videos. And you know what....i bet ok4...russell...mudiay will be the face of the league......

Workout vidoes do not simulate real time game situations. How you think Rodmans video was? He probably looked like a second rounder with todays videos of 3pt shots. Same with carl malone and plenty other HOFers.


You're speaking like NBA GMs have not watched him play extensively. Hope you don't think they will draft him just because of the workout...do you? My understanding is he had commitments from at least one team LAST year to get drafted in the lottery if he had stayed in the draft.

Hinkie and Saunders have both personally seen him play in Europe on multiple occasions.

Said this somewhere else, some of you guys are acting like he was a volleyball player until last year and only decided to play BB because he kept on getting caught in the volleyball net going up to spike.

Given his background, you should think of him more as an American player in his approach to the game.

Whoever takes him is not taking him because of the other day without having scouted him during the 2.5 years he played in Europe.

Knicks had Gaines- the scout Jackson trusts the most- and others watching him in game situation, just as they had guys watching Mudiay. We, as fans, were just unaware of everyone who Phil were looking at over the past year, except for the well documented knowledge that Phil had scouted Russell and we had sent scouts to KU practices.


Just got to trust Jackson's judgement and make the best choice based on the guys left after 1-3 are taken.

We will get to choose one of these guys at 4, depending upon Minny, Philly, and LA of course: OK4, Russell, Porzingis, Mudiay, or Winslow.

Not a bad group to choose from, and much better most of us expected after the ping pong balls betrayed us.

EnySpree: Can we agree to agree not to mention Phil Jackson and triangle for the rest of our lives?
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
6/14/2015  10:11 AM
The differences I see in KrisP n Bargs is KrisP is a little more athletic but they're basically the same player. What make KrisP a possible better prospect is I believe he wants to be great. Desire is the missing ingredient with Bargs. Not talent. Bargs has great talent but a lack of desire to be great. If KrisP has that desire he can be what Bargs was supposed to be.

That still doesn't mean he's the right pick for NY. This place chews players up and spits em out. 2 years of development is an eternity in NY. I don't think this is a good place to put a kid like KrisP.

newyorknewyork
Posts: 30169
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
6/14/2015  10:15 AM
Bonn1997 wrote:
newyorknewyork wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:Has anyone ever seen one player like this with these skills and this length in their life? And we have a chance to get him? How much does Anthony Davis weigh again?

You really don't think Bargs could do those things in a workout video? Not saying he'll be the next Bargs. I have no idea. I just don't give that much weight to 4 min videos.

I think these *in-game* highlights of Bargs at age 19 are at least as impressive. The "and 1" starting at 0:17 was insane actually.

Briggs KG is the answer to that question.

Porzingis looks more fluid and smooth then Bargs which is why he has more potential on the defensive end. But really it comes down to IQ and effort in the game. For all Bargs skills he has some of the worst defensive IQ and rebounding IQ we have seen. I would prefer if Porzingis was a shot blocking rebounding guy first with a developing offensive game like Towns. His interview though makes him intriguing as he comes off very smart and coach able.


I'm sure Bargs would look fluid and smooth in workout videos too.
Nothing against Porzingis. I'd LOVE to have him but it's too much of a gamble with the 4th pick IMO.

Bargs is more of an awkward dude. I don't know if I want Porzingis at #4 either as of yet. I would need to be very confident in his ability to defend and rebound before I pulled the trigger if I was Phil.

https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
s3231
Posts: 23162
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #544
USA
6/14/2015  10:20 AM
Bonn1997 wrote:
s3231 wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
s3231 wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
s3231 wrote:For those making the KP to Bargnani comparisons, I think the athleticism that Porzingis has at this stage separates the two by a bit.

I really really really like KP as a prospect and even from just watching interviews, it's diffiicult to not like where his head is at. Like others have said in this thread though, I don't see him being ready to contribute substantially in year one. Physically, he will get abused in the post and if you watch the game footage, it's not uncommon to see his opposition put a 6'7 guy on him and still establish position in the paint and outbox/out rebound KP.

He already looks like he has added a few more pounds since the season ended so I don't see any reason why he can't develop into a star in this league. But if you draft Porgz at #4, the expectation has to be that you will need to wait 1-2 years before he really takes off.

Not sure if Phil and the front office will be willing to wait but you never know. Phil has said he doesn't expect much out of rookies in first couple of years before (especially with bigs) and he brought up Bynum as an example from his time with the Lakers. We'll see what happens.....hell of a prospect though.


Athleticism? Did you see the video I posted of Bargs in game plays at age 19?

I did, watched the whole thing. Bangs looked very good as a prospect too but KP plays more above the rim in my opinion and that should help him get more easy baskets at next level. Coild Bargs do one handed alley oops with ease at 19? That's a serious question because I don't really remember him showing that at that age.


I'm sure he could. He was dunking on grown men in the NBA in games in his early 20s.

Not bad but KP is still on another level of athleticism in my book.


You think Porzingis could do that stuff in Bargs dunk video right now? Or are you projecting growth for him over time?

Yeah, I do think he can do that stuff in the Bargs dunk video plus even more right now. His athleticism is off the charts for someone his size and he can become an alley-op machine at the next level with his wingspan. He moves a lot more fluidly than Bargs does (or even then Gallo did at that age).


What I cannot predict though, is will he lose any of that athleticism as he bulks up? Hopefully not but we've seen it happen before so he will need to be careful about how much weight he puts on and how quickly he does it.

"This is a very cautious situation that we're in. You have to be conservative in terms of using your assets and using them wisely. We're building for the future." - Zeke (I guess not protecting a first round pick is being conservative)
s3231
Posts: 23162
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #544
USA
6/14/2015  10:23 AM    LAST EDITED: 6/14/2015  10:25 AM
nixluva wrote:The differences I see in KrisP n Bargs is KrisP is a little more athletic but they're basically the same player. What make KrisP a possible better prospect is I believe he wants to be great. Desire is the missing ingredient with Bargs. Not talent. Bargs has great talent but a lack of desire to be great. If KrisP has that desire he can be what Bargs was supposed to be.

That still doesn't mean he's the right pick for NY. This place chews players up and spits em out. 2 years of development is an eternity in NY. I don't think this is a good place to put a kid like KrisP.

Agree that the mental component is the biggest piece because if KP doesn't have that drive, then he may not live up to the hype at all.

Think the other difference though in regards to athleticism is that it may bode well for KP's defensive potential (think he has more than Bargs did). Hopefully for this kid's sake, he finds a way to bulk up and do it in a way that doesn't hinder him.

"This is a very cautious situation that we're in. You have to be conservative in terms of using your assets and using them wisely. We're building for the future." - Zeke (I guess not protecting a first round pick is being conservative)
foosballnick
Posts: 21535
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/17/2010
Member: #3148

6/14/2015  10:24 AM
Bonn1997 wrote:
s3231 wrote:For those making the KP to Bargnani comparisons, I think the athleticism that Porzingis has at this stage separates the two by a bit.

I really really really like KP as a prospect and even from just watching interviews, it's diffiicult to not like where his head is at. Like others have said in this thread though, I don't see him being ready to contribute substantially in year one. Physically, he will get abused in the post and if you watch the game footage, it's not uncommon to see his opposition put a 6'7 guy on him and still establish position in the paint and outbox/out rebound KP.

He already looks like he has added a few more pounds since the season ended so I don't see any reason why he can't develop into a star in this league. But if you draft Porgz at #4, the expectation has to be that you will need to wait 1-2 years before he really takes off.

Not sure if Phil and the front office will be willing to wait but you never know. Phil has said he doesn't expect much out of rookies in first couple of years before (especially with bigs) and he brought up Bynum as an example from his time with the Lakers. We'll see what happens.....hell of a prospect though.


Athleticism? Did you see the video I posted of Bargs in game plays at age 19?

Bargs was drafted #1 overall for a reason. Do you think it's talent and athleticism that's held him from performing or is it perhaps desire and injuries? These guys are not robots. What often separates the best is the mental aspect such as desire and work ethic.

newyorknewyork
Posts: 30169
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
6/14/2015  10:26 AM
Bonn1997 wrote:
s3231 wrote:For those making the KP to Bargnani comparisons, I think the athleticism that Porzingis has at this stage separates the two by a bit.

I really really really like KP as a prospect and even from just watching interviews, it's diffiicult to not like where his head is at. Like others have said in this thread though, I don't see him being ready to contribute substantially in year one. Physically, he will get abused in the post and if you watch the game footage, it's not uncommon to see his opposition put a 6'7 guy on him and still establish position in the paint and outbox/out rebound KP.

He already looks like he has added a few more pounds since the season ended so I don't see any reason why he can't develop into a star in this league. But if you draft Porgz at #4, the expectation has to be that you will need to wait 1-2 years before he really takes off.

Not sure if Phil and the front office will be willing to wait but you never know. Phil has said he doesn't expect much out of rookies in first couple of years before (especially with bigs) and he brought up Bynum as an example from his time with the Lakers. We'll see what happens.....hell of a prospect though.


Athleticism? Did you see the video I posted of Bargs in game plays at age 19?

Didn't really show much athleticism. Showed length and a jump shot. The main highlight he just threw the ball up not looking and it happen to go in. Not like he had full body control in the air with hang time adjusting mid air to control the layup.

Like Bargs, Porzingis as a PNR-PNP big man has all the tools. Catch and shoot, put the ball on the floor, or finish due to length. So he could be a good offensive weapon in that setting. The questions though are all about his ability to defend and rebound. If he can do that then he may be more of a Paul Gasol then a Bargnani.

https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
newyorker4ever
Posts: 26515
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/19/2014
Member: #5816

6/14/2015  10:30 AM
Bonn1997 wrote:
newyorknewyork wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:Has anyone ever seen one player like this with these skills and this length in their life? And we have a chance to get him? How much does Anthony Davis weigh again?

You really don't think Bargs could do those things in a workout video? Not saying he'll be the next Bargs. I have no idea. I just don't give that much weight to 4 min videos.

I think these *in-game* highlights of Bargs at age 19 are at least as impressive. The "and 1" starting at 0:17 was insane actually.

Briggs KG is the answer to that question.

Porzingis looks more fluid and smooth then Bargs which is why he has more potential on the defensive end. But really it comes down to IQ and effort in the game. For all Bargs skills he has some of the worst defensive IQ and rebounding IQ we have seen. I would prefer if Porzingis was a shot blocking rebounding guy first with a developing offensive game like Towns. His interview though makes him intriguing as he comes off very smart and coach able.


I'm sure Bargs would look fluid and smooth in workout videos too.
Nothing against Porzingis. I'd LOVE to have him but it's too much of a gamble with the 4th pick IMO.

Well of course Bargs would look good in a workout video because he is good. Bargs doesn't get enough credit for how good he really is when he's healthy and he always has been. He has always consistently hit the 15/18 footer which has always been his game but everyone got so down on him because he was always injured not because he didn't produce when he was on the court. The Bargs that we all saw in the last month of the season is the same player he's always been when he was healthy.
newyorker4ever
Posts: 26515
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/19/2014
Member: #5816

6/14/2015  10:33 AM
s3231 wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
s3231 wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
s3231 wrote:For those making the KP to Bargnani comparisons, I think the athleticism that Porzingis has at this stage separates the two by a bit.

I really really really like KP as a prospect and even from just watching interviews, it's diffiicult to not like where his head is at. Like others have said in this thread though, I don't see him being ready to contribute substantially in year one. Physically, he will get abused in the post and if you watch the game footage, it's not uncommon to see his opposition put a 6'7 guy on him and still establish position in the paint and outbox/out rebound KP.

He already looks like he has added a few more pounds since the season ended so I don't see any reason why he can't develop into a star in this league. But if you draft Porgz at #4, the expectation has to be that you will need to wait 1-2 years before he really takes off.

Not sure if Phil and the front office will be willing to wait but you never know. Phil has said he doesn't expect much out of rookies in first couple of years before (especially with bigs) and he brought up Bynum as an example from his time with the Lakers. We'll see what happens.....hell of a prospect though.


Athleticism? Did you see the video I posted of Bargs in game plays at age 19?

I did, watched the whole thing. Bangs looked very good as a prospect too but KP plays more above the rim in my opinion and that should help him get more easy baskets at next level. Coild Bargs do one handed alley oops with ease at 19? That's a serious question because I don't really remember him showing that at that age.


I'm sure he could. He was dunking on grown men in the NBA in games in his early 20s.

Not bad but KP is still on another level of athleticism in my book.


Athletically the Zinger is clearly better than Bargs.
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
6/14/2015  10:35 AM
The player taken at 4 is the player you think will be the best at his peak. You cannot take a draft pick at 4 for fit perceived readiness or any other factor than who you honestly believe will be best player at that very high spot. It's the advantage of the spot-- your teams ability to hit a ball over the fence. The Knicks have been a singles hitter up here. You can go for role player/ fit etc after 20
RIP Crushalot😞
smackeddog
Posts: 38391
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/30/2005
Member: #883
6/14/2015  10:38 AM
Like I said on the other thread, Bargs problem was never talent, its his god-awful attitude and work ethic.
newyorker4ever
Posts: 26515
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/19/2014
Member: #5816

6/14/2015  10:40 AM
s3231 wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
s3231 wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
s3231 wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
s3231 wrote:For those making the KP to Bargnani comparisons, I think the athleticism that Porzingis has at this stage separates the two by a bit.

I really really really like KP as a prospect and even from just watching interviews, it's diffiicult to not like where his head is at. Like others have said in this thread though, I don't see him being ready to contribute substantially in year one. Physically, he will get abused in the post and if you watch the game footage, it's not uncommon to see his opposition put a 6'7 guy on him and still establish position in the paint and outbox/out rebound KP.

He already looks like he has added a few more pounds since the season ended so I don't see any reason why he can't develop into a star in this league. But if you draft Porgz at #4, the expectation has to be that you will need to wait 1-2 years before he really takes off.

Not sure if Phil and the front office will be willing to wait but you never know. Phil has said he doesn't expect much out of rookies in first couple of years before (especially with bigs) and he brought up Bynum as an example from his time with the Lakers. We'll see what happens.....hell of a prospect though.


Athleticism? Did you see the video I posted of Bargs in game plays at age 19?

I did, watched the whole thing. Bangs looked very good as a prospect too but KP plays more above the rim in my opinion and that should help him get more easy baskets at next level. Coild Bargs do one handed alley oops with ease at 19? That's a serious question because I don't really remember him showing that at that age.


I'm sure he could. He was dunking on grown men in the NBA in games in his early 20s.

Not bad but KP is still on another level of athleticism in my book.


You think Porzingis could do that stuff in Bargs dunk video right now? Or are you projecting growth for him over time?

Yeah, I do think he can do that stuff in the Bargs dunk video plus even more right now. His athleticism is off the charts for someone his size and he can become an alley-op machine at the next level with his wingspan. He moves a lot more fluidly than Bargs does (or even then Gallo did at that age).


What I cannot predict though, is will he lose any of that athleticism as he bulks up? Hopefully not but we've seen it happen before so he will need to be careful about how much weight he puts on and how quickly he does it.


Well said and it's like people don't understand that there's ways he can use his size to his advantage even though he's on the thin side. The way the NBA is today if he can use the flop some when these bigger guys are banging on him down low he could use it to get the foul call and he can still rebound and block shots at the size he's at now. I really like this kid and i've been pushing for him from the beginning but is there some hesitation with him?? Of course there is but there is with pretty much all of these kids but this kid comes from a family of basketball players, even his mother played and he talks with a confidence that i like as well in his videos.
Made up my mind. Porzingis @4

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy