[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Can We Trade Up In The Draft?
Author Thread
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
5/29/2015  3:28 PM
NardDogNation wrote:
smackeddog wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
Moonangie wrote:
newyorker4ever wrote:
yellowboy90 wrote:why not trade with the Lakers if Towns is picked number 1 and they want ok4? Their is little chance Philly will take ok4 so it would be smart for the Lakers to trade back and get some compensation as well.

jeanie needs to stand by her man and give him a gift.

Towns is the only player in this draft i'd trade up for but we don't have the assets to be trading up and would most likely have to give up future draft picks.

Melo is a pretty solid asset. He's friends with Kobe, he has 5 years left near his prime, he could attract Rondo to LA. We might not get Towns, but the #2 is pretty darn good.

Nevertheless, I'm staying at #4 and snagging Mudiay (or Russell if he drops).

You're not getting 15 years of Jahlil Okafor for 4 years of Carmelo Anthony.

Like the Twolves didn't get 15years of Wiggins for 1 year of Kevin Love?

Kevin Love was 26 years old at the time. That makes him 5 years Melo's junior. That's 5 additional seasons of allstar basketball. Big difference. And most importantly, the Cavs thought they'd be getting much more than a season from Kevin Love.

25 actually and Melo is 31 and coming off season ending surgery.
We basically had the same response to Smack though.

AUTOADVERT
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
5/29/2015  3:32 PM    LAST EDITED: 5/29/2015  3:35 PM
yellowboy90 wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:How much would it take to move up to 3? I assume we'd have to take on McGee's contract and give up at least one of your young players.

probably the 2018 pick and McGee.

edit. Elfrid Payton(10) and Dario Saric(12) were traded last year and it only cost the Magic a 2017 pick. That was two spots so maybe it would be a 2018 1st or Mcgee's contract not both. There is a chance its even less since its a one spot move.

The Orl/Philly trade makes me think NY/LAL could actually do a deal.


Well Nard clarified that it can't be McGee's contract.
The gap between D Russell and these other guys is widely considered to be substantial, though. I think it would take the 2018 pick and either Galloway or the 2020 pick.
I hope something like top 15 protection on the 2016 pick, Gallo, and 3 mil would be enough. It's a terrible price to pay for winning 1 too many games but I think D Russell is our best chance chance in the near future to get a franchise player. I wouldn't do that trade if I ran Philly though.
yellowboy90
Posts: 33942
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/23/2011
Member: #3538

5/29/2015  3:36 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:
yellowboy90 wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:How much would it take to move up to 3? I assume we'd have to take on McGee's contract and give up at least one of your young players.

probably the 2018 pick and McGee.

edit. Elfrid Payton(10) and Dario Saric(12) were traded last year and it only cost the Magic a 2017 pick. That was two spots so maybe it would be a 2018 1st or Mcgee's contract not both. There is a chance its even less since its a one spot move.

The Orl/Philly trade makes me think NY/LAL could actually do a deal.


Well Nard clarified that it can't be McGee's contract.
The gap between D Russell and these other guys is widely considered to be substantial, though. I think it would take the 2018 pick and either Galloway or the 2020 pick.
I hope something like top 15 protection on the 2016 pick, Gallo, and 3 mil would be enough. It's a terrible price to pay for winning 1 too many games but I think D Russell is our best chance chance in the near future of get a franchise player.

If there are willing to trade out the gap is not substantial to them so I doubt it would take more than what it took a team to move up 2 spots.

I'll look at some more draft day swaps to compare but look at the Love/Mayo trade. I would include the jaminson/carter trade but that seems to old.

Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
5/29/2015  3:40 PM
yellowboy90 wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
yellowboy90 wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:How much would it take to move up to 3? I assume we'd have to take on McGee's contract and give up at least one of your young players.

probably the 2018 pick and McGee.

edit. Elfrid Payton(10) and Dario Saric(12) were traded last year and it only cost the Magic a 2017 pick. That was two spots so maybe it would be a 2018 1st or Mcgee's contract not both. There is a chance its even less since its a one spot move.

The Orl/Philly trade makes me think NY/LAL could actually do a deal.


Well Nard clarified that it can't be McGee's contract.
The gap between D Russell and these other guys is widely considered to be substantial, though. I think it would take the 2018 pick and either Galloway or the 2020 pick.
I hope something like top 15 protection on the 2016 pick, Gallo, and 3 mil would be enough. It's a terrible price to pay for winning 1 too many games but I think D Russell is our best chance chance in the near future of get a franchise player.

If there are willing to trade out the gap is not substantial to them so I doubt it would take more than what it took a team to move up 2 spots.

I'll look at some more draft day swaps to compare but look at the Love/Mayo trade. I would include the jaminson/carter trade but that seems to old.


Or the gap is substantial to them but they're willing to do it if we offered even more substantial compensation.
yellowboy90
Posts: 33942
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/23/2011
Member: #3538

5/29/2015  3:45 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:
yellowboy90 wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
yellowboy90 wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:How much would it take to move up to 3? I assume we'd have to take on McGee's contract and give up at least one of your young players.

probably the 2018 pick and McGee.

edit. Elfrid Payton(10) and Dario Saric(12) were traded last year and it only cost the Magic a 2017 pick. That was two spots so maybe it would be a 2018 1st or Mcgee's contract not both. There is a chance its even less since its a one spot move.

The Orl/Philly trade makes me think NY/LAL could actually do a deal.


Well Nard clarified that it can't be McGee's contract.
The gap between D Russell and these other guys is widely considered to be substantial, though. I think it would take the 2018 pick and either Galloway or the 2020 pick.
I hope something like top 15 protection on the 2016 pick, Gallo, and 3 mil would be enough. It's a terrible price to pay for winning 1 too many games but I think D Russell is our best chance chance in the near future of get a franchise player.

If there are willing to trade out the gap is not substantial to them so I doubt it would take more than what it took a team to move up 2 spots.

I'll look at some more draft day swaps to compare but look at the Love/Mayo trade. I would include the jaminson/carter trade but that seems to old.


Or the gap is substantial to them but they're willing to do it if we offered even more substantial compensation.


maybe but I would like to see some precedence that it would take two #1s.

Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
5/29/2015  3:55 PM
yellowboy90 wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
yellowboy90 wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
yellowboy90 wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:How much would it take to move up to 3? I assume we'd have to take on McGee's contract and give up at least one of your young players.

probably the 2018 pick and McGee.

edit. Elfrid Payton(10) and Dario Saric(12) were traded last year and it only cost the Magic a 2017 pick. That was two spots so maybe it would be a 2018 1st or Mcgee's contract not both. There is a chance its even less since its a one spot move.

The Orl/Philly trade makes me think NY/LAL could actually do a deal.


Well Nard clarified that it can't be McGee's contract.
The gap between D Russell and these other guys is widely considered to be substantial, though. I think it would take the 2018 pick and either Galloway or the 2020 pick.
I hope something like top 15 protection on the 2016 pick, Gallo, and 3 mil would be enough. It's a terrible price to pay for winning 1 too many games but I think D Russell is our best chance chance in the near future of get a franchise player.

If there are willing to trade out the gap is not substantial to them so I doubt it would take more than what it took a team to move up 2 spots.

I'll look at some more draft day swaps to compare but look at the Love/Mayo trade. I would include the jaminson/carter trade but that seems to old.


Or the gap is substantial to them but they're willing to do it if we offered even more substantial compensation.


maybe but I would like to see some precedence that it would take two #1s.


I think trading up from the Mudiay/Stein/Winslow kind of players to D Russell is an unprecedented jump. So you won't find any relevant info. from past seasons. Usually when a draft is considered a certain number deep, teams within that number don't trade down even if it's just one spot.
GustavBahler
Posts: 42864
Alba Posts: 15
Joined: 7/12/2010
Member: #3186

5/29/2015  4:00 PM
NardDogNation wrote:
GustavBahler wrote:I believe we would have to include a young player who Philly really likes instead of a low first round pick. If we were talking about trading the 6th and 7th pick that would seem doable. If THJ didnt have such a dismal sophmore season we might be able to garner their interest.

What about THJr and a late first rounder in addition to our pick? I definitely think that Russell is the better player but Mudiay is no slouch. And unlike our situation, the Sixers don't necessarily have a system that marginalizes/handicaps Mudiay so why not go with him and whatever you could get?

I guess it depends on how they feel about THJ.

yellowboy90
Posts: 33942
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/23/2011
Member: #3538

5/29/2015  4:17 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:
yellowboy90 wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
yellowboy90 wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
yellowboy90 wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:How much would it take to move up to 3? I assume we'd have to take on McGee's contract and give up at least one of your young players.

probably the 2018 pick and McGee.

edit. Elfrid Payton(10) and Dario Saric(12) were traded last year and it only cost the Magic a 2017 pick. That was two spots so maybe it would be a 2018 1st or Mcgee's contract not both. There is a chance its even less since its a one spot move.

The Orl/Philly trade makes me think NY/LAL could actually do a deal.


Well Nard clarified that it can't be McGee's contract.
The gap between D Russell and these other guys is widely considered to be substantial, though. I think it would take the 2018 pick and either Galloway or the 2020 pick.
I hope something like top 15 protection on the 2016 pick, Gallo, and 3 mil would be enough. It's a terrible price to pay for winning 1 too many games but I think D Russell is our best chance chance in the near future of get a franchise player.

If there are willing to trade out the gap is not substantial to them so I doubt it would take more than what it took a team to move up 2 spots.

I'll look at some more draft day swaps to compare but look at the Love/Mayo trade. I would include the jaminson/carter trade but that seems to old.


Or the gap is substantial to them but they're willing to do it if we offered even more substantial compensation.


maybe but I would like to see some precedence that it would take two #1s.


I think trading up from the Mudiay/Stein/Winslow kind of players to D Russell is an unprecedented jump. So you won't find any relevant info. from past seasons. Usually when a draft is considered a certain number deep, teams within that number don't trade down even if it's just one spot.

I get what you are saying but it might not be as small of a top group as we think. Reports are teams are high on Mudiay and others are willing to trade up to get Stein or Winslow. Now for me there is a clear top 3 and maybe for philly there is a only Russell since they don't need a big, idk.

So would you give up the 2018 and 2020 pick for Russell? I would need at least two of there 2015 2nds, and not there last two.

BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
5/29/2015  4:23 PM
IF it is possible the only move Id make would be to trade down and get Kaminsky and Fuzaro--if I could get anything else in terms of Mickey Connughton that would be a huge bonus. But we have a lot of holes and I think the entire NBA is not reading what Kaminsky is and we should take advantage of that.

This whole thing with WCS we just went through it with Thansis--why in the name of God would we want another raw offensive player? What the dudes name Laberdye etc.. we spent another pick on a guy who isnt exactly offensively fundamental

We start getting two way fundamentally sound guys with size and start bunching them up when LBJ gets older in 3 years we might be able to contend then of we load up enough.

We will NEVER EVER EVER EVER win with Carmelo as the leader in the years remaining on his contract--not close.

RIP Crushalot😞
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
5/29/2015  4:29 PM    LAST EDITED: 5/29/2015  5:18 PM
yellowboy90 wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
yellowboy90 wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
yellowboy90 wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
yellowboy90 wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:How much would it take to move up to 3? I assume we'd have to take on McGee's contract and give up at least one of your young players.

probably the 2018 pick and McGee.

edit. Elfrid Payton(10) and Dario Saric(12) were traded last year and it only cost the Magic a 2017 pick. That was two spots so maybe it would be a 2018 1st or Mcgee's contract not both. There is a chance its even less since its a one spot move.

The Orl/Philly trade makes me think NY/LAL could actually do a deal.


Well Nard clarified that it can't be McGee's contract.
The gap between D Russell and these other guys is widely considered to be substantial, though. I think it would take the 2018 pick and either Galloway or the 2020 pick.
I hope something like top 15 protection on the 2016 pick, Gallo, and 3 mil would be enough. It's a terrible price to pay for winning 1 too many games but I think D Russell is our best chance chance in the near future of get a franchise player.

If there are willing to trade out the gap is not substantial to them so I doubt it would take more than what it took a team to move up 2 spots.

I'll look at some more draft day swaps to compare but look at the Love/Mayo trade. I would include the jaminson/carter trade but that seems to old.


Or the gap is substantial to them but they're willing to do it if we offered even more substantial compensation.


maybe but I would like to see some precedence that it would take two #1s.


I think trading up from the Mudiay/Stein/Winslow kind of players to D Russell is an unprecedented jump. So you won't find any relevant info. from past seasons. Usually when a draft is considered a certain number deep, teams within that number don't trade down even if it's just one spot.

I get what you are saying but it might not be as small of a top group as we think. Reports are teams are high on Mudiay and others are willing to trade up to get Stein or Winslow. Now for me there is a clear top 3 and maybe for philly there is a only Russell since they don't need a big, idk.

So would you give up the 2018 and 2020 pick for Russell? I would need at least two of there 2015 2nds, and not there last two.


Mudiay worries me. It's just too big a gamble IMO. If we keep the pick, I think I'd take Winslow or Kaminsky but explore trading down. 2018 and 2020 I think is too steep a price but it's a really hard decision.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
5/29/2015  4:30 PM    LAST EDITED: 5/29/2015  4:31 PM
BRIGGS wrote:IF it is possible the only move Id make would be to trade down and get Kaminsky and Fuzaro--if I could get anything else in terms of Mickey Connughton that would be a huge bonus. But we have a lot of holes and I think the entire NBA is not reading what Kaminsky is and we should take advantage of that.

This whole thing with WCS we just went through it with Thansis--why in the name of God would we want another raw offensive player? What the dudes name Laberdye etc.. we spent another pick on a guy who isnt exactly offensively fundamental

We start getting two way fundamentally sound guys with size and start bunching them up when LBJ gets older in 3 years we might be able to contend then of we load up enough.

We will NEVER EVER EVER EVER win with Carmelo as the leader in the years remaining on his contract--not close.


Then what's the point of keeping him? If you ran the team, would you be exploring trades for him?
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
5/29/2015  4:35 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:IF it is possible the only move Id make would be to trade down and get Kaminsky and Fuzaro--if I could get anything else in terms of Mickey Connughton that would be a huge bonus. But we have a lot of holes and I think the entire NBA is not reading what Kaminsky is and we should take advantage of that.

This whole thing with WCS we just went through it with Thansis--why in the name of God would we want another raw offensive player? What the dudes name Laberdye etc.. we spent another pick on a guy who isnt exactly offensively fundamental

We start getting two way fundamentally sound guys with size and start bunching them up when LBJ gets older in 3 years we might be able to contend then of we load up enough.

We will NEVER EVER EVER EVER win with Carmelo as the leader in the years remaining on his contract--not close.


Then what's the point of keeping him? If you ran the team, would you be exploring trades for him?

Right now melo is above the team. He is the owners pet who traded for him. Would I trade him? If the package I got back represented what I feel Melo could be for the right team than yes. I can also work with Melo and see how it works out while potentially raising his value again.

RIP Crushalot😞
smackeddog
Posts: 38391
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/30/2005
Member: #883
5/30/2015  3:06 AM
Bonn1997 wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
smackeddog wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
Moonangie wrote:
newyorker4ever wrote:
yellowboy90 wrote:why not trade with the Lakers if Towns is picked number 1 and they want ok4? Their is little chance Philly will take ok4 so it would be smart for the Lakers to trade back and get some compensation as well.

jeanie needs to stand by her man and give him a gift.

Towns is the only player in this draft i'd trade up for but we don't have the assets to be trading up and would most likely have to give up future draft picks.

Melo is a pretty solid asset. He's friends with Kobe, he has 5 years left near his prime, he could attract Rondo to LA. We might not get Towns, but the #2 is pretty darn good.

Nevertheless, I'm staying at #4 and snagging Mudiay (or Russell if he drops).

You're not getting 15 years of Jahlil Okafor for 4 years of Carmelo Anthony.

Like the Twolves didn't get 15years of Wiggins for 1 year of Kevin Love?

Kevin Love was 26 years old at the time. That makes him 5 years Melo's junior. That's 5 additional seasons of allstar basketball. Big difference. And most importantly, the Cavs thought they'd be getting much more than a season from Kevin Love.

25 actually and Melo is 31 and coming off season ending surgery.
We basically had the same response to Smack though.

Nope, teams are happy at the prospect of 4 years of an established all star, in exchange for a top pick (See KG and Allen), but yes, feel free to continue to convince yourselves that Melo is useless, has a crippling salary, is hated by every other player, regarded as trash by every GM and is untradeable and so we're stuck with him forever, while he turns 50 next season. This seems to be something you feel you really need to do and I know I'm not going to stop it with a few posts. They call it catastrophizing.

Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
5/30/2015  9:41 AM
smackeddog wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
smackeddog wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
Moonangie wrote:
newyorker4ever wrote:
yellowboy90 wrote:why not trade with the Lakers if Towns is picked number 1 and they want ok4? Their is little chance Philly will take ok4 so it would be smart for the Lakers to trade back and get some compensation as well.

jeanie needs to stand by her man and give him a gift.

Towns is the only player in this draft i'd trade up for but we don't have the assets to be trading up and would most likely have to give up future draft picks.

Melo is a pretty solid asset. He's friends with Kobe, he has 5 years left near his prime, he could attract Rondo to LA. We might not get Towns, but the #2 is pretty darn good.

Nevertheless, I'm staying at #4 and snagging Mudiay (or Russell if he drops).

You're not getting 15 years of Jahlil Okafor for 4 years of Carmelo Anthony.

Like the Twolves didn't get 15years of Wiggins for 1 year of Kevin Love?

Kevin Love was 26 years old at the time. That makes him 5 years Melo's junior. That's 5 additional seasons of allstar basketball. Big difference. And most importantly, the Cavs thought they'd be getting much more than a season from Kevin Love.

25 actually and Melo is 31 and coming off season ending surgery.
We basically had the same response to Smack though.

Nope, teams are happy at the prospect of 4 years of an established all star, in exchange for a top pick (See KG and Allen), but yes, feel free to continue to convince yourselves that Melo is useless, has a crippling salary, is hated by every other player, regarded as trash by every GM and is untradeable and so we're stuck with him forever, while he turns 50 next season. This seems to be something you feel you really need to do and I know I'm not going to stop it with a few posts. They call it catastrophizing.


I don't even know where to begin a reply. I don't think you've actually read anything I wrote or at least you're not even trying to take it seriously and be respectful.
NardDogNation
Posts: 27669
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 5/7/2013
Member: #5555

5/30/2015  8:45 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
smackeddog wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
Moonangie wrote:
newyorker4ever wrote:
yellowboy90 wrote:why not trade with the Lakers if Towns is picked number 1 and they want ok4? Their is little chance Philly will take ok4 so it would be smart for the Lakers to trade back and get some compensation as well.

jeanie needs to stand by her man and give him a gift.

Towns is the only player in this draft i'd trade up for but we don't have the assets to be trading up and would most likely have to give up future draft picks.

Melo is a pretty solid asset. He's friends with Kobe, he has 5 years left near his prime, he could attract Rondo to LA. We might not get Towns, but the #2 is pretty darn good.

Nevertheless, I'm staying at #4 and snagging Mudiay (or Russell if he drops).

You're not getting 15 years of Jahlil Okafor for 4 years of Carmelo Anthony.

Like the Twolves didn't get 15years of Wiggins for 1 year of Kevin Love?

Kevin Love was 26 years old at the time. That makes him 5 years Melo's junior. That's 5 additional seasons of allstar basketball. Big difference. And most importantly, the Cavs thought they'd be getting much more than a season from Kevin Love.

25 actually and Melo is 31 and coming off season ending surgery.
We basically had the same response to Smack though.

Great minds think alike, lol.

NardDogNation
Posts: 27669
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 5/7/2013
Member: #5555

5/30/2015  8:47 PM
yellowboy90 wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
yellowboy90 wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
yellowboy90 wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:How much would it take to move up to 3? I assume we'd have to take on McGee's contract and give up at least one of your young players.

probably the 2018 pick and McGee.

edit. Elfrid Payton(10) and Dario Saric(12) were traded last year and it only cost the Magic a 2017 pick. That was two spots so maybe it would be a 2018 1st or Mcgee's contract not both. There is a chance its even less since its a one spot move.

The Orl/Philly trade makes me think NY/LAL could actually do a deal.


Well Nard clarified that it can't be McGee's contract.
The gap between D Russell and these other guys is widely considered to be substantial, though. I think it would take the 2018 pick and either Galloway or the 2020 pick.
I hope something like top 15 protection on the 2016 pick, Gallo, and 3 mil would be enough. It's a terrible price to pay for winning 1 too many games but I think D Russell is our best chance chance in the near future of get a franchise player.

If there are willing to trade out the gap is not substantial to them so I doubt it would take more than what it took a team to move up 2 spots.

I'll look at some more draft day swaps to compare but look at the Love/Mayo trade. I would include the jaminson/carter trade but that seems to old.


Or the gap is substantial to them but they're willing to do it if we offered even more substantial compensation.


maybe but I would like to see some precedence that it would take two #1s.

Chris Webber at no.1 for Anfernee Hardaway at no.3 along with 3 future 1st rounders. I think we can all agree that the Warriors went for overkill on that deal.

NardDogNation
Posts: 27669
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 5/7/2013
Member: #5555

5/30/2015  8:53 PM
TripleThreat wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:... reach a tentative agreement for another 1st round pick in the 20s, would the Sixers bite?

The only thing that the Knicks could trade of any value might be Clem Early ( might is a big word here for him) and their 2018 pick.

If they give up their 2018 pick to move up in this draft, I think Dolan and Phil Jackson would be run over the coals in the sports media and divide the Knicks fanbase.

The only person it would make happy besides Philly, would be Dan Snyder of the Redskins, because he wouldn't be the pariah of all sports owners anymore now that Donald Sterling is gone, Dolan would take the crown completely.

And rightfully so if the deal had to be made on those grounds. As much as I hate to admit it, D'Angelo just might be that much better a prospect than anyone else available at 4. It just amazes me how often the Knicks botch draft related matters up. In the few years that we've kept our lottery pick, we've consistently managed to play our way out of a surefire talent (see 2009 draft with Steph Curry) or have fallen a few rungs (drafting 6th instead of 4th in 2008 and drafting 4th instead of 2nd in this draft). We are a poorly run franchise but also can't seem to ever catch a break.

CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
5/30/2015  8:58 PM
NardDogNation wrote:
yellowboy90 wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
yellowboy90 wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
yellowboy90 wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:How much would it take to move up to 3? I assume we'd have to take on McGee's contract and give up at least one of your young players.

probably the 2018 pick and McGee.

edit. Elfrid Payton(10) and Dario Saric(12) were traded last year and it only cost the Magic a 2017 pick. That was two spots so maybe it would be a 2018 1st or Mcgee's contract not both. There is a chance its even less since its a one spot move.

The Orl/Philly trade makes me think NY/LAL could actually do a deal.


Well Nard clarified that it can't be McGee's contract.
The gap between D Russell and these other guys is widely considered to be substantial, though. I think it would take the 2018 pick and either Galloway or the 2020 pick.
I hope something like top 15 protection on the 2016 pick, Gallo, and 3 mil would be enough. It's a terrible price to pay for winning 1 too many games but I think D Russell is our best chance chance in the near future of get a franchise player.

If there are willing to trade out the gap is not substantial to them so I doubt it would take more than what it took a team to move up 2 spots.

I'll look at some more draft day swaps to compare but look at the Love/Mayo trade. I would include the jaminson/carter trade but that seems to old.


Or the gap is substantial to them but they're willing to do it if we offered even more substantial compensation.


maybe but I would like to see some precedence that it would take two #1s.

Chris Webber at no.1 for Anfernee Hardaway at no.3 along with 3 future 1st rounders. I think we can all agree that the Warriors went for overkill on that deal.

A buddy of mine covered the Warriors when they got C-Webb. He said the media there loved Don Nelson because he was so accessible and made his players be accessible to the media. Apparently that was one of Webber's biggest issues with Nelson. Funny because now Webber is in the media.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
NardDogNation
Posts: 27669
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 5/7/2013
Member: #5555

5/30/2015  9:17 PM
CrushAlot wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
yellowboy90 wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
yellowboy90 wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
yellowboy90 wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:How much would it take to move up to 3? I assume we'd have to take on McGee's contract and give up at least one of your young players.

probably the 2018 pick and McGee.

edit. Elfrid Payton(10) and Dario Saric(12) were traded last year and it only cost the Magic a 2017 pick. That was two spots so maybe it would be a 2018 1st or Mcgee's contract not both. There is a chance its even less since its a one spot move.

The Orl/Philly trade makes me think NY/LAL could actually do a deal.


Well Nard clarified that it can't be McGee's contract.
The gap between D Russell and these other guys is widely considered to be substantial, though. I think it would take the 2018 pick and either Galloway or the 2020 pick.
I hope something like top 15 protection on the 2016 pick, Gallo, and 3 mil would be enough. It's a terrible price to pay for winning 1 too many games but I think D Russell is our best chance chance in the near future of get a franchise player.

If there are willing to trade out the gap is not substantial to them so I doubt it would take more than what it took a team to move up 2 spots.

I'll look at some more draft day swaps to compare but look at the Love/Mayo trade. I would include the jaminson/carter trade but that seems to old.


Or the gap is substantial to them but they're willing to do it if we offered even more substantial compensation.


maybe but I would like to see some precedence that it would take two #1s.

Chris Webber at no.1 for Anfernee Hardaway at no.3 along with 3 future 1st rounders. I think we can all agree that the Warriors went for overkill on that deal.

A buddy of mine covered the Warriors when they got C-Webb. He said the media there loved Don Nelson because he was so accessible and made his players be accessible to the media. Apparently that was one of Webber's biggest issues with Nelson. Funny because now Webber is in the media.

I like Chris Webber but he can be something of a quagmire. I think that much is evident from the deterioration of his relationships with Michigan and Jalen Rose in particular. He still was a guy whose game I loved and tried patterning my game after.

yellowboy90
Posts: 33942
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/23/2011
Member: #3538

5/30/2015  9:36 PM
NardDogNation wrote:
yellowboy90 wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
yellowboy90 wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
yellowboy90 wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:How much would it take to move up to 3? I assume we'd have to take on McGee's contract and give up at least one of your young players.

probably the 2018 pick and McGee.

edit. Elfrid Payton(10) and Dario Saric(12) were traded last year and it only cost the Magic a 2017 pick. That was two spots so maybe it would be a 2018 1st or Mcgee's contract not both. There is a chance its even less since its a one spot move.

The Orl/Philly trade makes me think NY/LAL could actually do a deal.


Well Nard clarified that it can't be McGee's contract.
The gap between D Russell and these other guys is widely considered to be substantial, though. I think it would take the 2018 pick and either Galloway or the 2020 pick.
I hope something like top 15 protection on the 2016 pick, Gallo, and 3 mil would be enough. It's a terrible price to pay for winning 1 too many games but I think D Russell is our best chance chance in the near future of get a franchise player.

If there are willing to trade out the gap is not substantial to them so I doubt it would take more than what it took a team to move up 2 spots.

I'll look at some more draft day swaps to compare but look at the Love/Mayo trade. I would include the jaminson/carter trade but that seems to old.


Or the gap is substantial to them but they're willing to do it if we offered even more substantial compensation.


maybe but I would like to see some precedence that it would take two #1s.

Chris Webber at no.1 for Anfernee Hardaway at no.3 along with 3 future 1st rounders. I think we can all agree that the Warriors went for overkill on that deal.

Good one. I guess there is precedence. I am not sure people see Russell as they did Webber which is very highly because Hardaway was "no scrub"(SAS voice).

I think the best thing to do is try to get basic market value for the 4th pick in the trade. If they can get more than 2 1st rd picks(at least one 2015 1st) then they hit a home run and Phil will restore some faith in his ability.

Can We Trade Up In The Draft?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy