dk7th wrote:WaltLongmire wrote:Hard to understand the dislike some have for Kaminsky.
Good guy
High BB IQ
Intriguing skills set
Has improved his game every year in the NCAA
Played in an offensive system that requires discipline and teamwork
2 times in Final Four, once in finals
Matched up well and more than held his own against the two bigs expected to go 1 & 2
College Player of the Year
Yeah, why even consider taking a guy with this kind of pedigree, even if he shines in workouts?
if he only plays one end of the floor he won't end up a starter on a title-contending team. what if his defense is a liability?
This would be something you would have to confirm before you choose him. Same is true for anyone if we take them.
I always go back to Gallinari. He turned out to be a fine defender, and there was some info from overseas scouts that he was tougher than people thought, and was not Bargs, but I seem to recall that when he came to the Knicks for a workout, it was one of those workouts where you do your thing without other players, and the workout is limited to certain things- in his case, mostly shooting.
If I'm about to pay big money for a draft pick, and want to know what I'm getting, that might mean having him play some 5/5 or 3/3 ball to see what he can do up close.
I hate that some of the big name college players don't want to do everything at the combine.
EnySpree: Can we agree to agree not to mention Phil Jackson and triangle for the rest of our lives?