[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

draft express is almost never wrong
Author Thread
Moonangie
Posts: 24767
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 7/9/2009
Member: #2788

5/20/2015  10:54 AM
Cartman718 wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:
Cartman718 wrote:
fishmike wrote:
Cartman718 wrote:he could be a player... but more rondo-esque, than stephen curry-ish.
i think he will get even better at defense, but his offense is either fast break or nothing.
he needs the ball in his hands to score and that is his biggest weakness. i didn't see any highlights of him running around screens to catch the ball and make a shot.
no but you see a ton of highlights of his passing and opening up things for teammates and we desperately need a player who can make other players better, and he's a classic drive and dish PG. Nothing wrong with that. He's really the most like Westbrook. Doesnt shoot well, but can score about 100 ways around the basket. Too quick and agile and strong to guard when he's attacking the rim. Good upside on defense... He could be a very nice consolation prize for missing on 1-3

he's good in PNR, but if we really wanted a PG that makes others better, why couldn't we just have tried to get Russell?
Russell's defense is not as good as Mudiay's I'd imagine, but he's a much better prospect on offense.

If i was the lakers I would take russell, they already have Randle. The west is loaded with top of the line pg's and Byron scott won't survive after next season( 30% winning pct without one).

from your mouth to jeanie's ears. :)

What do you mean? That Lakers grab Russell thus forcing Philly to take Mudiay and leaving OK4/Towns for us? THat would be a miracle, but it's always a possibility.

AUTOADVERT
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
5/20/2015  11:00 AM
Moonangie wrote:
Cartman718 wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:
Cartman718 wrote:
fishmike wrote:
Cartman718 wrote:he could be a player... but more rondo-esque, than stephen curry-ish.
i think he will get even better at defense, but his offense is either fast break or nothing.
he needs the ball in his hands to score and that is his biggest weakness. i didn't see any highlights of him running around screens to catch the ball and make a shot.
no but you see a ton of highlights of his passing and opening up things for teammates and we desperately need a player who can make other players better, and he's a classic drive and dish PG. Nothing wrong with that. He's really the most like Westbrook. Doesnt shoot well, but can score about 100 ways around the basket. Too quick and agile and strong to guard when he's attacking the rim. Good upside on defense... He could be a very nice consolation prize for missing on 1-3

he's good in PNR, but if we really wanted a PG that makes others better, why couldn't we just have tried to get Russell?
Russell's defense is not as good as Mudiay's I'd imagine, but he's a much better prospect on offense.

If i was the lakers I would take russell, they already have Randle. The west is loaded with top of the line pg's and Byron scott won't survive after next season( 30% winning pct without one).

from your mouth to jeanie's ears. :)

What do you mean? That Lakers grab Russell thus forcing Philly to take Mudiay and leaving OK4/Towns for us? THat would be a miracle, but it's always a possibility.

I think it was possible for Okafor to fall to 4th given the right teams in place--but that did not happen. What hurts the Knicks is Mudiay barely played this year. The Knicks were quick to make draft workouts for some guys like Stein but did not scout Mudaiy or go get him for a workout during the Chicago part-its just hard for me to believe realistically we will draft him--right or wrong. And he was the pre season number 1 player on both mocks. I certainly wont be upset if we take him but I just dont think we will so as far as this drafting stuff goes its whatever right now. We do everything wrong so I dont expect us to break the string.

RIP Crushalot😞
newyorker4ever
Posts: 26515
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/19/2014
Member: #5816

5/20/2015  11:09 AM
mreinman wrote:
fishmike wrote:He's a good prospect. No ifs ands or butts. Ironically he's most people's 4th choice.

because nobody knows much about his so its easy to want him.


Yep, they don't know enough about the kid to give him a true evaluation so you just don't hear much about him and the other reason for him being projected 3 or lower is just because there's two legit big men coming out that both are seen as mostly can't miss prospects in one way or the other and teams just can't pass up on getting a legit center just like we were gonna take one of the two. We may have lost out on both the bigs but i don't see how anyone could be upset with any one of D.Russell, E.Mudiay, J.Winslow or my sleeper K.Porzingis.
newyorker4ever
Posts: 26515
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/19/2014
Member: #5816

5/20/2015  11:14 AM
knicks1248 wrote:they were a 100% right about shump, THJ, toney douglas..i like this kid a lot, i would take him over towns and oak, because we need a PG sooooooooooooo bad..the basketball gods know this


S.Mills made a comment last night that has me thinking more than i already was that we'll be trading the pick for veteran help. When talking about what they will do with the pick he said "we're gonna do whatever we need to do to help us win next year" I put it in quotes but i'm not sure if those were his exact words but i do know that he said "winning next year" which are the key words. Winning next year means to me that they don't want a rookie and that they want veterans that can help right away.
newyorker4ever
Posts: 26515
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/19/2014
Member: #5816

5/20/2015  11:16 AM
Cartman718 wrote:he could be a player... but more rondo-esque, than stephen curry-ish.
i think he will get even better at defense, but his offense is either fast break or nothing.
he needs the ball in his hands to score and that is his biggest weakness. i didn't see any highlights of him running around screens to catch the ball and make a shot.

I wouldn't put him at Rondo-esque but more of J.Wall-esque because remember that J.Wall came into the league as shooting being his worst asset and he's still a bit streaky but he's gotten better at it with commitment and hard work.

newyorker4ever
Posts: 26515
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/19/2014
Member: #5816

5/20/2015  11:20 AM
SupremeCommander wrote:
mreinman wrote:
fishmike wrote:He's a good prospect. No ifs ands or butts. Ironically he's most people's 4th choice.

because nobody knows much about his so its easy to want him.

that is untrue... we might not know much about his individual skillset but I do know that he was the number one prospect for the incoming college class last year and Larry Brown said SMU would have won it all if he had played for him instead of went to China. I know Mudiay is no scrub

Larry Brown also said that he's never seen a point guard with more skills then Mudiay which coming from a man in L.Brown that's seen it all as a hall of fame NBA and College coach is pretty huge.

BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
5/20/2015  11:23 AM
newyorker4ever wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:they were a 100% right about shump, THJ, toney douglas..i like this kid a lot, i would take him over towns and oak, because we need a PG sooooooooooooo bad..the basketball gods know this


S.Mills made a comment last night that has me thinking more than i already was that we'll be trading the pick for veteran help. When talking about what they will do with the pick he said "we're gonna do whatever we need to do to help us win next year" I put it in quotes but i'm not sure if those were his exact words but i do know that he said "winning next year" which are the key words. Winning next year means to me that they don't want a rookie and that they want veterans that can help right away.

They did not schedule a Mudaiy workout nor did they even scout him. It might be the right move to take Mudaiy to have him in for two private workouts but this is 12 years running where we have blown a pick. Did anyone read that article where in 10 years our tier one draft slots have played 430 games out of a possible 8000+?

The problem--Jim Dolan only cares about filling the seats and winning 40 games. This is NOT a championship type business plan. This is get me good content for my cable TV show and to fill my seats. Did anyone just pay for the Mayweather fight--same F deal. He doesnt care he just wants to give someone a little something o take the money out of their pockets. Our chance was last night and now we are really scred.


I expect the 4 pick and Calderon to go bye bye in one trade and were going to use full cap to the till.

RIP Crushalot😞
WaltLongmire
Posts: 27623
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/28/2014
Member: #5843

5/20/2015  11:29 AM
newyorker4ever wrote:
mreinman wrote:
fishmike wrote:He's a good prospect. No ifs ands or butts. Ironically he's most people's 4th choice.

because nobody knows much about his so its easy to want him.


Yep, they don't know enough about the kid to give him a true evaluation so you just don't hear much about him and the other reason for him being projected 3 or lower is just because there's two legit big men coming out that both are seen as mostly can't miss prospects in one way or the other and teams just can't pass up on getting a legit center just like we were gonna take one of the two. We may have lost out on both the bigs but i don't see how anyone could be upset with any one of D.Russell, E.Mudiay, J.Winslow or my sleeper K.Porzingis.

I see Porzingis as a sleeper pick for the Knicks, too.

He obviously needs to get stronger, but his size and length will compensate a bit for his lack of strength. Has a nice touch from outside, and he can help out as a shot blocker and pick up some steals.

Does not seem to be a great passer at this point- I assume that would be an issue in the offense we run, but he is still young.

It will be interesting to see if he has bulked up at all when he comes to the U.S. to work out for teams.

EnySpree: Can we agree to agree not to mention Phil Jackson and triangle for the rest of our lives?
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
5/20/2015  11:32 AM
WaltLongmire wrote:
newyorker4ever wrote:
mreinman wrote:
fishmike wrote:He's a good prospect. No ifs ands or butts. Ironically he's most people's 4th choice.

because nobody knows much about his so its easy to want him.


Yep, they don't know enough about the kid to give him a true evaluation so you just don't hear much about him and the other reason for him being projected 3 or lower is just because there's two legit big men coming out that both are seen as mostly can't miss prospects in one way or the other and teams just can't pass up on getting a legit center just like we were gonna take one of the two. We may have lost out on both the bigs but i don't see how anyone could be upset with any one of D.Russell, E.Mudiay, J.Winslow or my sleeper K.Porzingis.

I see Porzingis as a sleeper pick for the Knicks, too.

He obviously needs to get stronger, but his size and length will compensate a bit for his lack of strength. Has a nice touch from outside, and he can help out as a shot blocker and pick up some steals.

Does not seem to be a great passer at this point- I assume that would be an issue in the offense we run, but he is still young.

It will be interesting to see if he has bulked up at all when he comes to the U.S. to work out for teams.

Porzingis looks frail and somewhat awkward. I cant see where he handles the ball much or where he uses the pass.

RIP Crushalot😞
Nalod
Posts: 72089
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
5/20/2015  11:34 AM    LAST EDITED: 5/20/2015  11:37 AM
newyorker4ever wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:they were a 100% right about shump, THJ, toney douglas..i like this kid a lot, i would take him over towns and oak, because we need a PG sooooooooooooo bad..the basketball gods know this


S.Mills made a comment last night that has me thinking more than i already was that we'll be trading the pick for veteran help. When talking about what they will do with the pick he said "we're gonna do whatever we need to do to help us win next year" I put it in quotes but i'm not sure if those were his exact words but i do know that he said "winning next year" which are the key words. Winning next year means to me that they don't want a rookie and that they want veterans that can help right away.

I ran his quote thru my home made "StarphuchMeter" machine to see what he really meant and it rang a very neautral number. What that means is he was spewing generic answer which of course he wants to create a market by which a few teams should bid for the pick making it a better return for us. The reality is they should address the option of trading and see which teams really really want to move up. It would be foolish to not see what the asset can return.

newyorker4ever
Posts: 26515
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/19/2014
Member: #5816

5/20/2015  11:35 AM
BRIGGS wrote:
newyorker4ever wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:they were a 100% right about shump, THJ, toney douglas..i like this kid a lot, i would take him over towns and oak, because we need a PG sooooooooooooo bad..the basketball gods know this


S.Mills made a comment last night that has me thinking more than i already was that we'll be trading the pick for veteran help. When talking about what they will do with the pick he said "we're gonna do whatever we need to do to help us win next year" I put it in quotes but i'm not sure if those were his exact words but i do know that he said "winning next year" which are the key words. Winning next year means to me that they don't want a rookie and that they want veterans that can help right away.

They did not schedule a Mudaiy workout nor did they even scout him. It might be the right move to take Mudaiy to have him in for two private workouts but this is 12 years running where we have blown a pick. Did anyone read that article where in 10 years our tier one draft slots have played 430 games out of a possible 8000+?

The problem--Jim Dolan only cares about filling the seats and winning 40 games. This is NOT a championship type business plan. This is get me good content for my cable TV show and to fill my seats. Did anyone just pay for the Mayweather fight--same F deal. He doesnt care he just wants to give someone a little something o take the money out of their pockets. Our chance was last night and now we are really scred.


I expect the 4 pick and Calderon to go bye bye in one trade and were going to use full cap to the till.


You sure do say a lot of ridiculous things all the time. Dolan absolutely cares about winning and has always opened up his wallet as far as it can be opened to give his GM's whatever cash needed to get the players they can to try to win. The problem has always been what the GM's have spent all that money on. You speak as if the scouting process is over which is far from the truth cause there's over a month left to bring kids in for workouts and interviews so Mudiay will be coming in for a workout/interview. The one part i agree with you on is that i also think we'll be trading the pick for pieces that can help us right away and what scares me most with Phil and Mills is exactly that....trading. These guys have no experience in the art of the trade when you have to stay strong with these other GM's to get the absolute best trade you can out of them and that's exactly what he didn't do with the JR Smith trade. If he waited it out longer and closer to the trade deadline he would of got a better deal for JR and Shump but he didn't wait, he jumped on the first team that offered anything for him and for that didn't get much back for them.
newyorker4ever
Posts: 26515
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/19/2014
Member: #5816

5/20/2015  11:37 AM
BRIGGS wrote:
WaltLongmire wrote:
newyorker4ever wrote:
mreinman wrote:
fishmike wrote:He's a good prospect. No ifs ands or butts. Ironically he's most people's 4th choice.

because nobody knows much about his so its easy to want him.


Yep, they don't know enough about the kid to give him a true evaluation so you just don't hear much about him and the other reason for him being projected 3 or lower is just because there's two legit big men coming out that both are seen as mostly can't miss prospects in one way or the other and teams just can't pass up on getting a legit center just like we were gonna take one of the two. We may have lost out on both the bigs but i don't see how anyone could be upset with any one of D.Russell, E.Mudiay, J.Winslow or my sleeper K.Porzingis.

I see Porzingis as a sleeper pick for the Knicks, too.

He obviously needs to get stronger, but his size and length will compensate a bit for his lack of strength. Has a nice touch from outside, and he can help out as a shot blocker and pick up some steals.

Does not seem to be a great passer at this point- I assume that would be an issue in the offense we run, but he is still young.

It will be interesting to see if he has bulked up at all when he comes to the U.S. to work out for teams.

Porzingis looks frail and somewhat awkward. I cant see where he handles the ball much or where he uses the pass.


K.Durant and Dirk were also frail and somewhat awkward. Porzingis will be a great player in the NBA.
BigDaddyG
Posts: 40245
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049

5/20/2015  11:38 AM
WaltLongmire wrote:I see Porzingis as a sleeper pick for the Knicks, too.

He obviously needs to get stronger, but his size and length will compensate a bit for his lack of strength. Has a nice touch from outside, and he can help out as a shot blocker and pick up some steals.

Does not seem to be a great passer at this point- I assume that would be an issue in the offense we run, but he is still young.

It will be interesting to see if he has bulked up at all when he comes to the U.S. to work out for teams.

I'm starting to warm to the idea of Porzingis too. If the Monroe rumors are true, Porzingas will fit because of his shot blocking and his ability to hit from deep. Monroe can battle the big bodies inside while Porzingis patrols the weak side. He can also play off of Monroe and Melo at the three point line. In time, I can see him developing into Kirilenko with a J. That said, I think our best move is too trade down and pick up an additional pick for this year or 2016.

Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
BigDaddyG
Posts: 40245
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049

5/20/2015  11:44 AM
fishmike wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:
Cartman718 wrote:
fishmike wrote:
Cartman718 wrote:he could be a player... but more rondo-esque, than stephen curry-ish.
i think he will get even better at defense, but his offense is either fast break or nothing.
he needs the ball in his hands to score and that is his biggest weakness. i didn't see any highlights of him running around screens to catch the ball and make a shot.
no but you see a ton of highlights of his passing and opening up things for teammates and we desperately need a player who can make other players better, and he's a classic drive and dish PG. Nothing wrong with that. He's really the most like Westbrook. Doesnt shoot well, but can score about 100 ways around the basket. Too quick and agile and strong to guard when he's attacking the rim. Good upside on defense... He could be a very nice consolation prize for missing on 1-3

he's good in PNR, but if we really wanted a PG that makes others better, why couldn't we just have tried to get Russell?
Russell's defense is not as good as Mudiay's I'd imagine, but he's a much better prospect on offense.

If i was the lakers I would take russell, they already have Randle. The west is loaded with top of the line pg's and Byron scott won't survive after next season( 30% winning pct without one).

they dont have anything. They have a prospect with a broken foot who hasnt played in the NBA. They are not passing on OK4 because of Randle.

Yeah, you gotta take the prospect you feel is the best available. It's not like Randle was setting the world ablaze when he was healthy.
Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
5/20/2015  11:44 AM
newyorker4ever wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:
newyorker4ever wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:they were a 100% right about shump, THJ, toney douglas..i like this kid a lot, i would take him over towns and oak, because we need a PG sooooooooooooo bad..the basketball gods know this


S.Mills made a comment last night that has me thinking more than i already was that we'll be trading the pick for veteran help. When talking about what they will do with the pick he said "we're gonna do whatever we need to do to help us win next year" I put it in quotes but i'm not sure if those were his exact words but i do know that he said "winning next year" which are the key words. Winning next year means to me that they don't want a rookie and that they want veterans that can help right away.

They did not schedule a Mudaiy workout nor did they even scout him. It might be the right move to take Mudaiy to have him in for two private workouts but this is 12 years running where we have blown a pick. Did anyone read that article where in 10 years our tier one draft slots have played 430 games out of a possible 8000+?

The problem--Jim Dolan only cares about filling the seats and winning 40 games. This is NOT a championship type business plan. This is get me good content for my cable TV show and to fill my seats. Did anyone just pay for the Mayweather fight--same F deal. He doesnt care he just wants to give someone a little something o take the money out of their pockets. Our chance was last night and now we are really scred.


I expect the 4 pick and Calderon to go bye bye in one trade and were going to use full cap to the till.


You sure do say a lot of ridiculous things all the time. Dolan absolutely cares about winning and has always opened up his wallet as far as it can be opened to give his GM's whatever cash needed to get the players they can to try to win. The problem has always been what the GM's have spent all that money on. You speak as if the scouting process is over which is far from the truth cause there's over a month left to bring kids in for workouts and interviews so Mudiay will be coming in for a workout/interview. The one part i agree with you on is that i also think we'll be trading the pick for pieces that can help us right away and what scares me most with Phil and Mills is exactly that....trading. These guys have no experience in the art of the trade when you have to stay strong with these other GM's to get the absolute best trade you can out of them and that's exactly what he didn't do with the JR Smith trade. If he waited it out longer and closer to the trade deadline he would of got a better deal for JR and Shump but he didn't wait, he jumped on the first team that offered anything for him and for that didn't get much back for them.

NewYork--if Jim Dolan cared about winning we'd have a 30-40 something GM like Sam Presti or picked up Danny Ferry on the cheap. Instead we have a first time GM Jackson a retread who only lost his first time out Mills and of course the coup de grate the man with the vision I Thomas.

We have the ABSOLUTE worst basketball management in the NBAS and we PAID the most for it. So here it is--you have Jackson who if he is even in the decision making--Im not sure is trading away all of our players Tyson Chandler Iman Shumpert JR Smith and we got the worst player of the deal in Calderon with the longest contract and a pick 54 in 2020. Is Dolan really trying to win? Just because you spend money doesnt mean you will win--check our last 15 years. We have THE DUMBEST owner in sports history Marge Schott would laugh at Dolan.

RIP Crushalot😞
franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
5/20/2015  11:55 AM
newyorker4ever wrote:
SupremeCommander wrote:
mreinman wrote:
fishmike wrote:He's a good prospect. No ifs ands or butts. Ironically he's most people's 4th choice.

because nobody knows much about his so its easy to want him.

that is untrue... we might not know much about his individual skillset but I do know that he was the number one prospect for the incoming college class last year and Larry Brown said SMU would have won it all if he had played for him instead of went to China. I know Mudiay is no scrub

Larry Brown also said that he's never seen a point guard with more skills then Mudiay which coming from a man in L.Brown that's seen it all as a hall of fame NBA and College coach is pretty huge.

This is the same man who though Marbury & Stevie Francis could work. Just saying.

newyorker4ever
Posts: 26515
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/19/2014
Member: #5816

5/20/2015  12:05 PM
BRIGGS wrote:
newyorker4ever wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:
newyorker4ever wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:they were a 100% right about shump, THJ, toney douglas..i like this kid a lot, i would take him over towns and oak, because we need a PG sooooooooooooo bad..the basketball gods know this


S.Mills made a comment last night that has me thinking more than i already was that we'll be trading the pick for veteran help. When talking about what they will do with the pick he said "we're gonna do whatever we need to do to help us win next year" I put it in quotes but i'm not sure if those were his exact words but i do know that he said "winning next year" which are the key words. Winning next year means to me that they don't want a rookie and that they want veterans that can help right away.

They did not schedule a Mudaiy workout nor did they even scout him. It might be the right move to take Mudaiy to have him in for two private workouts but this is 12 years running where we have blown a pick. Did anyone read that article where in 10 years our tier one draft slots have played 430 games out of a possible 8000+?

The problem--Jim Dolan only cares about filling the seats and winning 40 games. This is NOT a championship type business plan. This is get me good content for my cable TV show and to fill my seats. Did anyone just pay for the Mayweather fight--same F deal. He doesnt care he just wants to give someone a little something o take the money out of their pockets. Our chance was last night and now we are really scred.


I expect the 4 pick and Calderon to go bye bye in one trade and were going to use full cap to the till.


You sure do say a lot of ridiculous things all the time. Dolan absolutely cares about winning and has always opened up his wallet as far as it can be opened to give his GM's whatever cash needed to get the players they can to try to win. The problem has always been what the GM's have spent all that money on. You speak as if the scouting process is over which is far from the truth cause there's over a month left to bring kids in for workouts and interviews so Mudiay will be coming in for a workout/interview. The one part i agree with you on is that i also think we'll be trading the pick for pieces that can help us right away and what scares me most with Phil and Mills is exactly that....trading. These guys have no experience in the art of the trade when you have to stay strong with these other GM's to get the absolute best trade you can out of them and that's exactly what he didn't do with the JR Smith trade. If he waited it out longer and closer to the trade deadline he would of got a better deal for JR and Shump but he didn't wait, he jumped on the first team that offered anything for him and for that didn't get much back for them.

NewYork--if Jim Dolan cared about winning we'd have a 30-40 something GM like Sam Presti or picked up Danny Ferry on the cheap. Instead we have a first time GM Jackson a retread who only lost his first time out Mills and of course the coup de grate the man with the vision I Thomas.

We have the ABSOLUTE worst basketball management in the NBAS and we PAID the most for it. So here it is--you have Jackson who if he is even in the decision making--Im not sure is trading away all of our players Tyson Chandler Iman Shumpert JR Smith and we got the worst player of the deal in Calderon with the longest contract and a pick 54 in 2020. Is Dolan really trying to win? Just because you spend money doesnt mean you will win--check our last 15 years. We have THE DUMBEST owner in sports history Marge Schott would laugh at Dolan.


So your argument on why Dolan doesn't want to win is because we don't have S.Presti or D.Ferry as our GM?? Hahahahaha where do you come up with this stuff?? Dolan has always done what he thought was best to help the Knicks win but that doesn't mean he made the best moves. He signed Phil with all that money because he thought Phil would be able to bring in the free agents just because of who he is and was as a head coach. You can make all the assumptions you want but you're dead wrong saying Dolan doesn't want to win and it's really pretty dumb to think any owner doesn't want his team to win.
newyorker4ever
Posts: 26515
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/19/2014
Member: #5816

5/20/2015  12:06 PM
franco12 wrote:
newyorker4ever wrote:
SupremeCommander wrote:
mreinman wrote:
fishmike wrote:He's a good prospect. No ifs ands or butts. Ironically he's most people's 4th choice.

because nobody knows much about his so its easy to want him.

that is untrue... we might not know much about his individual skillset but I do know that he was the number one prospect for the incoming college class last year and Larry Brown said SMU would have won it all if he had played for him instead of went to China. I know Mudiay is no scrub

Larry Brown also said that he's never seen a point guard with more skills then Mudiay which coming from a man in L.Brown that's seen it all as a hall of fame NBA and College coach is pretty huge.

This is the same man who though Marbury & Stevie Francis could work. Just saying.

So you're saying you don't think Larry Brown knows talent?? LOL OK.

BigDaddyG
Posts: 40245
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049

5/20/2015  12:13 PM
newyorker4ever wrote:
franco12 wrote:
newyorker4ever wrote:
SupremeCommander wrote:
mreinman wrote:
fishmike wrote:He's a good prospect. No ifs ands or butts. Ironically he's most people's 4th choice.

because nobody knows much about his so its easy to want him.

that is untrue... we might not know much about his individual skillset but I do know that he was the number one prospect for the incoming college class last year and Larry Brown said SMU would have won it all if he had played for him instead of went to China. I know Mudiay is no scrub

Larry Brown also said that he's never seen a point guard with more skills then Mudiay which coming from a man in L.Brown that's seen it all as a hall of fame NBA and College coach is pretty huge.

This is the same man who though Marbury & Stevie Francis could work. Just saying.

So you're saying you don't think Larry Brown knows talent?? LOL OK.


Larry Brown knows talent, but he's also a bit kookie. You have to take everything he says with a grain of salt.
Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189

5/20/2015  12:17 PM
newyorker4ever wrote:
franco12 wrote:
newyorker4ever wrote:
SupremeCommander wrote:
mreinman wrote:
fishmike wrote:He's a good prospect. No ifs ands or butts. Ironically he's most people's 4th choice.

because nobody knows much about his so its easy to want him.

that is untrue... we might not know much about his individual skillset but I do know that he was the number one prospect for the incoming college class last year and Larry Brown said SMU would have won it all if he had played for him instead of went to China. I know Mudiay is no scrub

Larry Brown also said that he's never seen a point guard with more skills then Mudiay which coming from a man in L.Brown that's seen it all as a hall of fame NBA and College coach is pretty huge.

This is the same man who though Marbury & Stevie Francis could work. Just saying.

So you're saying you don't think Larry Brown knows talent?? LOL OK.

or ....

1. he knows talent but can often be wrong like every other human being
2. he does not know talent like briggs and dk who can judge player within a couple of minutes
3. he was a really good defensive coach

so here is what phil is thinking ....
draft express is almost never wrong

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy